阶层流动还是阶层复制?再读文化资本理论并兼谈“底层文化资本”

Recent scholarship has developed the notion of "underclass cultural capital" as a means to challenge and reduce stigma associated with socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in rural contexts. Nonetheless, this emergent concept appears predicated upon a fundamental misinterpretation o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum 2023-11, Vol.21 (6), p.054-062
Hauptverfasser: 王丹(WANG Dan), 陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin), 史和佳(SHI Hejia), 石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi), 滕媛(TENG Yuan), 苏超(SU Chao)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 062
container_issue 6
container_start_page 054
container_title Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum
container_volume 21
creator 王丹(WANG Dan)
陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin)
史和佳(SHI Hejia)
石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi)
滕媛(TENG Yuan)
苏超(SU Chao)
description Recent scholarship has developed the notion of "underclass cultural capital" as a means to challenge and reduce stigma associated with socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in rural contexts. Nonetheless, this emergent concept appears predicated upon a fundamental misinterpretation of Bourdieu's seminal cultural capital framework. Prevailing exegeses of cultural capital have erroneously equated it with a set of cultural resources leveraged for social mobility. In stark contrast, Bourdieu's original articulation sought to elucidate the mechanisms underpinning the perpetuation of social class hierarchies and to unmask the obscured power dynamics within societal structures that facilitate this continuity. Bourdieu contends that cultural capital should not be construed as a collection of specific cultural attributes but rather as the capacity and agency to assimilate the dominant culture, a process optimally quantified through the prism of accumulated labor time. Additionally, the stratified distribution of
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cass_hyweb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hyweb_eric_00676396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cass_id>FDJYLT2023006008</cass_id><sourcerecordid>FDJYLT2023006008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456-ab9fee0ba1c27fb063055494460f1a2e3edbaa6c75808a57b6ad53a7fe1456733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDM30jUwMLXkYOAtLs5MMjAwNzYwtjQx42SIejlj29ONTc-2Nj7tWvFi_4xnM9ZDRJ4u6X3ase39nvlP23pfrN_9bFr7055pL7a2PJuz5vmEthfrdj3due1p654XGzoeNcx5umsqyBAkNY8a5vIwsKYl5hSn8kJpboYQN9cQZw9dH393T2dHH91kE1Mz3cQky7TUVIOkRMNkI_O0JAMzYwNTUxNLExMzgzTDRKNU49SUpMREs2RzUwsDi0RT8ySzxBRT40TztFRDoHZzY2NuBkWIscmJxcXxecXFKfFuLl6RPiFGBkbGBgZmBgYWQDVSEDUZleWpSfGpRZnJ8UApczNjSzNjAHODczg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>阶层流动还是阶层复制?再读文化资本理论并兼谈“底层文化资本”</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>王丹(WANG Dan) ; 陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin) ; 史和佳(SHI Hejia) ; 石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi) ; 滕媛(TENG Yuan) ; 苏超(SU Chao)</creator><creatorcontrib>王丹(WANG Dan) ; 陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin) ; 史和佳(SHI Hejia) ; 石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi) ; 滕媛(TENG Yuan) ; 苏超(SU Chao)</creatorcontrib><description>Recent scholarship has developed the notion of "underclass cultural capital" as a means to challenge and reduce stigma associated with socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in rural contexts. Nonetheless, this emergent concept appears predicated upon a fundamental misinterpretation of Bourdieu's seminal cultural capital framework. Prevailing exegeses of cultural capital have erroneously equated it with a set of cultural resources leveraged for social mobility. In stark contrast, Bourdieu's original articulation sought to elucidate the mechanisms underpinning the perpetuation of social class hierarchies and to unmask the obscured power dynamics within societal structures that facilitate this continuity. Bourdieu contends that cultural capital should not be construed as a collection of specific cultural attributes but rather as the capacity and agency to assimilate the dominant culture, a process optimally quantified through the prism of accumulated labor time. Additionally, the stratified distribution of</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-0059</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>大陸: 復旦大學</publisher><ispartof>Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum, 2023-11, Vol.21 (6), p.054-062</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>王丹(WANG Dan)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>史和佳(SHI Hejia)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>滕媛(TENG Yuan)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>苏超(SU Chao)</creatorcontrib><title>阶层流动还是阶层复制?再读文化资本理论并兼谈“底层文化资本”</title><title>Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum</title><description>Recent scholarship has developed the notion of "underclass cultural capital" as a means to challenge and reduce stigma associated with socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in rural contexts. Nonetheless, this emergent concept appears predicated upon a fundamental misinterpretation of Bourdieu's seminal cultural capital framework. Prevailing exegeses of cultural capital have erroneously equated it with a set of cultural resources leveraged for social mobility. In stark contrast, Bourdieu's original articulation sought to elucidate the mechanisms underpinning the perpetuation of social class hierarchies and to unmask the obscured power dynamics within societal structures that facilitate this continuity. Bourdieu contends that cultural capital should not be construed as a collection of specific cultural attributes but rather as the capacity and agency to assimilate the dominant culture, a process optimally quantified through the prism of accumulated labor time. Additionally, the stratified distribution of</description><issn>1672-0059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDM30jUwMLXkYOAtLs5MMjAwNzYwtjQx42SIejlj29ONTc-2Nj7tWvFi_4xnM9ZDRJ4u6X3ase39nvlP23pfrN_9bFr7055pL7a2PJuz5vmEthfrdj3due1p654XGzoeNcx5umsqyBAkNY8a5vIwsKYl5hSn8kJpboYQN9cQZw9dH393T2dHH91kE1Mz3cQky7TUVIOkRMNkI_O0JAMzYwNTUxNLExMzgzTDRKNU49SUpMREs2RzUwsDi0RT8ySzxBRT40TztFRDoHZzY2NuBkWIscmJxcXxecXFKfFuLl6RPiFGBkbGBgZmBgYWQDVSEDUZleWpSfGpRZnJ8UApczNjSzNjAHODczg</recordid><startdate>20231120</startdate><enddate>20231120</enddate><creator>王丹(WANG Dan)</creator><creator>陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin)</creator><creator>史和佳(SHI Hejia)</creator><creator>石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi)</creator><creator>滕媛(TENG Yuan)</creator><creator>苏超(SU Chao)</creator><general>復旦大學</general><general>复旦大学</general><scope>DT-</scope><scope>NSCOK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231120</creationdate><title>阶层流动还是阶层复制?再读文化资本理论并兼谈“底层文化资本”</title><author>王丹(WANG Dan) ; 陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin) ; 史和佳(SHI Hejia) ; 石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi) ; 滕媛(TENG Yuan) ; 苏超(SU Chao)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456-ab9fee0ba1c27fb063055494460f1a2e3edbaa6c75808a57b6ad53a7fe1456733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>王丹(WANG Dan)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>史和佳(SHI Hejia)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>滕媛(TENG Yuan)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>苏超(SU Chao)</creatorcontrib><collection>Ericdata Higher Education Knowledge Database</collection><collection>国家哲学社会科学文献中心 (National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation)</collection><jtitle>Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>王丹(WANG Dan)</au><au>陈佳欣(CHEN Jiaxin)</au><au>史和佳(SHI Hejia)</au><au>石唐森一(SHI Tangsenyi)</au><au>滕媛(TENG Yuan)</au><au>苏超(SU Chao)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>阶层流动还是阶层复制?再读文化资本理论并兼谈“底层文化资本”</atitle><jtitle>Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum</jtitle><date>2023-11-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>054</spage><epage>062</epage><pages>054-062</pages><issn>1672-0059</issn><abstract>Recent scholarship has developed the notion of "underclass cultural capital" as a means to challenge and reduce stigma associated with socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in rural contexts. Nonetheless, this emergent concept appears predicated upon a fundamental misinterpretation of Bourdieu's seminal cultural capital framework. Prevailing exegeses of cultural capital have erroneously equated it with a set of cultural resources leveraged for social mobility. In stark contrast, Bourdieu's original articulation sought to elucidate the mechanisms underpinning the perpetuation of social class hierarchies and to unmask the obscured power dynamics within societal structures that facilitate this continuity. Bourdieu contends that cultural capital should not be construed as a collection of specific cultural attributes but rather as the capacity and agency to assimilate the dominant culture, a process optimally quantified through the prism of accumulated labor time. Additionally, the stratified distribution of</abstract><cop>大陸</cop><pub>復旦大學</pub><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1672-0059
ispartof Fu dan jiao yu lun tan = Fudan education forum, 2023-11, Vol.21 (6), p.054-062
issn 1672-0059
language chi
recordid cdi_hyweb_eric_00676396
source 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)
title 阶层流动还是阶层复制?再读文化资本理论并兼谈“底层文化资本”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cass_hyweb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E9%98%B6%E5%B1%82%E6%B5%81%E5%8A%A8%E8%BF%98%E6%98%AF%E9%98%B6%E5%B1%82%E5%A4%8D%E5%88%B6%EF%BC%9F%E5%86%8D%E8%AF%BB%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%E5%B9%B6%E5%85%BC%E8%B0%88%E2%80%9C%E5%BA%95%E5%B1%82%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Fu%20dan%20jiao%20yu%20lun%20tan%20=%20Fudan%20education%20forum&rft.au=%E7%8E%8B%E4%B8%B9(WANG%20Dan)&rft.date=2023-11-20&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=054&rft.epage=062&rft.pages=054-062&rft.issn=1672-0059&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccass_hyweb%3EFDJYLT2023006008%3C/cass_hyweb%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cass_id=FDJYLT2023006008&rfr_iscdi=true