MacLean's model of flux penetration: addressing stability
The engineering design of eddy current actuated systems is expensive because of the rapid changes in field quantities and the resulting need to model very accurately. Many suggestions have been made to avoid computations in eddy current regions. The best known of these is the impedance boundary cond...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on magnetics 2003-05, Vol.39 (3), p.1187-1190 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1190 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1187 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on magnetics |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Hoole, S.R.H. Rahunanthan, A. Sivapriya, T. Sutharsan, S. |
| description | The engineering design of eddy current actuated systems is expensive because of the rapid changes in field quantities and the resulting need to model very accurately. Many suggestions have been made to avoid computations in eddy current regions. The best known of these is the impedance boundary condition at steel interfaces. However, the impedance boundary condition does not work for nonlinear steel because the phasor analysis on which the impedance boundary condition is based is not applicable. MacLean's model is best suited for analyzing in the nonlinear region. Reported problems with time stepping are overcome by studying various time-stepping methods and identifying a suitable numerical scheme. The identified method is shown to be convergent by using the von Neumann stability test. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TMAG.2003.810187 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_1198430</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1198430</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2429827231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b8f041383dd8324f28b3cec5dc11f3782ffd8ff870746cc9a7838553eac9addc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWKt3wcsiaE9bk012M_FWil_Q4qWeQ5oP2bLdrcku2H9vli0UPIinmck884aZF6FrgqeEYPGwWs5ephnGdAoEE-AnaEQEIynGhThFIxzfUsEKdo4uQtjEkuUEj5BYKr2wqp6EZNsYWyWNS1zVfSc7W9vWq7Zs6sdEGeNtCGX9mYRWrcuqbPeX6MypKtirQxyjj-en1fw1Xby_vM1ni1QzkrXpGhxmhAI1BmjGXAZrqq3OjSbEUQ6ZcwacA445K7QWigOFPKdWxdwYTcdoMujufPPV2dDKbRm0rSpV26YLUmBSAGQEInn_J5kBjxfgxT9AmgvIeARvf4GbpvN1XFcCMMo45TRCeIC0b0Lw1smdL7fK7yXBsvdG9t7I3hs5eBNH7g66KmhVOa9qXYbjHIscFL30zcCV1tpjm4j4OaY_KNCVxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>884347373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MacLean's model of flux penetration: addressing stability</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Hoole, S.R.H. ; Rahunanthan, A. ; Sivapriya, T. ; Sutharsan, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoole, S.R.H. ; Rahunanthan, A. ; Sivapriya, T. ; Sutharsan, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The engineering design of eddy current actuated systems is expensive because of the rapid changes in field quantities and the resulting need to model very accurately. Many suggestions have been made to avoid computations in eddy current regions. The best known of these is the impedance boundary condition at steel interfaces. However, the impedance boundary condition does not work for nonlinear steel because the phasor analysis on which the impedance boundary condition is based is not applicable. MacLean's model is best suited for analyzing in the nonlinear region. Reported problems with time stepping are overcome by studying various time-stepping methods and identifying a suitable numerical scheme. The identified method is shown to be convergent by using the von Neumann stability test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2003.810187</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEMGAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied classical electromagnetism ; Boundary conditions ; Eddy currents ; Electromagnetism; electron and ion optics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flux ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Impedance ; Magnetic analysis ; Magnetic flux ; Magnetism ; Magnetostatics; magnetic shielding, magnetic induction, boundary-value problems ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinearity ; Physics ; Roentgenium ; Saturation magnetization ; Stability ; Stability tests ; Steel ; Steels ; Testing</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on magnetics, 2003-05, Vol.39 (3), p.1187-1190</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2003</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b8f041383dd8324f28b3cec5dc11f3782ffd8ff870746cc9a7838553eac9addc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b8f041383dd8324f28b3cec5dc11f3782ffd8ff870746cc9a7838553eac9addc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1198430$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,793,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,54739</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1198430$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14810863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoole, S.R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahunanthan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivapriya, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutharsan, S.</creatorcontrib><title>MacLean's model of flux penetration: addressing stability</title><title>IEEE transactions on magnetics</title><addtitle>TMAG</addtitle><description>The engineering design of eddy current actuated systems is expensive because of the rapid changes in field quantities and the resulting need to model very accurately. Many suggestions have been made to avoid computations in eddy current regions. The best known of these is the impedance boundary condition at steel interfaces. However, the impedance boundary condition does not work for nonlinear steel because the phasor analysis on which the impedance boundary condition is based is not applicable. MacLean's model is best suited for analyzing in the nonlinear region. Reported problems with time stepping are overcome by studying various time-stepping methods and identifying a suitable numerical scheme. The identified method is shown to be convergent by using the von Neumann stability test.</description><subject>Applied classical electromagnetism</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Eddy currents</subject><subject>Electromagnetism; electron and ion optics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Impedance</subject><subject>Magnetic analysis</subject><subject>Magnetic flux</subject><subject>Magnetism</subject><subject>Magnetostatics; magnetic shielding, magnetic induction, boundary-value problems</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Roentgenium</subject><subject>Saturation magnetization</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stability tests</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Steels</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0018-9464</issn><issn>1941-0069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWKt3wcsiaE9bk012M_FWil_Q4qWeQ5oP2bLdrcku2H9vli0UPIinmck884aZF6FrgqeEYPGwWs5ephnGdAoEE-AnaEQEIynGhThFIxzfUsEKdo4uQtjEkuUEj5BYKr2wqp6EZNsYWyWNS1zVfSc7W9vWq7Zs6sdEGeNtCGX9mYRWrcuqbPeX6MypKtirQxyjj-en1fw1Xby_vM1ni1QzkrXpGhxmhAI1BmjGXAZrqq3OjSbEUQ6ZcwacA445K7QWigOFPKdWxdwYTcdoMujufPPV2dDKbRm0rSpV26YLUmBSAGQEInn_J5kBjxfgxT9AmgvIeARvf4GbpvN1XFcCMMo45TRCeIC0b0Lw1smdL7fK7yXBsvdG9t7I3hs5eBNH7g66KmhVOa9qXYbjHIscFL30zcCV1tpjm4j4OaY_KNCVxw</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>Hoole, S.R.H.</creator><creator>Rahunanthan, A.</creator><creator>Sivapriya, T.</creator><creator>Sutharsan, S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>MacLean's model of flux penetration: addressing stability</title><author>Hoole, S.R.H. ; Rahunanthan, A. ; Sivapriya, T. ; Sutharsan, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b8f041383dd8324f28b3cec5dc11f3782ffd8ff870746cc9a7838553eac9addc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Applied classical electromagnetism</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Eddy currents</topic><topic>Electromagnetism; electron and ion optics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Impedance</topic><topic>Magnetic analysis</topic><topic>Magnetic flux</topic><topic>Magnetism</topic><topic>Magnetostatics; magnetic shielding, magnetic induction, boundary-value problems</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Roentgenium</topic><topic>Saturation magnetization</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stability tests</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Steels</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoole, S.R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahunanthan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivapriya, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutharsan, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on magnetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoole, S.R.H.</au><au>Rahunanthan, A.</au><au>Sivapriya, T.</au><au>Sutharsan, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MacLean's model of flux penetration: addressing stability</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on magnetics</jtitle><stitle>TMAG</stitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1187</spage><epage>1190</epage><pages>1187-1190</pages><issn>0018-9464</issn><eissn>1941-0069</eissn><coden>IEMGAQ</coden><abstract>The engineering design of eddy current actuated systems is expensive because of the rapid changes in field quantities and the resulting need to model very accurately. Many suggestions have been made to avoid computations in eddy current regions. The best known of these is the impedance boundary condition at steel interfaces. However, the impedance boundary condition does not work for nonlinear steel because the phasor analysis on which the impedance boundary condition is based is not applicable. MacLean's model is best suited for analyzing in the nonlinear region. Reported problems with time stepping are overcome by studying various time-stepping methods and identifying a suitable numerical scheme. The identified method is shown to be convergent by using the von Neumann stability test.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TMAG.2003.810187</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-9464 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on magnetics, 2003-05, Vol.39 (3), p.1187-1190 |
| issn | 0018-9464 1941-0069 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_1198430 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Applied classical electromagnetism Boundary conditions Eddy currents Electromagnetism electron and ion optics Exact sciences and technology Flux Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Impedance Magnetic analysis Magnetic flux Magnetism Magnetostatics magnetic shielding, magnetic induction, boundary-value problems Mathematical models Nonlinearity Physics Roentgenium Saturation magnetization Stability Stability tests Steel Steels Testing |
| title | MacLean's model of flux penetration: addressing stability |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A33%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MacLean's%20model%20of%20flux%20penetration:%20addressing%20stability&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20magnetics&rft.au=Hoole,%20S.R.H.&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1187&rft.epage=1190&rft.pages=1187-1190&rft.issn=0018-9464&rft.eissn=1941-0069&rft.coden=IEMGAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TMAG.2003.810187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2429827231%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=884347373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1198430&rfr_iscdi=true |