The efficacy of board independence on C.S.R. practices: empirical evidence from China

The objective of this study is to identify the efficacy of board independence on corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) practices in the companies of mainland China. It was noted by the earlier studies that the relationship between the implications of C.S.R. strategies, and the board of governors...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja 2023-03, Vol.36 (1), p.727-745
1. Verfasser: Cao, Ruili
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 745
container_issue 1
container_start_page 727
container_title Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja
container_volume 36
creator Cao, Ruili
description The objective of this study is to identify the efficacy of board independence on corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) practices in the companies of mainland China. It was noted by the earlier studies that the relationship between the implications of C.S.R. strategies, and the board of governors is disturbing in China because of the ownership and other related issues. In this study, to identify the results of variables related to C.S.R., the adopted method was content analysis. Furthermore, to determine the results for the efficacy of board independence on C.S.R., the ordinary least square method was adopted in this study. The study concludes that with effective strategies and implications by board independence a high level of C.S.R. can be achieved. Significantly, this study provides a detailed insight into the efficacy of board independence and C.S.R. to ensure that all the strategies would be effective with an independent board.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2113335
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hrcak</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_303751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2922707547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d9bd8696f9070edfb4cfae3cdc11819d1923072ddb5181e3323d7fe4bc2f56e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLAzEQhRdRsNT-BCHg86657Ca7PinFGxQEbcG3kE0mNLXdrEmr9N-bstVH8zCZGb5zGE6WXRJcEFzja8IY4UK8FxRTWlCSZladZCNSl3XecF6epj4x-QE6zyYxrnB6NeeE01G2mC8BgbVOK71H3qLWq2CQ6wz0kEqnAfkOTYu34rVAfVB66zTEGwSb3oWkWiP4cgNng9-g6dJ16iI7s2odYXL8x9ni4X4-fcpnL4_P07tZrpkg29w0ral5w22DBQZj21JbBUwbTUhNGkMayrCgxrRVmoExyoywULaa2oqDYOMsH3yXQasP2Qe3UWEvvXJy2MSgIbWSYSYqkvirge-D_9xB3MqV34UunShpQ6nAoioPrtVA6eBjDGD_jAmWh9Dlb-jyELo8hp50t4POddaHjfr2YW3kVu3XPtigOu2iZP9b_AAnB4gV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2922707547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The efficacy of board independence on C.S.R. practices: empirical evidence from China</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Cao, Ruili</creator><creatorcontrib>Cao, Ruili</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study is to identify the efficacy of board independence on corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) practices in the companies of mainland China. It was noted by the earlier studies that the relationship between the implications of C.S.R. strategies, and the board of governors is disturbing in China because of the ownership and other related issues. In this study, to identify the results of variables related to C.S.R., the adopted method was content analysis. Furthermore, to determine the results for the efficacy of board independence on C.S.R., the ordinary least square method was adopted in this study. The study concludes that with effective strategies and implications by board independence a high level of C.S.R. can be achieved. Significantly, this study provides a detailed insight into the efficacy of board independence and C.S.R. to ensure that all the strategies would be effective with an independent board.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1331-677X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1848-9664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2113335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pula: Routledge</publisher><subject>board independence ; Boards of directors ; Chinese organisations sustainability ; Content analysis ; corporate social responsibility (CSR) ; Economic theory ; Efficacy ; efficacy of board independence ; Governors ; Ownership ; Social responsibility ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja, 2023-03, Vol.36 (1), p.727-745</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d9bd8696f9070edfb4cfae3cdc11819d1923072ddb5181e3323d7fe4bc2f56e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2113335$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2113335$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27481,27903,27904,59119,59120</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cao, Ruili</creatorcontrib><title>The efficacy of board independence on C.S.R. practices: empirical evidence from China</title><title>Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja</title><description>The objective of this study is to identify the efficacy of board independence on corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) practices in the companies of mainland China. It was noted by the earlier studies that the relationship between the implications of C.S.R. strategies, and the board of governors is disturbing in China because of the ownership and other related issues. In this study, to identify the results of variables related to C.S.R., the adopted method was content analysis. Furthermore, to determine the results for the efficacy of board independence on C.S.R., the ordinary least square method was adopted in this study. The study concludes that with effective strategies and implications by board independence a high level of C.S.R. can be achieved. Significantly, this study provides a detailed insight into the efficacy of board independence and C.S.R. to ensure that all the strategies would be effective with an independent board.</description><subject>board independence</subject><subject>Boards of directors</subject><subject>Chinese organisations sustainability</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>corporate social responsibility (CSR)</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>efficacy of board independence</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1331-677X</issn><issn>1848-9664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLAzEQhRdRsNT-BCHg86657Ca7PinFGxQEbcG3kE0mNLXdrEmr9N-bstVH8zCZGb5zGE6WXRJcEFzja8IY4UK8FxRTWlCSZladZCNSl3XecF6epj4x-QE6zyYxrnB6NeeE01G2mC8BgbVOK71H3qLWq2CQ6wz0kEqnAfkOTYu34rVAfVB66zTEGwSb3oWkWiP4cgNng9-g6dJ16iI7s2odYXL8x9ni4X4-fcpnL4_P07tZrpkg29w0ral5w22DBQZj21JbBUwbTUhNGkMayrCgxrRVmoExyoywULaa2oqDYOMsH3yXQasP2Qe3UWEvvXJy2MSgIbWSYSYqkvirge-D_9xB3MqV34UunShpQ6nAoioPrtVA6eBjDGD_jAmWh9Dlb-jyELo8hp50t4POddaHjfr2YW3kVu3XPtigOu2iZP9b_AAnB4gV</recordid><startdate>20230331</startdate><enddate>20230331</enddate><creator>Cao, Ruili</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor and Francis Group i Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli, Fakultet ekonomije i turizma Dr. Mijo Mirković</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>VP8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230331</creationdate><title>The efficacy of board independence on C.S.R. practices: empirical evidence from China</title><author>Cao, Ruili</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-d9bd8696f9070edfb4cfae3cdc11819d1923072ddb5181e3323d7fe4bc2f56e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>board independence</topic><topic>Boards of directors</topic><topic>Chinese organisations sustainability</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>corporate social responsibility (CSR)</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>efficacy of board independence</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cao, Ruili</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><jtitle>Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cao, Ruili</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The efficacy of board independence on C.S.R. practices: empirical evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja</jtitle><date>2023-03-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>745</epage><pages>727-745</pages><issn>1331-677X</issn><eissn>1848-9664</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study is to identify the efficacy of board independence on corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) practices in the companies of mainland China. It was noted by the earlier studies that the relationship between the implications of C.S.R. strategies, and the board of governors is disturbing in China because of the ownership and other related issues. In this study, to identify the results of variables related to C.S.R., the adopted method was content analysis. Furthermore, to determine the results for the efficacy of board independence on C.S.R., the ordinary least square method was adopted in this study. The study concludes that with effective strategies and implications by board independence a high level of C.S.R. can be achieved. Significantly, this study provides a detailed insight into the efficacy of board independence and C.S.R. to ensure that all the strategies would be effective with an independent board.</abstract><cop>Pula</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/1331677X.2022.2113335</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1331-677X
ispartof Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja, 2023-03, Vol.36 (1), p.727-745
issn 1331-677X
1848-9664
language eng
recordid cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_303751
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects board independence
Boards of directors
Chinese organisations sustainability
Content analysis
corporate social responsibility (CSR)
Economic theory
Efficacy
efficacy of board independence
Governors
Ownership
Social responsibility
Sustainability
title The efficacy of board independence on C.S.R. practices: empirical evidence from China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A07%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hrcak&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20efficacy%20of%20board%20independence%20on%20C.S.R.%20practices:%20empirical%20evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Economic%20research%20-%20Ekonomska%20istra%C5%BEivanja&rft.au=Cao,%20Ruili&rft.date=2023-03-31&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=745&rft.pages=727-745&rft.issn=1331-677X&rft.eissn=1848-9664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2113335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hrcak%3E2922707547%3C/proquest_hrcak%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2922707547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true