Rainfall estimation by inverting SMOS soil moisture estimates: A comparison of different methods over Australia
Remote sensing of soil moisture has reached a level of maturity and accuracy for which the retrieved products can be used to improve hydrological and meteorological applications. In this study, the soil moisture product from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite is used for improving...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2016-10, Vol.121 (20), p.12,062-12,079 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12,079 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 12,062 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Brocca, Luca Pellarin, Thierry Crow, Wade T. Ciabatta, Luca Massari, Christian Ryu, Dongryeol Su, Chun‐Hsu Rüdiger, Christoph Kerr, Yann |
description | Remote sensing of soil moisture has reached a level of maturity and accuracy for which the retrieved products can be used to improve hydrological and meteorological applications. In this study, the soil moisture product from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite is used for improving satellite rainfall estimates obtained from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission multisatellite precipitation analysis product (TMPA) using three different “bottom up” techniques: SM2RAIN, Soil Moisture Analysis Rainfall Tool, and Antecedent Precipitation Index Modification. The implementation of these techniques aims at improving the well‐known “top down” rainfall estimate derived from TMPA products (version 7) available in near real time. Ground observations provided by the Australian Water Availability Project are considered as a separate validation data set. The three algorithms are calibrated against the gauge‐corrected TMPA reanalysis product, 3B42, and used for adjusting the TMPA real‐time product, 3B42RT, using SMOS soil moisture data. The study area covers the entire Australian continent, and the analysis period ranges from January 2010 to November 2013. Results show that all the SMOS‐based rainfall products improve the performance of 3B42RT, even at daily time scale (differently from previous investigations). The major improvements are obtained in terms of estimation of accumulated rainfall with a reduction of the root‐mean‐square error of more than 25%. Also, in terms of temporal dynamic (correlation) and rainfall detection (categorical scores) the SMOS‐based products provide slightly better results with respect to 3B42RT, even though the relative performance between the methods is not always the same. The strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm and the spatial variability of their performances are identified in order to indicate the ways forward for this promising research activity. Results show that the integration of bottom up and top down approaches has the potential to improve the quality of near‐real‐time rainfall estimates from remote sensing in the near future.
Key Points
Comparison of three methods for estimating and correcting rainfall by using SMOS soil moisture data in Australia
SMOS soil moisture data are able to improve the accuracy of “top down” satellite rainfall product available in real time (3B42RT)
The integration of “bottom up” and “top down” approaches has high potential for delivering high‐quality satellite rainfall produc |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2016JD025382 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_insu_03706539v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1850779147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4697-3988f63d6cd36a4a5160ca8dddc25954196a15e66fa95488ae27149d79add1be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UlLxDAUAOAiCop68wcEvIg4mjS7t8FxZURwAW_h2aQaaZsxaZX590ZGRTyIuSQPvryFVxRbBO8TjMuDEhNxMcElp6pcKtZKIvRIaS2Wv9_yfrXYTOkZ56MwZZytFeEafFdD0yCXet9C70OHHubId68u9r57RDeXVzcoBd-gNvjUD9F9UZcO0RhVoZ1B9Cn_CzWyvq5ddF2PWtc_BZtQyInQeEh9hMbDRrGSqyW3-XmvF3cnx7dHZ6Pp1en50Xg6Aia0HFGtVC2oFZWlAhhwInAFylpblVxzRrQAwp0QNeRIKXClJExbqcFa8uDoerG7yPsEjZnF3G6cmwDenI2nxndpMJhKLDjVryTjnQWexfAy5OlM61PlmgY6F4ZkiBKMS6UZ-wflWEpNmMx0-xd9DkPs8tRZMY5LQthH7b2FqmJIKbr6u1uCzcdizc_FZk4X_M03bv6nNRen1xNOqZL0HWvuows</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845021141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rainfall estimation by inverting SMOS soil moisture estimates: A comparison of different methods over Australia</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Brocca, Luca ; Pellarin, Thierry ; Crow, Wade T. ; Ciabatta, Luca ; Massari, Christian ; Ryu, Dongryeol ; Su, Chun‐Hsu ; Rüdiger, Christoph ; Kerr, Yann</creator><creatorcontrib>Brocca, Luca ; Pellarin, Thierry ; Crow, Wade T. ; Ciabatta, Luca ; Massari, Christian ; Ryu, Dongryeol ; Su, Chun‐Hsu ; Rüdiger, Christoph ; Kerr, Yann</creatorcontrib><description>Remote sensing of soil moisture has reached a level of maturity and accuracy for which the retrieved products can be used to improve hydrological and meteorological applications. In this study, the soil moisture product from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite is used for improving satellite rainfall estimates obtained from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission multisatellite precipitation analysis product (TMPA) using three different “bottom up” techniques: SM2RAIN, Soil Moisture Analysis Rainfall Tool, and Antecedent Precipitation Index Modification. The implementation of these techniques aims at improving the well‐known “top down” rainfall estimate derived from TMPA products (version 7) available in near real time. Ground observations provided by the Australian Water Availability Project are considered as a separate validation data set. The three algorithms are calibrated against the gauge‐corrected TMPA reanalysis product, 3B42, and used for adjusting the TMPA real‐time product, 3B42RT, using SMOS soil moisture data. The study area covers the entire Australian continent, and the analysis period ranges from January 2010 to November 2013. Results show that all the SMOS‐based rainfall products improve the performance of 3B42RT, even at daily time scale (differently from previous investigations). The major improvements are obtained in terms of estimation of accumulated rainfall with a reduction of the root‐mean‐square error of more than 25%. Also, in terms of temporal dynamic (correlation) and rainfall detection (categorical scores) the SMOS‐based products provide slightly better results with respect to 3B42RT, even though the relative performance between the methods is not always the same. The strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm and the spatial variability of their performances are identified in order to indicate the ways forward for this promising research activity. Results show that the integration of bottom up and top down approaches has the potential to improve the quality of near‐real‐time rainfall estimates from remote sensing in the near future.
Key Points
Comparison of three methods for estimating and correcting rainfall by using SMOS soil moisture data in Australia
SMOS soil moisture data are able to improve the accuracy of “top down” satellite rainfall product available in real time (3B42RT)
The integration of “bottom up” and “top down” approaches has high potential for delivering high‐quality satellite rainfall products</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Antecedent precipitation index ; Estimates ; Geophysics ; Precipitation ; Precipitation (meteorology) ; Rainfall ; Real time ; Remote sensing ; Satellites ; Sciences of the Universe ; SMOS ; Soil analysis ; Soil moisture ; Water availability</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2016-10, Vol.121 (20), p.12,062-12,079</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4697-3988f63d6cd36a4a5160ca8dddc25954196a15e66fa95488ae27149d79add1be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4697-3988f63d6cd36a4a5160ca8dddc25954196a15e66fa95488ae27149d79add1be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9080-260X ; 0000-0002-4157-1446 ; 0000-0003-4375-4446 ; 0000-0001-6352-1717</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2016JD025382$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2016JD025382$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://insu.hal.science/insu-03706539$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brocca, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellarin, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, Wade T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciabatta, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massari, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Dongryeol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Chun‐Hsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüdiger, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Yann</creatorcontrib><title>Rainfall estimation by inverting SMOS soil moisture estimates: A comparison of different methods over Australia</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Remote sensing of soil moisture has reached a level of maturity and accuracy for which the retrieved products can be used to improve hydrological and meteorological applications. In this study, the soil moisture product from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite is used for improving satellite rainfall estimates obtained from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission multisatellite precipitation analysis product (TMPA) using three different “bottom up” techniques: SM2RAIN, Soil Moisture Analysis Rainfall Tool, and Antecedent Precipitation Index Modification. The implementation of these techniques aims at improving the well‐known “top down” rainfall estimate derived from TMPA products (version 7) available in near real time. Ground observations provided by the Australian Water Availability Project are considered as a separate validation data set. The three algorithms are calibrated against the gauge‐corrected TMPA reanalysis product, 3B42, and used for adjusting the TMPA real‐time product, 3B42RT, using SMOS soil moisture data. The study area covers the entire Australian continent, and the analysis period ranges from January 2010 to November 2013. Results show that all the SMOS‐based rainfall products improve the performance of 3B42RT, even at daily time scale (differently from previous investigations). The major improvements are obtained in terms of estimation of accumulated rainfall with a reduction of the root‐mean‐square error of more than 25%. Also, in terms of temporal dynamic (correlation) and rainfall detection (categorical scores) the SMOS‐based products provide slightly better results with respect to 3B42RT, even though the relative performance between the methods is not always the same. The strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm and the spatial variability of their performances are identified in order to indicate the ways forward for this promising research activity. Results show that the integration of bottom up and top down approaches has the potential to improve the quality of near‐real‐time rainfall estimates from remote sensing in the near future.
Key Points
Comparison of three methods for estimating and correcting rainfall by using SMOS soil moisture data in Australia
SMOS soil moisture data are able to improve the accuracy of “top down” satellite rainfall product available in real time (3B42RT)
The integration of “bottom up” and “top down” approaches has high potential for delivering high‐quality satellite rainfall products</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Antecedent precipitation index</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation (meteorology)</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>SMOS</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UlLxDAUAOAiCop68wcEvIg4mjS7t8FxZURwAW_h2aQaaZsxaZX590ZGRTyIuSQPvryFVxRbBO8TjMuDEhNxMcElp6pcKtZKIvRIaS2Wv9_yfrXYTOkZ56MwZZytFeEafFdD0yCXet9C70OHHubId68u9r57RDeXVzcoBd-gNvjUD9F9UZcO0RhVoZ1B9Cn_CzWyvq5ddF2PWtc_BZtQyInQeEh9hMbDRrGSqyW3-XmvF3cnx7dHZ6Pp1en50Xg6Aia0HFGtVC2oFZWlAhhwInAFylpblVxzRrQAwp0QNeRIKXClJExbqcFa8uDoerG7yPsEjZnF3G6cmwDenI2nxndpMJhKLDjVryTjnQWexfAy5OlM61PlmgY6F4ZkiBKMS6UZ-wflWEpNmMx0-xd9DkPs8tRZMY5LQthH7b2FqmJIKbr6u1uCzcdizc_FZk4X_M03bv6nNRen1xNOqZL0HWvuows</recordid><startdate>20161027</startdate><enddate>20161027</enddate><creator>Brocca, Luca</creator><creator>Pellarin, Thierry</creator><creator>Crow, Wade T.</creator><creator>Ciabatta, Luca</creator><creator>Massari, Christian</creator><creator>Ryu, Dongryeol</creator><creator>Su, Chun‐Hsu</creator><creator>Rüdiger, Christoph</creator><creator>Kerr, Yann</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-260X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-1446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4375-4446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6352-1717</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161027</creationdate><title>Rainfall estimation by inverting SMOS soil moisture estimates: A comparison of different methods over Australia</title><author>Brocca, Luca ; Pellarin, Thierry ; Crow, Wade T. ; Ciabatta, Luca ; Massari, Christian ; Ryu, Dongryeol ; Su, Chun‐Hsu ; Rüdiger, Christoph ; Kerr, Yann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4697-3988f63d6cd36a4a5160ca8dddc25954196a15e66fa95488ae27149d79add1be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Antecedent precipitation index</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation (meteorology)</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>SMOS</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brocca, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellarin, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, Wade T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciabatta, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massari, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Dongryeol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Chun‐Hsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüdiger, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Yann</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brocca, Luca</au><au>Pellarin, Thierry</au><au>Crow, Wade T.</au><au>Ciabatta, Luca</au><au>Massari, Christian</au><au>Ryu, Dongryeol</au><au>Su, Chun‐Hsu</au><au>Rüdiger, Christoph</au><au>Kerr, Yann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rainfall estimation by inverting SMOS soil moisture estimates: A comparison of different methods over Australia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2016-10-27</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>12,062</spage><epage>12,079</epage><pages>12,062-12,079</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Remote sensing of soil moisture has reached a level of maturity and accuracy for which the retrieved products can be used to improve hydrological and meteorological applications. In this study, the soil moisture product from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite is used for improving satellite rainfall estimates obtained from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission multisatellite precipitation analysis product (TMPA) using three different “bottom up” techniques: SM2RAIN, Soil Moisture Analysis Rainfall Tool, and Antecedent Precipitation Index Modification. The implementation of these techniques aims at improving the well‐known “top down” rainfall estimate derived from TMPA products (version 7) available in near real time. Ground observations provided by the Australian Water Availability Project are considered as a separate validation data set. The three algorithms are calibrated against the gauge‐corrected TMPA reanalysis product, 3B42, and used for adjusting the TMPA real‐time product, 3B42RT, using SMOS soil moisture data. The study area covers the entire Australian continent, and the analysis period ranges from January 2010 to November 2013. Results show that all the SMOS‐based rainfall products improve the performance of 3B42RT, even at daily time scale (differently from previous investigations). The major improvements are obtained in terms of estimation of accumulated rainfall with a reduction of the root‐mean‐square error of more than 25%. Also, in terms of temporal dynamic (correlation) and rainfall detection (categorical scores) the SMOS‐based products provide slightly better results with respect to 3B42RT, even though the relative performance between the methods is not always the same. The strengths and weaknesses of each algorithm and the spatial variability of their performances are identified in order to indicate the ways forward for this promising research activity. Results show that the integration of bottom up and top down approaches has the potential to improve the quality of near‐real‐time rainfall estimates from remote sensing in the near future.
Key Points
Comparison of three methods for estimating and correcting rainfall by using SMOS soil moisture data in Australia
SMOS soil moisture data are able to improve the accuracy of “top down” satellite rainfall product available in real time (3B42RT)
The integration of “bottom up” and “top down” approaches has high potential for delivering high‐quality satellite rainfall products</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2016JD025382</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-260X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-1446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4375-4446</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6352-1717</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2016-10, Vol.121 (20), p.12,062-12,079 |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_insu_03706539v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Algorithms Antecedent precipitation index Estimates Geophysics Precipitation Precipitation (meteorology) Rainfall Real time Remote sensing Satellites Sciences of the Universe SMOS Soil analysis Soil moisture Water availability |
title | Rainfall estimation by inverting SMOS soil moisture estimates: A comparison of different methods over Australia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A59%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rainfall%20estimation%20by%20inverting%20SMOS%20soil%20moisture%20estimates:%20A%20comparison%20of%20different%20methods%20over%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Brocca,%20Luca&rft.date=2016-10-27&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=12,062&rft.epage=12,079&rft.pages=12,062-12,079&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2016JD025382&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1850779147%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845021141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |