Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory
1. Introduction The main proposal of den Dikken's paper consists of two elegant assumptions, which propose to derive phase theory in a dynamic way and to explain a number of extraction constraints. The first assumption is that a projection immediately containing a predication (i.e., a subject a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theoretical linguistics 2007-06, Vol.33 (1), p.93-104 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | Theoretical linguistics |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Matushansky, Ora |
description | 1. Introduction The main proposal of den Dikken's paper consists of two elegant assumptions, which propose to derive phase theory in a dynamic way and to explain a number of extraction constraints. The first assumption is that a projection immediately containing a predication (i.e., a subject and its predicate) is a phase inherently. The second assumption is that a phase is extended to the maximal projection that its head moves to. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/TL.2007.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_00142762v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85662590</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-23420d555179e9c5e2646f0b8400c5d00e4248a384ffe073eebdb625f4c8bb7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9P20AQxVeoSKRpT3wBn7i0DrP_vJtjFNGCZIkUTNvbar0eYwdjh12nJd-ejVxx6mE0o9HvvRk9Qs4pLKik8rLIFwxALWKdkBnNKE8FZPCBzIADTYVg-ox8DGELwJSidEb0xmPVOju2Q5_YvkowOLvDpLGjazAkbZ9sGhswuXodsQ9Hqmhw8IdP5LS2XcDP__qcPHy7KtbXaX77_Wa9ylPHtR5TxgWDSkpJ1RKXTiLLRFZDqQWAkxUACia05VrUNYLiiGVVZkzWwumyVJbPydfJt7Gd2fn22fqDGWxrrle5ibvQBANABVMZ-0MjfjHhOz-87DGM5rkNDrvO9jjsg9Eyi-5LiOCXCXR-CMFj_W5OwRzDNEVujmFGdxVpPdF_bTeir_DR7w9xMNth7_v4xX9VnC55lKaTtA0jvr5fsf7JZIoraX4Uwqi7X5v1PftpfvM3mGuGhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85662590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Matushansky, Ora</creator><creatorcontrib>Matushansky, Ora</creatorcontrib><description>1. Introduction The main proposal of den Dikken's paper consists of two elegant assumptions, which propose to derive phase theory in a dynamic way and to explain a number of extraction constraints. The first assumption is that a projection immediately containing a predication (i.e., a subject and its predicate) is a phase inherently. The second assumption is that a phase is extended to the maximal projection that its head moves to.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-4060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/TL.2007.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: THLID2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Walter de Gruyter</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences ; Linguistics</subject><ispartof>Theoretical linguistics, 2007-06, Vol.33 (1), p.93-104</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-23420d555179e9c5e2646f0b8400c5d00e4248a384ffe073eebdb625f4c8bb7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-23420d555179e9c5e2646f0b8400c5d00e4248a384ffe073eebdb625f4c8bb7a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1420-7091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/TL.2007.007/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/TL.2007.007/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932,66761,68545</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://shs.hal.science/halshs-00142762$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matushansky, Ora</creatorcontrib><title>Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory</title><title>Theoretical linguistics</title><addtitle>Theoretical Linguistics</addtitle><description>1. Introduction The main proposal of den Dikken's paper consists of two elegant assumptions, which propose to derive phase theory in a dynamic way and to explain a number of extraction constraints. The first assumption is that a projection immediately containing a predication (i.e., a subject and its predicate) is a phase inherently. The second assumption is that a phase is extended to the maximal projection that its head moves to.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><issn>0301-4428</issn><issn>1613-4060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE9P20AQxVeoSKRpT3wBn7i0DrP_vJtjFNGCZIkUTNvbar0eYwdjh12nJd-ejVxx6mE0o9HvvRk9Qs4pLKik8rLIFwxALWKdkBnNKE8FZPCBzIADTYVg-ox8DGELwJSidEb0xmPVOju2Q5_YvkowOLvDpLGjazAkbZ9sGhswuXodsQ9Hqmhw8IdP5LS2XcDP__qcPHy7KtbXaX77_Wa9ylPHtR5TxgWDSkpJ1RKXTiLLRFZDqQWAkxUACia05VrUNYLiiGVVZkzWwumyVJbPydfJt7Gd2fn22fqDGWxrrle5ibvQBANABVMZ-0MjfjHhOz-87DGM5rkNDrvO9jjsg9Eyi-5LiOCXCXR-CMFj_W5OwRzDNEVujmFGdxVpPdF_bTeir_DR7w9xMNth7_v4xX9VnC55lKaTtA0jvr5fsf7JZIoraX4Uwqi7X5v1PftpfvM3mGuGhQ</recordid><startdate>20070619</startdate><enddate>20070619</enddate><creator>Matushansky, Ora</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter</general><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1420-7091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20070619</creationdate><title>Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory</title><author>Matushansky, Ora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-23420d555179e9c5e2646f0b8400c5d00e4248a384ffe073eebdb625f4c8bb7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matushansky, Ora</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Theoretical linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matushansky, Ora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory</atitle><jtitle>Theoretical linguistics</jtitle><addtitle>Theoretical Linguistics</addtitle><date>2007-06-19</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>93-104</pages><issn>0301-4428</issn><eissn>1613-4060</eissn><coden>THLID2</coden><abstract>1. Introduction The main proposal of den Dikken's paper consists of two elegant assumptions, which propose to derive phase theory in a dynamic way and to explain a number of extraction constraints. The first assumption is that a projection immediately containing a predication (i.e., a subject and its predicate) is a phase inherently. The second assumption is that a phase is extended to the maximal projection that its head moves to.</abstract><pub>Walter de Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/TL.2007.007</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1420-7091</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4428 |
ispartof | Theoretical linguistics, 2007-06, Vol.33 (1), p.93-104 |
issn | 0301-4428 1613-4060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_halshs_00142762v1 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Humanities and Social Sciences Linguistics |
title | Predication and escape hatches in Phase Extension Theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T12%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predication%20and%20escape%20hatches%20in%20Phase%20Extension%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Theoretical%20linguistics&rft.au=Matushansky,%20Ora&rft.date=2007-06-19&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=93-104&rft.issn=0301-4428&rft.eissn=1613-4060&rft.coden=THLID2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/TL.2007.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E85662590%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85662590&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |