Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

We studied posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model using two substitutes: a 1-mm diameter flexible cable and an 11-mm diameter Achil les tendon autograft. The thin cable allowed us to study five femoral and five tibial attachments in each knee. A nearly isometric attachment w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 1996-07, Vol.24 (4), p.437
1. Verfasser: Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 437
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 24
creator Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes
description We studied posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model using two substitutes: a 1-mm diameter flexible cable and an 11-mm diameter Achil les tendon autograft. The thin cable allowed us to study five femoral and five tibial attachments in each knee. A nearly isometric attachment was located after cutting the posterior cruciate ligament while the tibia was re duced with a 100 N anterior force. The five femoral locations studied were the isometric location and four locations centered around this isometric point. The Achilles tendon reconstruction was used with both an isometric and a nonisometric femoral site, allowing us to confirm the results with the wire cable. Posterior motion limits were measured under a 100 N posterior force in the intact, posterior cruciate ligament-deficient, and posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. We found that the restoration of knee stability in flexion depended strongly on the femoral attachment location. A femoral attachment that was nonisometric by intra operative measurement, but within the posterior cruci ate ligament anatomic footprint, most closely repro duced the intact knee's posterior motion limits. Variations in the tibial attachment site produced only minor changes in the posterior motion limits. We con cluded that the proximal-distal location selected for the femoral attachment of a posterior cruciate ligament substitute was particularly important in the restoration of normal posterior motion limits.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/036354659602400406
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>highwire</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_highwire_smallpub3_ajs24_4_437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ajs24_4_437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c797-ea10634a7d458d3bb5dabdafa902c8440264cb19f722e54c2ef6964ef781248b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjM1KxDAURoMoWEdfwFU3boToTXKTNEsp_kFBkdmXJE1mMnRaaTL4-s6gfIsDh8NHyC2DB8a0fgShhEQljQKOAAjqjFRMSk6FUPKcVKeAnopLcpXzDgCYVk1F7j_nXMKS5qVul4NPtoS6Sxu7D1Opv4Kfp1yOvqR5uiYX0Y453PxzRdYvz-v2jXYfr-_tU0e9NpoGy0AJtHpA2QzCOTlYN9hoDXDfIAJX6B0zUXMeJHoeojIKQ9QN49g4sSJ3f7fbtNn-pCX0eW_H8fvgRG93mWN_nNDiF48nRKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes</creator><creatorcontrib>Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes</creatorcontrib><description>We studied posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model using two substitutes: a 1-mm diameter flexible cable and an 11-mm diameter Achil les tendon autograft. The thin cable allowed us to study five femoral and five tibial attachments in each knee. A nearly isometric attachment was located after cutting the posterior cruciate ligament while the tibia was re duced with a 100 N anterior force. The five femoral locations studied were the isometric location and four locations centered around this isometric point. The Achilles tendon reconstruction was used with both an isometric and a nonisometric femoral site, allowing us to confirm the results with the wire cable. Posterior motion limits were measured under a 100 N posterior force in the intact, posterior cruciate ligament-deficient, and posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. We found that the restoration of knee stability in flexion depended strongly on the femoral attachment location. A femoral attachment that was nonisometric by intra operative measurement, but within the posterior cruci ate ligament anatomic footprint, most closely repro duced the intact knee's posterior motion limits. Variations in the tibial attachment site produced only minor changes in the posterior motion limits. We con cluded that the proximal-distal location selected for the femoral attachment of a posterior cruciate ligament substitute was particularly important in the restoration of normal posterior motion limits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/036354659602400406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</publisher><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 1996-07, Vol.24 (4), p.437</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c797-ea10634a7d458d3bb5dabdafa902c8440264cb19f722e54c2ef6964ef781248b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes</creatorcontrib><title>Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><description>We studied posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model using two substitutes: a 1-mm diameter flexible cable and an 11-mm diameter Achil les tendon autograft. The thin cable allowed us to study five femoral and five tibial attachments in each knee. A nearly isometric attachment was located after cutting the posterior cruciate ligament while the tibia was re duced with a 100 N anterior force. The five femoral locations studied were the isometric location and four locations centered around this isometric point. The Achilles tendon reconstruction was used with both an isometric and a nonisometric femoral site, allowing us to confirm the results with the wire cable. Posterior motion limits were measured under a 100 N posterior force in the intact, posterior cruciate ligament-deficient, and posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. We found that the restoration of knee stability in flexion depended strongly on the femoral attachment location. A femoral attachment that was nonisometric by intra operative measurement, but within the posterior cruci ate ligament anatomic footprint, most closely repro duced the intact knee's posterior motion limits. Variations in the tibial attachment site produced only minor changes in the posterior motion limits. We con cluded that the proximal-distal location selected for the femoral attachment of a posterior cruciate ligament substitute was particularly important in the restoration of normal posterior motion limits.</description><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjM1KxDAURoMoWEdfwFU3boToTXKTNEsp_kFBkdmXJE1mMnRaaTL4-s6gfIsDh8NHyC2DB8a0fgShhEQljQKOAAjqjFRMSk6FUPKcVKeAnopLcpXzDgCYVk1F7j_nXMKS5qVul4NPtoS6Sxu7D1Opv4Kfp1yOvqR5uiYX0Y453PxzRdYvz-v2jXYfr-_tU0e9NpoGy0AJtHpA2QzCOTlYN9hoDXDfIAJX6B0zUXMeJHoeojIKQ9QN49g4sSJ3f7fbtNn-pCX0eW_H8fvgRG93mWN_nNDiF48nRKQ</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes</creator><general>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</title><author>Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c797-ea10634a7d458d3bb5dabdafa902c8440264cb19f722e54c2ef6964ef781248b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marc T. Galloway Edward S. Grood John N. Mehalik Martin Levy Stephen C. Saddler Frank R. Noyes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>437</spage><pages>437-</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>We studied posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model using two substitutes: a 1-mm diameter flexible cable and an 11-mm diameter Achil les tendon autograft. The thin cable allowed us to study five femoral and five tibial attachments in each knee. A nearly isometric attachment was located after cutting the posterior cruciate ligament while the tibia was re duced with a 100 N anterior force. The five femoral locations studied were the isometric location and four locations centered around this isometric point. The Achilles tendon reconstruction was used with both an isometric and a nonisometric femoral site, allowing us to confirm the results with the wire cable. Posterior motion limits were measured under a 100 N posterior force in the intact, posterior cruciate ligament-deficient, and posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. We found that the restoration of knee stability in flexion depended strongly on the femoral attachment location. A femoral attachment that was nonisometric by intra operative measurement, but within the posterior cruci ate ligament anatomic footprint, most closely repro duced the intact knee's posterior motion limits. Variations in the tibial attachment site produced only minor changes in the posterior motion limits. We con cluded that the proximal-distal location selected for the femoral attachment of a posterior cruciate ligament substitute was particularly important in the restoration of normal posterior motion limits.</abstract><pub>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</pub><doi>10.1177/036354659602400406</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 1996-07, Vol.24 (4), p.437
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_highwire_smallpub3_ajs24_4_437
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T02%3A28%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-highwire&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Posterior%20Cruciate%20Ligament%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Marc%20T.%20Galloway%20Edward%20S.%20Grood%20John%20N.%20Mehalik%20Martin%20Levy%20Stephen%20C.%20Saddler%20Frank%20R.%20Noyes&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=437&rft.pages=437-&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/036354659602400406&rft_dat=%3Chighwire%3Eajs24_4_437%3C/highwire%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true