How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?
Abstract We illustrate how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) could be used to evaluate the impact of alternative designs of the common agricultural policy (CAP). We select four policy-design issues which relate to different components of the CAP and raise a wide range of economic questions: nudges...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European review of agricultural economics 2019-07, Vol.46 (3), p.473-493 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 493 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 473 |
| container_title | European review of agricultural economics |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Behaghel, Luc Macours, Karen Subervie, Julie |
| description | Abstract
We illustrate how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) could be used to evaluate the impact of alternative designs of the common agricultural policy (CAP). We select four policy-design issues which relate to different components of the CAP and raise a wide range of economic questions: nudges, coordination failures, equity-efficiency trade-offs, contract design. Based on examples from agricultural and social policies in developing and developed countries, we show that RCTs have provided useful rigorous evidence on similar design issues, suggesting that they could also be leveraged to help improve components of the CAP. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/erae/jbz021 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_02297689v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/erae/jbz021</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2430176570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d8a66dda12340caa2a2e4a4116f9a7a708e19ee7f82d6d4f9b3c521471e5ab603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVpoNO0q_4BQaGbxo2urJdXJYQ0UxjoJl2LO7Kc0WBbrmQnpL--mrqku6zug49zuPcQ8gHYF2BNfekT-svj_jfj8IpsQChR1QrMa7JhoGQF0ug35G3OR1bmWuoNsdv4SB2ONOHYxiFk31IXxznFvi_tnAL2mR58P9EwTCk-eDofPG19Dvcjjd3fycVhiCPF-xTc0s9Lwp5OsQ_u6es7ctYVBf_-Xz0nP7_d3F1vq92P2-_XV7vKCaHnqjWoVNsi8Fowh8iRe4ECQHUNatTMeGi8153hrWpF1-xrJzkIDV7iXrH6nFysugfs7ZTCgOnJRgx2e7WzZZcP2TLOG61M8wAF_7ji5aRfi8-zPcYljYWzXBoDxmimXqREzUArqU_Wn1fKpZhz8t2zPzB7isWeYrFrLIWmK-3Lm0P-zyotlWwEOwl-WpG4TC9q_QFkGphU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2588188706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Behaghel, Luc ; Macours, Karen ; Subervie, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Behaghel, Luc ; Macours, Karen ; Subervie, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
We illustrate how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) could be used to evaluate the impact of alternative designs of the common agricultural policy (CAP). We select four policy-design issues which relate to different components of the CAP and raise a wide range of economic questions: nudges, coordination failures, equity-efficiency trade-offs, contract design. Based on examples from agricultural and social policies in developing and developed countries, we show that RCTs have provided useful rigorous evidence on similar design issues, suggesting that they could also be leveraged to help improve components of the CAP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbz021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural policy ; Common Agricultural Policy ; Coordination ; Design ; Design improvements ; Developed countries ; Developing countries ; Economics and Finance ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; LDCs ; Randomization</subject><ispartof>European review of agricultural economics, 2019-07, Vol.46 (3), p.473-493</ispartof><rights>Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2019; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2019</rights><rights>Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2019; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>2019. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://research.stlouisfed.org/research_terms.html .</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d8a66dda12340caa2a2e4a4116f9a7a708e19ee7f82d6d4f9b3c521471e5ab603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d8a66dda12340caa2a2e4a4116f9a7a708e19ee7f82d6d4f9b3c521471e5ab603</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9717-6181 ; 0000-0002-6985-3971 ; 0000-0002-1585-4418</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1581,27853,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://shs.hal.science/halshs-02297689$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behaghel, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macours, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subervie, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?</title><title>European review of agricultural economics</title><description>Abstract
We illustrate how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) could be used to evaluate the impact of alternative designs of the common agricultural policy (CAP). We select four policy-design issues which relate to different components of the CAP and raise a wide range of economic questions: nudges, coordination failures, equity-efficiency trade-offs, contract design. Based on examples from agricultural and social policies in developing and developed countries, we show that RCTs have provided useful rigorous evidence on similar design issues, suggesting that they could also be leveraged to help improve components of the CAP.</description><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Common Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design improvements</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><issn>0165-1587</issn><issn>1464-3618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>AAFGM</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>ADZZV</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AGAJT</sourceid><sourceid>AQTIP</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>PQCXX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVpoNO0q_4BQaGbxo2urJdXJYQ0UxjoJl2LO7Kc0WBbrmQnpL--mrqku6zug49zuPcQ8gHYF2BNfekT-svj_jfj8IpsQChR1QrMa7JhoGQF0ug35G3OR1bmWuoNsdv4SB2ONOHYxiFk31IXxznFvi_tnAL2mR58P9EwTCk-eDofPG19Dvcjjd3fycVhiCPF-xTc0s9Lwp5OsQ_u6es7ctYVBf_-Xz0nP7_d3F1vq92P2-_XV7vKCaHnqjWoVNsi8Fowh8iRe4ECQHUNatTMeGi8153hrWpF1-xrJzkIDV7iXrH6nFysugfs7ZTCgOnJRgx2e7WzZZcP2TLOG61M8wAF_7ji5aRfi8-zPcYljYWzXBoDxmimXqREzUArqU_Wn1fKpZhz8t2zPzB7isWeYrFrLIWmK-3Lm0P-zyotlWwEOwl-WpG4TC9q_QFkGphU</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Behaghel, Luc</creator><creator>Macours, Karen</creator><creator>Subervie, Julie</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><general>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis</general><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>AAFGM</scope><scope>ABLUL</scope><scope>ABPUF</scope><scope>ABSSA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>ACIOU</scope><scope>ADZZV</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AGAJT</scope><scope>AGSBL</scope><scope>AJNOY</scope><scope>AQTIP</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BOUDT</scope><scope>CBHQV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQCXX</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9717-6181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-3971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1585-4418</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?</title><author>Behaghel, Luc ; Macours, Karen ; Subervie, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d8a66dda12340caa2a2e4a4116f9a7a708e19ee7f82d6d4f9b3c521471e5ab603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Common Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design improvements</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behaghel, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macours, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subervie, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>European review of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behaghel, Luc</au><au>Macours, Karen</au><au>Subervie, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?</atitle><jtitle>European review of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>473-493</pages><issn>0165-1587</issn><eissn>1464-3618</eissn><abstract>Abstract
We illustrate how randomised controlled trials (RCTs) could be used to evaluate the impact of alternative designs of the common agricultural policy (CAP). We select four policy-design issues which relate to different components of the CAP and raise a wide range of economic questions: nudges, coordination failures, equity-efficiency trade-offs, contract design. Based on examples from agricultural and social policies in developing and developed countries, we show that RCTs have provided useful rigorous evidence on similar design issues, suggesting that they could also be leveraged to help improve components of the CAP.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/erae/jbz021</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9717-6181</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-3971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1585-4418</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0165-1587 |
| ispartof | European review of agricultural economics, 2019-07, Vol.46 (3), p.473-493 |
| issn | 0165-1587 1464-3618 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_02297689v1 |
| source | PAIS Index; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Agricultural policy Common Agricultural Policy Coordination Design Design improvements Developed countries Developing countries Economics and Finance Humanities and Social Sciences LDCs Randomization |
| title | How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T10%3A14%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20can%20randomised%20controlled%20trials%20help%20improve%20the%20design%20of%20the%20common%20agricultural%20policy?&rft.jtitle=European%20review%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Behaghel,%20Luc&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=473-493&rft.issn=0165-1587&rft.eissn=1464-3618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/erae/jbz021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2430176570%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2588188706&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/erae/jbz021&rfr_iscdi=true |