Embodied withdrawal after overlap resolution

► I investigate visible conduct of participants during and after overlapping talk. ► Overlap resolution by drop out does not imply the abandonment of an action trajectory. ► After drop out, participants monitor the sequential and participative developments. ► Participants can pursue an action beyond drop out by using visible resources. ► Progressive modifications of visible features implement definitive withdrawal. Dropping out of overlap is a frequent practice for overlap resolution (Schegloff, 2000; Jefferson, 2004) in interaction, as it re-establishes the “one-at-a-time” principle of the turn-taking system (Sacks et al., 1974). While it is appropriate to analyze the practice of dropping out of overlap as a verbal and thus audible phenomenon, a close look at video data reveals that withdrawing from an action trajectory is also an embodied practice. Based on a fine-grained multimodal analysis (C. Goodwin, 1981; Mondada, 2007a,b) of videotaped interactions in French, this paper illustrates how overlapped speakers organize the momentary suspension of their action trajectory in visible ways. Indeed, participants do not instantly withdraw from their action trajectory when they stop talking. By using bodily resources, they are able to display continuous monitoring of the availability of their co-participants and of the next possible slot for resuming their suspended action. I therefore suggest analyzing the drop out of overlap as the first step of withdrawal, as definitive, embodied withdrawal can occur later, or, in case of resumption, not at all. Consequently, my paper analyzes withdrawal as a good example of strengthening the analytic concept of embodiment with regard to turn-taking practices in interaction.