An improved upscaling method of in-situ measurements with consideration of their uncertainty for the spatial scale match between satellite and in-situ measurements
The spatial scale mismatch between satellite and in-situ -based measurements can be reduced by deploying multiple in-situ sites within the coarse pixel. However, upscaling in-situ measurements from the ground-support scale to the coarse pixel scale is still necessary due to their "point" m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2023-01, Vol.61, p.1-1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Du, XiangLei Wu, Xiaodan Tang, Rongqi Zeng, Qicheng Li, Zheng Wang, Jingping Jiang, Zhiyong Wang, Kaizhong You, Dongqin Wen, Jianguang Xiao, Qing |
description | The spatial scale mismatch between satellite and in-situ -based measurements can be reduced by deploying multiple in-situ sites within the coarse pixel. However, upscaling in-situ measurements from the ground-support scale to the coarse pixel scale is still necessary due to their "point" measurement characteristics. The previous upscaling methods were generally developed merely for the in-situ measurements. Nevertheless, the uncertainty of in-situ measurements such as measurement errors and spatial representativeness errors was not dealt with. Consequently, the upscaling results inevitably suffer from errors, which will finally propagate into the pixel scale ground "truth". For the first time, this study presents an improved upscaling method with the consideration of the uncertainty of in-situ measurements based on the error theory and measurement adjustment theory. The effectiveness of the corrected upscaling coefficients was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of the corrected upscaling results with those based on the upscaling coefficients without considering the uncertainty of in-situ measurements. The results indicate that the accuracy of the upscaling results can be enhanced by 11.06% in the condition in which in-situ measurements suffer from large uncertainty. However, if the uncertainty of in-situ measurements is negligible, the corrected upscaling model is not necessary because it does not bring many benefits. Although the effectiveness of this method was only tested on a limited study area, it makes an important first step toward a higher precision pixel-scale ground "truth", especially when the uncertainty of in-situ measurements is non-negligible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3291883 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_10172055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10172055</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2840392586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-965e19a40701e24e7189e5dd58d84122e8944214c1db4f2b23ff2e7df63d088b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gOAi4Lpjbpq0yVIGHQVB8GddMs2tE2nTMUkVn8cXtWVm4cLVhcN3zoF7CDkHtgBg-upl9fS84Izni5xrUCo_IDOQUmWsEOKQzBjoIuNK82NyEuM7YyAklDPyc-2p67ah_0RLh22sTev8G-0wbXpL-4Y6n0WXhlExcQjYoU-Rfrm0oXXvo7MYTHK9n9C0QRfo4GsMyTifvmnTh0mlcTtCpqVTPNLOpHpD15i-ED2NJmHbuoTUePtv3Sk5akwb8Wx_5-T19uZleZc9PK7ul9cPWc1FkTJdSARtBCsZIBdYgtIorZXKKgGco9JCcBA12LVo-JrnTcOxtE2RW6bUOp-Ty13u-I6PAWOq3vsh-LGy4kqwXHOpipGCHVWHPsaATbUNrjPhuwJWTVtU0xbVtEW132L0XOw8DhH_8FByJmX-C_DEiYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2840392586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An improved upscaling method of in-situ measurements with consideration of their uncertainty for the spatial scale match between satellite and in-situ measurements</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Du, XiangLei ; Wu, Xiaodan ; Tang, Rongqi ; Zeng, Qicheng ; Li, Zheng ; Wang, Jingping ; Jiang, Zhiyong ; Wang, Kaizhong ; You, Dongqin ; Wen, Jianguang ; Xiao, Qing</creator><creatorcontrib>Du, XiangLei ; Wu, Xiaodan ; Tang, Rongqi ; Zeng, Qicheng ; Li, Zheng ; Wang, Jingping ; Jiang, Zhiyong ; Wang, Kaizhong ; You, Dongqin ; Wen, Jianguang ; Xiao, Qing</creatorcontrib><description>The spatial scale mismatch between satellite and in-situ -based measurements can be reduced by deploying multiple in-situ sites within the coarse pixel. However, upscaling in-situ measurements from the ground-support scale to the coarse pixel scale is still necessary due to their "point" measurement characteristics. The previous upscaling methods were generally developed merely for the in-situ measurements. Nevertheless, the uncertainty of in-situ measurements such as measurement errors and spatial representativeness errors was not dealt with. Consequently, the upscaling results inevitably suffer from errors, which will finally propagate into the pixel scale ground "truth". For the first time, this study presents an improved upscaling method with the consideration of the uncertainty of in-situ measurements based on the error theory and measurement adjustment theory. The effectiveness of the corrected upscaling coefficients was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of the corrected upscaling results with those based on the upscaling coefficients without considering the uncertainty of in-situ measurements. The results indicate that the accuracy of the upscaling results can be enhanced by 11.06% in the condition in which in-situ measurements suffer from large uncertainty. However, if the uncertainty of in-situ measurements is negligible, the corrected upscaling model is not necessary because it does not bring many benefits. Although the effectiveness of this method was only tested on a limited study area, it makes an important first step toward a higher precision pixel-scale ground "truth", especially when the uncertainty of in-situ measurements is non-negligible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3291883</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject><italic xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">in-situ measurements ; Accuracy ; Artificial satellites ; Coefficients ; Earth ; Effectiveness ; Error analysis ; Error correction ; In situ measurement ; Measurement uncertainty ; Pixels ; Remote sensing ; Satellite broadcasting ; satellite pixel ; Satellites ; spatial scale mismatch ; Uncertainty ; upscaling</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2023-01, Vol.61, p.1-1</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-965e19a40701e24e7189e5dd58d84122e8944214c1db4f2b23ff2e7df63d088b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0804-3104 ; 0009-0000-4632-3153 ; 0000-0003-2713-7755 ; 0000-0002-9528-838X ; 0000-0003-4602-502X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10172055$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10172055$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Du, XiangLei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiaodan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Rongqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Qicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kaizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Dongqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jianguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Qing</creatorcontrib><title>An improved upscaling method of in-situ measurements with consideration of their uncertainty for the spatial scale match between satellite and in-situ measurements</title><title>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</title><addtitle>TGRS</addtitle><description>The spatial scale mismatch between satellite and in-situ -based measurements can be reduced by deploying multiple in-situ sites within the coarse pixel. However, upscaling in-situ measurements from the ground-support scale to the coarse pixel scale is still necessary due to their "point" measurement characteristics. The previous upscaling methods were generally developed merely for the in-situ measurements. Nevertheless, the uncertainty of in-situ measurements such as measurement errors and spatial representativeness errors was not dealt with. Consequently, the upscaling results inevitably suffer from errors, which will finally propagate into the pixel scale ground "truth". For the first time, this study presents an improved upscaling method with the consideration of the uncertainty of in-situ measurements based on the error theory and measurement adjustment theory. The effectiveness of the corrected upscaling coefficients was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of the corrected upscaling results with those based on the upscaling coefficients without considering the uncertainty of in-situ measurements. The results indicate that the accuracy of the upscaling results can be enhanced by 11.06% in the condition in which in-situ measurements suffer from large uncertainty. However, if the uncertainty of in-situ measurements is negligible, the corrected upscaling model is not necessary because it does not bring many benefits. Although the effectiveness of this method was only tested on a limited study area, it makes an important first step toward a higher precision pixel-scale ground "truth", especially when the uncertainty of in-situ measurements is non-negligible.</description><subject><italic xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">in-situ measurements</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Artificial satellites</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Error correction</subject><subject>In situ measurement</subject><subject>Measurement uncertainty</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellite broadcasting</subject><subject>satellite pixel</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>spatial scale mismatch</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>upscaling</subject><issn>0196-2892</issn><issn>1558-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gOAi4Lpjbpq0yVIGHQVB8GddMs2tE2nTMUkVn8cXtWVm4cLVhcN3zoF7CDkHtgBg-upl9fS84Izni5xrUCo_IDOQUmWsEOKQzBjoIuNK82NyEuM7YyAklDPyc-2p67ah_0RLh22sTev8G-0wbXpL-4Y6n0WXhlExcQjYoU-Rfrm0oXXvo7MYTHK9n9C0QRfo4GsMyTifvmnTh0mlcTtCpqVTPNLOpHpD15i-ED2NJmHbuoTUePtv3Sk5akwb8Wx_5-T19uZleZc9PK7ul9cPWc1FkTJdSARtBCsZIBdYgtIorZXKKgGco9JCcBA12LVo-JrnTcOxtE2RW6bUOp-Ty13u-I6PAWOq3vsh-LGy4kqwXHOpipGCHVWHPsaATbUNrjPhuwJWTVtU0xbVtEW132L0XOw8DhH_8FByJmX-C_DEiYw</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Du, XiangLei</creator><creator>Wu, Xiaodan</creator><creator>Tang, Rongqi</creator><creator>Zeng, Qicheng</creator><creator>Li, Zheng</creator><creator>Wang, Jingping</creator><creator>Jiang, Zhiyong</creator><creator>Wang, Kaizhong</creator><creator>You, Dongqin</creator><creator>Wen, Jianguang</creator><creator>Xiao, Qing</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-3104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4632-3153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2713-7755</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-838X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-502X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>An improved upscaling method of in-situ measurements with consideration of their uncertainty for the spatial scale match between satellite and in-situ measurements</title><author>Du, XiangLei ; Wu, Xiaodan ; Tang, Rongqi ; Zeng, Qicheng ; Li, Zheng ; Wang, Jingping ; Jiang, Zhiyong ; Wang, Kaizhong ; You, Dongqin ; Wen, Jianguang ; Xiao, Qing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-965e19a40701e24e7189e5dd58d84122e8944214c1db4f2b23ff2e7df63d088b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic><italic xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">in-situ measurements</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Artificial satellites</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Error correction</topic><topic>In situ measurement</topic><topic>Measurement uncertainty</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellite broadcasting</topic><topic>satellite pixel</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>spatial scale mismatch</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>upscaling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Du, XiangLei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiaodan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Rongqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Qicheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kaizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Dongqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Jianguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Qing</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Du, XiangLei</au><au>Wu, Xiaodan</au><au>Tang, Rongqi</au><au>Zeng, Qicheng</au><au>Li, Zheng</au><au>Wang, Jingping</au><au>Jiang, Zhiyong</au><au>Wang, Kaizhong</au><au>You, Dongqin</au><au>Wen, Jianguang</au><au>Xiao, Qing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An improved upscaling method of in-situ measurements with consideration of their uncertainty for the spatial scale match between satellite and in-situ measurements</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle><stitle>TGRS</stitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>1</epage><pages>1-1</pages><issn>0196-2892</issn><eissn>1558-0644</eissn><coden>IGRSD2</coden><abstract>The spatial scale mismatch between satellite and in-situ -based measurements can be reduced by deploying multiple in-situ sites within the coarse pixel. However, upscaling in-situ measurements from the ground-support scale to the coarse pixel scale is still necessary due to their "point" measurement characteristics. The previous upscaling methods were generally developed merely for the in-situ measurements. Nevertheless, the uncertainty of in-situ measurements such as measurement errors and spatial representativeness errors was not dealt with. Consequently, the upscaling results inevitably suffer from errors, which will finally propagate into the pixel scale ground "truth". For the first time, this study presents an improved upscaling method with the consideration of the uncertainty of in-situ measurements based on the error theory and measurement adjustment theory. The effectiveness of the corrected upscaling coefficients was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of the corrected upscaling results with those based on the upscaling coefficients without considering the uncertainty of in-situ measurements. The results indicate that the accuracy of the upscaling results can be enhanced by 11.06% in the condition in which in-situ measurements suffer from large uncertainty. However, if the uncertainty of in-situ measurements is negligible, the corrected upscaling model is not necessary because it does not bring many benefits. Although the effectiveness of this method was only tested on a limited study area, it makes an important first step toward a higher precision pixel-scale ground "truth", especially when the uncertainty of in-situ measurements is non-negligible.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TGRS.2023.3291883</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-3104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4632-3153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2713-7755</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-838X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4602-502X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-2892 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2023-01, Vol.61, p.1-1 |
issn | 0196-2892 1558-0644 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_10172055 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | <italic xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">in-situ measurements Accuracy Artificial satellites Coefficients Earth Effectiveness Error analysis Error correction In situ measurement Measurement uncertainty Pixels Remote sensing Satellite broadcasting satellite pixel Satellites spatial scale mismatch Uncertainty upscaling |
title | An improved upscaling method of in-situ measurements with consideration of their uncertainty for the spatial scale match between satellite and in-situ measurements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20improved%20upscaling%20method%20of%20in-situ%20measurements%20with%20consideration%20of%20their%20uncertainty%20for%20the%20spatial%20scale%20match%20between%20satellite%20and%20in-situ%20measurements&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Du,%20XiangLei&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1&rft.pages=1-1&rft.issn=0196-2892&rft.eissn=1558-0644&rft.coden=IGRSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3291883&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2840392586%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2840392586&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10172055&rfr_iscdi=true |