社區大學知識解放理念的路線反思
This essay tries to examine and settle the dispute between different approaches to knowledge emancipation, which is the rationale of community university movement. It shows that the confusing meanings of critical selfawareness and its actual genesis have resulted in such dispute. The author thus int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Taiwan jiao yu she hui xue yan jiu = Taiwan journal of sociology of education 2010-12, Vol.10 (2), p.125-152 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 152 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Taiwan jiao yu she hui xue yan jiu = Taiwan journal of sociology of education |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | 李天健 |
description | This essay tries to examine and settle the dispute between different approaches to knowledge emancipation, which is the rationale of community university movement. It shows that the confusing meanings of critical selfawareness and its actual genesis have resulted in such dispute. The author thus introduces two narratives that provide the necessary condition for the emergence of critical self-awareness. To realize the idea of knowledge emancipation, two pedagogical methods are also recommended—one is called contextualizing social phenomena, and the other is called “problematizing theoretical knowledge |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hyweb_hyread_00119481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>00119481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h401-f73d30dde415bf0db85bf07b1584b0b18936e1dfd7a90ef1fa5e00218dd5cb943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NLMw0DUyMDDhYOAtLs5MMjA1tjA1MDM34GTQfb5k39PehqdLlj9du-P5_KUv1s54sXzxsyn7nk9oe7p_6_NZLS-2r3--fdbT_t5nDXN5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDdDiJtriLOHro-_u6ezo49uhomBoW6auXGKsUFKSqqJoWlSmkFKkgWIMk8yNLUwSTJIMrSwNDZLNUxJSzFPtDRITTNMSzRNNTAwMrRISTFNTrI0MeZmkIEYm1FZnpoUn1FZlJqYEm9gYGhoaWJhCJSWQpZOLcpMRkgCAIdsUs8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>社區大學知識解放理念的路線反思</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>李天健</creator><creatorcontrib>李天健</creatorcontrib><description>This essay tries to examine and settle the dispute between different approaches to knowledge emancipation, which is the rationale of community university movement. It shows that the confusing meanings of critical selfawareness and its actual genesis have resulted in such dispute. The author thus introduces two narratives that provide the necessary condition for the emergence of critical self-awareness. To realize the idea of knowledge emancipation, two pedagogical methods are also recommended—one is called contextualizing social phenomena, and the other is called “problematizing theoretical knowledge</description><description>本文旨在釐清社區大學的知識解放路線爭議,並提出解決方案。本文指出既有的路線爭議,主要導因於未釐清批判性自覺的概念涵義與發生歷程,並提出兩類敘事:「包含有濃厚社會知識的個殊生命敘事」,「包含有社會結構分析,而能區辨宰制與屈從的經驗性歷史敘事」,做為批判性自覺得以可能,達成知識解放的主要與必要知識類型。由此,套裝知識與經驗知識的區分,並不合適於做為思考知識解放理念的主要框架;黃武雄刻畫經驗知識的三原則,則需轉化為「社會現象脈絡化」以及「(理論)知識問題化」</description><identifier>ISSN: 1680-2004</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>台灣: 臺灣教育社會學學會</publisher><subject>community university ; critical selfawareness ; experiential knowledge ; knowledge emancipation ; TSSCI ; 批判性自覺 ; 知識解放 ; 社區大學 ; 經驗知識</subject><ispartof>Taiwan jiao yu she hui xue yan jiu = Taiwan journal of sociology of education, 2010-12, Vol.10 (2), p.125-152</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>李天健</creatorcontrib><title>社區大學知識解放理念的路線反思</title><title>Taiwan jiao yu she hui xue yan jiu = Taiwan journal of sociology of education</title><addtitle>Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education</addtitle><description>This essay tries to examine and settle the dispute between different approaches to knowledge emancipation, which is the rationale of community university movement. It shows that the confusing meanings of critical selfawareness and its actual genesis have resulted in such dispute. The author thus introduces two narratives that provide the necessary condition for the emergence of critical self-awareness. To realize the idea of knowledge emancipation, two pedagogical methods are also recommended—one is called contextualizing social phenomena, and the other is called “problematizing theoretical knowledge</description><description>本文旨在釐清社區大學的知識解放路線爭議,並提出解決方案。本文指出既有的路線爭議,主要導因於未釐清批判性自覺的概念涵義與發生歷程,並提出兩類敘事:「包含有濃厚社會知識的個殊生命敘事」,「包含有社會結構分析,而能區辨宰制與屈從的經驗性歷史敘事」,做為批判性自覺得以可能,達成知識解放的主要與必要知識類型。由此,套裝知識與經驗知識的區分,並不合適於做為思考知識解放理念的主要框架;黃武雄刻畫經驗知識的三原則,則需轉化為「社會現象脈絡化」以及「(理論)知識問題化」</description><subject>community university</subject><subject>critical selfawareness</subject><subject>experiential knowledge</subject><subject>knowledge emancipation</subject><subject>TSSCI</subject><subject>批判性自覺</subject><subject>知識解放</subject><subject>社區大學</subject><subject>經驗知識</subject><issn>1680-2004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0NLMw0DUyMDDhYOAtLs5MMjA1tjA1MDM34GTQfb5k39PehqdLlj9du-P5_KUv1s54sXzxsyn7nk9oe7p_6_NZLS-2r3--fdbT_t5nDXN5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDdDiJtriLOHro-_u6ezo49uhomBoW6auXGKsUFKSqqJoWlSmkFKkgWIMk8yNLUwSTJIMrSwNDZLNUxJSzFPtDRITTNMSzRNNTAwMrRISTFNTrI0MeZmkIEYm1FZnpoUn1FZlJqYEm9gYGhoaWJhCJSWQpZOLcpMRkgCAIdsUs8</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>李天健</creator><general>臺灣教育社會學學會</general><scope>DT-</scope><scope>9RA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>社區大學知識解放理念的路線反思</title><author>李天健</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h401-f73d30dde415bf0db85bf07b1584b0b18936e1dfd7a90ef1fa5e00218dd5cb943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>community university</topic><topic>critical selfawareness</topic><topic>experiential knowledge</topic><topic>knowledge emancipation</topic><topic>TSSCI</topic><topic>批判性自覺</topic><topic>知識解放</topic><topic>社區大學</topic><topic>經驗知識</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>李天健</creatorcontrib><collection>Ericdata Higher Education Knowledge Database</collection><collection>HyRead台灣全文資料庫</collection><jtitle>Taiwan jiao yu she hui xue yan jiu = Taiwan journal of sociology of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>李天健</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>社區大學知識解放理念的路線反思</atitle><jtitle>Taiwan jiao yu she hui xue yan jiu = Taiwan journal of sociology of education</jtitle><addtitle>Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>125-152</pages><issn>1680-2004</issn><abstract>This essay tries to examine and settle the dispute between different approaches to knowledge emancipation, which is the rationale of community university movement. It shows that the confusing meanings of critical selfawareness and its actual genesis have resulted in such dispute. The author thus introduces two narratives that provide the necessary condition for the emergence of critical self-awareness. To realize the idea of knowledge emancipation, two pedagogical methods are also recommended—one is called contextualizing social phenomena, and the other is called “problematizing theoretical knowledge</abstract><abstract>本文旨在釐清社區大學的知識解放路線爭議,並提出解決方案。本文指出既有的路線爭議,主要導因於未釐清批判性自覺的概念涵義與發生歷程,並提出兩類敘事:「包含有濃厚社會知識的個殊生命敘事」,「包含有社會結構分析,而能區辨宰制與屈從的經驗性歷史敘事」,做為批判性自覺得以可能,達成知識解放的主要與必要知識類型。由此,套裝知識與經驗知識的區分,並不合適於做為思考知識解放理念的主要框架;黃武雄刻畫經驗知識的三原則,則需轉化為「社會現象脈絡化」以及「(理論)知識問題化」</abstract><cop>台灣</cop><pub>臺灣教育社會學學會</pub><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1680-2004 |
ispartof | Taiwan jiao yu she hui xue yan jiu = Taiwan journal of sociology of education, 2010-12, Vol.10 (2), p.125-152 |
issn | 1680-2004 |
language | chi |
recordid | cdi_hyweb_hyread_00119481 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | community university critical selfawareness experiential knowledge knowledge emancipation TSSCI 批判性自覺 知識解放 社區大學 經驗知識 |
title | 社區大學知識解放理念的路線反思 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E7%A4%BE%E5%8D%80%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E7%9F%A5%E8%AD%98%E8%A7%A3%E6%94%BE%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E7%9A%84%E8%B7%AF%E7%B7%9A%E5%8F%8D%E6%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Taiwan%20jiao%20yu%20she%20hui%20xue%20yan%20jiu%20=%20Taiwan%20journal%20of%20sociology%20of%20education&rft.au=%E6%9D%8E%E5%A4%A9%E5%81%A5&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=125-152&rft.issn=1680-2004&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Chyweb%3E00119481%3C/hyweb%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |