Diagnostic Performance of 64- versus 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Compared with Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
Purpose: The newer 256-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has the capability of improving diagnostic performance in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 64- versus 2...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta Cardiologica Sinica 2013-03, Vol.29 (2), p.151-159 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 159 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 151 |
| container_title | Acta Cardiologica Sinica |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Su-Kiat Chua Huei-Fong Hung Jun-Jack Cheng Min-Tsung Tseng Wai-Yip Law Chu-Jen Kuo Chiung-Zuan Chiu Che-Ming Chang Shih-Huang Lee Huey-Ming Lo Sheng-Chang Lin Jer-Young Liou Kou-Gi Shyu |
| description | Purpose: The newer 256-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has the capability of improving diagnostic performance in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 64- versus 256-slice CTCA in two similar populations.
Methods: Our study included 120 consecutive patients who were referred for CTCA and subsequently underwent conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Sixty patients were studied by 64-slice CTCA, with the other 60 by 256-slice CTCA. We compared the technical characteristics and diagnostic performance of 64- and 256-slice CTCA for the detection of 50% stenosis of the coronary arteries on CCA.
Results: The 256-slice CTCA had a shorter scanning time (4.4 0.6 sec vs. 5.0 ± 0.7 sec, p ＜ 0.001) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The diagnostic accuracy rates of 256-slice CTCA based on patient analysis (97% vs. 83%, p ＜ 0.05), vessel analysis (95% vs. 85%, p ＜ 0.05), and segment analysi |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hyweb_hyread_00256080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00256080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hyweb_hyread_002560803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjk2KwkAQRnvhgDLjDVz0BQKdjIm6FH-YpaB7KWMlKUi6Q1VHydU8nS0KboRZfdT7XlE1UKPYxHGUzafJUI1F6GTiLE0WqZmN1G1NUFonnnK9Qy4cN2Bz1K7Q2TTSF2TpRCdpFu1rCnzlmrbzeNYH17iSoa36wNhZ4F4vbUlv2LTAQbySr8JkL2g9Ba_-7JPVO_AUJHmu7DtpMX-cevvsMcSaBEHwR30VUAuOX_mtJtvNYfUXVf0VT8eqZ4Tz0ZjwvJmb33_qO7yEYOc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Performance of 64- versus 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Compared with Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Su-Kiat Chua ; Huei-Fong Hung ; Jun-Jack Cheng ; Min-Tsung Tseng ; Wai-Yip Law ; Chu-Jen Kuo ; Chiung-Zuan Chiu ; Che-Ming Chang ; Shih-Huang Lee ; Huey-Ming Lo ; Sheng-Chang Lin ; Jer-Young Liou ; Kou-Gi Shyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Su-Kiat Chua ; Huei-Fong Hung ; Jun-Jack Cheng ; Min-Tsung Tseng ; Wai-Yip Law ; Chu-Jen Kuo ; Chiung-Zuan Chiu ; Che-Ming Chang ; Shih-Huang Lee ; Huey-Ming Lo ; Sheng-Chang Lin ; Jer-Young Liou ; Kou-Gi Shyu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The newer 256-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has the capability of improving diagnostic performance in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 64- versus 256-slice CTCA in two similar populations.
Methods: Our study included 120 consecutive patients who were referred for CTCA and subsequently underwent conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Sixty patients were studied by 64-slice CTCA, with the other 60 by 256-slice CTCA. We compared the technical characteristics and diagnostic performance of 64- and 256-slice CTCA for the detection of 50% stenosis of the coronary arteries on CCA.
Results: The 256-slice CTCA had a shorter scanning time (4.4 0.6 sec vs. 5.0 ± 0.7 sec, p ＜ 0.001) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The diagnostic accuracy rates of 256-slice CTCA based on patient analysis (97% vs. 83%, p ＜ 0.05), vessel analysis (95% vs. 85%, p ＜ 0.05), and segment analysi</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-6842</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>台灣: 中華民國心臟學會</publisher><subject>256-slice helical CTCA ; 64-slice helical CTCA ; Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) ; Conventional coronary angiography ; Diagnostic performance ; MEDLINE ; SCI ; Scopus</subject><ispartof>Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2013-03, Vol.29 (2), p.151-159</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Su-Kiat Chua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huei-Fong Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun-Jack Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min-Tsung Tseng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wai-Yip Law</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu-Jen Kuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiung-Zuan Chiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Che-Ming Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih-Huang Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huey-Ming Lo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng-Chang Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jer-Young Liou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kou-Gi Shyu</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Performance of 64- versus 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Compared with Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease</title><title>Acta Cardiologica Sinica</title><description>Purpose: The newer 256-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has the capability of improving diagnostic performance in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 64- versus 256-slice CTCA in two similar populations.
Methods: Our study included 120 consecutive patients who were referred for CTCA and subsequently underwent conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Sixty patients were studied by 64-slice CTCA, with the other 60 by 256-slice CTCA. We compared the technical characteristics and diagnostic performance of 64- and 256-slice CTCA for the detection of 50% stenosis of the coronary arteries on CCA.
Results: The 256-slice CTCA had a shorter scanning time (4.4 0.6 sec vs. 5.0 ± 0.7 sec, p ＜ 0.001) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The diagnostic accuracy rates of 256-slice CTCA based on patient analysis (97% vs. 83%, p ＜ 0.05), vessel analysis (95% vs. 85%, p ＜ 0.05), and segment analysi</description><subject>256-slice helical CTCA</subject><subject>64-slice helical CTCA</subject><subject>Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA)</subject><subject>Conventional coronary angiography</subject><subject>Diagnostic performance</subject><subject>MEDLINE</subject><subject>SCI</subject><subject>Scopus</subject><issn>1011-6842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjk2KwkAQRnvhgDLjDVz0BQKdjIm6FH-YpaB7KWMlKUi6Q1VHydU8nS0KboRZfdT7XlE1UKPYxHGUzafJUI1F6GTiLE0WqZmN1G1NUFonnnK9Qy4cN2Bz1K7Q2TTSF2TpRCdpFu1rCnzlmrbzeNYH17iSoa36wNhZ4F4vbUlv2LTAQbySr8JkL2g9Ba_-7JPVO_AUJHmu7DtpMX-cevvsMcSaBEHwR30VUAuOX_mtJtvNYfUXVf0VT8eqZ4Tz0ZjwvJmb33_qO7yEYOc</recordid><startdate>201303</startdate><enddate>201303</enddate><creator>Su-Kiat Chua</creator><creator>Huei-Fong Hung</creator><creator>Jun-Jack Cheng</creator><creator>Min-Tsung Tseng</creator><creator>Wai-Yip Law</creator><creator>Chu-Jen Kuo</creator><creator>Chiung-Zuan Chiu</creator><creator>Che-Ming Chang</creator><creator>Shih-Huang Lee</creator><creator>Huey-Ming Lo</creator><creator>Sheng-Chang Lin</creator><creator>Jer-Young Liou</creator><creator>Kou-Gi Shyu</creator><general>中華民國心臟學會</general><scope>9RA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201303</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Performance of 64- versus 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Compared with Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease</title><author>Su-Kiat Chua ; Huei-Fong Hung ; Jun-Jack Cheng ; Min-Tsung Tseng ; Wai-Yip Law ; Chu-Jen Kuo ; Chiung-Zuan Chiu ; Che-Ming Chang ; Shih-Huang Lee ; Huey-Ming Lo ; Sheng-Chang Lin ; Jer-Young Liou ; Kou-Gi Shyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hyweb_hyread_002560803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>256-slice helical CTCA</topic><topic>64-slice helical CTCA</topic><topic>Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA)</topic><topic>Conventional coronary angiography</topic><topic>Diagnostic performance</topic><topic>MEDLINE</topic><topic>SCI</topic><topic>Scopus</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Su-Kiat Chua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huei-Fong Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun-Jack Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min-Tsung Tseng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wai-Yip Law</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu-Jen Kuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiung-Zuan Chiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Che-Ming Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih-Huang Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huey-Ming Lo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheng-Chang Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jer-Young Liou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kou-Gi Shyu</creatorcontrib><collection>HyRead台灣全文資料庫</collection><jtitle>Acta Cardiologica Sinica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Su-Kiat Chua</au><au>Huei-Fong Hung</au><au>Jun-Jack Cheng</au><au>Min-Tsung Tseng</au><au>Wai-Yip Law</au><au>Chu-Jen Kuo</au><au>Chiung-Zuan Chiu</au><au>Che-Ming Chang</au><au>Shih-Huang Lee</au><au>Huey-Ming Lo</au><au>Sheng-Chang Lin</au><au>Jer-Young Liou</au><au>Kou-Gi Shyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Performance of 64- versus 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Compared with Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease</atitle><jtitle>Acta Cardiologica Sinica</jtitle><date>2013-03</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>151-159</pages><issn>1011-6842</issn><abstract>Purpose: The newer 256-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has the capability of improving diagnostic performance in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 64- versus 256-slice CTCA in two similar populations.
Methods: Our study included 120 consecutive patients who were referred for CTCA and subsequently underwent conventional coronary angiography (CCA). Sixty patients were studied by 64-slice CTCA, with the other 60 by 256-slice CTCA. We compared the technical characteristics and diagnostic performance of 64- and 256-slice CTCA for the detection of 50% stenosis of the coronary arteries on CCA.
Results: The 256-slice CTCA had a shorter scanning time (4.4 0.6 sec vs. 5.0 ± 0.7 sec, p ＜ 0.001) compared to 64-slice CTCA. The diagnostic accuracy rates of 256-slice CTCA based on patient analysis (97% vs. 83%, p ＜ 0.05), vessel analysis (95% vs. 85%, p ＜ 0.05), and segment analysi</abstract><cop>台灣</cop><pub>中華民國心臟學會</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1011-6842 |
| ispartof | Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2013-03, Vol.29 (2), p.151-159 |
| issn | 1011-6842 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_hyweb_hyread_00256080 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | 256-slice helical CTCA 64-slice helical CTCA Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) Conventional coronary angiography Diagnostic performance MEDLINE SCI Scopus |
| title | Diagnostic Performance of 64- versus 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Compared with Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A25%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Performance%20of%2064-%20versus%20256-Slice%20Computed%20Tomography%20Coronary%20Angiography%20Compared%20with%20Conventional%20Coronary%20Angiography%20in%20Patients%20with%20Suspected%20Coronary%20Artery%20Disease&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Cardiologica%20Sinica&rft.au=Su-Kiat%20Chua&rft.date=2013-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=151-159&rft.issn=1011-6842&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Chyweb%3E00256080%3C/hyweb%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |