Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making

Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project ro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on engineering management 2024-01, Vol.71, p.1-37
1. Verfasser: Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title IEEE transactions on engineering management
container_volume 71
creator Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan
description Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this paper illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision-making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment complexity) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision-making in the project management context. This paper contributes to the research on decision-making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision-making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10449486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10449486</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2947400046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-8055dc3df4e504409b0c3f8e825a41c0c89d5f3106c121338dfe3b653e983c3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt3Dx4WvHbr5GubeJNatdCiSAVvIc3OytZ2U5Pdg_56U9uDp-FlnncGHkIuKQwpBX2zmMyHDJgYcj4C0HBEelRKlQMIOCY9AKpyzTU9JWcxrlIUkkGPvL8Ev0LXZq9-2cW2wRhvs7FvHG7bzq7rH9vWvhlkc7SxC7jBph1ktimz6Wa7rt3fNmaVD9k9ujqmlM_tZ918nJOTyq4jXhxmn7w9TBbjp3z2_Dgd381yxzRrcwVSlo6XlUAJQoBeguOVQsWkFdSBU7qUFadQOMoo56qskC8LyVErnnq8T673d7fBf3UYW7PyXWjSS8O0GAlIAopEwZ5ywccYsDLbUG9s-DYUzM6fSf7Mzp85-EuVq32lRsR_uBBaqIL_ArcZa9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2947400046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creatorcontrib><description>Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this paper illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision-making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment complexity) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision-making in the project management context. This paper contributes to the research on decision-making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision-making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEMA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Decision analysis ; Decision making ; disruption ; Empirical analysis ; Empirically based decision support system ; Measurement ; Operating systems ; Project management ; project robustness ; Recoverability ; Resilience ; Resistance ; Reviews ; Robustness</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2024-01, Vol.71, p.1-37</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-8055dc3df4e504409b0c3f8e825a41c0c89d5f3106c121338dfe3b653e983c3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-8055dc3df4e504409b0c3f8e825a41c0c89d5f3106c121338dfe3b653e983c3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7839-2794</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10449486$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10449486$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creatorcontrib><title>Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making</title><title>IEEE transactions on engineering management</title><addtitle>TEM</addtitle><description>Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this paper illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision-making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment complexity) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision-making in the project management context. This paper contributes to the research on decision-making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision-making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.</description><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>disruption</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Empirically based decision support system</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Operating systems</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>project robustness</subject><subject>Recoverability</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><issn>0018-9391</issn><issn>1558-0040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt3Dx4WvHbr5GubeJNatdCiSAVvIc3OytZ2U5Pdg_56U9uDp-FlnncGHkIuKQwpBX2zmMyHDJgYcj4C0HBEelRKlQMIOCY9AKpyzTU9JWcxrlIUkkGPvL8Ev0LXZq9-2cW2wRhvs7FvHG7bzq7rH9vWvhlkc7SxC7jBph1ktimz6Wa7rt3fNmaVD9k9ujqmlM_tZ918nJOTyq4jXhxmn7w9TBbjp3z2_Dgd381yxzRrcwVSlo6XlUAJQoBeguOVQsWkFdSBU7qUFadQOMoo56qskC8LyVErnnq8T673d7fBf3UYW7PyXWjSS8O0GAlIAopEwZ5ywccYsDLbUG9s-DYUzM6fSf7Mzp85-EuVq32lRsR_uBBaqIL_ArcZa9M</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-2794</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making</title><author>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-8055dc3df4e504409b0c3f8e825a41c0c89d5f3106c121338dfe3b653e983c3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>disruption</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Empirically based decision support system</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Operating systems</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>project robustness</topic><topic>Recoverability</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle><stitle>TEM</stitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>1-37</pages><issn>0018-9391</issn><eissn>1558-0040</eissn><coden>IEEMA4</coden><abstract>Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this paper is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term "project robustness" based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this paper illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision-making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment complexity) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision-making in the project management context. This paper contributes to the research on decision-making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision-making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090</doi><tpages>37</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-2794</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0018-9391
ispartof IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2024-01, Vol.71, p.1-37
issn 0018-9391
1558-0040
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_10449486
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Decision analysis
Decision making
disruption
Empirical analysis
Empirically based decision support system
Measurement
Operating systems
Project management
project robustness
Recoverability
Resilience
Resistance
Reviews
Robustness
title Project Robustness: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision-Making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A18%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Project%20Robustness:%20Conceptualization,%20Measurement,%20and%20Implications%20for%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20engineering%20management&rft.au=Zarghami,%20Seyed%20Ashkan&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=1-37&rft.issn=0018-9391&rft.eissn=1558-0040&rft.coden=IEEMA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2947400046%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2947400046&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10449486&rfr_iscdi=true