TESTING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTURES FROM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION
This paper introduces a general procedure that tests the significance of the departures from utility maximization, departures defined as violations of the general axiom of revealed preference (GARP). This general procedure is based on (i) an adjustment procedure that computes the minimal perturbatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Macroeconomic dynamics 2005-06, Vol.9 (3), p.372-397 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 397 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 372 |
container_title | Macroeconomic dynamics |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | de PERETTI, PHILIPPE |
description | This paper introduces a general procedure that tests the significance of the departures from utility maximization, departures defined as violations of the general axiom of revealed preference (GARP). This general procedure is based on (i) an adjustment procedure that computes the minimal perturbation in order to satisfy GARP by using the information content in the transitive closure matrix and (ii) a test procedure that checks the significance of the necessary adjustment. This procedure can be easily implemented and programmed, and we run Monte Carlo simulations to show that it is quite powerful. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1365100505040241 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_00646801v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1365100505040241</cupid><sourcerecordid>878814251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6d12090beeadf63d33505dad80cc2b6756674c3db5e713a892d49c5bf72354983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gLfg2ehO9k-SY2jTdiFNpNmCelmSbGJbWqPZVvDbu7VFBJE5zPDm9x7DIHQN-A4w-Pc5EM4AY2aLYo_CCeoB5aEbYMZP7WzX7n5_ji6MWWEMnHhhDw1lnEuRjh05iZ1cjFMxEoMoHcRONvrWhvFDNJPzWZw7o1k2deZSJEI-OdPoUUzFcyRFll6is6ZYm_rq2PtoPorlYOIm2dimJW5FgW1drsHDIS7rutANJ5oQe60udICryiu5zzj3aUV0yWofSBGEnqZhxcrG9wijYUD66PaQuyjW6q1bboruU7XFUk2iRFnNLIzCmFMeYPgAi98c8Leufd_VZqtW7a57tZyCMOA-MOxbCA5Q1bXGdHXzEwxY7V-r_rzWesjRU2zKbqlf6l_J_7q-AEuGcmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198671507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TESTING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTURES FROM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>de PERETTI, PHILIPPE</creator><creatorcontrib>de PERETTI, PHILIPPE</creatorcontrib><description>This paper introduces a general procedure that tests the significance of the departures from utility maximization, departures defined as violations of the general axiom of revealed preference (GARP). This general procedure is based on (i) an adjustment procedure that computes the minimal perturbation in order to satisfy GARP by using the information content in the transitive closure matrix and (ii) a test procedure that checks the significance of the necessary adjustment. This procedure can be easily implemented and programmed, and we run Monte Carlo simulations to show that it is quite powerful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-1005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8056</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1365100505040241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Advantages ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Economics and Finance ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Hypotheses ; Legislation ; Macroeconomics ; Nonparametric statistics ; Optimization ; Power ; Studies ; Utility functions ; Violations</subject><ispartof>Macroeconomic dynamics, 2005-06, Vol.9 (3), p.372-397</ispartof><rights>2005 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Jun 2005</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6d12090beeadf63d33505dad80cc2b6756674c3db5e713a892d49c5bf72354983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6d12090beeadf63d33505dad80cc2b6756674c3db5e713a892d49c5bf72354983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0695-277X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1365100505040241/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://shs.hal.science/halshs-00646801$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de PERETTI, PHILIPPE</creatorcontrib><title>TESTING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTURES FROM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION</title><title>Macroeconomic dynamics</title><addtitle>Macroecon. Dynam</addtitle><description>This paper introduces a general procedure that tests the significance of the departures from utility maximization, departures defined as violations of the general axiom of revealed preference (GARP). This general procedure is based on (i) an adjustment procedure that computes the minimal perturbation in order to satisfy GARP by using the information content in the transitive closure matrix and (ii) a test procedure that checks the significance of the necessary adjustment. This procedure can be easily implemented and programmed, and we run Monte Carlo simulations to show that it is quite powerful.</description><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Nonparametric statistics</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Violations</subject><issn>1365-1005</issn><issn>1469-8056</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gLfg2ehO9k-SY2jTdiFNpNmCelmSbGJbWqPZVvDbu7VFBJE5zPDm9x7DIHQN-A4w-Pc5EM4AY2aLYo_CCeoB5aEbYMZP7WzX7n5_ji6MWWEMnHhhDw1lnEuRjh05iZ1cjFMxEoMoHcRONvrWhvFDNJPzWZw7o1k2deZSJEI-OdPoUUzFcyRFll6is6ZYm_rq2PtoPorlYOIm2dimJW5FgW1drsHDIS7rutANJ5oQe60udICryiu5zzj3aUV0yWofSBGEnqZhxcrG9wijYUD66PaQuyjW6q1bboruU7XFUk2iRFnNLIzCmFMeYPgAi98c8Leufd_VZqtW7a57tZyCMOA-MOxbCA5Q1bXGdHXzEwxY7V-r_rzWesjRU2zKbqlf6l_J_7q-AEuGcmA</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>de PERETTI, PHILIPPE</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0695-277X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>TESTING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTURES FROM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION</title><author>de PERETTI, PHILIPPE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-6d12090beeadf63d33505dad80cc2b6756674c3db5e713a892d49c5bf72354983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Nonparametric statistics</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Violations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de PERETTI, PHILIPPE</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Macroeconomic dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de PERETTI, PHILIPPE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TESTING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTURES FROM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION</atitle><jtitle>Macroeconomic dynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Macroecon. Dynam</addtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>372</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>372-397</pages><issn>1365-1005</issn><eissn>1469-8056</eissn><abstract>This paper introduces a general procedure that tests the significance of the departures from utility maximization, departures defined as violations of the general axiom of revealed preference (GARP). This general procedure is based on (i) an adjustment procedure that computes the minimal perturbation in order to satisfy GARP by using the information content in the transitive closure matrix and (ii) a test procedure that checks the significance of the necessary adjustment. This procedure can be easily implemented and programmed, and we run Monte Carlo simulations to show that it is quite powerful.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1365100505040241</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0695-277X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1365-1005 |
ispartof | Macroeconomic dynamics, 2005-06, Vol.9 (3), p.372-397 |
issn | 1365-1005 1469-8056 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_00646801v1 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Advantages Economic models Economic theory Economics and Finance Humanities and Social Sciences Hypotheses Legislation Macroeconomics Nonparametric statistics Optimization Power Studies Utility functions Violations |
title | TESTING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEPARTURES FROM UTILITY MAXIMIZATION |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TESTING%20THE%20SIGNIFICANCE%20OF%20THE%20DEPARTURES%20FROM%20UTILITY%20MAXIMIZATION&rft.jtitle=Macroeconomic%20dynamics&rft.au=de%20PERETTI,%20PHILIPPE&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=372-397&rft.issn=1365-1005&rft.eissn=1469-8056&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1365100505040241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E878814251%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198671507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1365100505040241&rfr_iscdi=true |