Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiology 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 228 |
container_title | Radiology |
container_volume | 249 |
creator | Marc Soubeyrand David Biau Nabil Jomaah Clément Pradel Christian Dumontier Geoffroy Nourissat |
description | Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by
penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center over a 2-month period in 2006 were prospectively included. The institutional review
board approved the study, and each patient gave written informed consent. There were 30 injuries in 26 patients (19 men and
seven women; median age, 34 years). US examination was performed before surgery. Surgeons were not informed of the US findings.
For tendons, arteries, and nerves, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value
of US were computed.
Results: US depicted all tendon lesions, with no false-positive findings; two arterial lesions were missed, with no false-positive
findings, and four nerve lesions were missed, with six false-positive findings. The negative predictive value was 100% (95%
confidence interval: 95.5%, 100%) for tendons, 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 88.7%, 99.6%) for arteries, and 93.7% (95%
confidence interval: 84.5%, 98.2%) for nerves. In three cases, US depicted foreign bodies missed at surgery.
Conclusion: US was highly effective in identifying patients with no tendon or arterial lesions. Performance was poorer for diagnosing
nerve lesions. US followed by a repeat physical examination after 72 hours to look for missed nerve damage may deserve evaluation
as an alternative to routine surgical exploration when US findings are normal.
© RSNA, 2008 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1148/radiol.2491071679 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>highwire</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_highwire_smallpub3_radiology249_1_228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>radiology249_1_228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-highwire_smallpub3_radiology249_1_2283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj0tOwzAUAC0EEuFzAHbvAKT4xQlJ2CFaVCQWSC1sI-M6yauMXfk5Qr19-V2A1WxGI40QVyhniGVzE_WGgpsVZYuyxtu6PRIZVkWdo8LqWGRSKpU3Jban4ox5KyWWVVNnwrxYb1PUifwAb8HpCE9-O0WyDKGHNFpYar-5gznpwQdOZODemClqs_8WXldAHuZ2R-YnsQp9ytfEPFl4tkzBM16Ik147tpd_PBfXj4v1wzIfaRg_KdqOP7Rzu-lddb8fYdh_nXTYFUWj_qkfAGF4VFY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Marc Soubeyrand ; David Biau ; Nabil Jomaah ; Clément Pradel ; Christian Dumontier ; Geoffroy Nourissat</creator><creatorcontrib>Marc Soubeyrand ; David Biau ; Nabil Jomaah ; Clément Pradel ; Christian Dumontier ; Geoffroy Nourissat</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by
penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center over a 2-month period in 2006 were prospectively included. The institutional review
board approved the study, and each patient gave written informed consent. There were 30 injuries in 26 patients (19 men and
seven women; median age, 34 years). US examination was performed before surgery. Surgeons were not informed of the US findings.
For tendons, arteries, and nerves, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value
of US were computed.
Results: US depicted all tendon lesions, with no false-positive findings; two arterial lesions were missed, with no false-positive
findings, and four nerve lesions were missed, with six false-positive findings. The negative predictive value was 100% (95%
confidence interval: 95.5%, 100%) for tendons, 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 88.7%, 99.6%) for arteries, and 93.7% (95%
confidence interval: 84.5%, 98.2%) for nerves. In three cases, US depicted foreign bodies missed at surgery.
Conclusion: US was highly effective in identifying patients with no tendon or arterial lesions. Performance was poorer for diagnosing
nerve lesions. US followed by a repeat physical examination after 72 hours to look for missed nerve damage may deserve evaluation
as an alternative to routine surgical exploration when US findings are normal.
© RSNA, 2008</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2491071679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Radiological Society of North America</publisher><ispartof>Radiology, 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.228</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marc Soubeyrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David Biau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabil Jomaah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clément Pradel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian Dumontier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoffroy Nourissat</creatorcontrib><title>Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1</title><title>Radiology</title><description>Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by
penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center over a 2-month period in 2006 were prospectively included. The institutional review
board approved the study, and each patient gave written informed consent. There were 30 injuries in 26 patients (19 men and
seven women; median age, 34 years). US examination was performed before surgery. Surgeons were not informed of the US findings.
For tendons, arteries, and nerves, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value
of US were computed.
Results: US depicted all tendon lesions, with no false-positive findings; two arterial lesions were missed, with no false-positive
findings, and four nerve lesions were missed, with six false-positive findings. The negative predictive value was 100% (95%
confidence interval: 95.5%, 100%) for tendons, 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 88.7%, 99.6%) for arteries, and 93.7% (95%
confidence interval: 84.5%, 98.2%) for nerves. In three cases, US depicted foreign bodies missed at surgery.
Conclusion: US was highly effective in identifying patients with no tendon or arterial lesions. Performance was poorer for diagnosing
nerve lesions. US followed by a repeat physical examination after 72 hours to look for missed nerve damage may deserve evaluation
as an alternative to routine surgical exploration when US findings are normal.
© RSNA, 2008</description><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVj0tOwzAUAC0EEuFzAHbvAKT4xQlJ2CFaVCQWSC1sI-M6yauMXfk5Qr19-V2A1WxGI40QVyhniGVzE_WGgpsVZYuyxtu6PRIZVkWdo8LqWGRSKpU3Jban4ox5KyWWVVNnwrxYb1PUifwAb8HpCE9-O0WyDKGHNFpYar-5gznpwQdOZODemClqs_8WXldAHuZ2R-YnsQp9ytfEPFl4tkzBM16Ik147tpd_PBfXj4v1wzIfaRg_KdqOP7Rzu-lddb8fYdh_nXTYFUWj_qkfAGF4VFY</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Marc Soubeyrand</creator><creator>David Biau</creator><creator>Nabil Jomaah</creator><creator>Clément Pradel</creator><creator>Christian Dumontier</creator><creator>Geoffroy Nourissat</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1</title><author>Marc Soubeyrand ; David Biau ; Nabil Jomaah ; Clément Pradel ; Christian Dumontier ; Geoffroy Nourissat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-highwire_smallpub3_radiology249_1_2283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marc Soubeyrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David Biau</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabil Jomaah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clément Pradel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christian Dumontier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geoffroy Nourissat</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marc Soubeyrand</au><au>David Biau</au><au>Nabil Jomaah</au><au>Clément Pradel</au><au>Christian Dumontier</au><au>Geoffroy Nourissat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>249</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>228</spage><pages>228-</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasonography (US) in depicting lesions of the tendons, arteries, and nerves caused by
penetrating wounds of the volar aspect of the hand, with surgical exploration as the reference standard.
Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients seen at one center over a 2-month period in 2006 were prospectively included. The institutional review
board approved the study, and each patient gave written informed consent. There were 30 injuries in 26 patients (19 men and
seven women; median age, 34 years). US examination was performed before surgery. Surgeons were not informed of the US findings.
For tendons, arteries, and nerves, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value
of US were computed.
Results: US depicted all tendon lesions, with no false-positive findings; two arterial lesions were missed, with no false-positive
findings, and four nerve lesions were missed, with six false-positive findings. The negative predictive value was 100% (95%
confidence interval: 95.5%, 100%) for tendons, 96.7% (95% confidence interval: 88.7%, 99.6%) for arteries, and 93.7% (95%
confidence interval: 84.5%, 98.2%) for nerves. In three cases, US depicted foreign bodies missed at surgery.
Conclusion: US was highly effective in identifying patients with no tendon or arterial lesions. Performance was poorer for diagnosing
nerve lesions. US followed by a repeat physical examination after 72 hours to look for missed nerve damage may deserve evaluation
as an alternative to routine surgical exploration when US findings are normal.
© RSNA, 2008</abstract><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><doi>10.1148/radiol.2491071679</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-8419 |
ispartof | Radiology, 2008-10, Vol.249 (1), p.228 |
issn | 0033-8419 1527-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_highwire_smallpub3_radiology249_1_228 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Penetrating Volar Injuries of the Hand: Diagnostic Accuracy of US in Depicting Soft-Tissue Lesions1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T08%3A31%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-highwire&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Penetrating%20Volar%20Injuries%20of%20the%20Hand:%20Diagnostic%20Accuracy%20of%20US%20in%20Depicting%20Soft-Tissue%20Lesions1&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Marc%20Soubeyrand&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=249&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=228&rft.pages=228-&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2491071679&rft_dat=%3Chighwire%3Eradiology249_1_228%3C/highwire%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |