Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats
The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE photonics technology letters 2003-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1168-1170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1170 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1168 |
container_title | IEEE photonics technology letters |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Chongjin Xie Moller, L. Haunstein, H. Hunsche, S. |
description | The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats with larger pulsewidth have larger penalty, while the modulation formats with smaller bandwidth perform better in PMD compensated systems. It is also shown that DPSK can tolerate more PMD than OOK for both PMD uncompensated and compensated systems, and that CSRZ, because of its specific spectrum characteristics, has a different feature from return-to-zero formats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/LPT.2003.814876 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1215539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1215539</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28193414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6738a808f2048dab6c0ebb1b2d9a0b3e11ee2db1baf4754eab8c2e79fe07f9793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c9LwzAUB_AgCs7p2YOX4kFP3fKSdE2OMvwFAz3Mc0jbF-hom5q0yPzrzawgePCUl8fnBV6-hFwCXQBQtdy8bheMUr6QIGS-OiIzUAJSCrk4jjWNNQDPTslZCDtKQWRczEi5dm1vfB1clzibhH0YsE0G16A3XYmxSnrXRPBphtp1aesqTKo69OhDvCcFDh-IXWxZix67IYlibL5xYp1vzRDOyYk1TcCLn3NO3h7ut-undPPy-Ly-26QlF2pIVzmXRlJpGRWyMsWqpFgUULBKGVpwBEBkVWwYK_JMoClkyTBXFmluVa74nNxO7_bevY8YBt3WocSmMR26MWgV_4IqoBDlzb-SSVBcgIjw-g_cudF3cQstpWA8F1xGtJxQ6V0IHq3ufd0av9dA9SEbHbPRh2z0lE2cuJomakT81QyyjCv-BRXKjK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884237438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Chongjin Xie ; Moller, L. ; Haunstein, H. ; Hunsche, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chongjin Xie ; Moller, L. ; Haunstein, H. ; Hunsche, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats with larger pulsewidth have larger penalty, while the modulation formats with smaller bandwidth perform better in PMD compensated systems. It is also shown that DPSK can tolerate more PMD than OOK for both PMD uncompensated and compensated systems, and that CSRZ, because of its specific spectrum characteristics, has a different feature from return-to-zero formats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1041-1135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0174</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/LPT.2003.814876</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IPTLEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Bandwidth ; Carriers ; Differential quadrature phase shift keying ; Format ; Modulation ; Optical fiber polarization ; Optical fibers ; Optical filters ; Optical noise ; Optical receivers ; Photonics ; Polarization mode dispersion ; Signal to noise ratio ; Stimulated emission ; Tolerances</subject><ispartof>IEEE photonics technology letters, 2003-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1168-1170</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2003</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6738a808f2048dab6c0ebb1b2d9a0b3e11ee2db1baf4754eab8c2e79fe07f9793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6738a808f2048dab6c0ebb1b2d9a0b3e11ee2db1baf4754eab8c2e79fe07f9793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1215539$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,793,27905,27906,54739</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1215539$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chongjin Xie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moller, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haunstein, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsche, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats</title><title>IEEE photonics technology letters</title><addtitle>LPT</addtitle><description>The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats with larger pulsewidth have larger penalty, while the modulation formats with smaller bandwidth perform better in PMD compensated systems. It is also shown that DPSK can tolerate more PMD than OOK for both PMD uncompensated and compensated systems, and that CSRZ, because of its specific spectrum characteristics, has a different feature from return-to-zero formats.</description><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Carriers</subject><subject>Differential quadrature phase shift keying</subject><subject>Format</subject><subject>Modulation</subject><subject>Optical fiber polarization</subject><subject>Optical fibers</subject><subject>Optical filters</subject><subject>Optical noise</subject><subject>Optical receivers</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Polarization mode dispersion</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Stimulated emission</subject><subject>Tolerances</subject><issn>1041-1135</issn><issn>1941-0174</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c9LwzAUB_AgCs7p2YOX4kFP3fKSdE2OMvwFAz3Mc0jbF-hom5q0yPzrzawgePCUl8fnBV6-hFwCXQBQtdy8bheMUr6QIGS-OiIzUAJSCrk4jjWNNQDPTslZCDtKQWRczEi5dm1vfB1clzibhH0YsE0G16A3XYmxSnrXRPBphtp1aesqTKo69OhDvCcFDh-IXWxZix67IYlibL5xYp1vzRDOyYk1TcCLn3NO3h7ut-undPPy-Ly-26QlF2pIVzmXRlJpGRWyMsWqpFgUULBKGVpwBEBkVWwYK_JMoClkyTBXFmluVa74nNxO7_bevY8YBt3WocSmMR26MWgV_4IqoBDlzb-SSVBcgIjw-g_cudF3cQstpWA8F1xGtJxQ6V0IHq3ufd0av9dA9SEbHbPRh2z0lE2cuJomakT81QyyjCv-BRXKjK0</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Chongjin Xie</creator><creator>Moller, L.</creator><creator>Haunstein, H.</creator><creator>Hunsche, S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats</title><author>Chongjin Xie ; Moller, L. ; Haunstein, H. ; Hunsche, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6738a808f2048dab6c0ebb1b2d9a0b3e11ee2db1baf4754eab8c2e79fe07f9793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Carriers</topic><topic>Differential quadrature phase shift keying</topic><topic>Format</topic><topic>Modulation</topic><topic>Optical fiber polarization</topic><topic>Optical fibers</topic><topic>Optical filters</topic><topic>Optical noise</topic><topic>Optical receivers</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Polarization mode dispersion</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Stimulated emission</topic><topic>Tolerances</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chongjin Xie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moller, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haunstein, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsche, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE photonics technology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chongjin Xie</au><au>Moller, L.</au><au>Haunstein, H.</au><au>Hunsche, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats</atitle><jtitle>IEEE photonics technology letters</jtitle><stitle>LPT</stitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1168</spage><epage>1170</epage><pages>1168-1170</pages><issn>1041-1135</issn><eissn>1941-0174</eissn><coden>IPTLEL</coden><abstract>The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats with larger pulsewidth have larger penalty, while the modulation formats with smaller bandwidth perform better in PMD compensated systems. It is also shown that DPSK can tolerate more PMD than OOK for both PMD uncompensated and compensated systems, and that CSRZ, because of its specific spectrum characteristics, has a different feature from return-to-zero formats.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/LPT.2003.814876</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1041-1135 |
ispartof | IEEE photonics technology letters, 2003-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1168-1170 |
issn | 1041-1135 1941-0174 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1215539 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Bandwidth Carriers Differential quadrature phase shift keying Format Modulation Optical fiber polarization Optical fibers Optical filters Optical noise Optical receivers Photonics Polarization mode dispersion Signal to noise ratio Stimulated emission Tolerances |
title | Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T07%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20system%20tolerance%20to%20polarization-mode%20dispersion%20between%20different%20modulation%20formats&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20photonics%20technology%20letters&rft.au=Chongjin%20Xie&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1168&rft.epage=1170&rft.pages=1168-1170&rft.issn=1041-1135&rft.eissn=1941-0174&rft.coden=IPTLEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/LPT.2003.814876&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28193414%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884237438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1215539&rfr_iscdi=true |