Rethinking: On the Urartian ivory artefacts
Ivory carving, which is thought to enter Anatolia as a result of highly advanced commercial and cultural relations of the 1st Millennia BC, spread to a wider area and every region created their own school once it became a tradable product. The ivory artefacts found in Urartian settlements such as Al...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Anadolu araştırmaları 2017-01, Vol.2017 (20), p.135-159 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 159 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 20 |
| container_start_page | 135 |
| container_title | Anadolu araştırmaları |
| container_volume | 2017 |
| creator | Alp,Esra |
| description | Ivory carving, which is thought to enter Anatolia as a result of highly advanced
commercial and cultural relations of the 1st Millennia BC, spread to a wider area
and every region created their own school once it became a tradable product. The
ivory artefacts found in Urartian settlements such as Altıntepe, Toprakkale and Kamir
Blur suggest that Urartu was not indifferent to ‘Ivory Artefact Carving’, which is also
known to exist in the 1st Millennia BC in Syria, Iran, Assyria, Phoenicia, Phrygia,
and some of the Neo-Hittite Kingdoms. Technical competence seen in these artefacts
brings up the question of whether they came to the Urartian lands via commercial
activities such as import and export between these small states or it was Urartu’s own
development of turning this art into local production. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>idealonline</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_idealonline_journals_IDEAL_67110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>IDEAL_67110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-idealonline_journals_IDEAL_671103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDWz1LU0NzHjYOAtLs4yAAJzAyNTQwNOBu2g1JKMzLzszLx0KwX_PIWSjFSF0KLEopLMxDyFzLL8okoFICc1LTG5pJiHgTUtMac4lRdKczOou7mGOHvoZqakJubk5-Vk5qXGZ-WXFuUBZeM9XVwdfeLNzA0NDYyJVwkA-qA0ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rethinking: On the Urartian ivory artefacts</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Alp,Esra</creator><contributor>Konyar,Erkan ; Ergin,Gürkan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Alp,Esra ; Konyar,Erkan ; Ergin,Gürkan</creatorcontrib><description>Ivory carving, which is thought to enter Anatolia as a result of highly advanced
commercial and cultural relations of the 1st Millennia BC, spread to a wider area
and every region created their own school once it became a tradable product. The
ivory artefacts found in Urartian settlements such as Altıntepe, Toprakkale and Kamir
Blur suggest that Urartu was not indifferent to ‘Ivory Artefact Carving’, which is also
known to exist in the 1st Millennia BC in Syria, Iran, Assyria, Phoenicia, Phrygia,
and some of the Neo-Hittite Kingdoms. Technical competence seen in these artefacts
brings up the question of whether they came to the Urartian lands via commercial
activities such as import and export between these small states or it was Urartu’s own
development of turning this art into local production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0569-9746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları</publisher><subject>Coğrafya ; Tarih</subject><ispartof>Anadolu araştırmaları, 2017-01, Vol.2017 (20), p.135-159</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Konyar,Erkan</contributor><contributor>Ergin,Gürkan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Alp,Esra</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking: On the Urartian ivory artefacts</title><title>Anadolu araştırmaları</title><description>Ivory carving, which is thought to enter Anatolia as a result of highly advanced
commercial and cultural relations of the 1st Millennia BC, spread to a wider area
and every region created their own school once it became a tradable product. The
ivory artefacts found in Urartian settlements such as Altıntepe, Toprakkale and Kamir
Blur suggest that Urartu was not indifferent to ‘Ivory Artefact Carving’, which is also
known to exist in the 1st Millennia BC in Syria, Iran, Assyria, Phoenicia, Phrygia,
and some of the Neo-Hittite Kingdoms. Technical competence seen in these artefacts
brings up the question of whether they came to the Urartian lands via commercial
activities such as import and export between these small states or it was Urartu’s own
development of turning this art into local production.</description><subject>Coğrafya</subject><subject>Tarih</subject><issn>0569-9746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDWz1LU0NzHjYOAtLs4yAAJzAyNTQwNOBu2g1JKMzLzszLx0KwX_PIWSjFSF0KLEopLMxDyFzLL8okoFICc1LTG5pJiHgTUtMac4lRdKczOou7mGOHvoZqakJubk5-Vk5qXGZ-WXFuUBZeM9XVwdfeLNzA0NDYyJVwkA-qA0ow</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Alp,Esra</creator><general>İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları</general><scope>IEBAR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Rethinking: On the Urartian ivory artefacts</title><author>Alp,Esra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-idealonline_journals_IDEAL_671103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Coğrafya</topic><topic>Tarih</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alp,Esra</creatorcontrib><collection>Idealonline online kütüphane - Journals</collection><jtitle>Anadolu araştırmaları</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alp,Esra</au><au>Konyar,Erkan</au><au>Ergin,Gürkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rethinking: On the Urartian ivory artefacts</atitle><jtitle>Anadolu araştırmaları</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>2017</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>135-159</pages><issn>0569-9746</issn><abstract>Ivory carving, which is thought to enter Anatolia as a result of highly advanced
commercial and cultural relations of the 1st Millennia BC, spread to a wider area
and every region created their own school once it became a tradable product. The
ivory artefacts found in Urartian settlements such as Altıntepe, Toprakkale and Kamir
Blur suggest that Urartu was not indifferent to ‘Ivory Artefact Carving’, which is also
known to exist in the 1st Millennia BC in Syria, Iran, Assyria, Phoenicia, Phrygia,
and some of the Neo-Hittite Kingdoms. Technical competence seen in these artefacts
brings up the question of whether they came to the Urartian lands via commercial
activities such as import and export between these small states or it was Urartu’s own
development of turning this art into local production.</abstract><pub>İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0569-9746 |
| ispartof | Anadolu araştırmaları, 2017-01, Vol.2017 (20), p.135-159 |
| issn | 0569-9746 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_idealonline_journals_IDEAL_67110 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Coğrafya Tarih |
| title | Rethinking: On the Urartian ivory artefacts |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A43%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-idealonline&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking:%20On%20the%20Urartian%20ivory%20artefacts&rft.jtitle=Anadolu%20ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rmalar%C4%B1&rft.au=Alp,Esra&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=2017&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=135-159&rft.issn=0569-9746&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cidealonline%3EIDEAL_67110%3C/idealonline%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |