Analiza razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdana odugovlačenja u sudskim postupcima u složenim kaznenim predmetima
Na zamolbu Ministarstva pravosuđa i uprave autori su izradili analizu razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdane odgode u sudskim postupcima usloženim kaznenim predmetima s prijedlozima odgovarajućih mjera zapopravljanje stanja. Svrha je prijedloga ispunjenje preporuke Odborastručnjaka Vijeća Europe MONEYVAL...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 2023-12, Vol.30 (2), p.453-489 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | hrv ; eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 489 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 453 |
| container_title | Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Vojvoda, Nikša Željko, Darija Bonačić, Marin |
| description | Na zamolbu Ministarstva pravosuđa i uprave autori su izradili analizu razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdane odgode u sudskim postupcima usloženim kaznenim predmetima s prijedlozima odgovarajućih mjera zapopravljanje stanja. Svrha je prijedloga ispunjenje preporuke Odborastručnjaka Vijeća Europe MONEYVAL iz Izvješća 5. kruga evaluacijeo mjerama protiv pranja novca i protiv financiranja terorista za Republiku Hrvatsku. Uzimajući u obzir postavljeni zadatak, istraživanje seusredotočilo na kaznene postupke za kaznena djela kod kojih postojivisok rizik od pranja novca te za odabrana kaznena djela srednjeg rizika. Kako bi se utvrdilo u kojem stadiju ili u kojim stadijima postupkadolazi do odugovlačenja postupka, odvojeno su analizirani (pod)stadijoptuživanja, stadij rasprave i stadij žalbenog postupka. Istraživanje sesastojalo od tri dijela. U prvom su dijelu prikupljeni statistički podacio trajanju kaznenih postupaka za odabrana kaznena djela u navedenatri stadija postupka, kao i o prosječnom trajanju tih stadija postupka za sva kaznena djela. U drugom dijelu napravljena je kvalitativna analiza odabranih predmeta, a u trećem su dijelu provedeni fokus-grupai intervjui s državnim odvjetnicima, sucima i odvjetnicima. Uz provedeno istraživanje razmotreni su i opći uvjeti u pravosuđu koji utječuna trajanje svih kaznenih postupaka te recentne izmjene Zakona o kaznenom postupku usmjerene na ubrzanje kaznenih postupaka. Nakonprovedene analize iznose se nalazi i normativne preporuke za ubrzanjekaznenih postupaka u složenim predmetima.
At the request of the Croatian Ministry of Justice and Public Administration, the authorsmade an analysis of the reasons leading to undue delays in court proceedings in complex criminal cases, containing suggestions for appropriate measures to remedy the situation, in orderto meet the recommendation of the Committee of Experts of the Council of Europe MONEYVAL from the Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation Report on Croatia as regards anti-moneylaundering and counter-terrorist financing measures. Taking into account the task set, the research focused on criminal proceedings regarding criminal offences where there is a high riskof money laundering and for selected criminal offences of medium risk. In order to determineat which stage or stages of the proceedings a delay occurs, the indictment stage, the hearingstage, and the stage of the appeal were analysed separately. The study consisted of three parts.In the first part, statistical data were collecte |
| doi_str_mv | 10.54070/hljk.30.2.9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hrcak</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_313086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2917909998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1419-7f46a13be3fd9acb5dc176c10f58bd5b9d8cca6c7000879d5840bd6b956963423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UUtOwzAUtBBIVKU7DhCJLQl2HDvxsqr4SUhsYG05ttPm62DXlcgduBIruBemQazeaN5ont4MAJcIJiSDObzZdU2bYJikCTsBi5TmMGaM0dOAM8JiSjA6ByvnGghhilCBUbYA_XoQXT2JyIqpM1sRtaapIz9Z0_rGR4M2oxUHJQYRGeW35tCJrw89NCLykfPKtXUfjcbt_Sjr_kh25vtTD4FuxTQcwWi16vU-7C_AWSU6p1d_cwle725fNg_x0_P942b9FEuUIRbnVUYFwqXGlWJClkRJlFOJYEWKUpGSqUJKQWUePilypkiRwVLRkhHKKM5SvATx7LuzUrR8tOG2fedG1HxmnJU6QI4RhgUN-qtZP1rz5rXb88Z4G5JxPGUoZzAEWQTV9ayS1jhndfVvjCA_dsB_O-AY8pQz_ANETn51</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2917909998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analiza razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdana odugovlačenja u sudskim postupcima u složenim kaznenim predmetima</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vojvoda, Nikša ; Željko, Darija ; Bonačić, Marin</creator><creatorcontrib>Vojvoda, Nikša ; Željko, Darija ; Bonačić, Marin</creatorcontrib><description>Na zamolbu Ministarstva pravosuđa i uprave autori su izradili analizu razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdane odgode u sudskim postupcima usloženim kaznenim predmetima s prijedlozima odgovarajućih mjera zapopravljanje stanja. Svrha je prijedloga ispunjenje preporuke Odborastručnjaka Vijeća Europe MONEYVAL iz Izvješća 5. kruga evaluacijeo mjerama protiv pranja novca i protiv financiranja terorista za Republiku Hrvatsku. Uzimajući u obzir postavljeni zadatak, istraživanje seusredotočilo na kaznene postupke za kaznena djela kod kojih postojivisok rizik od pranja novca te za odabrana kaznena djela srednjeg rizika. Kako bi se utvrdilo u kojem stadiju ili u kojim stadijima postupkadolazi do odugovlačenja postupka, odvojeno su analizirani (pod)stadijoptuživanja, stadij rasprave i stadij žalbenog postupka. Istraživanje sesastojalo od tri dijela. U prvom su dijelu prikupljeni statistički podacio trajanju kaznenih postupaka za odabrana kaznena djela u navedenatri stadija postupka, kao i o prosječnom trajanju tih stadija postupka za sva kaznena djela. U drugom dijelu napravljena je kvalitativna analiza odabranih predmeta, a u trećem su dijelu provedeni fokus-grupai intervjui s državnim odvjetnicima, sucima i odvjetnicima. Uz provedeno istraživanje razmotreni su i opći uvjeti u pravosuđu koji utječuna trajanje svih kaznenih postupaka te recentne izmjene Zakona o kaznenom postupku usmjerene na ubrzanje kaznenih postupaka. Nakonprovedene analize iznose se nalazi i normativne preporuke za ubrzanjekaznenih postupaka u složenim predmetima.
At the request of the Croatian Ministry of Justice and Public Administration, the authorsmade an analysis of the reasons leading to undue delays in court proceedings in complex criminal cases, containing suggestions for appropriate measures to remedy the situation, in orderto meet the recommendation of the Committee of Experts of the Council of Europe MONEYVAL from the Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation Report on Croatia as regards anti-moneylaundering and counter-terrorist financing measures. Taking into account the task set, the research focused on criminal proceedings regarding criminal offences where there is a high riskof money laundering and for selected criminal offences of medium risk. In order to determineat which stage or stages of the proceedings a delay occurs, the indictment stage, the hearingstage, and the stage of the appeal were analysed separately. The study consisted of three parts.In the first part, statistical data were collected on the length of the criminal proceedings forselected criminal offences in the above-mentioned three stages of the proceedings, as well asthe average length of these stages of the proceedings for all criminal offences. In the secondpart, a qualitative analysis of selected cases was carried out, while in the third part a focusgroup and interviews with prosecutors, judges and lawyers were conducted. In addition to theresearch carried out, consideration was given to the general conditions in the judiciary thataffect the length of all criminal proceedings, as well as recent amendments to the CriminalProcedure Code (hereinafter: CPC) aimed at speeding up criminal proceedings. Finally, thereport contains conclusions and normative recommendations for speeding up criminal proceedings in complex cases.At the legislative level it is recommended to introduce into the system criteria for identifying complex cases and to properly evaluate the work of prosecutors and judges on these cases.The proposed criteria are the type of criminal offence, the number of accused persons, and thenumber of offences. On the one hand, this would have the effect on reducing the allocation ofnew cases during the handling of such cases and, on the other hand, on their correct evaluationwhen considering whether a judge has fulfilled his or her judicial duties for a certain year. Recognising the complexity of such cases at the hearing stage would allow the judges to conductthe hearing in a concentrated way which would consequently significantly reduce the lengthof such cases. Two additional measures aimed at speeding up complex cases would be worthconsidering: a) to forbid the possibility to file again the motion for the exclusion of evidenceat the hearing stage if the appeal court has already rendered a decision on the appeal against adecision not to exclude certain evidence at the indictment stage; b) to facilitate the possibilityof trial in absentia by requiring that there are “important”, instead of “particularly important”reasons for such a trial. This would speed up rendering the decision on trial in absentia insome cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2459-6531</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2670-9996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2459-6531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.54070/hljk.30.2.9</identifier><language>hrv ; eng</language><publisher>Zagreb: Hrvatsko Udruzenje za Kaznene Znanosti</publisher><subject>complex criminal cases, duratiodelay of proceedings, Framework Standards for the Workload of Judges, money laundering, MONEYVAL ; Court hearings & proceedings ; Criminal procedure ; Money laundering ; Složeni kazneni predmeti, trajanje postupka, odugovlačenje postupka, Okvirna mjerila za rad sudaca, pranje novca, MONEYVAL ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 2023-12, Vol.30 (2), p.453-489</ispartof><rights>Copyright Hrvatsko Udruzenje za Kaznene Znanosti 2023</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/logo_broj/24203.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vojvoda, Nikša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Željko, Darija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonačić, Marin</creatorcontrib><title>Analiza razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdana odugovlačenja u sudskim postupcima u složenim kaznenim predmetima</title><title>Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu</title><description>Na zamolbu Ministarstva pravosuđa i uprave autori su izradili analizu razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdane odgode u sudskim postupcima usloženim kaznenim predmetima s prijedlozima odgovarajućih mjera zapopravljanje stanja. Svrha je prijedloga ispunjenje preporuke Odborastručnjaka Vijeća Europe MONEYVAL iz Izvješća 5. kruga evaluacijeo mjerama protiv pranja novca i protiv financiranja terorista za Republiku Hrvatsku. Uzimajući u obzir postavljeni zadatak, istraživanje seusredotočilo na kaznene postupke za kaznena djela kod kojih postojivisok rizik od pranja novca te za odabrana kaznena djela srednjeg rizika. Kako bi se utvrdilo u kojem stadiju ili u kojim stadijima postupkadolazi do odugovlačenja postupka, odvojeno su analizirani (pod)stadijoptuživanja, stadij rasprave i stadij žalbenog postupka. Istraživanje sesastojalo od tri dijela. U prvom su dijelu prikupljeni statistički podacio trajanju kaznenih postupaka za odabrana kaznena djela u navedenatri stadija postupka, kao i o prosječnom trajanju tih stadija postupka za sva kaznena djela. U drugom dijelu napravljena je kvalitativna analiza odabranih predmeta, a u trećem su dijelu provedeni fokus-grupai intervjui s državnim odvjetnicima, sucima i odvjetnicima. Uz provedeno istraživanje razmotreni su i opći uvjeti u pravosuđu koji utječuna trajanje svih kaznenih postupaka te recentne izmjene Zakona o kaznenom postupku usmjerene na ubrzanje kaznenih postupaka. Nakonprovedene analize iznose se nalazi i normativne preporuke za ubrzanjekaznenih postupaka u složenim predmetima.
At the request of the Croatian Ministry of Justice and Public Administration, the authorsmade an analysis of the reasons leading to undue delays in court proceedings in complex criminal cases, containing suggestions for appropriate measures to remedy the situation, in orderto meet the recommendation of the Committee of Experts of the Council of Europe MONEYVAL from the Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation Report on Croatia as regards anti-moneylaundering and counter-terrorist financing measures. Taking into account the task set, the research focused on criminal proceedings regarding criminal offences where there is a high riskof money laundering and for selected criminal offences of medium risk. In order to determineat which stage or stages of the proceedings a delay occurs, the indictment stage, the hearingstage, and the stage of the appeal were analysed separately. The study consisted of three parts.In the first part, statistical data were collected on the length of the criminal proceedings forselected criminal offences in the above-mentioned three stages of the proceedings, as well asthe average length of these stages of the proceedings for all criminal offences. In the secondpart, a qualitative analysis of selected cases was carried out, while in the third part a focusgroup and interviews with prosecutors, judges and lawyers were conducted. In addition to theresearch carried out, consideration was given to the general conditions in the judiciary thataffect the length of all criminal proceedings, as well as recent amendments to the CriminalProcedure Code (hereinafter: CPC) aimed at speeding up criminal proceedings. Finally, thereport contains conclusions and normative recommendations for speeding up criminal proceedings in complex cases.At the legislative level it is recommended to introduce into the system criteria for identifying complex cases and to properly evaluate the work of prosecutors and judges on these cases.The proposed criteria are the type of criminal offence, the number of accused persons, and thenumber of offences. On the one hand, this would have the effect on reducing the allocation ofnew cases during the handling of such cases and, on the other hand, on their correct evaluationwhen considering whether a judge has fulfilled his or her judicial duties for a certain year. Recognising the complexity of such cases at the hearing stage would allow the judges to conductthe hearing in a concentrated way which would consequently significantly reduce the lengthof such cases. Two additional measures aimed at speeding up complex cases would be worthconsidering: a) to forbid the possibility to file again the motion for the exclusion of evidenceat the hearing stage if the appeal court has already rendered a decision on the appeal against adecision not to exclude certain evidence at the indictment stage; b) to facilitate the possibilityof trial in absentia by requiring that there are “important”, instead of “particularly important”reasons for such a trial. This would speed up rendering the decision on trial in absentia insome cases.</description><subject>complex criminal cases, duratiodelay of proceedings, Framework Standards for the Workload of Judges, money laundering, MONEYVAL</subject><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>Criminal procedure</subject><subject>Money laundering</subject><subject>Složeni kazneni predmeti, trajanje postupka, odugovlačenje postupka, Okvirna mjerila za rad sudaca, pranje novca, MONEYVAL</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>2459-6531</issn><issn>2670-9996</issn><issn>2459-6531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UUtOwzAUtBBIVKU7DhCJLQl2HDvxsqr4SUhsYG05ttPm62DXlcgduBIruBemQazeaN5ont4MAJcIJiSDObzZdU2bYJikCTsBi5TmMGaM0dOAM8JiSjA6ByvnGghhilCBUbYA_XoQXT2JyIqpM1sRtaapIz9Z0_rGR4M2oxUHJQYRGeW35tCJrw89NCLykfPKtXUfjcbt_Sjr_kh25vtTD4FuxTQcwWi16vU-7C_AWSU6p1d_cwle725fNg_x0_P942b9FEuUIRbnVUYFwqXGlWJClkRJlFOJYEWKUpGSqUJKQWUePilypkiRwVLRkhHKKM5SvATx7LuzUrR8tOG2fedG1HxmnJU6QI4RhgUN-qtZP1rz5rXb88Z4G5JxPGUoZzAEWQTV9ayS1jhndfVvjCA_dsB_O-AY8pQz_ANETn51</recordid><startdate>20231205</startdate><enddate>20231205</enddate><creator>Vojvoda, Nikša</creator><creator>Željko, Darija</creator><creator>Bonačić, Marin</creator><general>Hrvatsko Udruzenje za Kaznene Znanosti</general><general>Hrvatsko udruženje za kaznene znanosti i praksu</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>VP8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231205</creationdate><title>Analiza razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdana odugovlačenja u sudskim postupcima u složenim kaznenim predmetima</title><author>Vojvoda, Nikša ; Željko, Darija ; Bonačić, Marin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1419-7f46a13be3fd9acb5dc176c10f58bd5b9d8cca6c7000879d5840bd6b956963423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>hrv ; eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>complex criminal cases, duratiodelay of proceedings, Framework Standards for the Workload of Judges, money laundering, MONEYVAL</topic><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>Criminal procedure</topic><topic>Money laundering</topic><topic>Složeni kazneni predmeti, trajanje postupka, odugovlačenje postupka, Okvirna mjerila za rad sudaca, pranje novca, MONEYVAL</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vojvoda, Nikša</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Željko, Darija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonačić, Marin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><jtitle>Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vojvoda, Nikša</au><au>Željko, Darija</au><au>Bonačić, Marin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analiza razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdana odugovlačenja u sudskim postupcima u složenim kaznenim predmetima</atitle><jtitle>Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu</jtitle><date>2023-12-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>453-489</pages><issn>2459-6531</issn><eissn>2670-9996</eissn><eissn>2459-6531</eissn><abstract>Na zamolbu Ministarstva pravosuđa i uprave autori su izradili analizu razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdane odgode u sudskim postupcima usloženim kaznenim predmetima s prijedlozima odgovarajućih mjera zapopravljanje stanja. Svrha je prijedloga ispunjenje preporuke Odborastručnjaka Vijeća Europe MONEYVAL iz Izvješća 5. kruga evaluacijeo mjerama protiv pranja novca i protiv financiranja terorista za Republiku Hrvatsku. Uzimajući u obzir postavljeni zadatak, istraživanje seusredotočilo na kaznene postupke za kaznena djela kod kojih postojivisok rizik od pranja novca te za odabrana kaznena djela srednjeg rizika. Kako bi se utvrdilo u kojem stadiju ili u kojim stadijima postupkadolazi do odugovlačenja postupka, odvojeno su analizirani (pod)stadijoptuživanja, stadij rasprave i stadij žalbenog postupka. Istraživanje sesastojalo od tri dijela. U prvom su dijelu prikupljeni statistički podacio trajanju kaznenih postupaka za odabrana kaznena djela u navedenatri stadija postupka, kao i o prosječnom trajanju tih stadija postupka za sva kaznena djela. U drugom dijelu napravljena je kvalitativna analiza odabranih predmeta, a u trećem su dijelu provedeni fokus-grupai intervjui s državnim odvjetnicima, sucima i odvjetnicima. Uz provedeno istraživanje razmotreni su i opći uvjeti u pravosuđu koji utječuna trajanje svih kaznenih postupaka te recentne izmjene Zakona o kaznenom postupku usmjerene na ubrzanje kaznenih postupaka. Nakonprovedene analize iznose se nalazi i normativne preporuke za ubrzanjekaznenih postupaka u složenim predmetima.
At the request of the Croatian Ministry of Justice and Public Administration, the authorsmade an analysis of the reasons leading to undue delays in court proceedings in complex criminal cases, containing suggestions for appropriate measures to remedy the situation, in orderto meet the recommendation of the Committee of Experts of the Council of Europe MONEYVAL from the Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation Report on Croatia as regards anti-moneylaundering and counter-terrorist financing measures. Taking into account the task set, the research focused on criminal proceedings regarding criminal offences where there is a high riskof money laundering and for selected criminal offences of medium risk. In order to determineat which stage or stages of the proceedings a delay occurs, the indictment stage, the hearingstage, and the stage of the appeal were analysed separately. The study consisted of three parts.In the first part, statistical data were collected on the length of the criminal proceedings forselected criminal offences in the above-mentioned three stages of the proceedings, as well asthe average length of these stages of the proceedings for all criminal offences. In the secondpart, a qualitative analysis of selected cases was carried out, while in the third part a focusgroup and interviews with prosecutors, judges and lawyers were conducted. In addition to theresearch carried out, consideration was given to the general conditions in the judiciary thataffect the length of all criminal proceedings, as well as recent amendments to the CriminalProcedure Code (hereinafter: CPC) aimed at speeding up criminal proceedings. Finally, thereport contains conclusions and normative recommendations for speeding up criminal proceedings in complex cases.At the legislative level it is recommended to introduce into the system criteria for identifying complex cases and to properly evaluate the work of prosecutors and judges on these cases.The proposed criteria are the type of criminal offence, the number of accused persons, and thenumber of offences. On the one hand, this would have the effect on reducing the allocation ofnew cases during the handling of such cases and, on the other hand, on their correct evaluationwhen considering whether a judge has fulfilled his or her judicial duties for a certain year. Recognising the complexity of such cases at the hearing stage would allow the judges to conductthe hearing in a concentrated way which would consequently significantly reduce the lengthof such cases. Two additional measures aimed at speeding up complex cases would be worthconsidering: a) to forbid the possibility to file again the motion for the exclusion of evidenceat the hearing stage if the appeal court has already rendered a decision on the appeal against adecision not to exclude certain evidence at the indictment stage; b) to facilitate the possibilityof trial in absentia by requiring that there are “important”, instead of “particularly important”reasons for such a trial. This would speed up rendering the decision on trial in absentia insome cases.</abstract><cop>Zagreb</cop><pub>Hrvatsko Udruzenje za Kaznene Znanosti</pub><doi>10.54070/hljk.30.2.9</doi><tpages>37</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2459-6531 |
| ispartof | Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu, 2023-12, Vol.30 (2), p.453-489 |
| issn | 2459-6531 2670-9996 2459-6531 |
| language | hrv ; eng |
| recordid | cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_313086 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | complex criminal cases, duratiodelay of proceedings, Framework Standards for the Workload of Judges, money laundering, MONEYVAL Court hearings & proceedings Criminal procedure Money laundering Složeni kazneni predmeti, trajanje postupka, odugovlačenje postupka, Okvirna mjerila za rad sudaca, pranje novca, MONEYVAL Trials |
| title | Analiza razloga koji uzrokuju neopravdana odugovlačenja u sudskim postupcima u složenim kaznenim predmetima |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A51%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hrcak&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analiza%20razloga%20koji%20uzrokuju%20neopravdana%20odugovla%C4%8Denja%20u%20sudskim%20postupcima%20u%20slo%C5%BEenim%20kaznenim%20predmetima&rft.jtitle=Hrvatski%20ljetopis%20za%20kaznene%20znanosti%20i%20praksu&rft.au=Vojvoda,%20Nik%C5%A1a&rft.date=2023-12-05&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=453-489&rft.issn=2459-6531&rft.eissn=2670-9996&rft_id=info:doi/10.54070/hljk.30.2.9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hrcak%3E2917909998%3C/proquest_hrcak%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2917909998&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |