Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France
The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological economics 2009-03, Vol.68 (5), p.1408-1416 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1416 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1408 |
container_title | Ecological economics |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Mosnier, Claire Ridier, Aude Képhaliacos, Charilaos Carpy-Goulard, Françoise |
description | The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures (compulsory buffer strips along rivers and crop diversity). A farm-level bio-economic model incorporating yield uncertainty is built and adjusted to represent two typical arable farms in the Southwest of France. The model also combines agro-environmental indicators. The results indicate that a simple decoupling of direct payments, without cross-compliance measures, has no impact on allocations between different crops. If cross-compliance measures are imposed, a small reduction in the cultivated area of irrigated crops is observed. The penalty levied (1% of the total subsidy paid) when farmers do not comply with the “buffer strips” requirement is sufficient for both farm-types. Decoupling and modulation result in a fall in the total gross margin of around 3%, principally because of the 5% modulation rate, while the “buffer strips” requirement leads to a further decrease of around 1%. Moreover, this requirement improves the environmental indicators at the farm level. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_00844542v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921800908004618</els_id><sourcerecordid>37141278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9c507ae6cac612d00ea37658eb62977835bd39af4c375d1b865eb1c6ba3851df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcGO0zAQtRBIlMIvIJ84kWLHiePcqKpdFqkSSMDZcpwJcYntYKdd7d8zJbDXtfQ80ui9N6N5hLzlbMcZlx9OO7BxQoRdyZjC5o4x_oxsuGpEITmTz8mGtSUvFGPtS_Iq5xNjTMpWbMivG9RF7yw1oacQLi7F4CEsZqLOz8YuNA50GYEe9l-pd32xQPI0wcXBPY2BmmS6CahNcaaDSd6Fn9QF-i2el7G4h4z0QG-TCRZekxeDmTK8-Ve35MftzffDXXH88unzYX8sbF2VS9HamjUGpDVW8rJnDIxoZK2gk2XbNErUXS9aM1RWNHXPOyVr6LiVnRGq5v0gtuT96juaSc_JeZMedDRO3-2PGnt5zBoPVVU47sKR_m6lzyn-PuPG2rtsYZpMgHjOulaKyVLIJ4mi4RUvccEtkSsRr5JzguFxC870NTN90v8z09fMrn3MDIXHVZhgBvuoAnx_6fqihZEKvwcEKlssDlEjZgSvrmYVThgXj3YfVzvAa2NgSWfrAJPoXQK76D66pzb6A6YZvK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37141278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mosnier, Claire ; Ridier, Aude ; Képhaliacos, Charilaos ; Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creator><creatorcontrib>Mosnier, Claire ; Ridier, Aude ; Képhaliacos, Charilaos ; Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creatorcontrib><description>The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures (compulsory buffer strips along rivers and crop diversity). A farm-level bio-economic model incorporating yield uncertainty is built and adjusted to represent two typical arable farms in the Southwest of France. The model also combines agro-environmental indicators. The results indicate that a simple decoupling of direct payments, without cross-compliance measures, has no impact on allocations between different crops. If cross-compliance measures are imposed, a small reduction in the cultivated area of irrigated crops is observed. The penalty levied (1% of the total subsidy paid) when farmers do not comply with the “buffer strips” requirement is sufficient for both farm-types. Decoupling and modulation result in a fall in the total gross margin of around 3%, principally because of the 5% modulation rate, while the “buffer strips” requirement leads to a further decrease of around 1%. Moreover, this requirement improves the environmental indicators at the farm level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agro-ecological indicators ; Arable farms ; CAP mid-term review ; CAP mid-term review Cross-compliance MP (Mathematical Programming) model Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms ; Common Agricultural Policy ; Compliance ; Crops ; Cross-compliance ; Economic conditions ; Economic impact analysis ; Economics and Finance ; Environment ; Environmental protection ; Farming ; Farms ; France ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Legislation ; MP (Mathematical Programming) model ; Regulation ; Subsidies</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2009-03, Vol.68 (5), p.1408-1416</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9c507ae6cac612d00ea37658eb62977835bd39af4c375d1b865eb1c6ba3851df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9c507ae6cac612d00ea37658eb62977835bd39af4c375d1b865eb1c6ba3851df3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7893-735X ; 0000-0003-0210-3460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,3994,27846,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeecolec/v_3a68_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a5_3ap_3a1408-1416.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://shs.hal.science/halshs-00844542$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mosnier, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridier, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Képhaliacos, Charilaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creatorcontrib><title>Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures (compulsory buffer strips along rivers and crop diversity). A farm-level bio-economic model incorporating yield uncertainty is built and adjusted to represent two typical arable farms in the Southwest of France. The model also combines agro-environmental indicators. The results indicate that a simple decoupling of direct payments, without cross-compliance measures, has no impact on allocations between different crops. If cross-compliance measures are imposed, a small reduction in the cultivated area of irrigated crops is observed. The penalty levied (1% of the total subsidy paid) when farmers do not comply with the “buffer strips” requirement is sufficient for both farm-types. Decoupling and modulation result in a fall in the total gross margin of around 3%, principally because of the 5% modulation rate, while the “buffer strips” requirement leads to a further decrease of around 1%. Moreover, this requirement improves the environmental indicators at the farm level.</description><subject>Agro-ecological indicators</subject><subject>Arable farms</subject><subject>CAP mid-term review</subject><subject>CAP mid-term review Cross-compliance MP (Mathematical Programming) model Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms</subject><subject>Common Agricultural Policy</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cross-compliance</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic impact analysis</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>MP (Mathematical Programming) model</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcGO0zAQtRBIlMIvIJ84kWLHiePcqKpdFqkSSMDZcpwJcYntYKdd7d8zJbDXtfQ80ui9N6N5hLzlbMcZlx9OO7BxQoRdyZjC5o4x_oxsuGpEITmTz8mGtSUvFGPtS_Iq5xNjTMpWbMivG9RF7yw1oacQLi7F4CEsZqLOz8YuNA50GYEe9l-pd32xQPI0wcXBPY2BmmS6CahNcaaDSd6Fn9QF-i2el7G4h4z0QG-TCRZekxeDmTK8-Ve35MftzffDXXH88unzYX8sbF2VS9HamjUGpDVW8rJnDIxoZK2gk2XbNErUXS9aM1RWNHXPOyVr6LiVnRGq5v0gtuT96juaSc_JeZMedDRO3-2PGnt5zBoPVVU47sKR_m6lzyn-PuPG2rtsYZpMgHjOulaKyVLIJ4mi4RUvccEtkSsRr5JzguFxC870NTN90v8z09fMrn3MDIXHVZhgBvuoAnx_6fqihZEKvwcEKlssDlEjZgSvrmYVThgXj3YfVzvAa2NgSWfrAJPoXQK76D66pzb6A6YZvK0</recordid><startdate>20090315</startdate><enddate>20090315</enddate><creator>Mosnier, Claire</creator><creator>Ridier, Aude</creator><creator>Képhaliacos, Charilaos</creator><creator>Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7893-735X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0210-3460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20090315</creationdate><title>Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France</title><author>Mosnier, Claire ; Ridier, Aude ; Képhaliacos, Charilaos ; Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9c507ae6cac612d00ea37658eb62977835bd39af4c375d1b865eb1c6ba3851df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agro-ecological indicators</topic><topic>Arable farms</topic><topic>CAP mid-term review</topic><topic>CAP mid-term review Cross-compliance MP (Mathematical Programming) model Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms</topic><topic>Common Agricultural Policy</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cross-compliance</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic impact analysis</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>MP (Mathematical Programming) model</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mosnier, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridier, Aude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Képhaliacos, Charilaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mosnier, Claire</au><au>Ridier, Aude</au><au>Képhaliacos, Charilaos</au><au>Carpy-Goulard, Françoise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2009-03-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1408</spage><epage>1416</epage><pages>1408-1416</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>The issue addressed in this paper is whether implementation of the CAP MTR, (involving decoupled payments reduced by “modulations” and subject to cross-compliance measures) can be effective in improving the environmental impact of arable farming. The focus is on two French cross-compliance measures (compulsory buffer strips along rivers and crop diversity). A farm-level bio-economic model incorporating yield uncertainty is built and adjusted to represent two typical arable farms in the Southwest of France. The model also combines agro-environmental indicators. The results indicate that a simple decoupling of direct payments, without cross-compliance measures, has no impact on allocations between different crops. If cross-compliance measures are imposed, a small reduction in the cultivated area of irrigated crops is observed. The penalty levied (1% of the total subsidy paid) when farmers do not comply with the “buffer strips” requirement is sufficient for both farm-types. Decoupling and modulation result in a fall in the total gross margin of around 3%, principally because of the 5% modulation rate, while the “buffer strips” requirement leads to a further decrease of around 1%. Moreover, this requirement improves the environmental indicators at the farm level.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7893-735X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0210-3460</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-8009 |
ispartof | Ecological economics, 2009-03, Vol.68 (5), p.1408-1416 |
issn | 0921-8009 1873-6106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_00844542v1 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms CAP mid-term review CAP mid-term review Cross-compliance MP (Mathematical Programming) model Agro-ecological indicators Arable farms Common Agricultural Policy Compliance Crops Cross-compliance Economic conditions Economic impact analysis Economics and Finance Environment Environmental protection Farming Farms France Humanities and Social Sciences Legislation MP (Mathematical Programming) model Regulation Subsidies |
title | Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A37%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20and%20environmental%20impact%20of%20the%20CAP%20mid-term%20review%20on%20arable%20crop%20farming%20in%20South-western%20France&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Mosnier,%20Claire&rft.date=2009-03-15&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1408&rft.epage=1416&rft.pages=1408-1416&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E37141278%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37141278&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0921800908004618&rfr_iscdi=true |