Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment
Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distribute...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 2024-12, Vol.25 (12), p.20753-20766 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20766 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 20753 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Liu, Xiaoyu Dabiri, Azita Wang, Yihui Xun, Jing De Schutter, Bart |
description | Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distributed MPC, serial distributed MPC, and decentralized MPC, for virtually coupled trains with a nonlinear train dynamic model. To make a balanced trade-off between computational complexity and efficiency, we also propose and assess convex approximations of the above control approaches. Furthermore, we are the first to introduce the relaxed dynamic programming approach to analyze the stability of the MPC-based nonlinear train control problem. By using the relaxed dynamic programming approach, a distributed stopping criterion with a stability guarantee is developed for the cooperative distributed MPC approach. In real life, masses of trains are different and can change at stations due to changes in passenger loads. This change in mass can significantly affect the dynamics and control of the virtually coupled trains when not taken into account in the control design. Therefore, we explicitly consider heterogeneous train masses when designing MPC approaches. We evaluate the different distributed MPC approaches through case studies based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang Line. Simulation results indicate that the cooperative distributed MPC approach has the best tracking performance, while the serial distributed MPC approach can reduce communication requirements and computation capabilities with sacrifices of tracking performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TITS.2024.3458169 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10689254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10689254</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TITS_2024_3458169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-2b12695c51f1702089da9b255d810bbdea2347fb9453f0f22a922d2a2d5cb27e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwAEgc_AIp3k2cxtyq8tNKRSARuEZOvEGu0riyHaS-PanKgdOsZmfm8DF2C2IGINR9uS4_Zigwm6WZLCBXZ2wCUhaJEJCfH2_MEiWkuGRXIWxHN5MAE7Z9tCF6Ww-RDH91hjr-7snYJtof4kvXR-863jrPv6yPg-66w-gO-26MryiSd9_UkxsCL722fXgYv7u99ja4nuve8EUIFMKO-njNLlrdBbr50yn7fH4ql6tk8_ayXi42SQMKYoI1YK5kI6GFuUBRKKNVjVKaAkRdG9KYZvO2VplMW9EiaoVoUKORTY1zSqcMTruNdyF4aqu9tzvtDxWI6girOsKqjrCqP1hj5-7UsUT0L58XCmWW_gLbdmgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Liu, Xiaoyu ; Dabiri, Azita ; Wang, Yihui ; Xun, Jing ; De Schutter, Bart</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoyu ; Dabiri, Azita ; Wang, Yihui ; Xun, Jing ; De Schutter, Bart</creatorcontrib><description>Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distributed MPC, serial distributed MPC, and decentralized MPC, for virtually coupled trains with a nonlinear train dynamic model. To make a balanced trade-off between computational complexity and efficiency, we also propose and assess convex approximations of the above control approaches. Furthermore, we are the first to introduce the relaxed dynamic programming approach to analyze the stability of the MPC-based nonlinear train control problem. By using the relaxed dynamic programming approach, a distributed stopping criterion with a stability guarantee is developed for the cooperative distributed MPC approach. In real life, masses of trains are different and can change at stations due to changes in passenger loads. This change in mass can significantly affect the dynamics and control of the virtually coupled trains when not taken into account in the control design. Therefore, we explicitly consider heterogeneous train masses when designing MPC approaches. We evaluate the different distributed MPC approaches through case studies based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang Line. Simulation results indicate that the cooperative distributed MPC approach has the best tracking performance, while the serial distributed MPC approach can reduce communication requirements and computation capabilities with sacrifices of tracking performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-9050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3458169</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITISFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Couplings ; Decentralized control ; Delays ; distributed model predictive control ; heterogeneous train masses ; relaxed dynamic programming ; Safety ; Stability criteria ; Topology ; train speed control ; Vehicle dynamics ; Virtual coupling</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2024-12, Vol.25 (12), p.20753-20766</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8174-9181 ; 0000-0001-9867-6196 ; 0000-0002-4051-4896 ; 0000-0003-1656-4719 ; 0000-0003-3677-3323</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10689254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabiri, Azita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Schutter, Bart</creatorcontrib><title>Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment</title><title>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</title><addtitle>TITS</addtitle><description>Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distributed MPC, serial distributed MPC, and decentralized MPC, for virtually coupled trains with a nonlinear train dynamic model. To make a balanced trade-off between computational complexity and efficiency, we also propose and assess convex approximations of the above control approaches. Furthermore, we are the first to introduce the relaxed dynamic programming approach to analyze the stability of the MPC-based nonlinear train control problem. By using the relaxed dynamic programming approach, a distributed stopping criterion with a stability guarantee is developed for the cooperative distributed MPC approach. In real life, masses of trains are different and can change at stations due to changes in passenger loads. This change in mass can significantly affect the dynamics and control of the virtually coupled trains when not taken into account in the control design. Therefore, we explicitly consider heterogeneous train masses when designing MPC approaches. We evaluate the different distributed MPC approaches through case studies based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang Line. Simulation results indicate that the cooperative distributed MPC approach has the best tracking performance, while the serial distributed MPC approach can reduce communication requirements and computation capabilities with sacrifices of tracking performance.</description><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Decentralized control</subject><subject>Delays</subject><subject>distributed model predictive control</subject><subject>heterogeneous train masses</subject><subject>relaxed dynamic programming</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Stability criteria</subject><subject>Topology</subject><subject>train speed control</subject><subject>Vehicle dynamics</subject><subject>Virtual coupling</subject><issn>1524-9050</issn><issn>1558-0016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwAEgc_AIp3k2cxtyq8tNKRSARuEZOvEGu0riyHaS-PanKgdOsZmfm8DF2C2IGINR9uS4_Zigwm6WZLCBXZ2wCUhaJEJCfH2_MEiWkuGRXIWxHN5MAE7Z9tCF6Ww-RDH91hjr-7snYJtof4kvXR-863jrPv6yPg-66w-gO-26MryiSd9_UkxsCL722fXgYv7u99ja4nuve8EUIFMKO-njNLlrdBbr50yn7fH4ql6tk8_ayXi42SQMKYoI1YK5kI6GFuUBRKKNVjVKaAkRdG9KYZvO2VplMW9EiaoVoUKORTY1zSqcMTruNdyF4aqu9tzvtDxWI6girOsKqjrCqP1hj5-7UsUT0L58XCmWW_gLbdmgg</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Liu, Xiaoyu</creator><creator>Dabiri, Azita</creator><creator>Wang, Yihui</creator><creator>Xun, Jing</creator><creator>De Schutter, Bart</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-9181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-6196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-4896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-4719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-3323</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment</title><author>Liu, Xiaoyu ; Dabiri, Azita ; Wang, Yihui ; Xun, Jing ; De Schutter, Bart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-2b12695c51f1702089da9b255d810bbdea2347fb9453f0f22a922d2a2d5cb27e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Decentralized control</topic><topic>Delays</topic><topic>distributed model predictive control</topic><topic>heterogeneous train masses</topic><topic>relaxed dynamic programming</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Stability criteria</topic><topic>Topology</topic><topic>train speed control</topic><topic>Vehicle dynamics</topic><topic>Virtual coupling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dabiri, Azita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Schutter, Bart</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Xiaoyu</au><au>Dabiri, Azita</au><au>Wang, Yihui</au><au>Xun, Jing</au><au>De Schutter, Bart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems</jtitle><stitle>TITS</stitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>20753</spage><epage>20766</epage><pages>20753-20766</pages><issn>1524-9050</issn><eissn>1558-0016</eissn><coden>ITISFG</coden><abstract>Virtual coupling is regarded as an efficient way to improve the line capacity of rail transportation systems by reducing the spacing between consecutive trains. This paper is the first to compare and assess different distributed model predictive control (MPC) approaches, i.e., cooperative distributed MPC, serial distributed MPC, and decentralized MPC, for virtually coupled trains with a nonlinear train dynamic model. To make a balanced trade-off between computational complexity and efficiency, we also propose and assess convex approximations of the above control approaches. Furthermore, we are the first to introduce the relaxed dynamic programming approach to analyze the stability of the MPC-based nonlinear train control problem. By using the relaxed dynamic programming approach, a distributed stopping criterion with a stability guarantee is developed for the cooperative distributed MPC approach. In real life, masses of trains are different and can change at stations due to changes in passenger loads. This change in mass can significantly affect the dynamics and control of the virtually coupled trains when not taken into account in the control design. Therefore, we explicitly consider heterogeneous train masses when designing MPC approaches. We evaluate the different distributed MPC approaches through case studies based on the data of the Beijing Yizhuang Line. Simulation results indicate that the cooperative distributed MPC approach has the best tracking performance, while the serial distributed MPC approach can reduce communication requirements and computation capabilities with sacrifices of tracking performance.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TITS.2024.3458169</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-9181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-6196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-4896</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-4719</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-3323</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-9050 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2024-12, Vol.25 (12), p.20753-20766 |
issn | 1524-9050 1558-0016 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_10689254 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Couplings Decentralized control Delays distributed model predictive control heterogeneous train masses relaxed dynamic programming Safety Stability criteria Topology train speed control Vehicle dynamics Virtual coupling |
title | Distributed Model Predictive Control for Virtually Coupled Heterogeneous Trains: Comparison and Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distributed%20Model%20Predictive%20Control%20for%20Virtually%20Coupled%20Heterogeneous%20Trains:%20Comparison%20and%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20intelligent%20transportation%20systems&rft.au=Liu,%20Xiaoyu&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=20753&rft.epage=20766&rft.pages=20753-20766&rft.issn=1524-9050&rft.eissn=1558-0016&rft.coden=ITISFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TITS.2024.3458169&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_ieee_%3E10_1109_TITS_2024_3458169%3C/crossref_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10689254&rfr_iscdi=true |