VRA Core、CDWA 與 Archaeodata 比較研究初探
This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | 圖書館學與資訊科學 2005-10, Vol.31 (2), p.084-107 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 107 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 084 |
| container_title | 圖書館學與資訊科學 |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | 林玉雲(Yu-Yun Lin) |
| description | This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions, and structures of the three metadata standards, and points out that significant differences exist among these standards in terms of object description, semantics, and structures. These differences may introduce incompatibilities for the museum community in providing cross-databases searching. Results presented in this article can be used as guidelines for future metadata structuring. Some suggestions for “Union Catalog Project of National Digital Archives Program” are also included. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hyweb_hyread_00262137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00262137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hyweb_hyread_002621373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDYz1jU2MzHgYOAtLs5MMjC2MDA3MTOy4GQwCgtyVHDOL0p93NDo7BLuqPCio13BsSg5IzE1PyWxJFHh2fopL_Y0P18w5fnKbU875j7rW8TDwJqWmFOcyguluRlk3FxDnD10MyrLU5PiMyqLUhNT4g0MjMyMDI3NjQlIAwA-IzSu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>VRA Core、CDWA 與 Archaeodata 比較研究初探</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>林玉雲(Yu-Yun Lin)</creator><creatorcontrib>林玉雲(Yu-Yun Lin)</creatorcontrib><description>This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions, and structures of the three metadata standards, and points out that significant differences exist among these standards in terms of object description, semantics, and structures. These differences may introduce incompatibilities for the museum community in providing cross-databases searching. Results presented in this article can be used as guidelines for future metadata structuring. Some suggestions for “Union Catalog Project of National Digital Archives Program” are also included.</description><description>本文試就「中央研究院歷史語言研究所珍藏 歷史文物數位典藏計畫考古分項計畫」所發展 之Metadata — Archaeodata與歐美博物館及美 術館界著稱的Metadata「標準視覺資源學會核 心類目（Visual Resources Association， VRA Core Categories)」以及「藝術品描述類目 (Categories for the Description of Works of Art ,CDWA)」進行比較研究。 作者從三種Met</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-3640</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>台灣: 國立臺灣師範大學</publisher><subject>Archaeodata ; CDWA ; Comparative Method ; Metadata Standard ; National Digital Archives Program ; VRA Core ; 數位典藏國家型科技計畫 ; 比較研究 ; 藝術品描述類目 ; 視覺資源學會核心類目 ; 詮釋資料標準</subject><ispartof>圖書館學與資訊科學, 2005-10, Vol.31 (2), p.084-107</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>林玉雲(Yu-Yun Lin)</creatorcontrib><title>VRA Core、CDWA 與 Archaeodata 比較研究初探</title><title>圖書館學與資訊科學</title><description>This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions, and structures of the three metadata standards, and points out that significant differences exist among these standards in terms of object description, semantics, and structures. These differences may introduce incompatibilities for the museum community in providing cross-databases searching. Results presented in this article can be used as guidelines for future metadata structuring. Some suggestions for “Union Catalog Project of National Digital Archives Program” are also included.</description><description>本文試就「中央研究院歷史語言研究所珍藏 歷史文物數位典藏計畫考古分項計畫」所發展 之Metadata — Archaeodata與歐美博物館及美 術館界著稱的Metadata「標準視覺資源學會核 心類目（Visual Resources Association， VRA Core Categories)」以及「藝術品描述類目 (Categories for the Description of Works of Art ,CDWA)」進行比較研究。 作者從三種Met</description><subject>Archaeodata</subject><subject>CDWA</subject><subject>Comparative Method</subject><subject>Metadata Standard</subject><subject>National Digital Archives Program</subject><subject>VRA Core</subject><subject>數位典藏國家型科技計畫</subject><subject>比較研究</subject><subject>藝術品描述類目</subject><subject>視覺資源學會核心類目</subject><subject>詮釋資料標準</subject><issn>0363-3640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDYz1jU2MzHgYOAtLs5MMjC2MDA3MTOy4GQwCgtyVHDOL0p93NDo7BLuqPCio13BsSg5IzE1PyWxJFHh2fopL_Y0P18w5fnKbU875j7rW8TDwJqWmFOcyguluRlk3FxDnD10MyrLU5PiMyqLUhNT4g0MjMyMDI3NjQlIAwA-IzSu</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>林玉雲(Yu-Yun Lin)</creator><general>國立臺灣師範大學</general><scope>9RA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>VRA Core、CDWA 與 Archaeodata 比較研究初探</title><author>林玉雲(Yu-Yun Lin)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hyweb_hyread_002621373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Archaeodata</topic><topic>CDWA</topic><topic>Comparative Method</topic><topic>Metadata Standard</topic><topic>National Digital Archives Program</topic><topic>VRA Core</topic><topic>數位典藏國家型科技計畫</topic><topic>比較研究</topic><topic>藝術品描述類目</topic><topic>視覺資源學會核心類目</topic><topic>詮釋資料標準</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>林玉雲(Yu-Yun Lin)</creatorcontrib><collection>HyRead台灣全文資料庫</collection><jtitle>圖書館學與資訊科學</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>林玉雲(Yu-Yun Lin)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>VRA Core、CDWA 與 Archaeodata 比較研究初探</atitle><jtitle>圖書館學與資訊科學</jtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>084</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>084-107</pages><issn>0363-3640</issn><abstract>This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions, and structures of the three metadata standards, and points out that significant differences exist among these standards in terms of object description, semantics, and structures. These differences may introduce incompatibilities for the museum community in providing cross-databases searching. Results presented in this article can be used as guidelines for future metadata structuring. Some suggestions for “Union Catalog Project of National Digital Archives Program” are also included.</abstract><abstract>本文試就「中央研究院歷史語言研究所珍藏 歷史文物數位典藏計畫考古分項計畫」所發展 之Metadata — Archaeodata與歐美博物館及美 術館界著稱的Metadata「標準視覺資源學會核 心類目（Visual Resources Association， VRA Core Categories)」以及「藝術品描述類目 (Categories for the Description of Works of Art ,CDWA)」進行比較研究。 作者從三種Met</abstract><cop>台灣</cop><pub>國立臺灣師範大學</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0363-3640 |
| ispartof | 圖書館學與資訊科學, 2005-10, Vol.31 (2), p.084-107 |
| issn | 0363-3640 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_hyweb_hyread_00262137 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Archaeodata CDWA Comparative Method Metadata Standard National Digital Archives Program VRA Core 數位典藏國家型科技計畫 比較研究 藝術品描述類目 視覺資源學會核心類目 詮釋資料標準 |
| title | VRA Core、CDWA 與 Archaeodata 比較研究初探 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A36%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=VRA%20Core%E3%80%81CDWA%20%E8%88%87%20Archaeodata%20%E6%AF%94%E8%BC%83%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E5%88%9D%E6%8E%A2&rft.jtitle=%E5%9C%96%E6%9B%B8%E9%A4%A8%E5%AD%B8%E8%88%87%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8&rft.au=%E6%9E%97%E7%8E%89%E9%9B%B2(Yu-Yun%20Lin)&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=084&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=084-107&rft.issn=0363-3640&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Chyweb%3E00262137%3C/hyweb%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |