Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making
Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project ro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on engineering management 2024-01, Vol.71, p.1-37 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on engineering management |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan |
description | Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this paper illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision-making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment complexity) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision-making in the project management context. This paper contributes to the research on decision-making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision-making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10449486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10449486</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2947400046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-8055dc3df4e504409b0c3f8e825a41c0c89d5f3106c121338dfe3b653e983c3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt3Dx4WvHbr5GubeJNatdCiSAVvIc3OytZ2U5Pdg_56U9uDp-FlnncGHkIuKQwpBX2zmMyHDJgYcj4C0HBEelRKlQMIOCY9AKpyzTU9JWcxrlIUkkGPvL8Ev0LXZq9-2cW2wRhvs7FvHG7bzq7rH9vWvhlkc7SxC7jBph1ktimz6Wa7rt3fNmaVD9k9ujqmlM_tZ918nJOTyq4jXhxmn7w9TBbjp3z2_Dgd381yxzRrcwVSlo6XlUAJQoBeguOVQsWkFdSBU7qUFadQOMoo56qskC8LyVErnnq8T673d7fBf3UYW7PyXWjSS8O0GAlIAopEwZ5ywccYsDLbUG9s-DYUzM6fSf7Mzp85-EuVq32lRsR_uBBaqIL_ArcZa9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2947400046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creatorcontrib><description>Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this paper illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision-making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment complexity) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision-making in the project management context. This paper contributes to the research on decision-making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision-making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEMA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Decision analysis ; Decision making ; disruption ; Empirical analysis ; Empirically based decision support system ; Measurement ; Operating systems ; Project management ; project robustness ; Recoverability ; Resilience ; Resistance ; Reviews ; Robustness</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2024-01, Vol.71, p.1-37</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-8055dc3df4e504409b0c3f8e825a41c0c89d5f3106c121338dfe3b653e983c3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-8055dc3df4e504409b0c3f8e825a41c0c89d5f3106c121338dfe3b653e983c3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7839-2794</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10449486$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10449486$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creatorcontrib><title>Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making</title><title>IEEE transactions on engineering management</title><addtitle>TEM</addtitle><description>Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this paper illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision-making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment complexity) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision-making in the project management context. This paper contributes to the research on decision-making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision-making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.</description><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>disruption</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Empirically based decision support system</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Operating systems</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>project robustness</subject><subject>Recoverability</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><issn>0018-9391</issn><issn>1558-0040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt3Dx4WvHbr5GubeJNatdCiSAVvIc3OytZ2U5Pdg_56U9uDp-FlnncGHkIuKQwpBX2zmMyHDJgYcj4C0HBEelRKlQMIOCY9AKpyzTU9JWcxrlIUkkGPvL8Ev0LXZq9-2cW2wRhvs7FvHG7bzq7rH9vWvhlkc7SxC7jBph1ktimz6Wa7rt3fNmaVD9k9ujqmlM_tZ918nJOTyq4jXhxmn7w9TBbjp3z2_Dgd381yxzRrcwVSlo6XlUAJQoBeguOVQsWkFdSBU7qUFadQOMoo56qskC8LyVErnnq8T673d7fBf3UYW7PyXWjSS8O0GAlIAopEwZ5ywccYsDLbUG9s-DYUzM6fSf7Mzp85-EuVq32lRsR_uBBaqIL_ArcZa9M</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-2794</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making</title><author>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-8055dc3df4e504409b0c3f8e825a41c0c89d5f3106c121338dfe3b653e983c3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>disruption</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Empirically based decision support system</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Operating systems</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>project robustness</topic><topic>Recoverability</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle><stitle>TEM</stitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>1-37</pages><issn>0018-9391</issn><eissn>1558-0040</eissn><coden>IEEMA4</coden><abstract>Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this paper illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision-making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment complexity) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision-making in the project management context. This paper contributes to the research on decision-making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision-making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090</doi><tpages>37</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-2794</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9391 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2024-01, Vol.71, p.1-37 |
issn | 0018-9391 1558-0040 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_10449486 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Decision analysis Decision making disruption Empirical analysis Empirically based decision support system Measurement Operating systems Project management project robustness Recoverability Resilience Resistance Reviews Robustness |
title | Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A18%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Project%20Robustness:%20Conceptualization,%20Measurement,%20and%20Implications%20for%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20engineering%20management&rft.au=Zarghami,%20Seyed%20Ashkan&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=1-37&rft.issn=0018-9391&rft.eissn=1558-0040&rft.coden=IEEMA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2947400046%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2947400046&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10449486&rfr_iscdi=true |