Testing the predictive power of nuclear mass models
A number of tests are introduced which probe the ability of nuclear mass models to extrapolate. Three models are analyzed in detail: the liquid drop model, the liquid drop model plus empirical shell corrections and the Duflo–Zuker mass formula. If predicted nuclei are close to the fitted ones, avera...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear physics. A 2008-11, Vol.812 (1), p.28-43 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 43 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 28 |
| container_title | Nuclear physics. A |
| container_volume | 812 |
| creator | Mendoza-Temis, J. Morales, I. Barea, J. Frank, A. Hirsch, J.G. Vieyra, J.C. López Van Isacker, P. Velázquez, V. |
| description | A number of tests are introduced which probe the ability of nuclear mass models to extrapolate. Three models are analyzed in detail: the liquid drop model, the liquid drop model plus empirical shell corrections and the Duflo–Zuker mass formula. If predicted nuclei are close to the fitted ones, average errors in predicted and fitted masses are similar. However, the challenge of predicting nuclear masses in a region stabilized by shell effects (e.g., the lead region) is far more difficult. The Duflo–Zuker mass formula emerges as a powerful predictive tool. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.08.008 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_in2p3_00326804v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0375947408006726</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0375947408006726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-cc294e1965a61231fb2eacb259baa8555b279eb0265635d454def7cbd624264d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_g7lL4uzfJMdS1AoBL_W8bHYndkuahN1Y6bc3odKrw4OZw3sP5kfII4WMAlXP-6z7tu2wO0WTMYAimwXFFVnQIucplVJckwXwXKalyMUtuYtxD9MogAXhW4yj776ScYfJENB5O_rjdPY_GJK-SeZyNCE5mBiTQ--wjffkpjFtxIe_vSSfry_b9SatPt7e16sqtVzSMbWWlQJpqaRRlHHa1AyNrZksa2MKKWXN8hJrYEoqLp2QwmGT29opJpgSji_J07l3Z1o9BH8w4aR74_VmVWnfsYFrAM5UAeJIJ3d-dtvQxxiwuUQo6JmU3usLKT2T0rOgmJKrc3L6DY8eg47WY2cnGAHtqF3v_-34BQqmdVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing the predictive power of nuclear mass models</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mendoza-Temis, J. ; Morales, I. ; Barea, J. ; Frank, A. ; Hirsch, J.G. ; Vieyra, J.C. López ; Van Isacker, P. ; Velázquez, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Temis, J. ; Morales, I. ; Barea, J. ; Frank, A. ; Hirsch, J.G. ; Vieyra, J.C. López ; Van Isacker, P. ; Velázquez, V.</creatorcontrib><description>A number of tests are introduced which probe the ability of nuclear mass models to extrapolate. Three models are analyzed in detail: the liquid drop model, the liquid drop model plus empirical shell corrections and the Duflo–Zuker mass formula. If predicted nuclei are close to the fitted ones, average errors in predicted and fitted masses are similar. However, the challenge of predicting nuclear masses in a region stabilized by shell effects (e.g., the lead region) is far more difficult. The Duflo–Zuker mass formula emerges as a powerful predictive tool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0375-9474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.08.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Binding energies ; Extrapolation ; Nuclear mass models ; Nuclear Theory ; Physics ; Tests</subject><ispartof>Nuclear physics. A, 2008-11, Vol.812 (1), p.28-43</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-cc294e1965a61231fb2eacb259baa8555b279eb0265635d454def7cbd624264d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-cc294e1965a61231fb2eacb259baa8555b279eb0265635d454def7cbd624264d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947408006726$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://in2p3.hal.science/in2p3-00326804$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Temis, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barea, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieyra, J.C. López</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Isacker, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velázquez, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing the predictive power of nuclear mass models</title><title>Nuclear physics. A</title><description>A number of tests are introduced which probe the ability of nuclear mass models to extrapolate. Three models are analyzed in detail: the liquid drop model, the liquid drop model plus empirical shell corrections and the Duflo–Zuker mass formula. If predicted nuclei are close to the fitted ones, average errors in predicted and fitted masses are similar. However, the challenge of predicting nuclear masses in a region stabilized by shell effects (e.g., the lead region) is far more difficult. The Duflo–Zuker mass formula emerges as a powerful predictive tool.</description><subject>Binding energies</subject><subject>Extrapolation</subject><subject>Nuclear mass models</subject><subject>Nuclear Theory</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Tests</subject><issn>0375-9474</issn><issn>1873-1554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_g7lL4uzfJMdS1AoBL_W8bHYndkuahN1Y6bc3odKrw4OZw3sP5kfII4WMAlXP-6z7tu2wO0WTMYAimwXFFVnQIucplVJckwXwXKalyMUtuYtxD9MogAXhW4yj776ScYfJENB5O_rjdPY_GJK-SeZyNCE5mBiTQ--wjffkpjFtxIe_vSSfry_b9SatPt7e16sqtVzSMbWWlQJpqaRRlHHa1AyNrZksa2MKKWXN8hJrYEoqLp2QwmGT29opJpgSji_J07l3Z1o9BH8w4aR74_VmVWnfsYFrAM5UAeJIJ3d-dtvQxxiwuUQo6JmU3usLKT2T0rOgmJKrc3L6DY8eg47WY2cnGAHtqF3v_-34BQqmdVE</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Mendoza-Temis, J.</creator><creator>Morales, I.</creator><creator>Barea, J.</creator><creator>Frank, A.</creator><creator>Hirsch, J.G.</creator><creator>Vieyra, J.C. López</creator><creator>Van Isacker, P.</creator><creator>Velázquez, V.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>North-Holland ; Elsevier [1967-....]</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>Testing the predictive power of nuclear mass models</title><author>Mendoza-Temis, J. ; Morales, I. ; Barea, J. ; Frank, A. ; Hirsch, J.G. ; Vieyra, J.C. López ; Van Isacker, P. ; Velázquez, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-cc294e1965a61231fb2eacb259baa8555b279eb0265635d454def7cbd624264d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Binding energies</topic><topic>Extrapolation</topic><topic>Nuclear mass models</topic><topic>Nuclear Theory</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Temis, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barea, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieyra, J.C. López</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Isacker, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velázquez, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Nuclear physics. A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendoza-Temis, J.</au><au>Morales, I.</au><au>Barea, J.</au><au>Frank, A.</au><au>Hirsch, J.G.</au><au>Vieyra, J.C. López</au><au>Van Isacker, P.</au><au>Velázquez, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing the predictive power of nuclear mass models</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear physics. A</jtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>812</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>28-43</pages><issn>0375-9474</issn><eissn>1873-1554</eissn><abstract>A number of tests are introduced which probe the ability of nuclear mass models to extrapolate. Three models are analyzed in detail: the liquid drop model, the liquid drop model plus empirical shell corrections and the Duflo–Zuker mass formula. If predicted nuclei are close to the fitted ones, average errors in predicted and fitted masses are similar. However, the challenge of predicting nuclear masses in a region stabilized by shell effects (e.g., the lead region) is far more difficult. The Duflo–Zuker mass formula emerges as a powerful predictive tool.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.08.008</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0375-9474 |
| ispartof | Nuclear physics. A, 2008-11, Vol.812 (1), p.28-43 |
| issn | 0375-9474 1873-1554 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_in2p3_00326804v1 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Binding energies Extrapolation Nuclear mass models Nuclear Theory Physics Tests |
| title | Testing the predictive power of nuclear mass models |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A14%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20the%20predictive%20power%20of%20nuclear%20mass%20models&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20physics.%20A&rft.au=Mendoza-Temis,%20J.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=812&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=28-43&rft.issn=0375-9474&rft.eissn=1873-1554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.08.008&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES0375947408006726%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0375947408006726&rfr_iscdi=true |