Real-world outcomes of lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of stage c-IA lung carcinoma

Abstract OBJECTIVES To determine safety and survival outcomes associated with lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for early-stage lung cancer by quiring the French population-based registry EPIdemiology in THORacic surgery (EPITHOR). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 19 452 patients with st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2024-07, Vol.66 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Thomas, Pascal Alexandre, Seguin-Givelet, Agathe, Pages, Pierre-Benoît, Alifano, Marco, Brouchet, Laurent, Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel, Baste, Jean-Marc, Glorion, Matthieu, Belaroussi, Yaniss, Filaire, Marc, Heyndrickx, Maxime, Loundou, Anderson, Fourdrain, Alex, Dahan, Marcel, Boyer, Laurent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery
container_volume 66
creator Thomas, Pascal Alexandre
Seguin-Givelet, Agathe
Pages, Pierre-Benoît
Alifano, Marco
Brouchet, Laurent
Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel
Baste, Jean-Marc
Glorion, Matthieu
Belaroussi, Yaniss
Filaire, Marc
Heyndrickx, Maxime
Loundou, Anderson
Fourdrain, Alex
Dahan, Marcel
Boyer, Laurent
description Abstract OBJECTIVES To determine safety and survival outcomes associated with lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for early-stage lung cancer by quiring the French population-based registry EPIdemiology in THORacic surgery (EPITHOR). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 19 452 patients with stage c IA lung carcinoma who underwent lobectomy, segmentectomy or wedge resection between 2016 and 2022 with curative-intent. Main outcome measures were 90-day mortality and 5-year overall survival estimates. Proportional hazards regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust outcomes for key patient, tumour and practice environment factors. RESULTS The treatment distribution was 72.2% for lobectomy, 21.5% for segmentectomy and 6.3% for wedge. Unadjusted 90-day mortality rates were 1.6%, 1.2% and 1.1%, respectively (P = 0.10). Unadjusted 5-year overall survival estimates were 80%, 78% and 70%, with significant inter-group survival curves differences (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ejcts/ezae251
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04826700v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ejcts/ezae251</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3072292246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-e588371bebbb6affe183dbb9a54699e9664ce62f4ff0ec05e5e73baef65303c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdtLwzAUh4Mo3h99lTwqWE2aNmkfx_AGA0EUfAtJerJ1tM1MUsf86-3c1EefzoWP7xz4IXRGyTUlJbuBuYnhBj4VpDndQYe0ECwRLHvbHXpCSSLKjBygoxDmhBDOUrGPDlhRUpFReoj8M6gmWTrfVNj10bgWAnYWN06Dia5dXeEA0xa6uBmx6iq8hGoK2EMYdrXrsHUexxng6EHFNbs2hKgGyCSPI9z03RQb5U3duVadoD2rmgCn23qMXu9uX8YPyeTp_nE8miQmzXhMIC8KJqgGrTVX1gItWKV1qfKMlyWUnGcGeGozawkYkkMOgmkFlueMMMPYMbrceGeqkQtft8qvpFO1fBhN5HpHsiLlgpAPOrAXG3bh3XsPIcq2DgaaRnXg-iAZEWlapsNjA5psUONdCB7sr5sSuY5Efkcit5EM_PlW3esWql_6J4O_265f_OP6AtUHmIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072292246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real-world outcomes of lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of stage c-IA lung carcinoma</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Current</source><creator>Thomas, Pascal Alexandre ; Seguin-Givelet, Agathe ; Pages, Pierre-Benoît ; Alifano, Marco ; Brouchet, Laurent ; Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Baste, Jean-Marc ; Glorion, Matthieu ; Belaroussi, Yaniss ; Filaire, Marc ; Heyndrickx, Maxime ; Loundou, Anderson ; Fourdrain, Alex ; Dahan, Marcel ; Boyer, Laurent</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Pascal Alexandre ; Seguin-Givelet, Agathe ; Pages, Pierre-Benoît ; Alifano, Marco ; Brouchet, Laurent ; Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Baste, Jean-Marc ; Glorion, Matthieu ; Belaroussi, Yaniss ; Filaire, Marc ; Heyndrickx, Maxime ; Loundou, Anderson ; Fourdrain, Alex ; Dahan, Marcel ; Boyer, Laurent ; EPITHOR working group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract OBJECTIVES To determine safety and survival outcomes associated with lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for early-stage lung cancer by quiring the French population-based registry EPIdemiology in THORacic surgery (EPITHOR). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 19 452 patients with stage c IA lung carcinoma who underwent lobectomy, segmentectomy or wedge resection between 2016 and 2022 with curative-intent. Main outcome measures were 90-day mortality and 5-year overall survival estimates. Proportional hazards regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust outcomes for key patient, tumour and practice environment factors. RESULTS The treatment distribution was 72.2% for lobectomy, 21.5% for segmentectomy and 6.3% for wedge. Unadjusted 90-day mortality rates were 1.6%, 1.2% and 1.1%, respectively (P = 0.10). Unadjusted 5-year overall survival estimates were 80%, 78% and 70%, with significant inter-group survival curves differences (P &lt; 0.0001). Multivariable proportional hazards regression showed that wedge was associated with worse overall survival [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.03–1.47); P = 0.021] compared with lobectomy, while no significant difference was disclosed when comparing segmentectomy to lobectomy (1.08 [0.97–1.20]; P = 0.162). The three-way propensity score analyses confirmed similar 90-day mortality rate for wedge resection and segmentectomy compared with lobectomy (hazard ratio: 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.16–1.11; P = 0.081 and 0.99; 0.48–2.10; P = 0.998, respectively), but poorer overall survival (1.45; 1.13–1.86; P = 0.003 and 1.31; 1–1.71; P = 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Wedge resection was associated with comparable 90-day mortality but lower overall survival when compared to lobectomy. Overall, all types of sublobar resections may not offer equivalent oncologic effectiveness in real-world settings. In 2 recent multicentre randomized controlled studies [1, 2], sublobar resection was found to be noninferior to lobectomy in terms of disease-free and overall survival. Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-7940</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-734X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38917411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Human health and pathology ; Life Sciences ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.66 (1)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved. 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-e588371bebbb6affe183dbb9a54699e9664ce62f4ff0ec05e5e73baef65303c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2906-4433 ; 0000-0002-1739-4523 ; 0000-0003-4301-9476 ; 0000-0002-2038-1037 ; 0000-0002-3305-6989 ; 0000-0002-3233-860X ; 0000-0001-6431-3899 ; 0000-0001-7654-474X ; 0009-0000-1189-9849</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38917411$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://uca.hal.science/hal-04826700$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Pascal Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seguin-Givelet, Agathe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pages, Pierre-Benoît</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alifano, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouchet, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baste, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glorion, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belaroussi, Yaniss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filaire, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyndrickx, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loundou, Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourdrain, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahan, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EPITHOR working group</creatorcontrib><title>Real-world outcomes of lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of stage c-IA lung carcinoma</title><title>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract OBJECTIVES To determine safety and survival outcomes associated with lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for early-stage lung cancer by quiring the French population-based registry EPIdemiology in THORacic surgery (EPITHOR). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 19 452 patients with stage c IA lung carcinoma who underwent lobectomy, segmentectomy or wedge resection between 2016 and 2022 with curative-intent. Main outcome measures were 90-day mortality and 5-year overall survival estimates. Proportional hazards regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust outcomes for key patient, tumour and practice environment factors. RESULTS The treatment distribution was 72.2% for lobectomy, 21.5% for segmentectomy and 6.3% for wedge. Unadjusted 90-day mortality rates were 1.6%, 1.2% and 1.1%, respectively (P = 0.10). Unadjusted 5-year overall survival estimates were 80%, 78% and 70%, with significant inter-group survival curves differences (P &lt; 0.0001). Multivariable proportional hazards regression showed that wedge was associated with worse overall survival [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.03–1.47); P = 0.021] compared with lobectomy, while no significant difference was disclosed when comparing segmentectomy to lobectomy (1.08 [0.97–1.20]; P = 0.162). The three-way propensity score analyses confirmed similar 90-day mortality rate for wedge resection and segmentectomy compared with lobectomy (hazard ratio: 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.16–1.11; P = 0.081 and 0.99; 0.48–2.10; P = 0.998, respectively), but poorer overall survival (1.45; 1.13–1.86; P = 0.003 and 1.31; 1–1.71; P = 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Wedge resection was associated with comparable 90-day mortality but lower overall survival when compared to lobectomy. Overall, all types of sublobar resections may not offer equivalent oncologic effectiveness in real-world settings. In 2 recent multicentre randomized controlled studies [1, 2], sublobar resection was found to be noninferior to lobectomy in terms of disease-free and overall survival. Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1010-7940</issn><issn>1873-734X</issn><issn>1873-734X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkdtLwzAUh4Mo3h99lTwqWE2aNmkfx_AGA0EUfAtJerJ1tM1MUsf86-3c1EefzoWP7xz4IXRGyTUlJbuBuYnhBj4VpDndQYe0ECwRLHvbHXpCSSLKjBygoxDmhBDOUrGPDlhRUpFReoj8M6gmWTrfVNj10bgWAnYWN06Dia5dXeEA0xa6uBmx6iq8hGoK2EMYdrXrsHUexxng6EHFNbs2hKgGyCSPI9z03RQb5U3duVadoD2rmgCn23qMXu9uX8YPyeTp_nE8miQmzXhMIC8KJqgGrTVX1gItWKV1qfKMlyWUnGcGeGozawkYkkMOgmkFlueMMMPYMbrceGeqkQtft8qvpFO1fBhN5HpHsiLlgpAPOrAXG3bh3XsPIcq2DgaaRnXg-iAZEWlapsNjA5psUONdCB7sr5sSuY5Efkcit5EM_PlW3esWql_6J4O_265f_OP6AtUHmIQ</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Thomas, Pascal Alexandre</creator><creator>Seguin-Givelet, Agathe</creator><creator>Pages, Pierre-Benoît</creator><creator>Alifano, Marco</creator><creator>Brouchet, Laurent</creator><creator>Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel</creator><creator>Baste, Jean-Marc</creator><creator>Glorion, Matthieu</creator><creator>Belaroussi, Yaniss</creator><creator>Filaire, Marc</creator><creator>Heyndrickx, Maxime</creator><creator>Loundou, Anderson</creator><creator>Fourdrain, Alex</creator><creator>Dahan, Marcel</creator><creator>Boyer, Laurent</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford University Press (OUP)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-4433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1739-4523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2038-1037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-6989</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3233-860X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-3899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-474X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1189-9849</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Real-world outcomes of lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of stage c-IA lung carcinoma</title><author>Thomas, Pascal Alexandre ; Seguin-Givelet, Agathe ; Pages, Pierre-Benoît ; Alifano, Marco ; Brouchet, Laurent ; Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Baste, Jean-Marc ; Glorion, Matthieu ; Belaroussi, Yaniss ; Filaire, Marc ; Heyndrickx, Maxime ; Loundou, Anderson ; Fourdrain, Alex ; Dahan, Marcel ; Boyer, Laurent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-e588371bebbb6affe183dbb9a54699e9664ce62f4ff0ec05e5e73baef65303c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Pascal Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seguin-Givelet, Agathe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pages, Pierre-Benoît</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alifano, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouchet, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baste, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glorion, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belaroussi, Yaniss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filaire, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyndrickx, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loundou, Anderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fourdrain, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahan, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EPITHOR working group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Pascal Alexandre</au><au>Seguin-Givelet, Agathe</au><au>Pages, Pierre-Benoît</au><au>Alifano, Marco</au><au>Brouchet, Laurent</au><au>Falcoz, Pierre-Emmanuel</au><au>Baste, Jean-Marc</au><au>Glorion, Matthieu</au><au>Belaroussi, Yaniss</au><au>Filaire, Marc</au><au>Heyndrickx, Maxime</au><au>Loundou, Anderson</au><au>Fourdrain, Alex</au><au>Dahan, Marcel</au><au>Boyer, Laurent</au><aucorp>EPITHOR working group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real-world outcomes of lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of stage c-IA lung carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cardiothorac Surg</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1010-7940</issn><issn>1873-734X</issn><eissn>1873-734X</eissn><abstract>Abstract OBJECTIVES To determine safety and survival outcomes associated with lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for early-stage lung cancer by quiring the French population-based registry EPIdemiology in THORacic surgery (EPITHOR). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 19 452 patients with stage c IA lung carcinoma who underwent lobectomy, segmentectomy or wedge resection between 2016 and 2022 with curative-intent. Main outcome measures were 90-day mortality and 5-year overall survival estimates. Proportional hazards regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust outcomes for key patient, tumour and practice environment factors. RESULTS The treatment distribution was 72.2% for lobectomy, 21.5% for segmentectomy and 6.3% for wedge. Unadjusted 90-day mortality rates were 1.6%, 1.2% and 1.1%, respectively (P = 0.10). Unadjusted 5-year overall survival estimates were 80%, 78% and 70%, with significant inter-group survival curves differences (P &lt; 0.0001). Multivariable proportional hazards regression showed that wedge was associated with worse overall survival [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.03–1.47); P = 0.021] compared with lobectomy, while no significant difference was disclosed when comparing segmentectomy to lobectomy (1.08 [0.97–1.20]; P = 0.162). The three-way propensity score analyses confirmed similar 90-day mortality rate for wedge resection and segmentectomy compared with lobectomy (hazard ratio: 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.16–1.11; P = 0.081 and 0.99; 0.48–2.10; P = 0.998, respectively), but poorer overall survival (1.45; 1.13–1.86; P = 0.003 and 1.31; 1–1.71; P = 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Wedge resection was associated with comparable 90-day mortality but lower overall survival when compared to lobectomy. Overall, all types of sublobar resections may not offer equivalent oncologic effectiveness in real-world settings. In 2 recent multicentre randomized controlled studies [1, 2], sublobar resection was found to be noninferior to lobectomy in terms of disease-free and overall survival. Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38917411</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejcts/ezae251</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-4433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1739-4523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2038-1037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-6989</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3233-860X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-3899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-474X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1189-9849</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-7940
ispartof European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2024-07, Vol.66 (1)
issn 1010-7940
1873-734X
1873-734X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04826700v1
source Oxford University Press Journals Current
subjects Cancer
Human health and pathology
Life Sciences
Surgery
title Real-world outcomes of lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of stage c-IA lung carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-world%20outcomes%20of%20lobectomy,%20segmentectomy%20and%20wedge%20resection%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20stage%20c-IA%20lung%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cardio-thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Thomas,%20Pascal%20Alexandre&rft.aucorp=EPITHOR%20working%20group&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1010-7940&rft.eissn=1873-734X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezae251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3072292246%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072292246&rft_id=info:pmid/38917411&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ejcts/ezae251&rfr_iscdi=true