A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study
The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Therapie 2024-07, Vol.79 (4), p.435-441 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 441 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 435 |
container_title | Therapie |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Carton, Louise Bordy, Romain Totoson, Perle Laforgue, Edouard-Jules Pelerin, Jean-Marc Portier-Feunteun, Thomas Mainbourg, Sabine Deplanque, Dominique Zimmer, Luc Laporte, Silvy Bordet, Régis Grenet, Guillaume Legeay, Samuel |
description | The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants.
An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10.
Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”.
The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04805817v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040595723001841</els_id><sourcerecordid>38008601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-ed547c6765491ed9c0b31f3da0da3bc604e7b521c95d2c3b536ca06eb809c4c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznh5A5FsXXQ8aZpeXAiDeIMBNwruQpqcOhlmmpK0A769KdVZujrwne8_IT8hVwwWDFh-u1n0a_SqW6SQ8ogWER6ROatEmQhRlMdkDpBBIipRzMhZCBuAlBVVcUpmvAQoc2Bz8rmkHvc22B4N3aMP1rXUNTTepsaGbuhVbx1tnKfdWvmd0m7rvqxWW9p7ZVvbft3RZUvRDHo027gI_WC-L8hJo7YBL3_nOfl4enx_eElWb8-vD8tVonkm-gSNyAqdF7nIKoam0lBz1nCjwChe6xwyLGqRMl0Jk2peC55rBTnWJVQ60xU_JzfT3bXays7bnfLf0ikrX5YrOTLIShAlK_Ysutnkau9C8NgcAgzkWKrcyKlUOZY60ghj7HqKdUO9Q3MI_bUYhftJwPjRvUUvg7bYajTWo-6lcfb_F34AQHOKxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carton, Louise ; Bordy, Romain ; Totoson, Perle ; Laforgue, Edouard-Jules ; Pelerin, Jean-Marc ; Portier-Feunteun, Thomas ; Mainbourg, Sabine ; Deplanque, Dominique ; Zimmer, Luc ; Laporte, Silvy ; Bordet, Régis ; Grenet, Guillaume ; Legeay, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Carton, Louise ; Bordy, Romain ; Totoson, Perle ; Laforgue, Edouard-Jules ; Pelerin, Jean-Marc ; Portier-Feunteun, Thomas ; Mainbourg, Sabine ; Deplanque, Dominique ; Zimmer, Luc ; Laporte, Silvy ; Bordet, Régis ; Grenet, Guillaume ; Legeay, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants.
An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10.
Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”.
The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1958-5578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38008601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; France ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Methodology ; Pharmaceutical sciences ; Pharmacology ; Pharmacology - education ; Statistics ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Therapeutics ; Training program</subject><ispartof>Therapie, 2024-07, Vol.79 (4), p.435-441</ispartof><rights>2023 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-ed547c6765491ed9c0b31f3da0da3bc604e7b521c95d2c3b536ca06eb809c4c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5393-995X ; 0000-0002-5237-2581 ; 0000-0002-1523-7372 ; 0000-0001-6197-8668 ; 0000-0002-7400-1212 ; 0000-0003-4564-2931 ; 0000-0002-2805-7098 ; 0000-0002-5012-4330 ; 0000-0003-3916-6422</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38008601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04805817$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carton, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordy, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totoson, Perle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laforgue, Edouard-Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelerin, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portier-Feunteun, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainbourg, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deplanque, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laporte, Silvy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordet, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenet, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legeay, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study</title><title>Therapie</title><addtitle>Therapie</addtitle><description>The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants.
An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10.
Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”.
The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology - education</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Therapeutics</subject><subject>Training program</subject><issn>0040-5957</issn><issn>1958-5578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznh5A5FsXXQ8aZpeXAiDeIMBNwruQpqcOhlmmpK0A769KdVZujrwne8_IT8hVwwWDFh-u1n0a_SqW6SQ8ogWER6ROatEmQhRlMdkDpBBIipRzMhZCBuAlBVVcUpmvAQoc2Bz8rmkHvc22B4N3aMP1rXUNTTepsaGbuhVbx1tnKfdWvmd0m7rvqxWW9p7ZVvbft3RZUvRDHo027gI_WC-L8hJo7YBL3_nOfl4enx_eElWb8-vD8tVonkm-gSNyAqdF7nIKoam0lBz1nCjwChe6xwyLGqRMl0Jk2peC55rBTnWJVQ60xU_JzfT3bXays7bnfLf0ikrX5YrOTLIShAlK_Ysutnkau9C8NgcAgzkWKrcyKlUOZY60ghj7HqKdUO9Q3MI_bUYhftJwPjRvUUvg7bYajTWo-6lcfb_F34AQHOKxA</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Carton, Louise</creator><creator>Bordy, Romain</creator><creator>Totoson, Perle</creator><creator>Laforgue, Edouard-Jules</creator><creator>Pelerin, Jean-Marc</creator><creator>Portier-Feunteun, Thomas</creator><creator>Mainbourg, Sabine</creator><creator>Deplanque, Dominique</creator><creator>Zimmer, Luc</creator><creator>Laporte, Silvy</creator><creator>Bordet, Régis</creator><creator>Grenet, Guillaume</creator><creator>Legeay, Samuel</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier Masson</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5393-995X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-2581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-7372</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-8668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-1212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-7098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-4330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-6422</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study</title><author>Carton, Louise ; Bordy, Romain ; Totoson, Perle ; Laforgue, Edouard-Jules ; Pelerin, Jean-Marc ; Portier-Feunteun, Thomas ; Mainbourg, Sabine ; Deplanque, Dominique ; Zimmer, Luc ; Laporte, Silvy ; Bordet, Régis ; Grenet, Guillaume ; Legeay, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-ed547c6765491ed9c0b31f3da0da3bc604e7b521c95d2c3b536ca06eb809c4c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology - education</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Therapeutics</topic><topic>Training program</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carton, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordy, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totoson, Perle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laforgue, Edouard-Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelerin, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portier-Feunteun, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainbourg, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deplanque, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laporte, Silvy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordet, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenet, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legeay, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Therapie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carton, Louise</au><au>Bordy, Romain</au><au>Totoson, Perle</au><au>Laforgue, Edouard-Jules</au><au>Pelerin, Jean-Marc</au><au>Portier-Feunteun, Thomas</au><au>Mainbourg, Sabine</au><au>Deplanque, Dominique</au><au>Zimmer, Luc</au><au>Laporte, Silvy</au><au>Bordet, Régis</au><au>Grenet, Guillaume</au><au>Legeay, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study</atitle><jtitle>Therapie</jtitle><addtitle>Therapie</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>435-441</pages><issn>0040-5957</issn><eissn>1958-5578</eissn><abstract>The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants.
An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10.
Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”.
The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>38008601</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5393-995X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-2581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-7372</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-8668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-1212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-7098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-4330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-6422</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-5957 |
ispartof | Therapie, 2024-07, Vol.79 (4), p.435-441 |
issn | 0040-5957 1958-5578 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04805817v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Female France Humans Life Sciences Male Methodology Pharmaceutical sciences Pharmacology Pharmacology - education Statistics Surveys and Questionnaires Therapeutics Training program |
title | A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A46%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20revisited%20version%20of%20the%20disputatio%20for%20pharmacological%20training:%20An%20educational%20study&rft.jtitle=Therapie&rft.au=Carton,%20Louise&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=435-441&rft.issn=0040-5957&rft.eissn=1958-5578&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_hal_p%3E38008601%3C/pubmed_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/38008601&rft_els_id=S0040595723001841&rfr_iscdi=true |