Procyclicality or Reverse Causality?

There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Panizza, Ugo, Jaimovich, Dany
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Panizza, Ugo
Jaimovich, Dany
description There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or expenditure growth) and either GDP growth or some measure of the output gap. This paper argues that such a methodology does not permit the identification of the effect of the business cycle on fiscal policy and hence cannot be used to estimate policy reaction functions. The paper proposes a new instrument for GDP growth and shows that, once GDP growth is properly instrumented, procyclicality tends to disappear. There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or expenditure growth) and either GDP growth or some measure of the output gap. This paper argues that such a methodology does not permit the identification of the effect of the business cycle on fiscal policy and hence cannot be used to estimate policy reaction functions. The paper proposes a new instrument for GDP growth and shows that, once GDP growth is properly instrumented, procyclicality tends to disappear.
doi_str_mv 10.18235/0010973
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iadb_FFQFF</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iadb_primary_35226015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35226015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-iadb_primary_352260153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAwNNAztDAyNtU3MDA0sDQ35mRQCSjKT65MzslMTszJLKlUyC9SCEotSy0qTlVwTiwtBgva8zCwpiXmFKfyQmluBhk31xBnD93MxJSk-IKizNzEosp4Y1MjIzMDQ1NjAtIALfMnKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Procyclicality or Reverse Causality?</title><source>Inter-American Development Bank</source><creator>Panizza, Ugo ; Jaimovich, Dany</creator><creatorcontrib>Panizza, Ugo ; Jaimovich, Dany ; Department of Research and Chief Economist</creatorcontrib><description>There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or expenditure growth) and either GDP growth or some measure of the output gap. This paper argues that such a methodology does not permit the identification of the effect of the business cycle on fiscal policy and hence cannot be used to estimate policy reaction functions. The paper proposes a new instrument for GDP growth and shows that, once GDP growth is properly instrumented, procyclicality tends to disappear. There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or expenditure growth) and either GDP growth or some measure of the output gap. This paper argues that such a methodology does not permit the identification of the effect of the business cycle on fiscal policy and hence cannot be used to estimate policy reaction functions. The paper proposes a new instrument for GDP growth and shows that, once GDP growth is properly instrumented, procyclicality tends to disappear.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.18235/0010973</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Fiscal Policy ; WP-599</subject><creationdate>2011-02</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://webimages.iadb.org/publications/english/image/1941.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,27453</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://publications.iadb.org/en/node/10210$$EView_record_in_Inter-American_Development_Bank$$FView_record_in_$$GInter-American_Development_Bank$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panizza, Ugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaimovich, Dany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Research and Chief Economist</creatorcontrib><title>Procyclicality or Reverse Causality?</title><description>There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or expenditure growth) and either GDP growth or some measure of the output gap. This paper argues that such a methodology does not permit the identification of the effect of the business cycle on fiscal policy and hence cannot be used to estimate policy reaction functions. The paper proposes a new instrument for GDP growth and shows that, once GDP growth is properly instrumented, procyclicality tends to disappear. There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or expenditure growth) and either GDP growth or some measure of the output gap. This paper argues that such a methodology does not permit the identification of the effect of the business cycle on fiscal policy and hence cannot be used to estimate policy reaction functions. The paper proposes a new instrument for GDP growth and shows that, once GDP growth is properly instrumented, procyclicality tends to disappear.</description><subject>Fiscal Policy</subject><subject>WP-599</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FFQFF</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBAwNNAztDAyNtU3MDA0sDQ35mRQCSjKT65MzslMTszJLKlUyC9SCEotSy0qTlVwTiwtBgva8zCwpiXmFKfyQmluBhk31xBnD93MxJSk-IKizNzEosp4Y1MjIzMDQ1NjAtIALfMnKA</recordid><startdate>20110207</startdate><enddate>20110207</enddate><creator>Panizza, Ugo</creator><creator>Jaimovich, Dany</creator><scope>FFQFF</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110207</creationdate><title>Procyclicality or Reverse Causality?</title><author>Panizza, Ugo ; Jaimovich, Dany</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-iadb_primary_352260153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Fiscal Policy</topic><topic>WP-599</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panizza, Ugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaimovich, Dany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Research and Chief Economist</creatorcontrib><collection>Inter-American Development Bank</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panizza, Ugo</au><au>Jaimovich, Dany</au><aucorp>Department of Research and Chief Economist</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Procyclicality or Reverse Causality?</atitle><date>2011-02-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><abstract>There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or expenditure growth) and either GDP growth or some measure of the output gap. This paper argues that such a methodology does not permit the identification of the effect of the business cycle on fiscal policy and hence cannot be used to estimate policy reaction functions. The paper proposes a new instrument for GDP growth and shows that, once GDP growth is properly instrumented, procyclicality tends to disappear. There is a large literature showing that fiscal policy is either acyclical or countercyclical in industrial countries and procyclical in developing countries. Most of this literature is based on OLS regressions that focus on the correlation between a fiscal variable (usually the budget balance or expenditure growth) and either GDP growth or some measure of the output gap. This paper argues that such a methodology does not permit the identification of the effect of the business cycle on fiscal policy and hence cannot be used to estimate policy reaction functions. The paper proposes a new instrument for GDP growth and shows that, once GDP growth is properly instrumented, procyclicality tends to disappear.</abstract><doi>10.18235/0010973</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.18235/0010973
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_iadb_primary_35226015
source Inter-American Development Bank
subjects Fiscal Policy
WP-599
title Procyclicality or Reverse Causality?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iadb_FFQFF&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Procyclicality%20or%20Reverse%20Causality?&rft.au=Panizza,%20Ugo&rft.aucorp=Department%20of%20Research%20and%20Chief%20Economist&rft.date=2011-02-07&rft_id=info:doi/10.18235/0010973&rft_dat=%3Ciadb_FFQFF%3E35226015%3C/iadb_FFQFF%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true