Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment

Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distribute...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 2024-12, Vol.25 (12), p.20753-20766
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Xiaoyu, Dabiri, Azita, Wang, Yihui, Xun, Jing, De Schutter, Bart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20766
container_issue 12
container_start_page 20753
container_title IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems
container_volume 25
creator Liu, Xiaoyu
Dabiri, Azita
Wang, Yihui
Xun, Jing
De Schutter, Bart
description Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distributed MPC, serial distributed MPC, and decentralized MPC, for virtually coupled trains with a nonlinear train dynamic model. To make a balanced trade-off between computational complexity and efficiency, we also propose and assess convex approximations of the above control approaches. Furthermore, we are the first to introduce the relaxed dynamic programming approach to analyze the stability of the MPC-based nonlinear train control problem. By using the relaxed dynamic programming approach, a distributed stopping criterion with a stability guarantee is developed for the cooperative distributed MPC approach. In real life, masses of trains are different and can change at stations due to changes in passenger loads. This change in mass can significantly affect the dynamics and control of the virtually coupled trains when not taken into account in the control design. Therefore, we explicitly consider heterogeneous train masses when designing MPC approaches. We evaluate the different distributed MPC approaches through case studies based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang Line. Simulation results indicate that the cooperative distributed MPC approach has the best tracking performance, while the serial distributed MPC approach can reduce communication requirements and computation capabilities with sacrifices of tracking performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TITS.2024.3458169
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10689254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10689254</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TITS_2024_3458169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-2b12695c51f1702089da9b255d810bbdea2347fb9453f0f22a922d2a2d5cb27e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwAEgc_AIp3k2cxtyq8tNKRSARuEZOvEGu0riyHaS-PanKgdOsZmfm8DF2C2IGINR9uS4_Zigwm6WZLCBXZ2wCUhaJEJCfH2_MEiWkuGRXIWxHN5MAE7Z9tCF6Ww-RDH91hjr-7snYJtof4kvXR-863jrPv6yPg-66w-gO-26MryiSd9_UkxsCL722fXgYv7u99ja4nuve8EUIFMKO-njNLlrdBbr50yn7fH4ql6tk8_ayXi42SQMKYoI1YK5kI6GFuUBRKKNVjVKaAkRdG9KYZvO2VplMW9EiaoVoUKORTY1zSqcMTruNdyF4aqu9tzvtDxWI6girOsKqjrCqP1hj5-7UsUT0L58XCmWW_gLbdmgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Liu, Xiaoyu ; Dabiri, Azita ; Wang, Yihui ; Xun, Jing ; De Schutter, Bart</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoyu ; Dabiri, Azita ; Wang, Yihui ; Xun, Jing ; De Schutter, Bart</creatorcontrib><description>Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distributed MPC, serial distributed MPC, and decentralized MPC, for virtually coupled trains with a nonlinear train dynamic model. To make a balanced trade-off between computational complexity and efficiency, we also propose and assess convex approximations of the above control approaches. Furthermore, we are the first to introduce the relaxed dynamic programming approach to analyze the stability of the MPC-based nonlinear train control problem. By using the relaxed dynamic programming approach, a distributed stopping criterion with a stability guarantee is developed for the cooperative distributed MPC approach. In real life, masses of trains are different and can change at stations due to changes in passenger loads. This change in mass can significantly affect the dynamics and control of the virtually coupled trains when not taken into account in the control design. Therefore, we explicitly consider heterogeneous train masses when designing MPC approaches. We evaluate the different distributed MPC approaches through case studies based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang Line. Simulation results indicate that the cooperative distributed MPC approach has the best tracking performance, while the serial distributed MPC approach can reduce communication requirements and computation capabilities with sacrifices of tracking performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-9050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3458169</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITISFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Couplings ; Decentralized control ; Delays ; distributed model predictive control ; heterogeneous train masses ; relaxed dynamic programming ; Safety ; Stability criteria ; Topology ; train speed control ; Vehicle dynamics ; Virtual coupling</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2024-12, Vol.25 (12), p.20753-20766</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8174-9181 ; 0000-0001-9867-6196 ; 0000-0002-4051-4896 ; 0000-0003-1656-4719 ; 0000-0003-3677-3323</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10689254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabiri, Azita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Schutter, Bart</creatorcontrib><title>Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment</title><title>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</title><addtitle>TITS</addtitle><description>Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distributed MPC, serial distributed MPC, and decentralized MPC, for virtually coupled trains with a nonlinear train dynamic model. To make a balanced trade-off between computational complexity and efficiency, we also propose and assess convex approximations of the above control approaches. Furthermore, we are the first to introduce the relaxed dynamic programming approach to analyze the stability of the MPC-based nonlinear train control problem. By using the relaxed dynamic programming approach, a distributed stopping criterion with a stability guarantee is developed for the cooperative distributed MPC approach. In real life, masses of trains are different and can change at stations due to changes in passenger loads. This change in mass can significantly affect the dynamics and control of the virtually coupled trains when not taken into account in the control design. Therefore, we explicitly consider heterogeneous train masses when designing MPC approaches. We evaluate the different distributed MPC approaches through case studies based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang Line. Simulation results indicate that the cooperative distributed MPC approach has the best tracking performance, while the serial distributed MPC approach can reduce communication requirements and computation capabilities with sacrifices of tracking performance.</description><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Decentralized control</subject><subject>Delays</subject><subject>distributed model predictive control</subject><subject>heterogeneous train masses</subject><subject>relaxed dynamic programming</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Stability criteria</subject><subject>Topology</subject><subject>train speed control</subject><subject>Vehicle dynamics</subject><subject>Virtual coupling</subject><issn>1524-9050</issn><issn>1558-0016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwAEgc_AIp3k2cxtyq8tNKRSARuEZOvEGu0riyHaS-PanKgdOsZmfm8DF2C2IGINR9uS4_Zigwm6WZLCBXZ2wCUhaJEJCfH2_MEiWkuGRXIWxHN5MAE7Z9tCF6Ww-RDH91hjr-7snYJtof4kvXR-863jrPv6yPg-66w-gO-26MryiSd9_UkxsCL722fXgYv7u99ja4nuve8EUIFMKO-njNLlrdBbr50yn7fH4ql6tk8_ayXi42SQMKYoI1YK5kI6GFuUBRKKNVjVKaAkRdG9KYZvO2VplMW9EiaoVoUKORTY1zSqcMTruNdyF4aqu9tzvtDxWI6girOsKqjrCqP1hj5-7UsUT0L58XCmWW_gLbdmgg</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Liu, Xiaoyu</creator><creator>Dabiri, Azita</creator><creator>Wang, Yihui</creator><creator>Xun, Jing</creator><creator>De Schutter, Bart</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-9181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-6196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-4896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-4719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-3323</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment</title><author>Liu, Xiaoyu ; Dabiri, Azita ; Wang, Yihui ; Xun, Jing ; De Schutter, Bart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-2b12695c51f1702089da9b255d810bbdea2347fb9453f0f22a922d2a2d5cb27e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Decentralized control</topic><topic>Delays</topic><topic>distributed model predictive control</topic><topic>heterogeneous train masses</topic><topic>relaxed dynamic programming</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Stability criteria</topic><topic>Topology</topic><topic>train speed control</topic><topic>Vehicle dynamics</topic><topic>Virtual coupling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabiri, Azita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Schutter, Bart</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Xiaoyu</au><au>Dabiri, Azita</au><au>Wang, Yihui</au><au>Xun, Jing</au><au>De Schutter, Bart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</jtitle><stitle>TITS</stitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>20753</spage><epage>20766</epage><pages>20753-20766</pages><issn>1524-9050</issn><eissn>1558-0016</eissn><coden>ITISFG</coden><abstract>Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distributed MPC, serial distributed MPC, and decentralized MPC, for virtually coupled trains with a nonlinear train dynamic model. To make a balanced trade-off between computational complexity and efficiency, we also propose and assess convex approximations of the above control approaches. Furthermore, we are the first to introduce the relaxed dynamic programming approach to analyze the stability of the MPC-based nonlinear train control problem. By using the relaxed dynamic programming approach, a distributed stopping criterion with a stability guarantee is developed for the cooperative distributed MPC approach. In real life, masses of trains are different and can change at stations due to changes in passenger loads. This change in mass can significantly affect the dynamics and control of the virtually coupled trains when not taken into account in the control design. Therefore, we explicitly consider heterogeneous train masses when designing MPC approaches. We evaluate the different distributed MPC approaches through case studies based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang Line. Simulation results indicate that the cooperative distributed MPC approach has the best tracking performance, while the serial distributed MPC approach can reduce communication requirements and computation capabilities with sacrifices of tracking performance.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TITS.2024.3458169</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-9181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-6196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-4896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-4719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-3323</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1524-9050
ispartof IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2024-12, Vol.25 (12), p.20753-20766
issn 1524-9050
1558-0016
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_10689254
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Couplings
Decentralized control
Delays
distributed model predictive control
heterogeneous train masses
relaxed dynamic programming
Safety
Stability criteria
Topology
train speed control
Vehicle dynamics
Virtual coupling
title Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distributed%20Model%20Predictive%20Control%20for%20Virtually%20Coupled%20Heterogeneous%20Trains:%20Comparison%20and%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20intelligent%20transportation%20systems&rft.au=Liu,%20Xiaoyu&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=20753&rft.epage=20766&rft.pages=20753-20766&rft.issn=1524-9050&rft.eissn=1558-0016&rft.coden=ITISFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TITS.2024.3458169&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_ieee_%3E10_1109_TITS_2024_3458169%3C/crossref_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10689254&rfr_iscdi=true