Subjective theories on solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic and the desire for sanctioning “non-solidaric” behaviour

Solidarity was perceived to be of great importance during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the expected vaccination against COVID-19. Showing any hesitancy was often declared as a lack of solidarity. This paper focuses on three research questions: (1) How did laypeople perceive solidarity during the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kriminologija & socijalna integracija 2023-12, Vol.31 (2), p.88-107
1. Verfasser: Wüstner, Kerstin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107
container_issue 2
container_start_page 88
container_title Kriminologija & socijalna integracija
container_volume 31
creator Wüstner, Kerstin
description Solidarity was perceived to be of great importance during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the expected vaccination against COVID-19. Showing any hesitancy was often declared as a lack of solidarity. This paper focuses on three research questions: (1) How did laypeople perceive solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic? (2) How did they react to people hesitant to vaccination? (3) What consequences could that have had for health promotion and society? In order to understand subjective theories of laypeople on solidarity during the pandemic – and on vaccination against COVID-19 in particular, 1 858 bottom line comments on ten different internet articles were analysed. As a result, laypeople often shared the idea that vaccination was an act of solidarity. Focusing on those who were hesitant, they attributed this to a lack of cognitive and social competence. Furthermore, the expected consequences of vaccination hesitancy were described, which in turn justified a wide range of suggested sanctions. They included discrimination and exclusion, as well as a desire for personal damage. Finally, possible effects on society are discussed. Smatralo se da je solidarnost od velike važnosti tijekom pandemije COVID-19, uključujući očekivano cijepljenje protiv COVID-19. Pokazivanje neodlučnosti često se proglašavalo nedostatkom solidarnosti. Ovaj se rad usredotočuje na tri istraživačka pitanja: (1) Kako su laici doživljavali solidarnost tijekom pandemije COVID-19? (2) Kako su reagirali na ljude koji su oklijevali oko cijepljenja? (3) Koje bi to posljedice moglo donijeti za promicanje zdravlja i društva? Kako bismo razumjeli subjektivne teorije laika o solidarnosti tijekom pandemije – a posebno o cijepljenju protiv COVID-19, analizirano je 1858 krajnjih komentara na deset različitih internetskih članaka. Kao rezultat toga, laici su često dijelili ideju da je cijepljenje čin solidarnosti. Fokusirajući se na one koji oklijevaju, pripisali su to nedostatku kognitivnih i socijalnih kompetencija. Nadalje su opisane očekivane posljedice oklijevanja od cijepljenja, što je zauzvrat opravdalo širok raspon predloženih sankcija. One uključuju diskriminaciju i isključivanje, kao i želju za osobnom štetom. Na kraju se raspravlja o mogućim učincima na društvo.
doi_str_mv 10.31299/ksi.31.2.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hrcak</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_312027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2904944291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2091-95d695420067bce130fa7578019da52ccffe51e58fd36ef881d21906e37fd28a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UUlOAzEQHCGQiEJOfMASRzTBy2w-orBFipQDy9Vy7DZxlnGwM5EiLnkIfC4vwckAfalSd3Wp1J0klwT3GaGc38yDjaxP--Qk6ZAqq9KSF-w0csZwSgucnSe9EGY4FiNZnmed5PO5mcxAre0G0HoKzlsIyNUouIXV0tv1FunG2_r9MEWD8dvwLiUcrWStYWkVinicaAjWAzLOoyDr6Ofqw9J-91W7Ov1zU_vdN5rAVG6sa_xFcmbkIkDvF7vJ68P9y-ApHY0fh4PbUaoo5iTluS54nlGMi3KigDBsZJmXFSZcy5wqZQzkBPLKaFaAqSqiKeG4AFYaTSvJukna-k69knOx8nYp_VY4aUXbCV5BpCKeEdMy6q9a_cq7jwbCWsxi2jpGFJTjjGcZ5SSqrluV8i4ED-bfmGBxfIiID4lMUEHYD7HqgPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2904944291</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subjective theories on solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic and the desire for sanctioning “non-solidaric” behaviour</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Wüstner, Kerstin</creator><creatorcontrib>Wüstner, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><description>Solidarity was perceived to be of great importance during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the expected vaccination against COVID-19. Showing any hesitancy was often declared as a lack of solidarity. This paper focuses on three research questions: (1) How did laypeople perceive solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic? (2) How did they react to people hesitant to vaccination? (3) What consequences could that have had for health promotion and society? In order to understand subjective theories of laypeople on solidarity during the pandemic – and on vaccination against COVID-19 in particular, 1 858 bottom line comments on ten different internet articles were analysed. As a result, laypeople often shared the idea that vaccination was an act of solidarity. Focusing on those who were hesitant, they attributed this to a lack of cognitive and social competence. Furthermore, the expected consequences of vaccination hesitancy were described, which in turn justified a wide range of suggested sanctions. They included discrimination and exclusion, as well as a desire for personal damage. Finally, possible effects on society are discussed. Smatralo se da je solidarnost od velike važnosti tijekom pandemije COVID-19, uključujući očekivano cijepljenje protiv COVID-19. Pokazivanje neodlučnosti često se proglašavalo nedostatkom solidarnosti. Ovaj se rad usredotočuje na tri istraživačka pitanja: (1) Kako su laici doživljavali solidarnost tijekom pandemije COVID-19? (2) Kako su reagirali na ljude koji su oklijevali oko cijepljenja? (3) Koje bi to posljedice moglo donijeti za promicanje zdravlja i društva? Kako bismo razumjeli subjektivne teorije laika o solidarnosti tijekom pandemije – a posebno o cijepljenju protiv COVID-19, analizirano je 1858 krajnjih komentara na deset različitih internetskih članaka. Kao rezultat toga, laici su često dijelili ideju da je cijepljenje čin solidarnosti. Fokusirajući se na one koji oklijevaju, pripisali su to nedostatku kognitivnih i socijalnih kompetencija. Nadalje su opisane očekivane posljedice oklijevanja od cijepljenja, što je zauzvrat opravdalo širok raspon predloženih sankcija. One uključuju diskriminaciju i isključivanje, kao i želju za osobnom štetom. Na kraju se raspravlja o mogućim učincima na društvo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1330-2604</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1848-7963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31299/ksi.31.2.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: KSINEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zagreb: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; COVID-19 pandemic ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Desire ; Discrimination ; Health education ; health policy ; Health promotion ; Immunization ; Pandemics ; punitive attitudes ; Sanctions ; Social cohesion ; Social skills ; solidarity ; subjective theories</subject><ispartof>Kriminologija &amp; socijalna integracija, 2023-12, Vol.31 (2), p.88-107</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. This is sourced from HRČAK - Portal of scientific journals of Croatia.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27321,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wüstner, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><title>Subjective theories on solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic and the desire for sanctioning “non-solidaric” behaviour</title><title>Kriminologija &amp; socijalna integracija</title><description>Solidarity was perceived to be of great importance during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the expected vaccination against COVID-19. Showing any hesitancy was often declared as a lack of solidarity. This paper focuses on three research questions: (1) How did laypeople perceive solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic? (2) How did they react to people hesitant to vaccination? (3) What consequences could that have had for health promotion and society? In order to understand subjective theories of laypeople on solidarity during the pandemic – and on vaccination against COVID-19 in particular, 1 858 bottom line comments on ten different internet articles were analysed. As a result, laypeople often shared the idea that vaccination was an act of solidarity. Focusing on those who were hesitant, they attributed this to a lack of cognitive and social competence. Furthermore, the expected consequences of vaccination hesitancy were described, which in turn justified a wide range of suggested sanctions. They included discrimination and exclusion, as well as a desire for personal damage. Finally, possible effects on society are discussed. Smatralo se da je solidarnost od velike važnosti tijekom pandemije COVID-19, uključujući očekivano cijepljenje protiv COVID-19. Pokazivanje neodlučnosti često se proglašavalo nedostatkom solidarnosti. Ovaj se rad usredotočuje na tri istraživačka pitanja: (1) Kako su laici doživljavali solidarnost tijekom pandemije COVID-19? (2) Kako su reagirali na ljude koji su oklijevali oko cijepljenja? (3) Koje bi to posljedice moglo donijeti za promicanje zdravlja i društva? Kako bismo razumjeli subjektivne teorije laika o solidarnosti tijekom pandemije – a posebno o cijepljenju protiv COVID-19, analizirano je 1858 krajnjih komentara na deset različitih internetskih članaka. Kao rezultat toga, laici su često dijelili ideju da je cijepljenje čin solidarnosti. Fokusirajući se na one koji oklijevaju, pripisali su to nedostatku kognitivnih i socijalnih kompetencija. Nadalje su opisane očekivane posljedice oklijevanja od cijepljenja, što je zauzvrat opravdalo širok raspon predloženih sankcija. One uključuju diskriminaciju i isključivanje, kao i želju za osobnom štetom. Na kraju se raspravlja o mogućim učincima na društvo.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 pandemic</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Desire</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>health policy</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>punitive attitudes</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Social cohesion</subject><subject>Social skills</subject><subject>solidarity</subject><subject>subjective theories</subject><issn>1330-2604</issn><issn>1848-7963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UUlOAzEQHCGQiEJOfMASRzTBy2w-orBFipQDy9Vy7DZxlnGwM5EiLnkIfC4vwckAfalSd3Wp1J0klwT3GaGc38yDjaxP--Qk6ZAqq9KSF-w0csZwSgucnSe9EGY4FiNZnmed5PO5mcxAre0G0HoKzlsIyNUouIXV0tv1FunG2_r9MEWD8dvwLiUcrWStYWkVinicaAjWAzLOoyDr6Ofqw9J-91W7Ov1zU_vdN5rAVG6sa_xFcmbkIkDvF7vJ68P9y-ApHY0fh4PbUaoo5iTluS54nlGMi3KigDBsZJmXFSZcy5wqZQzkBPLKaFaAqSqiKeG4AFYaTSvJukna-k69knOx8nYp_VY4aUXbCV5BpCKeEdMy6q9a_cq7jwbCWsxi2jpGFJTjjGcZ5SSqrluV8i4ED-bfmGBxfIiID4lMUEHYD7HqgPg</recordid><startdate>20231221</startdate><enddate>20231221</enddate><creator>Wüstner, Kerstin</creator><general>University of Zagreb, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences</general><general>Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Edukacijsko-rehabilitacijski fakultet</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>VP8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231221</creationdate><title>Subjective theories on solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic and the desire for sanctioning “non-solidaric” behaviour</title><author>Wüstner, Kerstin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2091-95d695420067bce130fa7578019da52ccffe51e58fd36ef881d21906e37fd28a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 pandemic</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Desire</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>health policy</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>punitive attitudes</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Social cohesion</topic><topic>Social skills</topic><topic>solidarity</topic><topic>subjective theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wüstner, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><jtitle>Kriminologija &amp; socijalna integracija</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wüstner, Kerstin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subjective theories on solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic and the desire for sanctioning “non-solidaric” behaviour</atitle><jtitle>Kriminologija &amp; socijalna integracija</jtitle><date>2023-12-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>88-107</pages><issn>1330-2604</issn><eissn>1848-7963</eissn><coden>KSINEF</coden><abstract>Solidarity was perceived to be of great importance during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the expected vaccination against COVID-19. Showing any hesitancy was often declared as a lack of solidarity. This paper focuses on three research questions: (1) How did laypeople perceive solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic? (2) How did they react to people hesitant to vaccination? (3) What consequences could that have had for health promotion and society? In order to understand subjective theories of laypeople on solidarity during the pandemic – and on vaccination against COVID-19 in particular, 1 858 bottom line comments on ten different internet articles were analysed. As a result, laypeople often shared the idea that vaccination was an act of solidarity. Focusing on those who were hesitant, they attributed this to a lack of cognitive and social competence. Furthermore, the expected consequences of vaccination hesitancy were described, which in turn justified a wide range of suggested sanctions. They included discrimination and exclusion, as well as a desire for personal damage. Finally, possible effects on society are discussed. Smatralo se da je solidarnost od velike važnosti tijekom pandemije COVID-19, uključujući očekivano cijepljenje protiv COVID-19. Pokazivanje neodlučnosti često se proglašavalo nedostatkom solidarnosti. Ovaj se rad usredotočuje na tri istraživačka pitanja: (1) Kako su laici doživljavali solidarnost tijekom pandemije COVID-19? (2) Kako su reagirali na ljude koji su oklijevali oko cijepljenja? (3) Koje bi to posljedice moglo donijeti za promicanje zdravlja i društva? Kako bismo razumjeli subjektivne teorije laika o solidarnosti tijekom pandemije – a posebno o cijepljenju protiv COVID-19, analizirano je 1858 krajnjih komentara na deset različitih internetskih članaka. Kao rezultat toga, laici su često dijelili ideju da je cijepljenje čin solidarnosti. Fokusirajući se na one koji oklijevaju, pripisali su to nedostatku kognitivnih i socijalnih kompetencija. Nadalje su opisane očekivane posljedice oklijevanja od cijepljenja, što je zauzvrat opravdalo širok raspon predloženih sankcija. One uključuju diskriminaciju i isključivanje, kao i želju za osobnom štetom. Na kraju se raspravlja o mogućim učincima na društvo.</abstract><cop>Zagreb</cop><pub>University of Zagreb, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences</pub><doi>10.31299/ksi.31.2.1</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1330-2604
ispartof Kriminologija & socijalna integracija, 2023-12, Vol.31 (2), p.88-107
issn 1330-2604
1848-7963
language eng
recordid cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_312027
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects COVID-19
COVID-19 pandemic
COVID-19 vaccines
Desire
Discrimination
Health education
health policy
Health promotion
Immunization
Pandemics
punitive attitudes
Sanctions
Social cohesion
Social skills
solidarity
subjective theories
title Subjective theories on solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic and the desire for sanctioning “non-solidaric” behaviour
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A39%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hrcak&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subjective%20theories%20on%20solidarity%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20and%20the%20desire%20for%20sanctioning%20%E2%80%9Cnon-solidaric%E2%80%9D%20behaviour&rft.jtitle=Kriminologija%20&%20socijalna%20integracija&rft.au=W%C3%BCstner,%20Kerstin&rft.date=2023-12-21&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=88-107&rft.issn=1330-2604&rft.eissn=1848-7963&rft.coden=KSINEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.31299/ksi.31.2.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hrcak%3E2904944291%3C/proquest_hrcak%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2904944291&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true