Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France

The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological economics 2009-03, Vol.68 (5), p.1408-1416
Hauptverfasser: Mosnier, Claire, Ridier, Aude, Képhaliacos, Charilaos, Carpy-Goulard, Françoise
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1416
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1408
container_title Ecological economics
container_volume 68
creator Mosnier, Claire
Ridier, Aude
Képhaliacos, Charilaos
Carpy-Goulard, Françoise
description The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures (compulsory buffer strips along rivers and crop diversity). A farm-level bio-economic model incorporating yield uncertainty is built and adjusted to represent two typical arable farms in the Southwest of France. The model also combines agro-environmental indicators. The results indicate that a simple decoupling of direct payments, without cross-compliance measures, has no impact on allocations between different crops. If cross-compliance measures are imposed, a small reduction in the cultivated area of irrigated crops is observed. The penalty levied (1% of the total subsidy paid) when farmers do not comply with the “buffer strips” requirement is sufficient for both farm-types. Decoupling and modulation result in a fall in the total gross margin of around 3%, principally because of the 5% modulation rate, while the “buffer strips” requirement leads to a further decrease of around 1%. Moreover, this requirement improves the environmental indicators at the farm level.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_00844542v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921800908004618</els_id><sourcerecordid>37141278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9c507ae6cac612d00ea37658eb62977835bd39af4c375d1b865eb1c6ba3851df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcGO0zAQtRBIlMIvIJ84kWLHiePcqKpdFqkSSMDZcpwJcYntYKdd7d8zJbDXtfQ80ui9N6N5hLzlbMcZlx9OO7BxQoRdyZjC5o4x_oxsuGpEITmTz8mGtSUvFGPtS_Iq5xNjTMpWbMivG9RF7yw1oacQLi7F4CEsZqLOz8YuNA50GYEe9l-pd32xQPI0wcXBPY2BmmS6CahNcaaDSd6Fn9QF-i2el7G4h4z0QG-TCRZekxeDmTK8-Ve35MftzffDXXH88unzYX8sbF2VS9HamjUGpDVW8rJnDIxoZK2gk2XbNErUXS9aM1RWNHXPOyVr6LiVnRGq5v0gtuT96juaSc_JeZMedDRO3-2PGnt5zBoPVVU47sKR_m6lzyn-PuPG2rtsYZpMgHjOulaKyVLIJ4mi4RUvccEtkSsRr5JzguFxC870NTN90v8z09fMrn3MDIXHVZhgBvuoAnx_6fqihZEKvwcEKlssDlEjZgSvrmYVThgXj3YfVzvAa2NgSWfrAJPoXQK76D66pzb6A6YZvK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37141278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mosnier, Claire ; Ridier, Aude ; Képhaliacos, Charilaos ; Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creator><creatorcontrib>Mosnier, Claire ; Ridier, Aude ; Képhaliacos, Charilaos ; Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creatorcontrib><description>The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures (compulsory buffer strips along rivers and crop diversity). A farm-level bio-economic model incorporating yield uncertainty is built and adjusted to represent two typical arable farms in the Southwest of France. The model also combines agro-environmental indicators. The results indicate that a simple decoupling of direct payments, without cross-compliance measures, has no impact on allocations between different crops. If cross-compliance measures are imposed, a small reduction in the cultivated area of irrigated crops is observed. The penalty levied (1% of the total subsidy paid) when farmers do not comply with the “buffer strips” requirement is sufficient for both farm-types. Decoupling and modulation result in a fall in the total gross margin of around 3%, principally because of the 5% modulation rate, while the “buffer strips” requirement leads to a further decrease of around 1%. Moreover, this requirement improves the environmental indicators at the farm level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agro-ecological indicators ; Arable farms ; CAP mid-term review ; CAP mid-term review Cross-compliance MP (Mathematical Programming) model Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms ; Common Agricultural Policy ; Compliance ; Crops ; Cross-compliance ; Economic conditions ; Economic impact analysis ; Economics and Finance ; Environment ; Environmental protection ; Farming ; Farms ; France ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Legislation ; MP (Mathematical Programming) model ; Regulation ; Subsidies</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2009-03, Vol.68 (5), p.1408-1416</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9c507ae6cac612d00ea37658eb62977835bd39af4c375d1b865eb1c6ba3851df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9c507ae6cac612d00ea37658eb62977835bd39af4c375d1b865eb1c6ba3851df3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7893-735X ; 0000-0003-0210-3460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,3994,27846,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeecolec/v_3a68_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a5_3ap_3a1408-1416.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://shs.hal.science/halshs-00844542$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mosnier, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridier, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Képhaliacos, Charilaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creatorcontrib><title>Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures (compulsory buffer strips along rivers and crop diversity). A farm-level bio-economic model incorporating yield uncertainty is built and adjusted to represent two typical arable farms in the Southwest of France. The model also combines agro-environmental indicators. The results indicate that a simple decoupling of direct payments, without cross-compliance measures, has no impact on allocations between different crops. If cross-compliance measures are imposed, a small reduction in the cultivated area of irrigated crops is observed. The penalty levied (1% of the total subsidy paid) when farmers do not comply with the “buffer strips” requirement is sufficient for both farm-types. Decoupling and modulation result in a fall in the total gross margin of around 3%, principally because of the 5% modulation rate, while the “buffer strips” requirement leads to a further decrease of around 1%. Moreover, this requirement improves the environmental indicators at the farm level.</description><subject>Agro-ecological indicators</subject><subject>Arable farms</subject><subject>CAP mid-term review</subject><subject>CAP mid-term review Cross-compliance MP (Mathematical Programming) model Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms</subject><subject>Common Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cross-compliance</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic impact analysis</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>MP (Mathematical Programming) model</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcGO0zAQtRBIlMIvIJ84kWLHiePcqKpdFqkSSMDZcpwJcYntYKdd7d8zJbDXtfQ80ui9N6N5hLzlbMcZlx9OO7BxQoRdyZjC5o4x_oxsuGpEITmTz8mGtSUvFGPtS_Iq5xNjTMpWbMivG9RF7yw1oacQLi7F4CEsZqLOz8YuNA50GYEe9l-pd32xQPI0wcXBPY2BmmS6CahNcaaDSd6Fn9QF-i2el7G4h4z0QG-TCRZekxeDmTK8-Ve35MftzffDXXH88unzYX8sbF2VS9HamjUGpDVW8rJnDIxoZK2gk2XbNErUXS9aM1RWNHXPOyVr6LiVnRGq5v0gtuT96juaSc_JeZMedDRO3-2PGnt5zBoPVVU47sKR_m6lzyn-PuPG2rtsYZpMgHjOulaKyVLIJ4mi4RUvccEtkSsRr5JzguFxC870NTN90v8z09fMrn3MDIXHVZhgBvuoAnx_6fqihZEKvwcEKlssDlEjZgSvrmYVThgXj3YfVzvAa2NgSWfrAJPoXQK76D66pzb6A6YZvK0</recordid><startdate>20090315</startdate><enddate>20090315</enddate><creator>Mosnier, Claire</creator><creator>Ridier, Aude</creator><creator>Képhaliacos, Charilaos</creator><creator>Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7893-735X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0210-3460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20090315</creationdate><title>Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France</title><author>Mosnier, Claire ; Ridier, Aude ; Képhaliacos, Charilaos ; Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9c507ae6cac612d00ea37658eb62977835bd39af4c375d1b865eb1c6ba3851df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agro-ecological indicators</topic><topic>Arable farms</topic><topic>CAP mid-term review</topic><topic>CAP mid-term review Cross-compliance MP (Mathematical Programming) model Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms</topic><topic>Common Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cross-compliance</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic impact analysis</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>MP (Mathematical Programming) model</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mosnier, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridier, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Képhaliacos, Charilaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mosnier, Claire</au><au>Ridier, Aude</au><au>Képhaliacos, Charilaos</au><au>Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2009-03-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1408</spage><epage>1416</epage><pages>1408-1416</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures (compulsory buffer strips along rivers and crop diversity). A farm-level bio-economic model incorporating yield uncertainty is built and adjusted to represent two typical arable farms in the Southwest of France. The model also combines agro-environmental indicators. The results indicate that a simple decoupling of direct payments, without cross-compliance measures, has no impact on allocations between different crops. If cross-compliance measures are imposed, a small reduction in the cultivated area of irrigated crops is observed. The penalty levied (1% of the total subsidy paid) when farmers do not comply with the “buffer strips” requirement is sufficient for both farm-types. Decoupling and modulation result in a fall in the total gross margin of around 3%, principally because of the 5% modulation rate, while the “buffer strips” requirement leads to a further decrease of around 1%. Moreover, this requirement improves the environmental indicators at the farm level.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7893-735X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0210-3460</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-8009
ispartof Ecological economics, 2009-03, Vol.68 (5), p.1408-1416
issn 0921-8009
1873-6106
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_00844542v1
source RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agro-ecological indicators
Arable farms
CAP mid-term review
CAP mid-term review Cross-compliance MP (Mathematical Programming) model Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms
Common Agricultural Policy
Compliance
Crops
Cross-compliance
Economic conditions
Economic impact analysis
Economics and Finance
Environment
Environmental protection
Farming
Farms
France
Humanities and Social Sciences
Legislation
MP (Mathematical Programming) model
Regulation
Subsidies
title Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A37%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20and%20environmental%20impact%20of%20the%20CAP%20mid-term%20review%20on%20arable%20crop%20farming%20in%20South-western%20France&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Mosnier,%20Claire&rft.date=2009-03-15&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1408&rft.epage=1416&rft.pages=1408-1416&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E37141278%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37141278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0921800908004618&rfr_iscdi=true