Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats

The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE photonics technology letters 2003-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1168-1170
Hauptverfasser: Chongjin Xie, Moller, L., Haunstein, H., Hunsche, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1170
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1168
container_title IEEE photonics technology letters
container_volume 15
creator Chongjin Xie
Moller, L.
Haunstein, H.
Hunsche, S.
description The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats with larger pulsewidth have larger penalty, while the modulation formats with smaller bandwidth perform better in PMD compensated systems. It is also shown that DPSK can tolerate more PMD than OOK for both PMD uncompensated and compensated systems, and that CSRZ, because of its specific spectrum characteristics, has a different feature from return-to-zero formats.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/LPT.2003.814876
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1215539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1215539</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>28193414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6738a808f2048dab6c0ebb1b2d9a0b3e11ee2db1baf4754eab8c2e79fe07f9793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c9LwzAUB_AgCs7p2YOX4kFP3fKSdE2OMvwFAz3Mc0jbF-hom5q0yPzrzawgePCUl8fnBV6-hFwCXQBQtdy8bheMUr6QIGS-OiIzUAJSCrk4jjWNNQDPTslZCDtKQWRczEi5dm1vfB1clzibhH0YsE0G16A3XYmxSnrXRPBphtp1aesqTKo69OhDvCcFDh-IXWxZix67IYlibL5xYp1vzRDOyYk1TcCLn3NO3h7ut-undPPy-Ly-26QlF2pIVzmXRlJpGRWyMsWqpFgUULBKGVpwBEBkVWwYK_JMoClkyTBXFmluVa74nNxO7_bevY8YBt3WocSmMR26MWgV_4IqoBDlzb-SSVBcgIjw-g_cudF3cQstpWA8F1xGtJxQ6V0IHq3ufd0av9dA9SEbHbPRh2z0lE2cuJomakT81QyyjCv-BRXKjK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884237438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Chongjin Xie ; Moller, L. ; Haunstein, H. ; Hunsche, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chongjin Xie ; Moller, L. ; Haunstein, H. ; Hunsche, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats with larger pulsewidth have larger penalty, while the modulation formats with smaller bandwidth perform better in PMD compensated systems. It is also shown that DPSK can tolerate more PMD than OOK for both PMD uncompensated and compensated systems, and that CSRZ, because of its specific spectrum characteristics, has a different feature from return-to-zero formats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1041-1135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0174</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/LPT.2003.814876</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IPTLEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Bandwidth ; Carriers ; Differential quadrature phase shift keying ; Format ; Modulation ; Optical fiber polarization ; Optical fibers ; Optical filters ; Optical noise ; Optical receivers ; Photonics ; Polarization mode dispersion ; Signal to noise ratio ; Stimulated emission ; Tolerances</subject><ispartof>IEEE photonics technology letters, 2003-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1168-1170</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2003</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6738a808f2048dab6c0ebb1b2d9a0b3e11ee2db1baf4754eab8c2e79fe07f9793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6738a808f2048dab6c0ebb1b2d9a0b3e11ee2db1baf4754eab8c2e79fe07f9793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1215539$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,793,27905,27906,54739</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1215539$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chongjin Xie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moller, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haunstein, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsche, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats</title><title>IEEE photonics technology letters</title><addtitle>LPT</addtitle><description>The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats with larger pulsewidth have larger penalty, while the modulation formats with smaller bandwidth perform better in PMD compensated systems. It is also shown that DPSK can tolerate more PMD than OOK for both PMD uncompensated and compensated systems, and that CSRZ, because of its specific spectrum characteristics, has a different feature from return-to-zero formats.</description><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Carriers</subject><subject>Differential quadrature phase shift keying</subject><subject>Format</subject><subject>Modulation</subject><subject>Optical fiber polarization</subject><subject>Optical fibers</subject><subject>Optical filters</subject><subject>Optical noise</subject><subject>Optical receivers</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Polarization mode dispersion</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Stimulated emission</subject><subject>Tolerances</subject><issn>1041-1135</issn><issn>1941-0174</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c9LwzAUB_AgCs7p2YOX4kFP3fKSdE2OMvwFAz3Mc0jbF-hom5q0yPzrzawgePCUl8fnBV6-hFwCXQBQtdy8bheMUr6QIGS-OiIzUAJSCrk4jjWNNQDPTslZCDtKQWRczEi5dm1vfB1clzibhH0YsE0G16A3XYmxSnrXRPBphtp1aesqTKo69OhDvCcFDh-IXWxZix67IYlibL5xYp1vzRDOyYk1TcCLn3NO3h7ut-undPPy-Ly-26QlF2pIVzmXRlJpGRWyMsWqpFgUULBKGVpwBEBkVWwYK_JMoClkyTBXFmluVa74nNxO7_bevY8YBt3WocSmMR26MWgV_4IqoBDlzb-SSVBcgIjw-g_cudF3cQstpWA8F1xGtJxQ6V0IHq3ufd0av9dA9SEbHbPRh2z0lE2cuJomakT81QyyjCv-BRXKjK0</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Chongjin Xie</creator><creator>Moller, L.</creator><creator>Haunstein, H.</creator><creator>Hunsche, S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats</title><author>Chongjin Xie ; Moller, L. ; Haunstein, H. ; Hunsche, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-6738a808f2048dab6c0ebb1b2d9a0b3e11ee2db1baf4754eab8c2e79fe07f9793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Carriers</topic><topic>Differential quadrature phase shift keying</topic><topic>Format</topic><topic>Modulation</topic><topic>Optical fiber polarization</topic><topic>Optical fibers</topic><topic>Optical filters</topic><topic>Optical noise</topic><topic>Optical receivers</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Polarization mode dispersion</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Stimulated emission</topic><topic>Tolerances</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chongjin Xie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moller, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haunstein, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsche, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE photonics technology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chongjin Xie</au><au>Moller, L.</au><au>Haunstein, H.</au><au>Hunsche, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats</atitle><jtitle>IEEE photonics technology letters</jtitle><stitle>LPT</stitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1168</spage><epage>1170</epage><pages>1168-1170</pages><issn>1041-1135</issn><eissn>1941-0174</eissn><coden>IPTLEL</coden><abstract>The polarization-mode dispersion (PMD) tolerance of different modulation formats is studied, including ON-OFF keyed (OOK), differential phase-shift keyed (DPSK), and carrier-suppressed return-to-zero (CSRZ) formats. It is shown that, generally, for PMD uncompensated systems, the modulation formats with larger pulsewidth have larger penalty, while the modulation formats with smaller bandwidth perform better in PMD compensated systems. It is also shown that DPSK can tolerate more PMD than OOK for both PMD uncompensated and compensated systems, and that CSRZ, because of its specific spectrum characteristics, has a different feature from return-to-zero formats.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/LPT.2003.814876</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1041-1135
ispartof IEEE photonics technology letters, 2003-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1168-1170
issn 1041-1135
1941-0174
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_1215539
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Bandwidth
Carriers
Differential quadrature phase shift keying
Format
Modulation
Optical fiber polarization
Optical fibers
Optical filters
Optical noise
Optical receivers
Photonics
Polarization mode dispersion
Signal to noise ratio
Stimulated emission
Tolerances
title Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T07%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20system%20tolerance%20to%20polarization-mode%20dispersion%20between%20different%20modulation%20formats&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20photonics%20technology%20letters&rft.au=Chongjin%20Xie&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1168&rft.epage=1170&rft.pages=1168-1170&rft.issn=1041-1135&rft.eissn=1941-0174&rft.coden=IPTLEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/LPT.2003.814876&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E28193414%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884237438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1215539&rfr_iscdi=true