Understanding and Benchmarking the Commonality of Adversarial Examples

Speech recognition system converts audio into texts by utilizing deep learning algorithms. Numerous works have demonstrated various adversarial example (AE) attacks, i.e., adding carefully-crafted noises can trick the speech recognition system into outputting completely incorrect texts. This paper a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: He, Ruiwen, Cheng, Yushi, Ze, Junning, Ji, Xiaoyu, Xu, Wenyuan
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Speech recognition system converts audio into texts by utilizing deep learning algorithms. Numerous works have demonstrated various adversarial example (AE) attacks, i.e., adding carefully-crafted noises can trick the speech recognition system into outputting completely incorrect texts. This paper aims to reveal the distinctive properties of adversarial audio in terms of phonetics. We believe analyzing the distinctive properties is critical in understanding adversarial attacks on ASR models, as well as guiding the generation and defense of AEs. Thus, we aim to answer three questions: (1) What are the distinctive properties of adversarial audio that are common to diverse attacks? (2) How to quantify these distinctive properties? (3) How can we use these properties to improve the security of ASR models? To answer these questions, we perform a large-scale measurement based on acoustic features and statistical analysis. By measuring a total of 612,000 acoustic-statistical feature vectors for 2,400 audio samples, we obtain four insights on the distinctive properties, i.e., filling energy gap, speech-like morphology, disordered signal, and abnormal linguistic pattern. Based on these properties, we design a naturalness score to assess the stealthiness of attacks and propose an adversarial example detector with an average accuracy of 91.1%.
ISSN:2375-1207
DOI:10.1109/SP54263.2024.00111