Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France

Elastic fundamental frequency is a key-parameter of simplified seismic design and vulnerability assessment methods. Empirical relationships exist in codes to estimate this frequency but they miss experimental data to validate them accounting for national feature of building design and, above all, co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2010-12, Vol.8 (6), p.1295-1307
Hauptverfasser: Michel, C., Guéguen, P., Lestuzzi, P., Bard, P.-Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1307
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1295
container_title Bulletin of earthquake engineering
container_volume 8
creator Michel, C.
Guéguen, P.
Lestuzzi, P.
Bard, P.-Y.
description Elastic fundamental frequency is a key-parameter of simplified seismic design and vulnerability assessment methods. Empirical relationships exist in codes to estimate this frequency but they miss experimental data to validate them accounting for national feature of building design and, above all, corresponding uncertainties. Even if resonance frequency extracted from ambient vibrations may be larger than the elastic frequency (at yield) generally used in earthquake engineering, ambient vibration recordings may provide a large set of data for statistical analysis of periods versus building characteristics relationships. We recorded ambient vibrations and estimated the fundamental frequency of about 60 buildings of various types (RC and masonry) in Grenoble City (France). These data complete the set existing yet, made of 26 RC-buildings of Grenoble (Farsi and Bard 2004) and 28 buildings in Nice (France) (Dunand 2005). Statistical analysis of these experimental data was performed for fundamental frequencies of RC shear wall structures and the results are compared with existing relationships. Only building height or number of stories has a statistical relevancy to estimate the resonance frequency but the variability associated to the proposed relationships is large. Moreover, we compared the elastic part of capacity curves of RC and masonry buildings used in the European Risk-UE method for vulnerability assessment with the experimental frequencies. The variability is also large and the curves may not be consistent with French existing buildings.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10518-010-9185-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_insu_00565330v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>861538323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-a2512c5881f26fb3e381159b32d91758ac3f30bcd81794b14fa4d0b4ebb216c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFr1jAUhosoOLf9gN0FbxShLqdpmvRyfGxO-MCbXXgXkvZ0ZqTpZ0479_17UzsUBL3KITzvyzk8RXEB_CNwri4JuARdcuBlC1qW6kVxAlKJEmrZvPw181I18PV18YbogfNKqpafFLSbxoNNnqbIHM4_ECMj9DT6jj0uIWKyzgc_H9k49RiI2dgzfDpg8iPG2QbWH6Nd6UOa8u_skdg0ZMTT7OM9c4sPfR6I-chuko0dnhWvBhsIz5_f0-Lu5vpud1vuv3z6vLval7YWei5tJaHqpNYwVM3gBAoNIFsnqr4FJbXtxCC463oNqq0d1IOte-5qdK6CphOnxYet9psN5pD3teloJuvN7dXe-EiL4Vw2Ugj-CBl-t8H5jO8L0mxGTx2GYCNOCxndgBRaVCKT7_9LglJc1KuOjL79C32YlhTzzUZzJVUN7doHG9SliSjh8HtX4GZ1aza3Jrs1q1ujcqbaMpTZeI_pT_G_Qz8BAOqnkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807574193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Michel, C. ; Guéguen, P. ; Lestuzzi, P. ; Bard, P.-Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Michel, C. ; Guéguen, P. ; Lestuzzi, P. ; Bard, P.-Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Elastic fundamental frequency is a key-parameter of simplified seismic design and vulnerability assessment methods. Empirical relationships exist in codes to estimate this frequency but they miss experimental data to validate them accounting for national feature of building design and, above all, corresponding uncertainties. Even if resonance frequency extracted from ambient vibrations may be larger than the elastic frequency (at yield) generally used in earthquake engineering, ambient vibration recordings may provide a large set of data for statistical analysis of periods versus building characteristics relationships. We recorded ambient vibrations and estimated the fundamental frequency of about 60 buildings of various types (RC and masonry) in Grenoble City (France). These data complete the set existing yet, made of 26 RC-buildings of Grenoble (Farsi and Bard 2004) and 28 buildings in Nice (France) (Dunand 2005). Statistical analysis of these experimental data was performed for fundamental frequencies of RC shear wall structures and the results are compared with existing relationships. Only building height or number of stories has a statistical relevancy to estimate the resonance frequency but the variability associated to the proposed relationships is large. Moreover, we compared the elastic part of capacity curves of RC and masonry buildings used in the European Risk-UE method for vulnerability assessment with the experimental frequencies. The variability is also large and the curves may not be consistent with French existing buildings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9185-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Buildings ; Civil Engineering ; Comparative studies ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake engineering ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental Sciences ; Estimates ; Experimental data ; Geophysics ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Global Changes ; Hydrogeology ; Original Research Paper ; Physics ; Reinforced concrete ; Resonance ; Resonant frequency ; Sciences of the Universe ; Seismic activity ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic phenomena ; Seismic surveys ; Statistical analysis ; Structural Geology ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2010-12, Vol.8 (6), p.1295-1307</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-a2512c5881f26fb3e381159b32d91758ac3f30bcd81794b14fa4d0b4ebb216c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-a2512c5881f26fb3e381159b32d91758ac3f30bcd81794b14fa4d0b4ebb216c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2786-1516 ; 0000-0001-8761-8708 ; 0000-0002-3018-1047</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-010-9185-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-010-9185-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27906,27907,41470,42539,51301</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://insu.hal.science/insu-00565330$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michel, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guéguen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lestuzzi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bard, P.-Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>Elastic fundamental frequency is a key-parameter of simplified seismic design and vulnerability assessment methods. Empirical relationships exist in codes to estimate this frequency but they miss experimental data to validate them accounting for national feature of building design and, above all, corresponding uncertainties. Even if resonance frequency extracted from ambient vibrations may be larger than the elastic frequency (at yield) generally used in earthquake engineering, ambient vibration recordings may provide a large set of data for statistical analysis of periods versus building characteristics relationships. We recorded ambient vibrations and estimated the fundamental frequency of about 60 buildings of various types (RC and masonry) in Grenoble City (France). These data complete the set existing yet, made of 26 RC-buildings of Grenoble (Farsi and Bard 2004) and 28 buildings in Nice (France) (Dunand 2005). Statistical analysis of these experimental data was performed for fundamental frequencies of RC shear wall structures and the results are compared with existing relationships. Only building height or number of stories has a statistical relevancy to estimate the resonance frequency but the variability associated to the proposed relationships is large. Moreover, we compared the elastic part of capacity curves of RC and masonry buildings used in the European Risk-UE method for vulnerability assessment with the experimental frequencies. The variability is also large and the curves may not be consistent with French existing buildings.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake engineering</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Experimental data</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Global Changes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Original Research Paper</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Resonance</subject><subject>Resonant frequency</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic phenomena</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFr1jAUhosoOLf9gN0FbxShLqdpmvRyfGxO-MCbXXgXkvZ0ZqTpZ0479_17UzsUBL3KITzvyzk8RXEB_CNwri4JuARdcuBlC1qW6kVxAlKJEmrZvPw181I18PV18YbogfNKqpafFLSbxoNNnqbIHM4_ECMj9DT6jj0uIWKyzgc_H9k49RiI2dgzfDpg8iPG2QbWH6Nd6UOa8u_skdg0ZMTT7OM9c4sPfR6I-chuko0dnhWvBhsIz5_f0-Lu5vpud1vuv3z6vLval7YWei5tJaHqpNYwVM3gBAoNIFsnqr4FJbXtxCC463oNqq0d1IOte-5qdK6CphOnxYet9psN5pD3teloJuvN7dXe-EiL4Vw2Ugj-CBl-t8H5jO8L0mxGTx2GYCNOCxndgBRaVCKT7_9LglJc1KuOjL79C32YlhTzzUZzJVUN7doHG9SliSjh8HtX4GZ1aza3Jrs1q1ujcqbaMpTZeI_pT_G_Qz8BAOqnkA</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Michel, C.</creator><creator>Guéguen, P.</creator><creator>Lestuzzi, P.</creator><creator>Bard, P.-Y.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2786-1516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8761-8708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-1047</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France</title><author>Michel, C. ; Guéguen, P. ; Lestuzzi, P. ; Bard, P.-Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a438t-a2512c5881f26fb3e381159b32d91758ac3f30bcd81794b14fa4d0b4ebb216c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake engineering</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Experimental data</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Global Changes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Original Research Paper</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Resonance</topic><topic>Resonant frequency</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic phenomena</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michel, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guéguen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lestuzzi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bard, P.-Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michel, C.</au><au>Guéguen, P.</au><au>Lestuzzi, P.</au><au>Bard, P.-Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1295</spage><epage>1307</epage><pages>1295-1307</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>Elastic fundamental frequency is a key-parameter of simplified seismic design and vulnerability assessment methods. Empirical relationships exist in codes to estimate this frequency but they miss experimental data to validate them accounting for national feature of building design and, above all, corresponding uncertainties. Even if resonance frequency extracted from ambient vibrations may be larger than the elastic frequency (at yield) generally used in earthquake engineering, ambient vibration recordings may provide a large set of data for statistical analysis of periods versus building characteristics relationships. We recorded ambient vibrations and estimated the fundamental frequency of about 60 buildings of various types (RC and masonry) in Grenoble City (France). These data complete the set existing yet, made of 26 RC-buildings of Grenoble (Farsi and Bard 2004) and 28 buildings in Nice (France) (Dunand 2005). Statistical analysis of these experimental data was performed for fundamental frequencies of RC shear wall structures and the results are compared with existing relationships. Only building height or number of stories has a statistical relevancy to estimate the resonance frequency but the variability associated to the proposed relationships is large. Moreover, we compared the elastic part of capacity curves of RC and masonry buildings used in the European Risk-UE method for vulnerability assessment with the experimental frequencies. The variability is also large and the curves may not be consistent with French existing buildings.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-010-9185-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2786-1516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8761-8708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-1047</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-761X
ispartof Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2010-12, Vol.8 (6), p.1295-1307
issn 1570-761X
1573-1456
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_insu_00565330v1
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Assessments
Buildings
Civil Engineering
Comparative studies
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquake engineering
Earthquakes
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Environmental Sciences
Estimates
Experimental data
Geophysics
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Global Changes
Hydrogeology
Original Research Paper
Physics
Reinforced concrete
Resonance
Resonant frequency
Sciences of the Universe
Seismic activity
Seismic engineering
Seismic phenomena
Seismic surveys
Statistical analysis
Structural Geology
Vibration
title Comparison between seismic vulnerability models and experimental dynamic properties of existing buildings in France
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A54%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20seismic%20vulnerability%20models%20and%20experimental%20dynamic%20properties%20of%20existing%20buildings%20in%20France&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Michel,%20C.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1295&rft.epage=1307&rft.pages=1295-1307&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-010-9185-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E861538323%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807574193&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true