Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.228
Hauptverfasser: Marc Soubeyrand, David Biau, Nabil Jomaah, Clément Pradel, Christian Dumontier, Geoffroy Nourissat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 228
container_title Radiology
container_volume 249
creator Marc Soubeyrand
David Biau
Nabil Jomaah
Clément Pradel
Christian Dumontier
Geoffroy Nourissat
description Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center over a 2-month period in 2006 were prospectively included. The institutional review board approved the study, and each patient gave written informed consent. There were 30 injuries in 26 patients (19 men and seven women; median age, 34 years). US examination was performed before surgery. Surgeons were not informed of the US findings. For tendons, arteries, and nerves, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of US were computed. Results: US depicted all tendon lesions, with no false-positive findings; two arterial lesions were missed, with no false-positive findings, and four nerve lesions were missed, with six false-positive findings. The negative predictive value was 100% (95% confidence interval: 95.5%, 100%) for tendons, 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 88.7%, 99.6%) for arteries, and 93.7% (95% confidence interval: 84.5%, 98.2%) for nerves. In three cases, US depicted foreign bodies missed at surgery. Conclusion: US was highly effective in identifying patients with no tendon or arterial lesions. Performance was poorer for diagnosing nerve lesions. US followed by a repeat physical examination after 72 hours to look for missed nerve damage may deserve evaluation as an alternative to routine surgical exploration when US findings are normal. © RSNA, 2008
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.2491071679
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>highwire</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_highwire_smallpub3_radiology249_1_228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>radiology249_1_228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-highwire_smallpub3_radiology249_1_2283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj0tOwzAUAC0EEuFzAHbvAKT4xQlJ2CFaVCQWSC1sI-M6yauMXfk5Qr19-V2A1WxGI40QVyhniGVzE_WGgpsVZYuyxtu6PRIZVkWdo8LqWGRSKpU3Jban4ox5KyWWVVNnwrxYb1PUifwAb8HpCE9-O0WyDKGHNFpYar-5gznpwQdOZODemClqs_8WXldAHuZ2R-YnsQp9ytfEPFl4tkzBM16Ik147tpd_PBfXj4v1wzIfaRg_KdqOP7Rzu-lddb8fYdh_nXTYFUWj_qkfAGF4VFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Marc Soubeyrand ; David Biau ; Nabil Jomaah ; Clément Pradel ; Christian Dumontier ; Geoffroy Nourissat</creator><creatorcontrib>Marc Soubeyrand ; David Biau ; Nabil Jomaah ; Clément Pradel ; Christian Dumontier ; Geoffroy Nourissat</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center over a 2-month period in 2006 were prospectively included. The institutional review board approved the study, and each patient gave written informed consent. There were 30 injuries in 26 patients (19 men and seven women; median age, 34 years). US examination was performed before surgery. Surgeons were not informed of the US findings. For tendons, arteries, and nerves, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of US were computed. Results: US depicted all tendon lesions, with no false-positive findings; two arterial lesions were missed, with no false-positive findings, and four nerve lesions were missed, with six false-positive findings. The negative predictive value was 100% (95% confidence interval: 95.5%, 100%) for tendons, 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 88.7%, 99.6%) for arteries, and 93.7% (95% confidence interval: 84.5%, 98.2%) for nerves. In three cases, US depicted foreign bodies missed at surgery. Conclusion: US was highly effective in identifying patients with no tendon or arterial lesions. Performance was poorer for diagnosing nerve lesions. US followed by a repeat physical examination after 72 hours to look for missed nerve damage may deserve evaluation as an alternative to routine surgical exploration when US findings are normal. © RSNA, 2008</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2491071679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Radiological Society of North America</publisher><ispartof>Radiology, 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.228</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marc Soubeyrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David Biau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabil Jomaah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clément Pradel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian Dumontier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoffroy Nourissat</creatorcontrib><title>Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1</title><title>Radiology</title><description>Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center over a 2-month period in 2006 were prospectively included. The institutional review board approved the study, and each patient gave written informed consent. There were 30 injuries in 26 patients (19 men and seven women; median age, 34 years). US examination was performed before surgery. Surgeons were not informed of the US findings. For tendons, arteries, and nerves, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of US were computed. Results: US depicted all tendon lesions, with no false-positive findings; two arterial lesions were missed, with no false-positive findings, and four nerve lesions were missed, with six false-positive findings. The negative predictive value was 100% (95% confidence interval: 95.5%, 100%) for tendons, 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 88.7%, 99.6%) for arteries, and 93.7% (95% confidence interval: 84.5%, 98.2%) for nerves. In three cases, US depicted foreign bodies missed at surgery. Conclusion: US was highly effective in identifying patients with no tendon or arterial lesions. Performance was poorer for diagnosing nerve lesions. US followed by a repeat physical examination after 72 hours to look for missed nerve damage may deserve evaluation as an alternative to routine surgical exploration when US findings are normal. © RSNA, 2008</description><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVj0tOwzAUAC0EEuFzAHbvAKT4xQlJ2CFaVCQWSC1sI-M6yauMXfk5Qr19-V2A1WxGI40QVyhniGVzE_WGgpsVZYuyxtu6PRIZVkWdo8LqWGRSKpU3Jban4ox5KyWWVVNnwrxYb1PUifwAb8HpCE9-O0WyDKGHNFpYar-5gznpwQdOZODemClqs_8WXldAHuZ2R-YnsQp9ytfEPFl4tkzBM16Ik147tpd_PBfXj4v1wzIfaRg_KdqOP7Rzu-lddb8fYdh_nXTYFUWj_qkfAGF4VFY</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Marc Soubeyrand</creator><creator>David Biau</creator><creator>Nabil Jomaah</creator><creator>Clément Pradel</creator><creator>Christian Dumontier</creator><creator>Geoffroy Nourissat</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1</title><author>Marc Soubeyrand ; David Biau ; Nabil Jomaah ; Clément Pradel ; Christian Dumontier ; Geoffroy Nourissat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-highwire_smallpub3_radiology249_1_2283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marc Soubeyrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David Biau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabil Jomaah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clément Pradel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian Dumontier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoffroy Nourissat</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marc Soubeyrand</au><au>David Biau</au><au>Nabil Jomaah</au><au>Clément Pradel</au><au>Christian Dumontier</au><au>Geoffroy Nourissat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>249</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>228</spage><pages>228-</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center over a 2-month period in 2006 were prospectively included. The institutional review board approved the study, and each patient gave written informed consent. There were 30 injuries in 26 patients (19 men and seven women; median age, 34 years). US examination was performed before surgery. Surgeons were not informed of the US findings. For tendons, arteries, and nerves, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of US were computed. Results: US depicted all tendon lesions, with no false-positive findings; two arterial lesions were missed, with no false-positive findings, and four nerve lesions were missed, with six false-positive findings. The negative predictive value was 100% (95% confidence interval: 95.5%, 100%) for tendons, 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 88.7%, 99.6%) for arteries, and 93.7% (95% confidence interval: 84.5%, 98.2%) for nerves. In three cases, US depicted foreign bodies missed at surgery. Conclusion: US was highly effective in identifying patients with no tendon or arterial lesions. Performance was poorer for diagnosing nerve lesions. US followed by a repeat physical examination after 72 hours to look for missed nerve damage may deserve evaluation as an alternative to routine surgical exploration when US findings are normal. © RSNA, 2008</abstract><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><doi>10.1148/radiol.2491071679</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.228
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_highwire_smallpub3_radiology249_1_228
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T08%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-highwire&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Penetrating%20Volar%20Injuries%20of%20the%20Hand:%20Diagnostic%20Accuracy%20of%20US%20in%20Depicting%20Soft-Tissue%20Lesions1&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Marc%20Soubeyrand&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=249&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=228&rft.pages=228-&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2491071679&rft_dat=%3Chighwire%3Eradiology249_1_228%3C/highwire%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true