Are People Willing to Voluntarily Contribute to Public Goods? The Results from the Behavioral Game Experiment
In the paper, we discuss the possibilities of alternative provision of public goods using the individual voluntary contributions. We use the data from the behavioral public goods game based on the model of voluntary contribution mechanism. We examine how people’s decisions about voluntary contributi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business 2021-12, Vol.24 (1), p.63-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 75 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Sirakovová, Eva Čaplánová, Anetta |
description | In the paper, we discuss the possibilities of alternative provision of public goods using the individual voluntary contributions. We use the data from the behavioral public goods game based on the model of voluntary contribution mechanism. We examine how people’s decisions about voluntary contributions to public goods change when the environment changes. The participants of the game were divided into small (5 persons) and large (10 persons) groups. During the game participants were asked to invest experimental money to different types of accounts, i.e. private account, Group account 1 and Group account 2. Using the game, we also examine the impact of a provision point on voluntary contributions. Based on the analysis of the data from this behavioral game, we found that the provision point is effective only if the participants are members of a small group. When the participants were members of both a small group and of a large group the provision point was not effective. When the income of participants was considered, we found that participants with higher experimental income were less willing to voluntarily contribute to financing of a public good. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/zireb-2021-0020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hrcak</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_271826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2627998742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-5ef3f9811518fed7dfb3669ab3303064ea713928aa2ae6ac7b9b8212202f19a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uc9LwzAYLaKgzJ29BjzX5UfXNgcRHXMKA4f44xjS9usWzZqZpOr8602tqBdzyePlvfd94UXREcEnNMny0YeyUMQUUxJjTPFOdEDyhMeEpHT3D96Phs494XASzpKEHkTrcwtoAWajAT0qrVWzRN6gB6Pbxkur9BZNTOOtKloP3cuiLbQq0cyYyp2huxWgW3Ct9g7V1qyRD8QFrOSrMlZqNJNrQNP3DVi1hsYfRnu11A6G3_cgur-c3k2u4vnN7HpyPo9LNiY-HkPNap4TMiZ5DVVW1QVLUy4LxjDDaQIyI4zTXEoqIZVlVvAip4SG_9eES8oGUdznrmwpn8UmTJd2K4xUomecLSFAQTOS0zToj3v9xpqXFpwXT6a1TVhR0JRmnOdZ0qWOelVpjXMW6p9ggkVXg_iqQXQ1iK6G4DjtHW9Se7AVLG27DeA3_h8nTRxJGfsEq0GQmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627998742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are People Willing to Voluntarily Contribute to Public Goods? The Results from the Behavioral Game Experiment</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Sirakovová, Eva ; Čaplánová, Anetta</creator><creatorcontrib>Sirakovová, Eva ; Čaplánová, Anetta</creatorcontrib><description>In the paper, we discuss the possibilities of alternative provision of public goods using the individual voluntary contributions. We use the data from the behavioral public goods game based on the model of voluntary contribution mechanism. We examine how people’s decisions about voluntary contributions to public goods change when the environment changes. The participants of the game were divided into small (5 persons) and large (10 persons) groups. During the game participants were asked to invest experimental money to different types of accounts, i.e. private account, Group account 1 and Group account 2. Using the game, we also examine the impact of a provision point on voluntary contributions. Based on the analysis of the data from this behavioral game, we found that the provision point is effective only if the participants are members of a small group. When the participants were members of both a small group and of a large group the provision point was not effective. When the income of participants was considered, we found that participants with higher experimental income were less willing to voluntarily contribute to financing of a public good.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1849-1162</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1331-5609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1849-1162</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/zireb-2021-0020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zagreb: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Behavior ; behavioral economics ; C92 ; Economics ; Experiments ; H41 ; H42 ; Hypotheses ; Low income groups ; online experiment ; provision point ; Public good ; public goods game ; small and large groups ; voluntary contribution mechanism</subject><ispartof>Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 2021-12, Vol.24 (1), p.63-75</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-5ef3f9811518fed7dfb3669ab3303064ea713928aa2ae6ac7b9b8212202f19a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/zireb-2021-0020$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/zireb-2021-0020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,780,784,789,790,885,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,76164,76165</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sirakovová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Čaplánová, Anetta</creatorcontrib><title>Are People Willing to Voluntarily Contribute to Public Goods? The Results from the Behavioral Game Experiment</title><title>Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business</title><description>In the paper, we discuss the possibilities of alternative provision of public goods using the individual voluntary contributions. We use the data from the behavioral public goods game based on the model of voluntary contribution mechanism. We examine how people’s decisions about voluntary contributions to public goods change when the environment changes. The participants of the game were divided into small (5 persons) and large (10 persons) groups. During the game participants were asked to invest experimental money to different types of accounts, i.e. private account, Group account 1 and Group account 2. Using the game, we also examine the impact of a provision point on voluntary contributions. Based on the analysis of the data from this behavioral game, we found that the provision point is effective only if the participants are members of a small group. When the participants were members of both a small group and of a large group the provision point was not effective. When the income of participants was considered, we found that participants with higher experimental income were less willing to voluntarily contribute to financing of a public good.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>behavioral economics</subject><subject>C92</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>H41</subject><subject>H42</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>online experiment</subject><subject>provision point</subject><subject>Public good</subject><subject>public goods game</subject><subject>small and large groups</subject><subject>voluntary contribution mechanism</subject><issn>1849-1162</issn><issn>1331-5609</issn><issn>1849-1162</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uc9LwzAYLaKgzJ29BjzX5UfXNgcRHXMKA4f44xjS9usWzZqZpOr8602tqBdzyePlvfd94UXREcEnNMny0YeyUMQUUxJjTPFOdEDyhMeEpHT3D96Phs494XASzpKEHkTrcwtoAWajAT0qrVWzRN6gB6Pbxkur9BZNTOOtKloP3cuiLbQq0cyYyp2huxWgW3Ct9g7V1qyRD8QFrOSrMlZqNJNrQNP3DVi1hsYfRnu11A6G3_cgur-c3k2u4vnN7HpyPo9LNiY-HkPNap4TMiZ5DVVW1QVLUy4LxjDDaQIyI4zTXEoqIZVlVvAip4SG_9eES8oGUdznrmwpn8UmTJd2K4xUomecLSFAQTOS0zToj3v9xpqXFpwXT6a1TVhR0JRmnOdZ0qWOelVpjXMW6p9ggkVXg_iqQXQ1iK6G4DjtHW9Se7AVLG27DeA3_h8nTRxJGfsEq0GQmQ</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Sirakovová, Eva</creator><creator>Čaplánová, Anetta</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><general>Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Ekonomski fakultet Zagreb</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>VP8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Are People Willing to Voluntarily Contribute to Public Goods? The Results from the Behavioral Game Experiment</title><author>Sirakovová, Eva ; Čaplánová, Anetta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-5ef3f9811518fed7dfb3669ab3303064ea713928aa2ae6ac7b9b8212202f19a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>behavioral economics</topic><topic>C92</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>H41</topic><topic>H42</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>online experiment</topic><topic>provision point</topic><topic>Public good</topic><topic>public goods game</topic><topic>small and large groups</topic><topic>voluntary contribution mechanism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sirakovová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Čaplánová, Anetta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><jtitle>Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sirakovová, Eva</au><au>Čaplánová, Anetta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are People Willing to Voluntarily Contribute to Public Goods? The Results from the Behavioral Game Experiment</atitle><jtitle>Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>63-75</pages><issn>1849-1162</issn><issn>1331-5609</issn><eissn>1849-1162</eissn><abstract>In the paper, we discuss the possibilities of alternative provision of public goods using the individual voluntary contributions. We use the data from the behavioral public goods game based on the model of voluntary contribution mechanism. We examine how people’s decisions about voluntary contributions to public goods change when the environment changes. The participants of the game were divided into small (5 persons) and large (10 persons) groups. During the game participants were asked to invest experimental money to different types of accounts, i.e. private account, Group account 1 and Group account 2. Using the game, we also examine the impact of a provision point on voluntary contributions. Based on the analysis of the data from this behavioral game, we found that the provision point is effective only if the participants are members of a small group. When the participants were members of both a small group and of a large group the provision point was not effective. When the income of participants was considered, we found that participants with higher experimental income were less willing to voluntarily contribute to financing of a public good.</abstract><cop>Zagreb</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/zireb-2021-0020</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1849-1162 |
ispartof | Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 2021-12, Vol.24 (1), p.63-75 |
issn | 1849-1162 1331-5609 1849-1162 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_271826 |
source | Business Source Complete; Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Behavior behavioral economics C92 Economics Experiments H41 H42 Hypotheses Low income groups online experiment provision point Public good public goods game small and large groups voluntary contribution mechanism |
title | Are People Willing to Voluntarily Contribute to Public Goods? The Results from the Behavioral Game Experiment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A26%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hrcak&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20People%20Willing%20to%20Voluntarily%20Contribute%20to%20Public%20Goods?%20The%20Results%20from%20the%20Behavioral%20Game%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=Zagreb%20International%20Review%20of%20Economics%20&%20Business&rft.au=Sirakovov%C3%A1,%20Eva&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=63-75&rft.issn=1849-1162&rft.eissn=1849-1162&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/zireb-2021-0020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hrcak%3E2627998742%3C/proquest_hrcak%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627998742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |