Strangeness enhancement at midrapidity in Pb–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c: A comparison with VENUS and RQMD models

Recently the WA97 Collaboration has measured \(\mathrm{K}^0_{\mathrm{S}}\), \(\mathrm\Lambda\), \(\mathrm\Xi\), \(\mathrm\Omega\) and negative particle yields and transverse mass spectra at central rapidity in Pb–Pb and p–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c. These results are compared with the predictions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields Particles and fields, 1999-11, Vol.11 (1), p.79-88
1. Verfasser: Antinori et al, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields
container_volume 11
creator Antinori et al, F.
description Recently the WA97 Collaboration has measured \(\mathrm{K}^0_{\mathrm{S}}\), \(\mathrm\Lambda\), \(\mathrm\Xi\), \(\mathrm\Omega\) and negative particle yields and transverse mass spectra at central rapidity in Pb–Pb and p–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c. These results are compared with the predictions of two of the most widely used event generators for heavy-ion collisions: VENUS 4.12 and RQMD 2.3. Both models predict that enhancements increase with the strangeness content of the particle. They fail, however, to reproduce completely the measured values of yields at central rapidity. In particular, for multistrange particles, VENUS fails to reproduce both the p–Pb and the Pb–Pb data, while RQMD works for p–Pb collisions but seems to be unable to reproduce the \(\mathrm\Omega\) data in Pb–Pb collisions. Moreover, the predicted behavior for strangeness production as a function of the centrality of the collision appears to be different from the observed behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s100529900157
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_in2p3_00019301v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2293982778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-56c8bf8f760b5d98cd0dca9b52d81c0a629ee836b134960aeed2f4c96c625ce03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1KAzEUhYMoWKtL9wGXMjbJ_CXuitZWqFqt7TZkkoyNzCRjMlW68x18Q5_EKRXBzb2Hy8fhcg4ApxhdYITyQehmShhDCKf5HujhJE6irDvt_-kkOQRHIbwihEiCaA-089YL-6KtDgFquxJW6lrbFooW1kZ50Rhl2g00Fs6K78-vWQGlqyoTjLNhC-GUwiEc6-VAXnZCuroR3gRn4YdpV3A5ul_MobAKPj3eXcPaKV2FY3BQiirok9_dB4ub0fPVJJo-jG-vhtNIEpy0UZpJWpS0zDNUpIpRqZCSghUpURRLJDLCtKZxVuA4YRkSWitSJpJlMiOp1Cjug_Od70pUvPGmFn7DnTB8MpxyY0kT8y4IzGKE33FHn-3oxru3tQ4tf3Vrb7sHOSEsZpTkOe2oaEdJ70Lwuvwzxohva-D_aoh_AKjmeJs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2293982778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strangeness enhancement at midrapidity in Pb–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c: A comparison with VENUS and RQMD models</title><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Antinori et al, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Antinori et al, F. ; The WA97 Collaboration</creatorcontrib><description>Recently the WA97 Collaboration has measured \(\mathrm{K}^0_{\mathrm{S}}\), \(\mathrm\Lambda\), \(\mathrm\Xi\), \(\mathrm\Omega\) and negative particle yields and transverse mass spectra at central rapidity in Pb–Pb and p–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c. These results are compared with the predictions of two of the most widely used event generators for heavy-ion collisions: VENUS 4.12 and RQMD 2.3. Both models predict that enhancements increase with the strangeness content of the particle. They fail, however, to reproduce completely the measured values of yields at central rapidity. In particular, for multistrange particles, VENUS fails to reproduce both the p–Pb and the Pb–Pb data, while RQMD works for p–Pb collisions but seems to be unable to reproduce the \(\mathrm\Omega\) data in Pb–Pb collisions. Moreover, the predicted behavior for strangeness production as a function of the centrality of the collision appears to be different from the observed behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1434-6044</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-6052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s100529900157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Atomic collisions ; Heavy ions ; High Energy Physics - Phenomenology ; Ionic collisions ; Mass spectra ; Physics ; Predictions ; Strangeness</subject><ispartof>The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields, 1999-11, Vol.11 (1), p.79-88</ispartof><rights>The European Physical Journal C - Particles and Fields is a copyright of Springer, (1999). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-56c8bf8f760b5d98cd0dca9b52d81c0a629ee836b134960aeed2f4c96c625ce03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://in2p3.hal.science/in2p3-00019301$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antinori et al, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The WA97 Collaboration</creatorcontrib><title>Strangeness enhancement at midrapidity in Pb–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c: A comparison with VENUS and RQMD models</title><title>The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields</title><description>Recently the WA97 Collaboration has measured \(\mathrm{K}^0_{\mathrm{S}}\), \(\mathrm\Lambda\), \(\mathrm\Xi\), \(\mathrm\Omega\) and negative particle yields and transverse mass spectra at central rapidity in Pb–Pb and p–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c. These results are compared with the predictions of two of the most widely used event generators for heavy-ion collisions: VENUS 4.12 and RQMD 2.3. Both models predict that enhancements increase with the strangeness content of the particle. They fail, however, to reproduce completely the measured values of yields at central rapidity. In particular, for multistrange particles, VENUS fails to reproduce both the p–Pb and the Pb–Pb data, while RQMD works for p–Pb collisions but seems to be unable to reproduce the \(\mathrm\Omega\) data in Pb–Pb collisions. Moreover, the predicted behavior for strangeness production as a function of the centrality of the collision appears to be different from the observed behavior.</description><subject>Atomic collisions</subject><subject>Heavy ions</subject><subject>High Energy Physics - Phenomenology</subject><subject>Ionic collisions</subject><subject>Mass spectra</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Strangeness</subject><issn>1434-6044</issn><issn>1434-6052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1KAzEUhYMoWKtL9wGXMjbJ_CXuitZWqFqt7TZkkoyNzCRjMlW68x18Q5_EKRXBzb2Hy8fhcg4ApxhdYITyQehmShhDCKf5HujhJE6irDvt_-kkOQRHIbwihEiCaA-089YL-6KtDgFquxJW6lrbFooW1kZ50Rhl2g00Fs6K78-vWQGlqyoTjLNhC-GUwiEc6-VAXnZCuroR3gRn4YdpV3A5ul_MobAKPj3eXcPaKV2FY3BQiirok9_dB4ub0fPVJJo-jG-vhtNIEpy0UZpJWpS0zDNUpIpRqZCSghUpURRLJDLCtKZxVuA4YRkSWitSJpJlMiOp1Cjug_Od70pUvPGmFn7DnTB8MpxyY0kT8y4IzGKE33FHn-3oxru3tQ4tf3Vrb7sHOSEsZpTkOe2oaEdJ70Lwuvwzxohva-D_aoh_AKjmeJs</recordid><startdate>19991101</startdate><enddate>19991101</enddate><creator>Antinori et al, F.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag (Germany)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991101</creationdate><title>Strangeness enhancement at midrapidity in Pb–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c: A comparison with VENUS and RQMD models</title><author>Antinori et al, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-56c8bf8f760b5d98cd0dca9b52d81c0a629ee836b134960aeed2f4c96c625ce03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Atomic collisions</topic><topic>Heavy ions</topic><topic>High Energy Physics - Phenomenology</topic><topic>Ionic collisions</topic><topic>Mass spectra</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Strangeness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antinori et al, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The WA97 Collaboration</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antinori et al, F.</au><aucorp>The WA97 Collaboration</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strangeness enhancement at midrapidity in Pb–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c: A comparison with VENUS and RQMD models</atitle><jtitle>The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields</jtitle><date>1999-11-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>79-88</pages><issn>1434-6044</issn><eissn>1434-6052</eissn><abstract>Recently the WA97 Collaboration has measured \(\mathrm{K}^0_{\mathrm{S}}\), \(\mathrm\Lambda\), \(\mathrm\Xi\), \(\mathrm\Omega\) and negative particle yields and transverse mass spectra at central rapidity in Pb–Pb and p–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c. These results are compared with the predictions of two of the most widely used event generators for heavy-ion collisions: VENUS 4.12 and RQMD 2.3. Both models predict that enhancements increase with the strangeness content of the particle. They fail, however, to reproduce completely the measured values of yields at central rapidity. In particular, for multistrange particles, VENUS fails to reproduce both the p–Pb and the Pb–Pb data, while RQMD works for p–Pb collisions but seems to be unable to reproduce the \(\mathrm\Omega\) data in Pb–Pb collisions. Moreover, the predicted behavior for strangeness production as a function of the centrality of the collision appears to be different from the observed behavior.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s100529900157</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1434-6044
ispartof The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields, 1999-11, Vol.11 (1), p.79-88
issn 1434-6044
1434-6052
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_in2p3_00019301v1
source Springer Nature OA/Free Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Atomic collisions
Heavy ions
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Ionic collisions
Mass spectra
Physics
Predictions
Strangeness
title Strangeness enhancement at midrapidity in Pb–Pb collisions at 158 A GeV/c: A comparison with VENUS and RQMD models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A52%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strangeness%20enhancement%20at%20midrapidity%20in%20Pb%E2%80%93Pb%20collisions%20at%20158%20A%20GeV/c:%20A%20comparison%20with%20VENUS%20and%20RQMD%20models&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20physical%20journal.%20C,%20Particles%20and%20fields&rft.au=Antinori%20et%20al,%20F.&rft.aucorp=The%20WA97%20Collaboration&rft.date=1999-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=79-88&rft.issn=1434-6044&rft.eissn=1434-6052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s100529900157&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2293982778%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2293982778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true