Gustatory responsiveness of fibers in the hamster glossopharyngeal nerve

T. Hanamori, I. J. Miller Jr and D. V. Smith Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267. 1. Mammalian taste receptors are distributed within separate subpopulations, innervated by branches of cranial nerves VII, IX, and X. Most gu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 1988-08, Vol.60 (2), p.478-498
Hauptverfasser: Hanamori, T, Miller, I. J., Jr, Smith, D. V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 498
container_issue 2
container_start_page 478
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 60
creator Hanamori, T
Miller, I. J., Jr
Smith, D. V
description T. Hanamori, I. J. Miller Jr and D. V. Smith Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267. 1. Mammalian taste receptors are distributed within separate subpopulations, innervated by branches of cranial nerves VII, IX, and X. Most gustatory electrophysiology has focused on input from the fungiform papillae on the anterior portion of the tongue, carried by the chorda tympani branch of the VIIth nerve. However, only a small percentage of the taste buds are located in the fungiform papillae (approximately 18% in the hamster). There have been no studies on the hamster's IXth nerve, which innervates greater than 50% of its taste buds, and most other studies of IXth nerve function have employed only whole-nerve recording. 2. Action potentials were recorded from 83 individual fibers in the IXth nerve of the hamster. Stimuli were five concentrations each of sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine hydrochloride (QHCl), all presented to every fiber at 37 degrees C. Responses were quantified as the number of impulses in 10 s minus the preceding 10 s of spontaneous activity. 3. Across these concentration series, HCl and QHCl were by far the most excitatory stimuli, with mean responses across all cells three to four times greater than those evoked by sucrose or NaCl. The order of effectiveness of the stimuli was H greater than Q much greater than N greater than S. 4. Of the 83 fibers, 56 were stimulated via the foliate papillae and 27 via the single vallate papilla. No fibers responded to both of these fields. There were generally no differences in the sensitivity of these two subpopulations of taste buds, except that QHCl was more effective when applied to the foliates. 5. A "total" response measure was derived by summing the excitatory responses to each stimulus across the entire concentration series. The fibers were then classified according to the best total response, resulting in 52 HCl-, 19 QHCl-, 8 sucrose- and 4 NaCl-best cells. Considering the slope of the concentration-response functions as a criterion for classification produced very similar results. The fiber classification varied somewhat with concentration, with more fibers categorized as HCl- and QHCl-best at the higher concentration levels. 6. Breadth of responsiveness was measured using the equation developed by Smith and Travers. At the concentrations used to examine hamster chorda tympani fibers, IXth nerve fibers were not very responsive and
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.478
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_highwire_physiology_jn_60_2_478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78451681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d72254a5ac26babdfff6d1e04164035d2cc92e4a081962174193777d127b7bcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUD1v2zAQJYoWqet071JAQ9HN6h0lfmgsgjYJECBLMhMUdbJoyKRKyin87yMjhjt2usO9d_fuPca-IJSIgv_YhRIbrUsJJS9rpd-x1TLmGxSNfs9WAEtfgVIf2aecdwCgBPArdlWhQlk1K3Z3e8iznWM6FonyFEP2LxQo5yL2Re9bSrnwoZgHKga7zzOlYjvGnOM02HQMW7JjESi90DX70Nsx0-dzXbPn37-ebu42D4-39zc_Hzau0mLedIpzUVthHZetbbu-72WHBDXKGirRcecaTrUFjY3kqGpsKqVUh1y1qnWuWrPvb3enFP8cKM9m77OjcbSB4iEbpWuBUuN_iShAS1hE1wzeiC4txhL1Zkp-v7gzCOaUstkFc0rZSDDcLCkvK1_Ptw_tnrrLwjnWBf92xm12duyTDc7nC01hpSXCvxcHvx3--kRmGo7ZxzFujyfRi94rwr-S2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15086040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gustatory responsiveness of fibers in the hamster glossopharyngeal nerve</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hanamori, T ; Miller, I. J., Jr ; Smith, D. V</creator><creatorcontrib>Hanamori, T ; Miller, I. J., Jr ; Smith, D. V</creatorcontrib><description>T. Hanamori, I. J. Miller Jr and D. V. Smith Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267. 1. Mammalian taste receptors are distributed within separate subpopulations, innervated by branches of cranial nerves VII, IX, and X. Most gustatory electrophysiology has focused on input from the fungiform papillae on the anterior portion of the tongue, carried by the chorda tympani branch of the VIIth nerve. However, only a small percentage of the taste buds are located in the fungiform papillae (approximately 18% in the hamster). There have been no studies on the hamster's IXth nerve, which innervates greater than 50% of its taste buds, and most other studies of IXth nerve function have employed only whole-nerve recording. 2. Action potentials were recorded from 83 individual fibers in the IXth nerve of the hamster. Stimuli were five concentrations each of sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine hydrochloride (QHCl), all presented to every fiber at 37 degrees C. Responses were quantified as the number of impulses in 10 s minus the preceding 10 s of spontaneous activity. 3. Across these concentration series, HCl and QHCl were by far the most excitatory stimuli, with mean responses across all cells three to four times greater than those evoked by sucrose or NaCl. The order of effectiveness of the stimuli was H greater than Q much greater than N greater than S. 4. Of the 83 fibers, 56 were stimulated via the foliate papillae and 27 via the single vallate papilla. No fibers responded to both of these fields. There were generally no differences in the sensitivity of these two subpopulations of taste buds, except that QHCl was more effective when applied to the foliates. 5. A "total" response measure was derived by summing the excitatory responses to each stimulus across the entire concentration series. The fibers were then classified according to the best total response, resulting in 52 HCl-, 19 QHCl-, 8 sucrose- and 4 NaCl-best cells. Considering the slope of the concentration-response functions as a criterion for classification produced very similar results. The fiber classification varied somewhat with concentration, with more fibers categorized as HCl- and QHCl-best at the higher concentration levels. 6. Breadth of responsiveness was measured using the equation developed by Smith and Travers. At the concentrations used to examine hamster chorda tympani fibers, IXth nerve fibers were not very responsive and were quite narrowly tuned to the four taste qualities. At higher concentrations the fibers became more broadly responsive across the four stimuli.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3171639</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JONEA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cricetinae - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Glossopharyngeal Nerve - drug effects ; Glossopharyngeal Nerve - physiology ; Male ; Mesocricetus - physiology ; Neurons, Afferent - classification ; Neurons, Afferent - drug effects ; Neurons, Afferent - physiology ; Olfactory system and olfaction. Gustatory system and gustation ; Quinine - pharmacology ; Sensory Thresholds - drug effects ; Sodium Chloride - pharmacology ; Sucrose - pharmacology ; Taste - drug effects ; Taste - physiology ; Taste Buds - drug effects ; Taste Buds - innervation ; Taste Buds - physiology ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 1988-08, Vol.60 (2), p.478-498</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d72254a5ac26babdfff6d1e04164035d2cc92e4a081962174193777d127b7bcc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7138610$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3171639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hanamori, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, I. J., Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, D. V</creatorcontrib><title>Gustatory responsiveness of fibers in the hamster glossopharyngeal nerve</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>T. Hanamori, I. J. Miller Jr and D. V. Smith Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267. 1. Mammalian taste receptors are distributed within separate subpopulations, innervated by branches of cranial nerves VII, IX, and X. Most gustatory electrophysiology has focused on input from the fungiform papillae on the anterior portion of the tongue, carried by the chorda tympani branch of the VIIth nerve. However, only a small percentage of the taste buds are located in the fungiform papillae (approximately 18% in the hamster). There have been no studies on the hamster's IXth nerve, which innervates greater than 50% of its taste buds, and most other studies of IXth nerve function have employed only whole-nerve recording. 2. Action potentials were recorded from 83 individual fibers in the IXth nerve of the hamster. Stimuli were five concentrations each of sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine hydrochloride (QHCl), all presented to every fiber at 37 degrees C. Responses were quantified as the number of impulses in 10 s minus the preceding 10 s of spontaneous activity. 3. Across these concentration series, HCl and QHCl were by far the most excitatory stimuli, with mean responses across all cells three to four times greater than those evoked by sucrose or NaCl. The order of effectiveness of the stimuli was H greater than Q much greater than N greater than S. 4. Of the 83 fibers, 56 were stimulated via the foliate papillae and 27 via the single vallate papilla. No fibers responded to both of these fields. There were generally no differences in the sensitivity of these two subpopulations of taste buds, except that QHCl was more effective when applied to the foliates. 5. A "total" response measure was derived by summing the excitatory responses to each stimulus across the entire concentration series. The fibers were then classified according to the best total response, resulting in 52 HCl-, 19 QHCl-, 8 sucrose- and 4 NaCl-best cells. Considering the slope of the concentration-response functions as a criterion for classification produced very similar results. The fiber classification varied somewhat with concentration, with more fibers categorized as HCl- and QHCl-best at the higher concentration levels. 6. Breadth of responsiveness was measured using the equation developed by Smith and Travers. At the concentrations used to examine hamster chorda tympani fibers, IXth nerve fibers were not very responsive and were quite narrowly tuned to the four taste qualities. At higher concentrations the fibers became more broadly responsive across the four stimuli.</description><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cricetinae - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Glossopharyngeal Nerve - drug effects</subject><subject>Glossopharyngeal Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mesocricetus - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons, Afferent - classification</subject><subject>Neurons, Afferent - drug effects</subject><subject>Neurons, Afferent - physiology</subject><subject>Olfactory system and olfaction. Gustatory system and gustation</subject><subject>Quinine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - drug effects</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride - pharmacology</subject><subject>Sucrose - pharmacology</subject><subject>Taste - drug effects</subject><subject>Taste - physiology</subject><subject>Taste Buds - drug effects</subject><subject>Taste Buds - innervation</subject><subject>Taste Buds - physiology</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUD1v2zAQJYoWqet071JAQ9HN6h0lfmgsgjYJECBLMhMUdbJoyKRKyin87yMjhjt2usO9d_fuPca-IJSIgv_YhRIbrUsJJS9rpd-x1TLmGxSNfs9WAEtfgVIf2aecdwCgBPArdlWhQlk1K3Z3e8iznWM6FonyFEP2LxQo5yL2Re9bSrnwoZgHKga7zzOlYjvGnOM02HQMW7JjESi90DX70Nsx0-dzXbPn37-ebu42D4-39zc_Hzau0mLedIpzUVthHZetbbu-72WHBDXKGirRcecaTrUFjY3kqGpsKqVUh1y1qnWuWrPvb3enFP8cKM9m77OjcbSB4iEbpWuBUuN_iShAS1hE1wzeiC4txhL1Zkp-v7gzCOaUstkFc0rZSDDcLCkvK1_Ptw_tnrrLwjnWBf92xm12duyTDc7nC01hpSXCvxcHvx3--kRmGo7ZxzFujyfRi94rwr-S2A</recordid><startdate>19880801</startdate><enddate>19880801</enddate><creator>Hanamori, T</creator><creator>Miller, I. J., Jr</creator><creator>Smith, D. V</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880801</creationdate><title>Gustatory responsiveness of fibers in the hamster glossopharyngeal nerve</title><author>Hanamori, T ; Miller, I. J., Jr ; Smith, D. V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-d72254a5ac26babdfff6d1e04164035d2cc92e4a081962174193777d127b7bcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - drug effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cricetinae - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Glossopharyngeal Nerve - drug effects</topic><topic>Glossopharyngeal Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mesocricetus - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons, Afferent - classification</topic><topic>Neurons, Afferent - drug effects</topic><topic>Neurons, Afferent - physiology</topic><topic>Olfactory system and olfaction. Gustatory system and gustation</topic><topic>Quinine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - drug effects</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride - pharmacology</topic><topic>Sucrose - pharmacology</topic><topic>Taste - drug effects</topic><topic>Taste - physiology</topic><topic>Taste Buds - drug effects</topic><topic>Taste Buds - innervation</topic><topic>Taste Buds - physiology</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hanamori, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, I. J., Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, D. V</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hanamori, T</au><au>Miller, I. J., Jr</au><au>Smith, D. V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gustatory responsiveness of fibers in the hamster glossopharyngeal nerve</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>1988-08-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>478</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>478-498</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><coden>JONEA4</coden><abstract>T. Hanamori, I. J. Miller Jr and D. V. Smith Department of Otolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267. 1. Mammalian taste receptors are distributed within separate subpopulations, innervated by branches of cranial nerves VII, IX, and X. Most gustatory electrophysiology has focused on input from the fungiform papillae on the anterior portion of the tongue, carried by the chorda tympani branch of the VIIth nerve. However, only a small percentage of the taste buds are located in the fungiform papillae (approximately 18% in the hamster). There have been no studies on the hamster's IXth nerve, which innervates greater than 50% of its taste buds, and most other studies of IXth nerve function have employed only whole-nerve recording. 2. Action potentials were recorded from 83 individual fibers in the IXth nerve of the hamster. Stimuli were five concentrations each of sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine hydrochloride (QHCl), all presented to every fiber at 37 degrees C. Responses were quantified as the number of impulses in 10 s minus the preceding 10 s of spontaneous activity. 3. Across these concentration series, HCl and QHCl were by far the most excitatory stimuli, with mean responses across all cells three to four times greater than those evoked by sucrose or NaCl. The order of effectiveness of the stimuli was H greater than Q much greater than N greater than S. 4. Of the 83 fibers, 56 were stimulated via the foliate papillae and 27 via the single vallate papilla. No fibers responded to both of these fields. There were generally no differences in the sensitivity of these two subpopulations of taste buds, except that QHCl was more effective when applied to the foliates. 5. A "total" response measure was derived by summing the excitatory responses to each stimulus across the entire concentration series. The fibers were then classified according to the best total response, resulting in 52 HCl-, 19 QHCl-, 8 sucrose- and 4 NaCl-best cells. Considering the slope of the concentration-response functions as a criterion for classification produced very similar results. The fiber classification varied somewhat with concentration, with more fibers categorized as HCl- and QHCl-best at the higher concentration levels. 6. Breadth of responsiveness was measured using the equation developed by Smith and Travers. At the concentrations used to examine hamster chorda tympani fibers, IXth nerve fibers were not very responsive and were quite narrowly tuned to the four taste qualities. At higher concentrations the fibers became more broadly responsive across the four stimuli.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>3171639</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.478</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 1988-08, Vol.60 (2), p.478-498
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_highwire_physiology_jn_60_2_478
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Action Potentials - drug effects
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cricetinae - physiology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Glossopharyngeal Nerve - drug effects
Glossopharyngeal Nerve - physiology
Male
Mesocricetus - physiology
Neurons, Afferent - classification
Neurons, Afferent - drug effects
Neurons, Afferent - physiology
Olfactory system and olfaction. Gustatory system and gustation
Quinine - pharmacology
Sensory Thresholds - drug effects
Sodium Chloride - pharmacology
Sucrose - pharmacology
Taste - drug effects
Taste - physiology
Taste Buds - drug effects
Taste Buds - innervation
Taste Buds - physiology
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Gustatory responsiveness of fibers in the hamster glossopharyngeal nerve
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A51%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gustatory%20responsiveness%20of%20fibers%20in%20the%20hamster%20glossopharyngeal%20nerve&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Hanamori,%20T&rft.date=1988-08-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=478&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=478-498&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.coden=JONEA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.1988.60.2.478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_highw%3E78451681%3C/proquest_highw%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15086040&rft_id=info:pmid/3171639&rfr_iscdi=true