Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems

After reviewing six senses of abstraction, this article focuses on abstractions that take the form of summary representations. Three central properties of these abstractions are established: (i) type-token interpretation; (ii) structured representation; and (iii) dynamic realization. Traditional the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2003-07, Vol.358 (1435), p.1177-1187
1. Verfasser: Barsalou, Lawrence W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1187
container_issue 1435
container_start_page 1177
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 358
creator Barsalou, Lawrence W.
description After reviewing six senses of abstraction, this article focuses on abstractions that take the form of summary representations. Three central properties of these abstractions are established: (i) type-token interpretation; (ii) structured representation; and (iii) dynamic realization. Traditional theories of representation handle interpretation and structure well but are not sufficiently dynamical. Conversely, connectionist theories are exquisitely dynamic but have problems with structure. Perceptual symbol systems offer an approach that implements all three properties naturally. Within this framework, a loose collection of property and relation simulators develops to represent abstractions. Type-token interpretation results from binding a property simulator to a region of a perceived or simulated category member. Structured representation results from binding a configuration of property and relation simulators to multiple regions in an integrated manner. Dynamic realization results from applying different subsets of property and relation simulators to category members on different occasions. From this standpoint, there are no permanent or complete abstractions of a category in memory. Instead, abstraction is the skill to construct temporary online interpretations of a category's members. Although an infinite number of abstractions are possible, attractors develop for habitual approaches to interpretation. This approach provides new ways of thinking about abstraction phenomena in categorization, inference, background knowledge and learning.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_highwire_royalsociety_royptb_358_1435_1177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3558209</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3558209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c696t-207b6a10de42b3ba41634c214dddda5fac73d943c86531e8f0c0340a82f646f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v0zAYjhCIlcGVE0I9IS4p_oo_LogxYCAqkGBwfeW4zuqSxMFOBuXX4zRVoULMF8t6ny8_dpY9xGiBkZLPQuzLBUGILjDF6lY2w0zgnCiBbmczpDjJJaP8JLsX4wYhpArB7mYnmChEOZOz7OlZGfugTe98O3ftvLPB2K4fdD2P26b04xZ728T72Z1K19E-2O-n2Zc3ry_P3-bLjxfvzs-WueGK9zlBouQao5VlpKSlZphTZghmq7R0UWkj6EoxaiQvKLayQgZRhrQkFWe8YvQ0ez7pdkPZ2JWxbYpXQxdco8MWvHZwPGndGq78NWCuKCEkCTzZCwT_fbCxh8ZFY-tat9YPEQRNxliqBFxMQBN8jMFWBxOMYCwXxnJhLBfGchPh8d_R_sD3bSYAnQDBb1NH3jjbb2Hjh9Cm4_9l402sT58vX2Kl0DUtpMOMFoAkxYgjQRn8ct1ObgRAAoCLcbCwgx3b_Ov6aHLdxN6Hw11oUUiCxnE-jV16_Z-HsQ7fgAsqCvgqGbx6Xyw_XCgBy4THE37trtY_XLBwdJt06JL9mHCXDWMhEufFjZwxsPFtnx76mAnVUKcvsarob8u67Uc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73531189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><description>After reviewing six senses of abstraction, this article focuses on abstractions that take the form of summary representations. Three central properties of these abstractions are established: (i) type-token interpretation; (ii) structured representation; and (iii) dynamic realization. Traditional theories of representation handle interpretation and structure well but are not sufficiently dynamical. Conversely, connectionist theories are exquisitely dynamic but have problems with structure. Perceptual symbol systems offer an approach that implements all three properties naturally. Within this framework, a loose collection of property and relation simulators develops to represent abstractions. Type-token interpretation results from binding a property simulator to a region of a perceived or simulated category member. Structured representation results from binding a configuration of property and relation simulators to multiple regions in an integrated manner. Dynamic realization results from applying different subsets of property and relation simulators to category members on different occasions. From this standpoint, there are no permanent or complete abstractions of a category in memory. Instead, abstraction is the skill to construct temporary online interpretations of a category's members. Although an infinite number of abstractions are possible, attractors develop for habitual approaches to interpretation. This approach provides new ways of thinking about abstraction phenomena in categorization, inference, background knowledge and learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12903648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Abstraction ; Animals ; Automobiles ; Cognition ; Concept ; Concept Formation ; Connectionism ; Dynamic ; Embodiment ; Humans ; Interpretation ; Learning ; Memory ; Mental imagery ; Mental objects ; Models, Psychological ; Perception ; Sensory perception ; Simulation ; Structured representations ; Symbolism ; Wheels</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2003-07, Vol.358 (1435), p.1177-1187</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c696t-207b6a10de42b3ba41634c214dddda5fac73d943c86531e8f0c0340a82f646f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c696t-207b6a10de42b3ba41634c214dddda5fac73d943c86531e8f0c0340a82f646f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3558209$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3558209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12903648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><title>Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>After reviewing six senses of abstraction, this article focuses on abstractions that take the form of summary representations. Three central properties of these abstractions are established: (i) type-token interpretation; (ii) structured representation; and (iii) dynamic realization. Traditional theories of representation handle interpretation and structure well but are not sufficiently dynamical. Conversely, connectionist theories are exquisitely dynamic but have problems with structure. Perceptual symbol systems offer an approach that implements all three properties naturally. Within this framework, a loose collection of property and relation simulators develops to represent abstractions. Type-token interpretation results from binding a property simulator to a region of a perceived or simulated category member. Structured representation results from binding a configuration of property and relation simulators to multiple regions in an integrated manner. Dynamic realization results from applying different subsets of property and relation simulators to category members on different occasions. From this standpoint, there are no permanent or complete abstractions of a category in memory. Instead, abstraction is the skill to construct temporary online interpretations of a category's members. Although an infinite number of abstractions are possible, attractors develop for habitual approaches to interpretation. This approach provides new ways of thinking about abstraction phenomena in categorization, inference, background knowledge and learning.</description><subject>Abstraction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Concept</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Connectionism</subject><subject>Dynamic</subject><subject>Embodiment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpretation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental imagery</subject><subject>Mental objects</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Structured representations</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><subject>Wheels</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v0zAYjhCIlcGVE0I9IS4p_oo_LogxYCAqkGBwfeW4zuqSxMFOBuXX4zRVoULMF8t6ny8_dpY9xGiBkZLPQuzLBUGILjDF6lY2w0zgnCiBbmczpDjJJaP8JLsX4wYhpArB7mYnmChEOZOz7OlZGfugTe98O3ftvLPB2K4fdD2P26b04xZ728T72Z1K19E-2O-n2Zc3ry_P3-bLjxfvzs-WueGK9zlBouQao5VlpKSlZphTZghmq7R0UWkj6EoxaiQvKLayQgZRhrQkFWe8YvQ0ez7pdkPZ2JWxbYpXQxdco8MWvHZwPGndGq78NWCuKCEkCTzZCwT_fbCxh8ZFY-tat9YPEQRNxliqBFxMQBN8jMFWBxOMYCwXxnJhLBfGchPh8d_R_sD3bSYAnQDBb1NH3jjbb2Hjh9Cm4_9l402sT58vX2Kl0DUtpMOMFoAkxYgjQRn8ct1ObgRAAoCLcbCwgx3b_Ov6aHLdxN6Hw11oUUiCxnE-jV16_Z-HsQ7fgAsqCvgqGbx6Xyw_XCgBy4THE37trtY_XLBwdJt06JL9mHCXDWMhEufFjZwxsPFtnx76mAnVUKcvsarob8u67Uc</recordid><startdate>20030729</startdate><enddate>20030729</enddate><creator>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030729</creationdate><title>Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems</title><author>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c696t-207b6a10de42b3ba41634c214dddda5fac73d943c86531e8f0c0340a82f646f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Abstraction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Concept</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Connectionism</topic><topic>Dynamic</topic><topic>Embodiment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpretation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental imagery</topic><topic>Mental objects</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Structured representations</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><topic>Wheels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2003-07-29</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>358</volume><issue>1435</issue><spage>1177</spage><epage>1187</epage><pages>1177-1187</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>After reviewing six senses of abstraction, this article focuses on abstractions that take the form of summary representations. Three central properties of these abstractions are established: (i) type-token interpretation; (ii) structured representation; and (iii) dynamic realization. Traditional theories of representation handle interpretation and structure well but are not sufficiently dynamical. Conversely, connectionist theories are exquisitely dynamic but have problems with structure. Perceptual symbol systems offer an approach that implements all three properties naturally. Within this framework, a loose collection of property and relation simulators develops to represent abstractions. Type-token interpretation results from binding a property simulator to a region of a perceived or simulated category member. Structured representation results from binding a configuration of property and relation simulators to multiple regions in an integrated manner. Dynamic realization results from applying different subsets of property and relation simulators to category members on different occasions. From this standpoint, there are no permanent or complete abstractions of a category in memory. Instead, abstraction is the skill to construct temporary online interpretations of a category's members. Although an infinite number of abstractions are possible, attractors develop for habitual approaches to interpretation. This approach provides new ways of thinking about abstraction phenomena in categorization, inference, background knowledge and learning.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>12903648</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2003.1319</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2003-07, Vol.358 (1435), p.1177-1187
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_highwire_royalsociety_royptb_358_1435_1177
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; JSTOR
subjects Abstraction
Animals
Automobiles
Cognition
Concept
Concept Formation
Connectionism
Dynamic
Embodiment
Humans
Interpretation
Learning
Memory
Mental imagery
Mental objects
Models, Psychological
Perception
Sensory perception
Simulation
Structured representations
Symbolism
Wheels
title Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abstraction%20in%20perceptual%20symbol%20systems&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Barsalou,%20Lawrence%20W.&rft.date=2003-07-29&rft.volume=358&rft.issue=1435&rft.spage=1177&rft.epage=1187&rft.pages=1177-1187&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2003.1319&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_highw%3E3558209%3C/jstor_highw%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73531189&rft_id=info:pmid/12903648&rft_jstor_id=3558209&rfr_iscdi=true