Nucleosynthesis [and Discussion]
Both Big-Bang and stellar nucleosynthesis have outcomes related to the density of baryonic matter, but whereas in the first case there is a standard model that makes very precise predictions of light element abundances as a function of the mean density of baryons in the Universe, in the second case...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences 1986-12, Vol.320 (1556), p.557-564 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 564 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1556 |
| container_start_page | 557 |
| container_title | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences |
| container_volume | 320 |
| creator | Pagel, Bernard Ephraim Julius |
| description | Both Big-Bang and stellar nucleosynthesis have outcomes related to the density of baryonic matter, but whereas in the first case there is a standard model that makes very precise predictions of light element abundances as a function of the mean density of baryons in the Universe, in the second case various uncertainties permit only very limited conclusions to be drawn. As far as Big-Bang synthesis and the light elements are concerned, existing results on D, 3He and 7Li indicate a value of ΩNh20 greater than 0.01 and less than 0.025, where ΩN is the ratio of baryonic density to the closure density and h0 is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km s-1 Mpc-1; probably 0.5 < h0 < 1. New results on the primordial helium abundance give a still tighter upper limit to ΩN,ΩNh20 < 0.013, which when compared with redshift surveys giving Ω > 0.05 implies that the observed matter can all be baryonic only if the various uncertainties are stretched to their limits. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1098/rsta.1986.0136 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_highwire_royalsociety_roypta_320_1556_557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>37818</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>37818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2333fc2ef581d91881903087d0a4b9d96927780f52ec51c3e3425a0e34d3a3a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j82L1EAQxYMouK5ePXiag9eMVV3ppPsky_qx4qKgqyyING2n4_QYk9CVqONfb2ciA4O4p-qm3q_ee1n2EGGNoNWTyKNdo1blGpDKW9kJFhXmQpfidnpTWeQS6Ppudo95C4BYSnGSrd5MrvU977px4znw6pPt6tWzwG5iDn33-X52p7Et-wd_52n24cXzq_OL_PLty1fnZ5e5k1CMuSCixgnfSIW1RqVQA4GqarDFF13rUouqUtBI4Z1ER54KIS2kUZMlK-k0Wy93XeyZo2_MEMN3G3cGwcz9zNzPzP3M3C8BjxdgsOxs20TbucAHShGB1pRktMhiv0v5exf8uDPbfopd-v7_ON9EvXt_dYaaih8kIKCUiVKEIFEjmt9h2J-bBSYJTGCevNnLjm3-dX20uG557OOhClUKVVrmyzLw6H8dljZ-M2VFlTQfVWE0pGjw-sJcJz0s-k34uvkZojdHXdJnSOZzvn0yKauEPL0RmdO6vht9Nx6Bppna1gx1Q38AVObFNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nucleosynthesis [and Discussion]</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Pagel, Bernard Ephraim Julius</creator><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Bernard Ephraim Julius</creatorcontrib><description>Both Big-Bang and stellar nucleosynthesis have outcomes related to the density of baryonic matter, but whereas in the first case there is a standard model that makes very precise predictions of light element abundances as a function of the mean density of baryons in the Universe, in the second case various uncertainties permit only very limited conclusions to be drawn. As far as Big-Bang synthesis and the light elements are concerned, existing results on D, 3He and 7Li indicate a value of ΩNh20 greater than 0.01 and less than 0.025, where ΩN is the ratio of baryonic density to the closure density and h0 is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km s-1 Mpc-1; probably 0.5 < h0 < 1. New results on the primordial helium abundance give a still tighter upper limit to ΩN,ΩNh20 < 0.013, which when compared with redshift surveys giving Ω > 0.05 implies that the observed matter can all be baryonic only if the various uncertainties are stretched to their limits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-503X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0080-4614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-0272</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1986.0136</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PTRMAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Astronomical objects ; Astronomy ; Baryons ; Cosmology ; Deuterium ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Galaxies ; Helium ; Interstellar medium ; Light elements ; Metal abundance ; Origin, formation and abundance of the elements ; Stellar masses ; Stellar nucleosynthesis ; Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences, 1986-12, Vol.320 (1556), p.557-564</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1986 The Royal Society</rights><rights>Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2333fc2ef581d91881903087d0a4b9d96927780f52ec51c3e3425a0e34d3a3a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2333fc2ef581d91881903087d0a4b9d96927780f52ec51c3e3425a0e34d3a3a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/37818$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/37818$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,27922,27923,58015,58019,58248,58252</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8330993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Bernard Ephraim Julius</creatorcontrib><title>Nucleosynthesis [and Discussion]</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences</title><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A</addtitle><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A</addtitle><description>Both Big-Bang and stellar nucleosynthesis have outcomes related to the density of baryonic matter, but whereas in the first case there is a standard model that makes very precise predictions of light element abundances as a function of the mean density of baryons in the Universe, in the second case various uncertainties permit only very limited conclusions to be drawn. As far as Big-Bang synthesis and the light elements are concerned, existing results on D, 3He and 7Li indicate a value of ΩNh20 greater than 0.01 and less than 0.025, where ΩN is the ratio of baryonic density to the closure density and h0 is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km s-1 Mpc-1; probably 0.5 < h0 < 1. New results on the primordial helium abundance give a still tighter upper limit to ΩN,ΩNh20 < 0.013, which when compared with redshift surveys giving Ω > 0.05 implies that the observed matter can all be baryonic only if the various uncertainties are stretched to their limits.</description><subject>Astronomical objects</subject><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Baryons</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Deuterium</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Galaxies</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Interstellar medium</subject><subject>Light elements</subject><subject>Metal abundance</subject><subject>Origin, formation and abundance of the elements</subject><subject>Stellar masses</subject><subject>Stellar nucleosynthesis</subject><subject>Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</subject><issn>1364-503X</issn><issn>0080-4614</issn><issn>1471-2962</issn><issn>2054-0272</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j82L1EAQxYMouK5ePXiag9eMVV3ppPsky_qx4qKgqyyING2n4_QYk9CVqONfb2ciA4O4p-qm3q_ee1n2EGGNoNWTyKNdo1blGpDKW9kJFhXmQpfidnpTWeQS6Ppudo95C4BYSnGSrd5MrvU977px4znw6pPt6tWzwG5iDn33-X52p7Et-wd_52n24cXzq_OL_PLty1fnZ5e5k1CMuSCixgnfSIW1RqVQA4GqarDFF13rUouqUtBI4Z1ER54KIS2kUZMlK-k0Wy93XeyZo2_MEMN3G3cGwcz9zNzPzP3M3C8BjxdgsOxs20TbucAHShGB1pRktMhiv0v5exf8uDPbfopd-v7_ON9EvXt_dYaaih8kIKCUiVKEIFEjmt9h2J-bBSYJTGCevNnLjm3-dX20uG557OOhClUKVVrmyzLw6H8dljZ-M2VFlTQfVWE0pGjw-sJcJz0s-k34uvkZojdHXdJnSOZzvn0yKauEPL0RmdO6vht9Nx6Bppna1gx1Q38AVObFNA</recordid><startdate>19861217</startdate><enddate>19861217</enddate><creator>Pagel, Bernard Ephraim Julius</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><general>Royal Society of London</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19861217</creationdate><title>Nucleosynthesis [and Discussion]</title><author>Pagel, Bernard Ephraim Julius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-2333fc2ef581d91881903087d0a4b9d96927780f52ec51c3e3425a0e34d3a3a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Astronomical objects</topic><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Baryons</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Deuterium</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Galaxies</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Interstellar medium</topic><topic>Light elements</topic><topic>Metal abundance</topic><topic>Origin, formation and abundance of the elements</topic><topic>Stellar masses</topic><topic>Stellar nucleosynthesis</topic><topic>Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Bernard Ephraim Julius</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pagel, Bernard Ephraim Julius</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nucleosynthesis [and Discussion]</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences</jtitle><stitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A</stitle><addtitle>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A</addtitle><date>1986-12-17</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>320</volume><issue>1556</issue><spage>557</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>557-564</pages><issn>1364-503X</issn><issn>0080-4614</issn><eissn>1471-2962</eissn><eissn>2054-0272</eissn><coden>PTRMAD</coden><abstract>Both Big-Bang and stellar nucleosynthesis have outcomes related to the density of baryonic matter, but whereas in the first case there is a standard model that makes very precise predictions of light element abundances as a function of the mean density of baryons in the Universe, in the second case various uncertainties permit only very limited conclusions to be drawn. As far as Big-Bang synthesis and the light elements are concerned, existing results on D, 3He and 7Li indicate a value of ΩNh20 greater than 0.01 and less than 0.025, where ΩN is the ratio of baryonic density to the closure density and h0 is the Hubble constant in units of 100 km s-1 Mpc-1; probably 0.5 < h0 < 1. New results on the primordial helium abundance give a still tighter upper limit to ΩN,ΩNh20 < 0.013, which when compared with redshift surveys giving Ω > 0.05 implies that the observed matter can all be baryonic only if the various uncertainties are stretched to their limits.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><doi>10.1098/rsta.1986.0136</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1364-503X |
| ispartof | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and physical sciences, 1986-12, Vol.320 (1556), p.557-564 |
| issn | 1364-503X 0080-4614 1471-2962 2054-0272 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_highwire_royalsociety_roypta_320_1556_557 |
| source | JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Astronomical objects Astronomy Baryons Cosmology Deuterium Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Galaxies Helium Interstellar medium Light elements Metal abundance Origin, formation and abundance of the elements Stellar masses Stellar nucleosynthesis Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe |
| title | Nucleosynthesis [and Discussion] |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T09%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nucleosynthesis%20%5Band%20Discussion%5D&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20A:%20Mathematical%20and%20physical%20sciences&rft.au=Pagel,%20Bernard%20Ephraim%20Julius&rft.date=1986-12-17&rft.volume=320&rft.issue=1556&rft.spage=557&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=557-564&rft.issn=1364-503X&rft.eissn=1471-2962&rft.coden=PTRMAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsta.1986.0136&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_highw%3E37818%3C/jstor_highw%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=37818&rfr_iscdi=true |