Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact

Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on education 2024-06, Vol.67 (3), p.364-376
Hauptverfasser: Dalal, Medha, Iqbal, Assad, Carberry, Adam R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 376
container_issue 3
container_start_page 364
container_title IEEE transactions on education
container_volume 67
creator Dalal, Medha
Iqbal, Assad
Carberry, Adam R.
description Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education ecosystem to help inform the future design and development of teacher professional learning models. Background: Efforts to provide precollege students with engineering or robotics-specific experiences are on the rise. These efforts are typically undertaken independently of one another. A first-of-its-kind collaboration between two precollege STEM initiatives aimed to break down existing silos between programs and offer a blended engineering and robotics curriculum targeting underserved schools. Research Questions: 1) How does a program designed to blend two existing engineering and robotics programs at the secondary school level impact teachers? and 2) What program elements are deemed valuable by participating teachers who are implementing a blended engineering and robotics program at the secondary school level? Methodology: Four focus groups were conducted with teachers ( {n} = 16) over a period of two years. Data was analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Findings: Four themes of growing confidence, exercising agency, responsive professional development, and support structures emerged across the four datasets. Collectively these themes capture pragmatic understandings of offering a new, blended precollege STEM program and advance an argument for the involvement of all stakeholders to support the teachers.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TE.2023.3338610
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10376265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10376265</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3064706355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-c4ba814f4ed120e61d5899b933d2d961d2fab3c45e94a366ab038db41b4efdc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1Lw0AUxBdRsFbPXjwEPKfud7PetEQtFOwhnpfN7ktMyZe7qeh_b0J68PSYx29mYBC6JXhFCFYPWbqimLIVYyyRBJ-hBRFiHSvJknO0wJgksWJCXaKrEA6j5IKKBTo819A6cNG26WtooB3MUHVt1BVR-lOFoWrLaO_BdnUNJURpW1YtgJ_fXelNEx6jDIz9BB_twYce7FB9Q5gSTsSUbexwjS4KUwe4Od0l-nhJs81bvHt_3W6edrGliRhiy3OTEF5wcIRikMSJRKlcMeaoU6OkhcmZ5QIUN0xKk2OWuJyTnEPhrGRLdD_n9r77OkIY9KE7-nas1AxLvsaSCTFSDzNlfReCh0L3vmqM_9UE62lQnaV6GlSfBh0dd7OjAoB_NFtLKgX7A5s1ctY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3064706355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Dalal, Medha ; Iqbal, Assad ; Carberry, Adam R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dalal, Medha ; Iqbal, Assad ; Carberry, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><description>Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education ecosystem to help inform the future design and development of teacher professional learning models. Background: Efforts to provide precollege students with engineering or robotics-specific experiences are on the rise. These efforts are typically undertaken independently of one another. A first-of-its-kind collaboration between two precollege STEM initiatives aimed to break down existing silos between programs and offer a blended engineering and robotics curriculum targeting underserved schools. Research Questions: 1) How does a program designed to blend two existing engineering and robotics programs at the secondary school level impact teachers? and 2) What program elements are deemed valuable by participating teachers who are implementing a blended engineering and robotics program at the secondary school level? Methodology: Four focus groups were conducted with teachers (&lt;inline-formula&gt; &lt;tex-math notation="LaTeX"&gt;{n} &lt;/tex-math&gt;&lt;/inline-formula&gt; = 16) over a period of two years. Data was analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Findings: Four themes of growing confidence, exercising agency, responsive professional development, and support structures emerged across the four datasets. Collectively these themes capture pragmatic understandings of offering a new, blended precollege STEM program and advance an argument for the involvement of all stakeholders to support the teachers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TE.2023.3338610</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEDAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Coding ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Engineering ; Engineering education ; Engineering profession ; Focus Groups ; Knowledge engineering ; Pre-college engineering ; precollege programs ; Professional development ; Professional Training ; Robot kinematics ; Robotics ; Robots ; Secondary Schools ; Stakeholders ; STEM ; STEM education ; Teachers ; Technical education ; Training</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on education, 2024-06, Vol.67 (3), p.364-376</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5705-1800 ; 0000-0003-0041-7060 ; 0000-0002-8060-7384</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10376265$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,794,27911,27912,54745</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dalal, Medha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Assad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carberry, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><title>Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact</title><title>IEEE transactions on education</title><addtitle>TE</addtitle><description>Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education ecosystem to help inform the future design and development of teacher professional learning models. Background: Efforts to provide precollege students with engineering or robotics-specific experiences are on the rise. These efforts are typically undertaken independently of one another. A first-of-its-kind collaboration between two precollege STEM initiatives aimed to break down existing silos between programs and offer a blended engineering and robotics curriculum targeting underserved schools. Research Questions: 1) How does a program designed to blend two existing engineering and robotics programs at the secondary school level impact teachers? and 2) What program elements are deemed valuable by participating teachers who are implementing a blended engineering and robotics program at the secondary school level? Methodology: Four focus groups were conducted with teachers (&lt;inline-formula&gt; &lt;tex-math notation="LaTeX"&gt;{n} &lt;/tex-math&gt;&lt;/inline-formula&gt; = 16) over a period of two years. Data was analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Findings: Four themes of growing confidence, exercising agency, responsive professional development, and support structures emerged across the four datasets. Collectively these themes capture pragmatic understandings of offering a new, blended precollege STEM program and advance an argument for the involvement of all stakeholders to support the teachers.</description><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering education</subject><subject>Engineering profession</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Knowledge engineering</subject><subject>Pre-college engineering</subject><subject>precollege programs</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professional Training</subject><subject>Robot kinematics</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Secondary Schools</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>STEM</subject><subject>STEM education</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Technical education</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0018-9359</issn><issn>1557-9638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1Lw0AUxBdRsFbPXjwEPKfud7PetEQtFOwhnpfN7ktMyZe7qeh_b0J68PSYx29mYBC6JXhFCFYPWbqimLIVYyyRBJ-hBRFiHSvJknO0wJgksWJCXaKrEA6j5IKKBTo819A6cNG26WtooB3MUHVt1BVR-lOFoWrLaO_BdnUNJURpW1YtgJ_fXelNEx6jDIz9BB_twYce7FB9Q5gSTsSUbexwjS4KUwe4Od0l-nhJs81bvHt_3W6edrGliRhiy3OTEF5wcIRikMSJRKlcMeaoU6OkhcmZ5QIUN0xKk2OWuJyTnEPhrGRLdD_n9r77OkIY9KE7-nas1AxLvsaSCTFSDzNlfReCh0L3vmqM_9UE62lQnaV6GlSfBh0dd7OjAoB_NFtLKgX7A5s1ctY</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Dalal, Medha</creator><creator>Iqbal, Assad</creator><creator>Carberry, Adam R.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-1800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0041-7060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-7384</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact</title><author>Dalal, Medha ; Iqbal, Assad ; Carberry, Adam R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-c4ba814f4ed120e61d5899b933d2d961d2fab3c45e94a366ab038db41b4efdc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering education</topic><topic>Engineering profession</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Knowledge engineering</topic><topic>Pre-college engineering</topic><topic>precollege programs</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professional Training</topic><topic>Robot kinematics</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Secondary Schools</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>STEM</topic><topic>STEM education</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Technical education</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dalal, Medha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Assad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carberry, Adam R.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dalal, Medha</au><au>Iqbal, Assad</au><au>Carberry, Adam R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on education</jtitle><stitle>TE</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>364</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>364-376</pages><issn>0018-9359</issn><eissn>1557-9638</eissn><coden>IEEDAB</coden><abstract>Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education ecosystem to help inform the future design and development of teacher professional learning models. Background: Efforts to provide precollege students with engineering or robotics-specific experiences are on the rise. These efforts are typically undertaken independently of one another. A first-of-its-kind collaboration between two precollege STEM initiatives aimed to break down existing silos between programs and offer a blended engineering and robotics curriculum targeting underserved schools. Research Questions: 1) How does a program designed to blend two existing engineering and robotics programs at the secondary school level impact teachers? and 2) What program elements are deemed valuable by participating teachers who are implementing a blended engineering and robotics program at the secondary school level? Methodology: Four focus groups were conducted with teachers (&lt;inline-formula&gt; &lt;tex-math notation="LaTeX"&gt;{n} &lt;/tex-math&gt;&lt;/inline-formula&gt; = 16) over a period of two years. Data was analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Findings: Four themes of growing confidence, exercising agency, responsive professional development, and support structures emerged across the four datasets. Collectively these themes capture pragmatic understandings of offering a new, blended precollege STEM program and advance an argument for the involvement of all stakeholders to support the teachers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TE.2023.3338610</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-1800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0041-7060</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-7384</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-9359
ispartof IEEE transactions on education, 2024-06, Vol.67 (3), p.364-376
issn 0018-9359
1557-9638
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_10376265
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Coding
Computer Assisted Instruction
Engineering
Engineering education
Engineering profession
Focus Groups
Knowledge engineering
Pre-college engineering
precollege programs
Professional development
Professional Training
Robot kinematics
Robotics
Robots
Secondary Schools
Stakeholders
STEM
STEM education
Teachers
Technical education
Training
title Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A04%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blended%20Implementation%20of%20Existing%20Precollege%20Engineering%20Programs:%20Teacher%20Perspectives%20of%20Program%20Impact&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20education&rft.au=Dalal,%20Medha&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=364&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=364-376&rft.issn=0018-9359&rft.eissn=1557-9638&rft.coden=IEEDAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TE.2023.3338610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E3064706355%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3064706355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10376265&rfr_iscdi=true