Fairness With Low Resentment in Distributed Sensor Systems to Detect Emitters
Consider a single distributed sensor system to detect the occurrence of rare emitters in multiple regions, each representing a different community. Alarms are sent to a common dispatch center, which dispatches units to each alarmed community. We assume that all communities contribute equally to the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on signal and information processing over networks 2024, Vol.10, p.552-564 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 564 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 552 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on signal and information processing over networks |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Fonseca, Benedito J. B. |
description | Consider a single distributed sensor system to detect the occurrence of rare emitters in multiple regions, each representing a different community. Alarms are sent to a common dispatch center, which dispatches units to each alarmed community. We assume that all communities contribute equally to the cost of the system; however, the probability of detecting an emitter may vary among communities, raising the issue of fairness. We adopt in here the concept of envy-free fairness in which the goal is to equalize the worst-case probability of detection in each community. As shown in our previous work, envy-free fairness can be achieved by adjusting the probabilities of false alarm at each community. In here, we extend our results by addressing a concern that may arise from envy-free fairness: resentment. After precisely defining the concept of resentment, we show that it is possible to design an envy-free fair detection system while keeping the maximum resentment bounded by combining poorly-served communities with a high enough number of well-served communities. We also present algorithms to allocate sensors to communities to design envy-free fair systems with bounded resentment while considering different optimization goals and constraints. Our examples illustrate that our algorithms often produce close-to-optimum allocations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TSIPN.2024.3414146 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10556798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10556798</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3072326887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-d69962f8147c67f0e0905ac084b17379953ba750a85840d5fd441372805d0ce83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtLw0AQhRdRsNT-AfFhwefU2Vt28yi9aKFesBV9W9JkgltMUne3SP-9qe1DGYaZh3PmDB8h1wyGjEF2t1zMXp-HHLgcCsm6Ss9IjwstEq3Tz_OT_ZIMQlgDAFNa6izrkadp7nyDIdAPF7_ovP2lbxiwiXXX1DV07EL0brWNWNIFNqH1dLELEetAY0vHGLGIdFK7GNGHK3JR5d8BB8fZJ-_TyXL0mMxfHmaj-3lSMK1jUqZZlvLKMKmLVFeAkIHKCzByxbTo_lJilWsFuVFGQqmqUkomNDegSijQiD65Pdzd-PZniyHadbv1TRdpBWgueGqM7lT8oCp8G4LHym68q3O_swzsnpz9J2f35OyRXGe6OZgcIp4YlEp1ZsQfmJJpAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072326887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fairness With Low Resentment in Distributed Sensor Systems to Detect Emitters</title><source>IEEE Xplore Digital Library</source><creator>Fonseca, Benedito J. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Benedito J. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Consider a single distributed sensor system to detect the occurrence of rare emitters in multiple regions, each representing a different community. Alarms are sent to a common dispatch center, which dispatches units to each alarmed community. We assume that all communities contribute equally to the cost of the system; however, the probability of detecting an emitter may vary among communities, raising the issue of fairness. We adopt in here the concept of envy-free fairness in which the goal is to equalize the worst-case probability of detection in each community. As shown in our previous work, envy-free fairness can be achieved by adjusting the probabilities of false alarm at each community. In here, we extend our results by addressing a concern that may arise from envy-free fairness: resentment. After precisely defining the concept of resentment, we show that it is possible to design an envy-free fair detection system while keeping the maximum resentment bounded by combining poorly-served communities with a high enough number of well-served communities. We also present algorithms to allocate sensors to communities to design envy-free fair systems with bounded resentment while considering different optimization goals and constraints. Our examples illustrate that our algorithms often produce close-to-optimum allocations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2373-776X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2373-776X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2373-7778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TSIPN.2024.3414146</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITSIBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Allocations ; Costs ; Distributed detection ; Distributed sensor systems ; Emitters ; fairness ; False alarms ; Information processing ; Monitoring ; Personnel ; Random variables ; resentment ; Resource management ; Sensor systems</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on signal and information processing over networks, 2024, Vol.10, p.552-564</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-d69962f8147c67f0e0905ac084b17379953ba750a85840d5fd441372805d0ce83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4967-4682</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10556798$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,4024,27923,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10556798$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Benedito J. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Fairness With Low Resentment in Distributed Sensor Systems to Detect Emitters</title><title>IEEE transactions on signal and information processing over networks</title><addtitle>TSIPN</addtitle><description>Consider a single distributed sensor system to detect the occurrence of rare emitters in multiple regions, each representing a different community. Alarms are sent to a common dispatch center, which dispatches units to each alarmed community. We assume that all communities contribute equally to the cost of the system; however, the probability of detecting an emitter may vary among communities, raising the issue of fairness. We adopt in here the concept of envy-free fairness in which the goal is to equalize the worst-case probability of detection in each community. As shown in our previous work, envy-free fairness can be achieved by adjusting the probabilities of false alarm at each community. In here, we extend our results by addressing a concern that may arise from envy-free fairness: resentment. After precisely defining the concept of resentment, we show that it is possible to design an envy-free fair detection system while keeping the maximum resentment bounded by combining poorly-served communities with a high enough number of well-served communities. We also present algorithms to allocate sensors to communities to design envy-free fair systems with bounded resentment while considering different optimization goals and constraints. Our examples illustrate that our algorithms often produce close-to-optimum allocations.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Distributed detection</subject><subject>Distributed sensor systems</subject><subject>Emitters</subject><subject>fairness</subject><subject>False alarms</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Personnel</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>resentment</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Sensor systems</subject><issn>2373-776X</issn><issn>2373-776X</issn><issn>2373-7778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFtLw0AQhRdRsNT-AfFhwefU2Vt28yi9aKFesBV9W9JkgltMUne3SP-9qe1DGYaZh3PmDB8h1wyGjEF2t1zMXp-HHLgcCsm6Ss9IjwstEq3Tz_OT_ZIMQlgDAFNa6izrkadp7nyDIdAPF7_ovP2lbxiwiXXX1DV07EL0brWNWNIFNqH1dLELEetAY0vHGLGIdFK7GNGHK3JR5d8BB8fZJ-_TyXL0mMxfHmaj-3lSMK1jUqZZlvLKMKmLVFeAkIHKCzByxbTo_lJilWsFuVFGQqmqUkomNDegSijQiD65Pdzd-PZniyHadbv1TRdpBWgueGqM7lT8oCp8G4LHym68q3O_swzsnpz9J2f35OyRXGe6OZgcIp4YlEp1ZsQfmJJpAA</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Fonseca, Benedito J. B.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4967-4682</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Fairness With Low Resentment in Distributed Sensor Systems to Detect Emitters</title><author>Fonseca, Benedito J. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-d69962f8147c67f0e0905ac084b17379953ba750a85840d5fd441372805d0ce83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Distributed detection</topic><topic>Distributed sensor systems</topic><topic>Emitters</topic><topic>fairness</topic><topic>False alarms</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Personnel</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>resentment</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Sensor systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Benedito J. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore Digital Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on signal and information processing over networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fonseca, Benedito J. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fairness With Low Resentment in Distributed Sensor Systems to Detect Emitters</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on signal and information processing over networks</jtitle><stitle>TSIPN</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>552</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>552-564</pages><issn>2373-776X</issn><eissn>2373-776X</eissn><eissn>2373-7778</eissn><coden>ITSIBW</coden><abstract>Consider a single distributed sensor system to detect the occurrence of rare emitters in multiple regions, each representing a different community. Alarms are sent to a common dispatch center, which dispatches units to each alarmed community. We assume that all communities contribute equally to the cost of the system; however, the probability of detecting an emitter may vary among communities, raising the issue of fairness. We adopt in here the concept of envy-free fairness in which the goal is to equalize the worst-case probability of detection in each community. As shown in our previous work, envy-free fairness can be achieved by adjusting the probabilities of false alarm at each community. In here, we extend our results by addressing a concern that may arise from envy-free fairness: resentment. After precisely defining the concept of resentment, we show that it is possible to design an envy-free fair detection system while keeping the maximum resentment bounded by combining poorly-served communities with a high enough number of well-served communities. We also present algorithms to allocate sensors to communities to design envy-free fair systems with bounded resentment while considering different optimization goals and constraints. Our examples illustrate that our algorithms often produce close-to-optimum allocations.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TSIPN.2024.3414146</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4967-4682</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2373-776X |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on signal and information processing over networks, 2024, Vol.10, p.552-564 |
issn | 2373-776X 2373-776X 2373-7778 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_10556798 |
source | IEEE Xplore Digital Library |
subjects | Algorithms Allocations Costs Distributed detection Distributed sensor systems Emitters fairness False alarms Information processing Monitoring Personnel Random variables resentment Resource management Sensor systems |
title | Fairness With Low Resentment in Distributed Sensor Systems to Detect Emitters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A11%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fairness%20With%20Low%20Resentment%20in%20Distributed%20Sensor%20Systems%20to%20Detect%20Emitters&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20signal%20and%20information%20processing%20over%20networks&rft.au=Fonseca,%20Benedito%20J.%20B.&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=552-564&rft.issn=2373-776X&rft.eissn=2373-776X&rft.coden=ITSIBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TSIPN.2024.3414146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E3072326887%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072326887&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10556798&rfr_iscdi=true |