Differential Dietary Nutrient Intake according to Hormone Replacement Therapy Use: An Underestimated Confounding Factor in Epidemiologic Studies?

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have produced divergent results concerning the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular disease and, to a lesser extent, dementia. Residual confounding (confounding that remains even after adjustment for various socioeconomi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of epidemiology 2007-12, Vol.166 (12), p.1451-1460
Hauptverfasser: Vercambre, Marie-Noël, Fournier, Agnès, Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise, Ringa, Virginie, Berr, Claudine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1460
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1451
container_title American journal of epidemiology
container_volume 166
creator Vercambre, Marie-Noël
Fournier, Agnès
Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise
Ringa, Virginie
Berr, Claudine
description Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have produced divergent results concerning the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular disease and, to a lesser extent, dementia. Residual confounding (confounding that remains even after adjustment for various socioeconomic and lifestyle factors) is one explanation that has been offered for these divergent results. The authors used data collected between 1990 and 1995 from 6,697 French women aged 61–72 years participating in a prospective cohort study to explore the hypothesis that nutritional intake varies according to HRT use and thus may be a source of residual confounding. After the authors adjusted for health and lifestyle factors, HRT users, compared with never users, had significantly higher intakes of alcohol; ω3 fatty acids; vitamins B6, B12, and D; and phosphorus and a lower intake of starch. These differential nutrient intakes were related to differences in eating habits. In particular, HRT users in the studied sample, compared with nonusers, ate significantly more fish. Most of the dietary differences were seen in both early users and delayers of HRT. To limit residual confounding in observational studies, dietary factors may be important parameters to be taken into account in analyses of HRT use and health outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/aje/kwm162
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_00170064v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/aje/kwm162</oup_id><sourcerecordid>68537954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-48ef1a20dcad773ff2c063292c941334497b2faccfad589717fef8d73ba224ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d9u0zAUBvAIgVgZ3PAAyEKCC0SY_yRxvBtUtds6qEAaq4S4sVzneHOb2MVOgD4Gb4xHq1XigitL1k-fz_GXZc8JfkewYCdqBSfrnx2p6INsRApe5RUtq4fZCGNMc0ErepQ9iXGFMSGixI-zI8IrUZe4HGW_p9YYCOB6q1o0tdCrsEWfhj7YdIcuXa_WgJTWPjTW3aDeo5kPnXeArmDTKg3dnbu-haA2W7SIcIrGDi1ck0JjbzvVQ4Mm3hk_uL8J50r3PiDr0NnGNtBZ3_obq9GXfmgsxPdPs0dGtRGe7c_jbHF-dj2Z5fPPF5eT8TzXRc36vKjBEEVxo1XDOTOGalwxKqgWBWGsKARfUpMGN6opa8EJN2DqhrOlorSAhh1nb3e5t6qVm5AmDVvplZWz8VxaFyF0Mv0Yx7gqfpDEX-_4JvjvQ1pNdjZqaFvlwA9RVnXJuCiLBF_-A1d-CC6tIikr60KUNU7ozQ7p4GMMYO4nIFjelSpTqXJXasIv9onDsoPmQPctJvBqD1TUqjVBOW3jwQlRMFaRg_PD5v8P5jtnYw-_7qUKa1lxxks5-_pNXn2YXUzolMiP7A8OTchA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235849580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential Dietary Nutrient Intake according to Hormone Replacement Therapy Use: An Underestimated Confounding Factor in Epidemiologic Studies?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vercambre, Marie-Noël ; Fournier, Agnès ; Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine ; Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise ; Ringa, Virginie ; Berr, Claudine</creator><creatorcontrib>Vercambre, Marie-Noël ; Fournier, Agnès ; Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine ; Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise ; Ringa, Virginie ; Berr, Claudine</creatorcontrib><description>Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have produced divergent results concerning the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular disease and, to a lesser extent, dementia. Residual confounding (confounding that remains even after adjustment for various socioeconomic and lifestyle factors) is one explanation that has been offered for these divergent results. The authors used data collected between 1990 and 1995 from 6,697 French women aged 61–72 years participating in a prospective cohort study to explore the hypothesis that nutritional intake varies according to HRT use and thus may be a source of residual confounding. After the authors adjusted for health and lifestyle factors, HRT users, compared with never users, had significantly higher intakes of alcohol; ω3 fatty acids; vitamins B6, B12, and D; and phosphorus and a lower intake of starch. These differential nutrient intakes were related to differences in eating habits. In particular, HRT users in the studied sample, compared with nonusers, ate significantly more fish. Most of the dietary differences were seen in both early users and delayers of HRT. To limit residual confounding in observational studies, dietary factors may be important parameters to be taken into account in analyses of HRT use and health outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm162</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17698505</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Analysis. Health state ; Bias ; bias (epidemiology) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular disease ; cohort studies ; confounding factors (epidemiology) ; Dementia ; Diet ; Diseases of the digestive system ; Endocrinology and metabolism ; Epidemiology ; Estrogen Replacement Therapy ; Female ; Food and Nutrition ; France - epidemiology ; General aspects ; Hormone replacement therapy ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Logistic Models ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Nutrition ; Nutritional Status ; observation ; Prospective Studies ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; randomized controlled trials ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Reproductive Biology ; Risk factors ; Santé publique et épidémiologie ; Women's Health</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 2007-12, Vol.166 (12), p.1451-1460</ispartof><rights>American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-48ef1a20dcad773ff2c063292c941334497b2faccfad589717fef8d73ba224ed3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8380-3439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19943361$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17698505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://inserm.hal.science/inserm-00170064$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vercambre, Marie-Noël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringa, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berr, Claudine</creatorcontrib><title>Differential Dietary Nutrient Intake according to Hormone Replacement Therapy Use: An Underestimated Confounding Factor in Epidemiologic Studies?</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have produced divergent results concerning the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular disease and, to a lesser extent, dementia. Residual confounding (confounding that remains even after adjustment for various socioeconomic and lifestyle factors) is one explanation that has been offered for these divergent results. The authors used data collected between 1990 and 1995 from 6,697 French women aged 61–72 years participating in a prospective cohort study to explore the hypothesis that nutritional intake varies according to HRT use and thus may be a source of residual confounding. After the authors adjusted for health and lifestyle factors, HRT users, compared with never users, had significantly higher intakes of alcohol; ω3 fatty acids; vitamins B6, B12, and D; and phosphorus and a lower intake of starch. These differential nutrient intakes were related to differences in eating habits. In particular, HRT users in the studied sample, compared with nonusers, ate significantly more fish. Most of the dietary differences were seen in both early users and delayers of HRT. To limit residual confounding in observational studies, dietary factors may be important parameters to be taken into account in analyses of HRT use and health outcomes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis. Health state</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>bias (epidemiology)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>cohort studies</subject><subject>confounding factors (epidemiology)</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diseases of the digestive system</subject><subject>Endocrinology and metabolism</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estrogen Replacement Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food and Nutrition</subject><subject>France - epidemiology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>observation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Reproductive Biology</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Santé publique et épidémiologie</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d9u0zAUBvAIgVgZ3PAAyEKCC0SY_yRxvBtUtds6qEAaq4S4sVzneHOb2MVOgD4Gb4xHq1XigitL1k-fz_GXZc8JfkewYCdqBSfrnx2p6INsRApe5RUtq4fZCGNMc0ErepQ9iXGFMSGixI-zI8IrUZe4HGW_p9YYCOB6q1o0tdCrsEWfhj7YdIcuXa_WgJTWPjTW3aDeo5kPnXeArmDTKg3dnbu-haA2W7SIcIrGDi1ck0JjbzvVQ4Mm3hk_uL8J50r3PiDr0NnGNtBZ3_obq9GXfmgsxPdPs0dGtRGe7c_jbHF-dj2Z5fPPF5eT8TzXRc36vKjBEEVxo1XDOTOGalwxKqgWBWGsKARfUpMGN6opa8EJN2DqhrOlorSAhh1nb3e5t6qVm5AmDVvplZWz8VxaFyF0Mv0Yx7gqfpDEX-_4JvjvQ1pNdjZqaFvlwA9RVnXJuCiLBF_-A1d-CC6tIikr60KUNU7ozQ7p4GMMYO4nIFjelSpTqXJXasIv9onDsoPmQPctJvBqD1TUqjVBOW3jwQlRMFaRg_PD5v8P5jtnYw-_7qUKa1lxxks5-_pNXn2YXUzolMiP7A8OTchA</recordid><startdate>20071215</startdate><enddate>20071215</enddate><creator>Vercambre, Marie-Noël</creator><creator>Fournier, Agnès</creator><creator>Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine</creator><creator>Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise</creator><creator>Ringa, Virginie</creator><creator>Berr, Claudine</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-3439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20071215</creationdate><title>Differential Dietary Nutrient Intake according to Hormone Replacement Therapy Use: An Underestimated Confounding Factor in Epidemiologic Studies?</title><author>Vercambre, Marie-Noël ; Fournier, Agnès ; Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine ; Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise ; Ringa, Virginie ; Berr, Claudine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-48ef1a20dcad773ff2c063292c941334497b2faccfad589717fef8d73ba224ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis. Health state</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>bias (epidemiology)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>cohort studies</topic><topic>confounding factors (epidemiology)</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diseases of the digestive system</topic><topic>Endocrinology and metabolism</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estrogen Replacement Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food and Nutrition</topic><topic>France - epidemiology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>observation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Reproductive Biology</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Santé publique et épidémiologie</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vercambre, Marie-Noël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringa, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berr, Claudine</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vercambre, Marie-Noël</au><au>Fournier, Agnès</au><au>Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine</au><au>Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise</au><au>Ringa, Virginie</au><au>Berr, Claudine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential Dietary Nutrient Intake according to Hormone Replacement Therapy Use: An Underestimated Confounding Factor in Epidemiologic Studies?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2007-12-15</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1451</spage><epage>1460</epage><pages>1451-1460</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have produced divergent results concerning the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular disease and, to a lesser extent, dementia. Residual confounding (confounding that remains even after adjustment for various socioeconomic and lifestyle factors) is one explanation that has been offered for these divergent results. The authors used data collected between 1990 and 1995 from 6,697 French women aged 61–72 years participating in a prospective cohort study to explore the hypothesis that nutritional intake varies according to HRT use and thus may be a source of residual confounding. After the authors adjusted for health and lifestyle factors, HRT users, compared with never users, had significantly higher intakes of alcohol; ω3 fatty acids; vitamins B6, B12, and D; and phosphorus and a lower intake of starch. These differential nutrient intakes were related to differences in eating habits. In particular, HRT users in the studied sample, compared with nonusers, ate significantly more fish. Most of the dietary differences were seen in both early users and delayers of HRT. To limit residual confounding in observational studies, dietary factors may be important parameters to be taken into account in analyses of HRT use and health outcomes.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>17698505</pmid><doi>10.1093/aje/kwm162</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-3439</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9262
ispartof American journal of epidemiology, 2007-12, Vol.166 (12), p.1451-1460
issn 0002-9262
1476-6256
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_00170064v1
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Analysis. Health state
Bias
bias (epidemiology)
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular disease
cohort studies
confounding factors (epidemiology)
Dementia
Diet
Diseases of the digestive system
Endocrinology and metabolism
Epidemiology
Estrogen Replacement Therapy
Female
Food and Nutrition
France - epidemiology
General aspects
Hormone replacement therapy
Human health and pathology
Humans
Life Sciences
Logistic Models
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Nutrition
Nutritional Status
observation
Prospective Studies
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
randomized controlled trials
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reproductive Biology
Risk factors
Santé publique et épidémiologie
Women's Health
title Differential Dietary Nutrient Intake according to Hormone Replacement Therapy Use: An Underestimated Confounding Factor in Epidemiologic Studies?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20Dietary%20Nutrient%20Intake%20according%20to%20Hormone%20Replacement%20Therapy%20Use:%20An%20Underestimated%20Confounding%20Factor%20in%20Epidemiologic%20Studies?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Vercambre,%20Marie-No%C3%ABl&rft.date=2007-12-15&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1451&rft.epage=1460&rft.pages=1451-1460&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/aje/kwm162&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E68537954%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235849580&rft_id=info:pmid/17698505&rft_oup_id=10.1093/aje/kwm162&rfr_iscdi=true