Task and ego goal orientations in competitive sport: a quantitative review of the literature from 1989 to 2016
Achievement goal theory (AGT) is a dominant theoretical framework. The purposes of this review were (1) to provide a summary of the task and ego goal orientations literature in competitive sport as measured by the Task and Ego Orientations in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ) or the Perceptions of Success...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Kinesiology 2016-06, Vol.48 (1), p.3-29 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 29 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | Kinesiology |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Lochbaum, Marc Kazak Çetinkalp, Zişan Graham, Kara-Aretha Wright, Taylor Zazo, Ricardo |
| description | Achievement goal theory (AGT) is a dominant theoretical framework. The purposes of this review were (1) to provide a summary of the task and ego goal orientations literature in competitive sport as measured by the Task and Ego Orientations in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ) or the Perceptions of Success in Sport Questionnaire (POSQ), (2) to test the interdependence of the two goal orientations, and (3) to provide the estimated means for both orientations across a number of historically examined moderator variables. 260 studies met inclusion criteria totaling 80,959 unique participants across 39 countries and 32 sports. Youth samples were nearly 50% of all included studies. The meta-analyzed intercorrelations (rw=.18, z=9.96, p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.26582/k.48.1.14 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_hrcak</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_160738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A470462254</galeid><sourcerecordid>A470462254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a4e30a5b3d5ce31e96b053eb8555cce477a2dec17525768666eb89ef024c8a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhosouH5c_AUFLyK05mOSpsdl8QsWvOzBW8im0zXbbrMmXcF_b7TiQeYwwzvPvMwwWXZFScmkUOyuK0GVtKRwlM2oAlVIrl6PU805LSgAPc3OYtwSAkIyOcv4ysQuN0OT48bnG2_63AeHw2hG54eYuyG3frfH0Y3uA_O492G8yE5a00e8_M3n2erhfrV4KpYvj8-L-bKwnKmxMICcGLHmjbDIKdZyTQTHtRJCWItQVYY1aGklmKikklKmXo0tYWCVqfl5Vky2b8GaTu-D25nwqb1xelJisJhKTSWpuEr8zcTvg38_YBz1zkWLfW8G9IeoqSJKklpVkNDrf-jWH8KQjtGsJlADZUATVU7UxvSo3dD6MRibosGds37A1iV9DhUByZj4tr2dBmzwMQZs_5amRP_8R3calKaaAv8Cvh2A6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2904941241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Task and ego goal orientations in competitive sport: a quantitative review of the literature from 1989 to 2016</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lochbaum, Marc ; Kazak Çetinkalp, Zişan ; Graham, Kara-Aretha ; Wright, Taylor ; Zazo, Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lochbaum, Marc ; Kazak Çetinkalp, Zişan ; Graham, Kara-Aretha ; Wright, Taylor ; Zazo, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>Achievement goal theory (AGT) is a dominant theoretical framework. The purposes of this review were (1) to provide a summary of the task and ego goal orientations literature in competitive sport as measured by the Task and Ego Orientations in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ) or the Perceptions of Success in Sport Questionnaire (POSQ), (2) to test the interdependence of the two goal orientations, and (3) to provide the estimated means for both orientations across a number of historically examined moderator variables. 260 studies met inclusion criteria totaling 80,959 unique participants across 39 countries and 32 sports. Youth samples were nearly 50% of all included studies. The meta-analyzed intercorrelations (rw=.18, z=9.96, p<.000) supported the conceptualized interdependence of the two goal orientations. The estimated mean values were 4.15+.30 (task) and 3.04+.51 (ego). However, differences, POSQ compared to TEOSQ, existed in the estimated means (g=.92 task; g=1.09 ego). Thus, the TEOSQ and POSQ samples for the moderator variables (i.e. sex, sport level, sport type, and collective/individualistic countries) were examined separately. Results both supported and refuted the hypotheses and also differed by measure. Because of TEOSQ and POSQ inconsistencies, an additional analysis was undertaken to examine whether the TEOSQ and POSQ differed to a common correlate motivation climate. This analysis revealed measurement differences in the ego to ego climate relationships. In conclusion, AGT has been extensively researched in competitive sport. The inconsistent pattern of results raises a number of future research questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1331-1441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1848-638X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26582/k.48.1.14</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zagreb: Sveuciliste U Zagrebu</publisher><subject>achievement goal theory ; achievement goals ; Analysis ; Computer industry ; motivation ; Perception of Success Questionnaire ; Questionnaires ; Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire</subject><ispartof>Kinesiology, 2016-06, Vol.48 (1), p.3-29</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Sveuciliste U Zagrebu</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. This is sourced from HRČAK - Portal of scientific journals of Croatia.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-7640-7075</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,313,314,780,784,792,864,885,27922,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lochbaum, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazak Çetinkalp, Zişan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Kara-Aretha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zazo, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>Task and ego goal orientations in competitive sport: a quantitative review of the literature from 1989 to 2016</title><title>Kinesiology</title><description>Achievement goal theory (AGT) is a dominant theoretical framework. The purposes of this review were (1) to provide a summary of the task and ego goal orientations literature in competitive sport as measured by the Task and Ego Orientations in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ) or the Perceptions of Success in Sport Questionnaire (POSQ), (2) to test the interdependence of the two goal orientations, and (3) to provide the estimated means for both orientations across a number of historically examined moderator variables. 260 studies met inclusion criteria totaling 80,959 unique participants across 39 countries and 32 sports. Youth samples were nearly 50% of all included studies. The meta-analyzed intercorrelations (rw=.18, z=9.96, p<.000) supported the conceptualized interdependence of the two goal orientations. The estimated mean values were 4.15+.30 (task) and 3.04+.51 (ego). However, differences, POSQ compared to TEOSQ, existed in the estimated means (g=.92 task; g=1.09 ego). Thus, the TEOSQ and POSQ samples for the moderator variables (i.e. sex, sport level, sport type, and collective/individualistic countries) were examined separately. Results both supported and refuted the hypotheses and also differed by measure. Because of TEOSQ and POSQ inconsistencies, an additional analysis was undertaken to examine whether the TEOSQ and POSQ differed to a common correlate motivation climate. This analysis revealed measurement differences in the ego to ego climate relationships. In conclusion, AGT has been extensively researched in competitive sport. The inconsistent pattern of results raises a number of future research questions.</description><subject>achievement goal theory</subject><subject>achievement goals</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Computer industry</subject><subject>motivation</subject><subject>Perception of Success Questionnaire</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire</subject><issn>1331-1441</issn><issn>1848-638X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkU1LxDAQhosouH5c_AUFLyK05mOSpsdl8QsWvOzBW8im0zXbbrMmXcF_b7TiQeYwwzvPvMwwWXZFScmkUOyuK0GVtKRwlM2oAlVIrl6PU805LSgAPc3OYtwSAkIyOcv4ysQuN0OT48bnG2_63AeHw2hG54eYuyG3frfH0Y3uA_O492G8yE5a00e8_M3n2erhfrV4KpYvj8-L-bKwnKmxMICcGLHmjbDIKdZyTQTHtRJCWItQVYY1aGklmKikklKmXo0tYWCVqfl5Vky2b8GaTu-D25nwqb1xelJisJhKTSWpuEr8zcTvg38_YBz1zkWLfW8G9IeoqSJKklpVkNDrf-jWH8KQjtGsJlADZUATVU7UxvSo3dD6MRibosGds37A1iV9DhUByZj4tr2dBmzwMQZs_5amRP_8R3calKaaAv8Cvh2A6Q</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Lochbaum, Marc</creator><creator>Kazak Çetinkalp, Zişan</creator><creator>Graham, Kara-Aretha</creator><creator>Wright, Taylor</creator><creator>Zazo, Ricardo</creator><general>Sveuciliste U Zagrebu</general><general>Sveuciliste u Zagrebu, Kinezioloski Fakultet</general><general>Kineziološki fakultet</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>VP8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7640-7075</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Task and ego goal orientations in competitive sport</title><author>Lochbaum, Marc ; Kazak Çetinkalp, Zişan ; Graham, Kara-Aretha ; Wright, Taylor ; Zazo, Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-a4e30a5b3d5ce31e96b053eb8555cce477a2dec17525768666eb89ef024c8a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>achievement goal theory</topic><topic>achievement goals</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Computer industry</topic><topic>motivation</topic><topic>Perception of Success Questionnaire</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lochbaum, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazak Çetinkalp, Zişan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Kara-Aretha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zazo, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><jtitle>Kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lochbaum, Marc</au><au>Kazak Çetinkalp, Zişan</au><au>Graham, Kara-Aretha</au><au>Wright, Taylor</au><au>Zazo, Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Task and ego goal orientations in competitive sport: a quantitative review of the literature from 1989 to 2016</atitle><jtitle>Kinesiology</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>3-29</pages><issn>1331-1441</issn><eissn>1848-638X</eissn><abstract>Achievement goal theory (AGT) is a dominant theoretical framework. The purposes of this review were (1) to provide a summary of the task and ego goal orientations literature in competitive sport as measured by the Task and Ego Orientations in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ) or the Perceptions of Success in Sport Questionnaire (POSQ), (2) to test the interdependence of the two goal orientations, and (3) to provide the estimated means for both orientations across a number of historically examined moderator variables. 260 studies met inclusion criteria totaling 80,959 unique participants across 39 countries and 32 sports. Youth samples were nearly 50% of all included studies. The meta-analyzed intercorrelations (rw=.18, z=9.96, p<.000) supported the conceptualized interdependence of the two goal orientations. The estimated mean values were 4.15+.30 (task) and 3.04+.51 (ego). However, differences, POSQ compared to TEOSQ, existed in the estimated means (g=.92 task; g=1.09 ego). Thus, the TEOSQ and POSQ samples for the moderator variables (i.e. sex, sport level, sport type, and collective/individualistic countries) were examined separately. Results both supported and refuted the hypotheses and also differed by measure. Because of TEOSQ and POSQ inconsistencies, an additional analysis was undertaken to examine whether the TEOSQ and POSQ differed to a common correlate motivation climate. This analysis revealed measurement differences in the ego to ego climate relationships. In conclusion, AGT has been extensively researched in competitive sport. The inconsistent pattern of results raises a number of future research questions.</abstract><cop>Zagreb</cop><pub>Sveuciliste U Zagrebu</pub><doi>10.26582/k.48.1.14</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7640-7075</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1331-1441 |
| ispartof | Kinesiology, 2016-06, Vol.48 (1), p.3-29 |
| issn | 1331-1441 1848-638X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hrcak_primary_oai_hrcak_srce_hr_160738 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | achievement goal theory achievement goals Analysis Computer industry motivation Perception of Success Questionnaire Questionnaires Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire |
| title | Task and ego goal orientations in competitive sport: a quantitative review of the literature from 1989 to 2016 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A46%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hrcak&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Task%20and%20ego%20goal%20orientations%20in%20competitive%20sport:%20a%20quantitative%20review%20of%20the%20literature%20from%201989%20to%202016&rft.jtitle=Kinesiology&rft.au=Lochbaum,%20Marc&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=3-29&rft.issn=1331-1441&rft.eissn=1848-638X&rft_id=info:doi/10.26582/k.48.1.14&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hrcak%3EA470462254%3C/gale_hrcak%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2904941241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A470462254&rfr_iscdi=true |