Metric and workload effects on computer systems evaluation
While a system's performance is a function of its design and implementation, the workload researchers subject the system to and the metrics they use also can affect performance evaluation results. There are two main approaches to performance evaluation: Analysis involves simplifications in the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Computer (Long Beach, Calif.) Calif.), 2003-09, Vol.36 (9), p.18-25 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 25 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 18 |
| container_title | Computer (Long Beach, Calif.) |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Feitelson, D.G. |
| description | While a system's performance is a function of its design and implementation, the workload researchers subject the system to and the metrics they use also can affect performance evaluation results. There are two main approaches to performance evaluation: Analysis involves simplifications in the interest of mathematical tractability, and simulation offers a more realistic alternative that directly uses real workload recordings. The problems the author describes appear more frequently during simulation because of its ability to directly reflect complex situations, even those the evaluator does not know about or understand. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/MC.2003.1231190 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1231190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1231190</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>452530231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-37e7de167b85c60576891b70740de5b7193045f3351560b2965c34ffbd93dc353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouK6ePXgpHrx1N5M0TeJNil-wixc9hzadQte2WZNU2X9vl10QPA0v87zD8BByDXQBQPVyXSwYpXwBjANoekJmIIRKqYLslMwoBZVqyNk5uQhhM8VMCT4j92uMvrVJOdTJj_OfnSvrBJsGbQyJGxLr-u0Y0SdhFyL2IcHvshvL2Lrhkpw1ZRfw6jjn5OPp8b14SVdvz6_Fwyq1HGRMuURZI-SyUsLmVMhcaagklRmtUVQSNKeZaDgXIHJaMZ0Ly7OmqWrNa8sFn5O7w92td18jhmj6NljsunJANwbDlBSMMzWBt__AjRv9MP1mQEuucybZBC0PkPUuBI-N2fq2L_3OADV7kWZdmL1IcxQ5NW4OjRYR_-jj9hdTmWxv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197396272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metric and workload effects on computer systems evaluation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Feitelson, D.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Feitelson, D.G.</creatorcontrib><description>While a system's performance is a function of its design and implementation, the workload researchers subject the system to and the metrics they use also can affect performance evaluation results. There are two main approaches to performance evaluation: Analysis involves simplifications in the interest of mathematical tractability, and simulation offers a more realistic alternative that directly uses real workload recordings. The problems the author describes appear more frequently during simulation because of its ability to directly reflect complex situations, even those the evaluator does not know about or understand. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MC.2003.1231190</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPTRB4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Analytical models ; Arithmetic ; Computers ; Delay estimation ; Design for experiments ; Job production systems ; Performance analysis ; Performance evaluation ; Processor scheduling ; Runtime ; Systems analysis ; Systems design</subject><ispartof>Computer (Long Beach, Calif.), 2003-09, Vol.36 (9), p.18-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Sep 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-37e7de167b85c60576891b70740de5b7193045f3351560b2965c34ffbd93dc353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-37e7de167b85c60576891b70740de5b7193045f3351560b2965c34ffbd93dc353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1231190$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1231190$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feitelson, D.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Metric and workload effects on computer systems evaluation</title><title>Computer (Long Beach, Calif.)</title><addtitle>MC</addtitle><description>While a system's performance is a function of its design and implementation, the workload researchers subject the system to and the metrics they use also can affect performance evaluation results. There are two main approaches to performance evaluation: Analysis involves simplifications in the interest of mathematical tractability, and simulation offers a more realistic alternative that directly uses real workload recordings. The problems the author describes appear more frequently during simulation because of its ability to directly reflect complex situations, even those the evaluator does not know about or understand. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>Arithmetic</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Delay estimation</subject><subject>Design for experiments</subject><subject>Job production systems</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Processor scheduling</subject><subject>Runtime</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><issn>0018-9162</issn><issn>1558-0814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouK6ePXgpHrx1N5M0TeJNil-wixc9hzadQte2WZNU2X9vl10QPA0v87zD8BByDXQBQPVyXSwYpXwBjANoekJmIIRKqYLslMwoBZVqyNk5uQhhM8VMCT4j92uMvrVJOdTJj_OfnSvrBJsGbQyJGxLr-u0Y0SdhFyL2IcHvshvL2Lrhkpw1ZRfw6jjn5OPp8b14SVdvz6_Fwyq1HGRMuURZI-SyUsLmVMhcaagklRmtUVQSNKeZaDgXIHJaMZ0Ly7OmqWrNa8sFn5O7w92td18jhmj6NljsunJANwbDlBSMMzWBt__AjRv9MP1mQEuucybZBC0PkPUuBI-N2fq2L_3OADV7kWZdmL1IcxQ5NW4OjRYR_-jj9hdTmWxv</recordid><startdate>200309</startdate><enddate>200309</enddate><creator>Feitelson, D.G.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200309</creationdate><title>Metric and workload effects on computer systems evaluation</title><author>Feitelson, D.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-37e7de167b85c60576891b70740de5b7193045f3351560b2965c34ffbd93dc353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>Arithmetic</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Delay estimation</topic><topic>Design for experiments</topic><topic>Job production systems</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Processor scheduling</topic><topic>Runtime</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feitelson, D.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computer (Long Beach, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feitelson, D.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metric and workload effects on computer systems evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Computer (Long Beach, Calif.)</jtitle><stitle>MC</stitle><date>2003-09</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>18-25</pages><issn>0018-9162</issn><eissn>1558-0814</eissn><coden>CPTRB4</coden><abstract>While a system's performance is a function of its design and implementation, the workload researchers subject the system to and the metrics they use also can affect performance evaluation results. There are two main approaches to performance evaluation: Analysis involves simplifications in the interest of mathematical tractability, and simulation offers a more realistic alternative that directly uses real workload recordings. The problems the author describes appear more frequently during simulation because of its ability to directly reflect complex situations, even those the evaluator does not know about or understand. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MC.2003.1231190</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-9162 |
| ispartof | Computer (Long Beach, Calif.), 2003-09, Vol.36 (9), p.18-25 |
| issn | 0018-9162 1558-0814 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1231190 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Analytical models Arithmetic Computers Delay estimation Design for experiments Job production systems Performance analysis Performance evaluation Processor scheduling Runtime Systems analysis Systems design |
| title | Metric and workload effects on computer systems evaluation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metric%20and%20workload%20effects%20on%20computer%20systems%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Computer%20(Long%20Beach,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Feitelson,%20D.G.&rft.date=2003-09&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=18-25&rft.issn=0018-9162&rft.eissn=1558-0814&rft.coden=CPTRB4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MC.2003.1231190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E452530231%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197396272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1231190&rfr_iscdi=true |