A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study

The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Therapie 2024-07, Vol.79 (4), p.435-441
Hauptverfasser: Carton, Louise, Bordy, Romain, Totoson, Perle, Laforgue, Edouard-Jules, Pelerin, Jean-Marc, Portier-Feunteun, Thomas, Mainbourg, Sabine, Deplanque, Dominique, Zimmer, Luc, Laporte, Silvy, Bordet, Régis, Grenet, Guillaume, Legeay, Samuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 441
container_issue 4
container_start_page 435
container_title Therapie
container_volume 79
creator Carton, Louise
Bordy, Romain
Totoson, Perle
Laforgue, Edouard-Jules
Pelerin, Jean-Marc
Portier-Feunteun, Thomas
Mainbourg, Sabine
Deplanque, Dominique
Zimmer, Luc
Laporte, Silvy
Bordet, Régis
Grenet, Guillaume
Legeay, Samuel
description The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants. An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10. Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”. The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04805817v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040595723001841</els_id><sourcerecordid>38008601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-ed547c6765491ed9c0b31f3da0da3bc604e7b521c95d2c3b536ca06eb809c4c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznh5A5FsXXQ8aZpeXAiDeIMBNwruQpqcOhlmmpK0A769KdVZujrwne8_IT8hVwwWDFh-u1n0a_SqW6SQ8ogWER6ROatEmQhRlMdkDpBBIipRzMhZCBuAlBVVcUpmvAQoc2Bz8rmkHvc22B4N3aMP1rXUNTTepsaGbuhVbx1tnKfdWvmd0m7rvqxWW9p7ZVvbft3RZUvRDHo027gI_WC-L8hJo7YBL3_nOfl4enx_eElWb8-vD8tVonkm-gSNyAqdF7nIKoam0lBz1nCjwChe6xwyLGqRMl0Jk2peC55rBTnWJVQ60xU_JzfT3bXays7bnfLf0ikrX5YrOTLIShAlK_Ysutnkau9C8NgcAgzkWKrcyKlUOZY60ghj7HqKdUO9Q3MI_bUYhftJwPjRvUUvg7bYajTWo-6lcfb_F34AQHOKxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carton, Louise ; Bordy, Romain ; Totoson, Perle ; Laforgue, Edouard-Jules ; Pelerin, Jean-Marc ; Portier-Feunteun, Thomas ; Mainbourg, Sabine ; Deplanque, Dominique ; Zimmer, Luc ; Laporte, Silvy ; Bordet, Régis ; Grenet, Guillaume ; Legeay, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Carton, Louise ; Bordy, Romain ; Totoson, Perle ; Laforgue, Edouard-Jules ; Pelerin, Jean-Marc ; Portier-Feunteun, Thomas ; Mainbourg, Sabine ; Deplanque, Dominique ; Zimmer, Luc ; Laporte, Silvy ; Bordet, Régis ; Grenet, Guillaume ; Legeay, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants. An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10. Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”. The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1958-5578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38008601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; France ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Methodology ; Pharmaceutical sciences ; Pharmacology ; Pharmacology - education ; Statistics ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Therapeutics ; Training program</subject><ispartof>Therapie, 2024-07, Vol.79 (4), p.435-441</ispartof><rights>2023 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-ed547c6765491ed9c0b31f3da0da3bc604e7b521c95d2c3b536ca06eb809c4c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5393-995X ; 0000-0002-5237-2581 ; 0000-0002-1523-7372 ; 0000-0001-6197-8668 ; 0000-0002-7400-1212 ; 0000-0003-4564-2931 ; 0000-0002-2805-7098 ; 0000-0002-5012-4330 ; 0000-0003-3916-6422</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38008601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04805817$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carton, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordy, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totoson, Perle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laforgue, Edouard-Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelerin, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portier-Feunteun, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainbourg, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deplanque, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laporte, Silvy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordet, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenet, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legeay, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study</title><title>Therapie</title><addtitle>Therapie</addtitle><description>The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants. An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10. Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”. The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology - education</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Therapeutics</subject><subject>Training program</subject><issn>0040-5957</issn><issn>1958-5578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznh5A5FsXXQ8aZpeXAiDeIMBNwruQpqcOhlmmpK0A769KdVZujrwne8_IT8hVwwWDFh-u1n0a_SqW6SQ8ogWER6ROatEmQhRlMdkDpBBIipRzMhZCBuAlBVVcUpmvAQoc2Bz8rmkHvc22B4N3aMP1rXUNTTepsaGbuhVbx1tnKfdWvmd0m7rvqxWW9p7ZVvbft3RZUvRDHo027gI_WC-L8hJo7YBL3_nOfl4enx_eElWb8-vD8tVonkm-gSNyAqdF7nIKoam0lBz1nCjwChe6xwyLGqRMl0Jk2peC55rBTnWJVQ60xU_JzfT3bXays7bnfLf0ikrX5YrOTLIShAlK_Ysutnkau9C8NgcAgzkWKrcyKlUOZY60ghj7HqKdUO9Q3MI_bUYhftJwPjRvUUvg7bYajTWo-6lcfb_F34AQHOKxA</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Carton, Louise</creator><creator>Bordy, Romain</creator><creator>Totoson, Perle</creator><creator>Laforgue, Edouard-Jules</creator><creator>Pelerin, Jean-Marc</creator><creator>Portier-Feunteun, Thomas</creator><creator>Mainbourg, Sabine</creator><creator>Deplanque, Dominique</creator><creator>Zimmer, Luc</creator><creator>Laporte, Silvy</creator><creator>Bordet, Régis</creator><creator>Grenet, Guillaume</creator><creator>Legeay, Samuel</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier Masson</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5393-995X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-2581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-7372</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-8668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-1212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-7098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-4330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-6422</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study</title><author>Carton, Louise ; Bordy, Romain ; Totoson, Perle ; Laforgue, Edouard-Jules ; Pelerin, Jean-Marc ; Portier-Feunteun, Thomas ; Mainbourg, Sabine ; Deplanque, Dominique ; Zimmer, Luc ; Laporte, Silvy ; Bordet, Régis ; Grenet, Guillaume ; Legeay, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-ed547c6765491ed9c0b31f3da0da3bc604e7b521c95d2c3b536ca06eb809c4c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology - education</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Therapeutics</topic><topic>Training program</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carton, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordy, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totoson, Perle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laforgue, Edouard-Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelerin, Jean-Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portier-Feunteun, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainbourg, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deplanque, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laporte, Silvy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordet, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenet, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legeay, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Therapie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carton, Louise</au><au>Bordy, Romain</au><au>Totoson, Perle</au><au>Laforgue, Edouard-Jules</au><au>Pelerin, Jean-Marc</au><au>Portier-Feunteun, Thomas</au><au>Mainbourg, Sabine</au><au>Deplanque, Dominique</au><au>Zimmer, Luc</au><au>Laporte, Silvy</au><au>Bordet, Régis</au><au>Grenet, Guillaume</au><au>Legeay, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study</atitle><jtitle>Therapie</jtitle><addtitle>Therapie</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>435-441</pages><issn>0040-5957</issn><eissn>1958-5578</eissn><abstract>The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants. An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10. Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”. The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>38008601</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5393-995X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-2581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-7372</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-8668</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-1212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-7098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-4330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-6422</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-5957
ispartof Therapie, 2024-07, Vol.79 (4), p.435-441
issn 0040-5957
1958-5578
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04805817v1
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Female
France
Humans
Life Sciences
Male
Methodology
Pharmaceutical sciences
Pharmacology
Pharmacology - education
Statistics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics
Training program
title A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A46%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20revisited%20version%20of%20the%20disputatio%20for%20pharmacological%20training:%20An%20educational%20study&rft.jtitle=Therapie&rft.au=Carton,%20Louise&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=435-441&rft.issn=0040-5957&rft.eissn=1958-5578&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_hal_p%3E38008601%3C/pubmed_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/38008601&rft_els_id=S0040595723001841&rfr_iscdi=true