Effects of general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain
Background and Purpose: Regional anaesthesia is commonly used for elective caesarean section.The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a positive effect of either general or spinal anesthesia on postoperative analgesic requirements and pain relief. Methods: The level of postoperative...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Periodicum biologorum 2009, Vol.111 (2), p.251 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Web Resource |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 251 |
| container_title | Periodicum biologorum |
| container_volume | 111 |
| creator | KALAGAC FABRIS, LADA MARETIĆ, ADRIANA |
| description | Background and Purpose: Regional anaesthesia is commonly used for
elective caesarean section.The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a positive effect of either general or spinal anesthesia on postoperative analgesic requirements and pain relief.
Methods: The level of postoperative analgesia has been compared in 64 women (ASA I or II) scheduled for elective caesarean section. General anaesthesia was performed with propofol, suxamethonium chloride,oxygen, nitrus oxide, and maintenance with 0,5% isoflurane and fentanyl. To achieve a sensory block height to the level of the sixth thoracic dermatome, spinal anaesthesia was performed with hyperbaric 0,5% levobupivacaine and 25 μg fentanyl. For all the patients postoperative analgesia was available on request without any limitation on time by administering the same dose of 75 mg i.m. diclofenac. If the patient had inadequate analgesia it was supplemented with 100 mg s.c. tramadol. Postoperative pain was recorded using visual analogue pain score as well as analgesic requirements over the first 24h after surgery.
Results: The time to first request for analgesia was significantly longer
in the spinal anesthesia group (p |
| format | Web Resource |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hrcak</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_38233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_hrcak_srce_hr_38233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_382333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjN0KwjAMhYsoONR3yAM42FYd81omPoD3I9RUq7MtzRz4Dj609edqd4ZATpLvnJFI8mq1SbNNuRqLJMtknq5lWUzFgvmSxVqXRSmrRDxrrUl1DE7DiSwFbAEtEndnYoPQU-A7A3tjBx_tAqi4YiC0wDHEOAuxvePO-ZjUmZ7elvYUDQqUs3y_-Q-G9jjgPBo7FxONLdPiN2diuasP2316DgqvjQ_mhuHRODTN98JBUZSNrAop5Z_4C20YYd4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>web_resource</recordtype></control><display><type>web_resource</type><title>Effects of general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>KALAGAC FABRIS, LADA ; MARETIĆ, ADRIANA</creator><creatorcontrib>KALAGAC FABRIS, LADA ; MARETIĆ, ADRIANA</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Purpose: Regional anaesthesia is commonly used for
elective caesarean section.The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a positive effect of either general or spinal anesthesia on postoperative analgesic requirements and pain relief.
Methods: The level of postoperative analgesia has been compared in 64 women (ASA I or II) scheduled for elective caesarean section. General anaesthesia was performed with propofol, suxamethonium chloride,oxygen, nitrus oxide, and maintenance with 0,5% isoflurane and fentanyl. To achieve a sensory block height to the level of the sixth thoracic dermatome, spinal anaesthesia was performed with hyperbaric 0,5% levobupivacaine and 25 μg fentanyl. For all the patients postoperative analgesia was available on request without any limitation on time by administering the same dose of 75 mg i.m. diclofenac. If the patient had inadequate analgesia it was supplemented with 100 mg s.c. tramadol. Postoperative pain was recorded using visual analogue pain score as well as analgesic requirements over the first 24h after surgery.
Results: The time to first request for analgesia was significantly longer
in the spinal anesthesia group (p<0.05). At almost all postoperative time points,visual analogue scale scores at rest and during mobilization were lower with spinal anaesthesia (p<0.05). More patients with general anesthesia received supplemental analgesic medication.
Conclusion: In parturients undergoing elective caesarean section,spinal anesthesia should be preferred because it is accompanied with less postoperative pain, less use of additional analgesics and less side effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-5362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1849-0964</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PDBIAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hrvatsko prirodoslovno društvo</publisher><subject>caesarean delivery ; general anesthesia ; postoperative analgesia ; side effects ; spinal anesthesia</subject><ispartof>Periodicum biologorum, 2009, Vol.111 (2), p.251</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/logo_broj/3219.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,780,881</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KALAGAC FABRIS, LADA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARETIĆ, ADRIANA</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain</title><title>Periodicum biologorum</title><description>Background and Purpose: Regional anaesthesia is commonly used for
elective caesarean section.The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a positive effect of either general or spinal anesthesia on postoperative analgesic requirements and pain relief.
Methods: The level of postoperative analgesia has been compared in 64 women (ASA I or II) scheduled for elective caesarean section. General anaesthesia was performed with propofol, suxamethonium chloride,oxygen, nitrus oxide, and maintenance with 0,5% isoflurane and fentanyl. To achieve a sensory block height to the level of the sixth thoracic dermatome, spinal anaesthesia was performed with hyperbaric 0,5% levobupivacaine and 25 μg fentanyl. For all the patients postoperative analgesia was available on request without any limitation on time by administering the same dose of 75 mg i.m. diclofenac. If the patient had inadequate analgesia it was supplemented with 100 mg s.c. tramadol. Postoperative pain was recorded using visual analogue pain score as well as analgesic requirements over the first 24h after surgery.
Results: The time to first request for analgesia was significantly longer
in the spinal anesthesia group (p<0.05). At almost all postoperative time points,visual analogue scale scores at rest and during mobilization were lower with spinal anaesthesia (p<0.05). More patients with general anesthesia received supplemental analgesic medication.
Conclusion: In parturients undergoing elective caesarean section,spinal anesthesia should be preferred because it is accompanied with less postoperative pain, less use of additional analgesics and less side effects.</description><subject>caesarean delivery</subject><subject>general anesthesia</subject><subject>postoperative analgesia</subject><subject>side effects</subject><subject>spinal anesthesia</subject><issn>0031-5362</issn><issn>1849-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>web_resource</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>web_resource</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjN0KwjAMhYsoONR3yAM42FYd81omPoD3I9RUq7MtzRz4Dj609edqd4ZATpLvnJFI8mq1SbNNuRqLJMtknq5lWUzFgvmSxVqXRSmrRDxrrUl1DE7DiSwFbAEtEndnYoPQU-A7A3tjBx_tAqi4YiC0wDHEOAuxvePO-ZjUmZ7elvYUDQqUs3y_-Q-G9jjgPBo7FxONLdPiN2diuasP2316DgqvjQ_mhuHRODTN98JBUZSNrAop5Z_4C20YYd4</recordid><startdate>20090615</startdate><enddate>20090615</enddate><creator>KALAGAC FABRIS, LADA</creator><creator>MARETIĆ, ADRIANA</creator><general>Hrvatsko prirodoslovno društvo</general><scope>VP8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090615</creationdate><title>Effects of general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain</title><author>KALAGAC FABRIS, LADA ; MARETIĆ, ADRIANA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_382333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>web_resources</rsrctype><prefilter>web_resources</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>caesarean delivery</topic><topic>general anesthesia</topic><topic>postoperative analgesia</topic><topic>side effects</topic><topic>spinal anesthesia</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KALAGAC FABRIS, LADA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARETIĆ, ADRIANA</creatorcontrib><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KALAGAC FABRIS, LADA</au><au>MARETIĆ, ADRIANA</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Effects of general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain</atitle><jtitle>Periodicum biologorum</jtitle><date>2009-06-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><pages>251-</pages><issn>0031-5362</issn><eissn>1849-0964</eissn><coden>PDBIAD</coden><abstract>Background and Purpose: Regional anaesthesia is commonly used for
elective caesarean section.The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a positive effect of either general or spinal anesthesia on postoperative analgesic requirements and pain relief.
Methods: The level of postoperative analgesia has been compared in 64 women (ASA I or II) scheduled for elective caesarean section. General anaesthesia was performed with propofol, suxamethonium chloride,oxygen, nitrus oxide, and maintenance with 0,5% isoflurane and fentanyl. To achieve a sensory block height to the level of the sixth thoracic dermatome, spinal anaesthesia was performed with hyperbaric 0,5% levobupivacaine and 25 μg fentanyl. For all the patients postoperative analgesia was available on request without any limitation on time by administering the same dose of 75 mg i.m. diclofenac. If the patient had inadequate analgesia it was supplemented with 100 mg s.c. tramadol. Postoperative pain was recorded using visual analogue pain score as well as analgesic requirements over the first 24h after surgery.
Results: The time to first request for analgesia was significantly longer
in the spinal anesthesia group (p<0.05). At almost all postoperative time points,visual analogue scale scores at rest and during mobilization were lower with spinal anaesthesia (p<0.05). More patients with general anesthesia received supplemental analgesic medication.
Conclusion: In parturients undergoing elective caesarean section,spinal anesthesia should be preferred because it is accompanied with less postoperative pain, less use of additional analgesics and less side effects.</abstract><pub>Hrvatsko prirodoslovno društvo</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-5362 |
| ispartof | Periodicum biologorum, 2009, Vol.111 (2), p.251 |
| issn | 0031-5362 1849-0964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_38233 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | caesarean delivery general anesthesia postoperative analgesia side effects spinal anesthesia |
| title | Effects of general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section on postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative pain |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hrcak&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20general%20anaesthesia%20versus%20spinal%20anaesthesia%20for%20caesarean%20section%20on%20postoperative%20analgesic%20consumption%20and%20postoperative%20pain&rft.jtitle=Periodicum%20biologorum&rft.au=KALAGAC%20FABRIS,%20LADA&rft.date=2009-06-15&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.pages=251-&rft.issn=0031-5362&rft.eissn=1849-0964&rft.coden=PDBIAD&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Chrcak%3Eoai_hrcak_srce_hr_38233%3C/hrcak%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |