Improving supercooled liquid water representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3

Most numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have a significant bias in predicting supercooled liquid water (SLW). For this reason, icing risk diagnostic tools do not use supercooled liquid water forecast by the models as an input parameter, but rather temperature and humidity, which are forecast...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 2024-10, Vol.150 (764), p.4086-4112
Hauptverfasser: Dupont, Rémi, Taymans, Claire, Vié, Benoît
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4112
container_issue 764
container_start_page 4086
container_title Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
container_volume 150
creator Dupont, Rémi
Taymans, Claire
Vié, Benoît
description Most numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have a significant bias in predicting supercooled liquid water (SLW). For this reason, icing risk diagnostic tools do not use supercooled liquid water forecast by the models as an input parameter, but rather temperature and humidity, which are forecast better than SLW. The main objective of this study is to improve the SLW representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3 (Three Ice categories) used in the operational Applications de la Recherche à l'Opérationnel à Méso‐Echelle (AROME) model. For this purpose, several parametrizations of the microphysical processes were evaluated to find a better representation of SLW in the Mesoscale Non‐Hydrostatic model (MESO‐NH), which also uses ICE3. Elements of the microphysical scheme of the HARMONIE‐AROME model and work carried out by the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (CNRM) have been tested and compared with the current scheme. After a preliminary study, three parametrizations of the microphysical scheme were selected, in which the processes of ice initiation, snow and graupel collection of cloud droplets, condensation, Bergeron–Findeisen, and saturation adjustment were modified. Then, MESO‐NH simulations were performed and compared with observations from the In‐Cloud ICing and Large‐drop Experiment (ICICLE) airborne campaign. Three case studies were used with different icing weather conditions such as freezing rain, freezing drizzle, lake effect, etc. The results show a better representation of SLW with a greater presence of cloud droplets for colder temperatures up to −$$ - $$30  ∘$$ ^{\circ } $$C. However, the liquid water content remains underestimated and the ice mass is overestimated. The ice initiation and cloud droplet collection by snow and graupel play a major role in the SLW representation. Parametrizations with restrictive ice initiation criteria reduce cloud droplet consumption and provide better agreement with observations. The results are promising and need to be investigated further with more cases and in the operational model AROME. This article presents the evaluation of updated microphysical parametrizations to improve the representation of supercooled liquid water in numerical weather prediction models. These updated parametrizations lead to an improvement in the liquid water content representation, with a greater presence of cloud droplets at negative temperature and a sharp decrease in ice‐crystal content. The results are promising
doi_str_mv 10.1002/qj.4806
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04802497v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3123909579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2156-5b81566db14d040cad446a1b4feb4fa69ee3b9e02d722fb29fcb4eb2236352973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AgCs4pfoWADyLSeUnTZnkcY7rJQBQF30LaXl1G13ZJt7Fvb-bENx-Og-PHcfcn5JrBgAHwh_VyIIaQnpAeE1JGQwmfp6QHECeRAlDn5ML7JQAkksseeZutWtdsbf1F_aZFlzdNhQWt7HpjC7ozHTrqsHXose5MZ5ua2pp2C6Qrm7umXey9zU1Ffb7AFdLZeBJfkrPSVB6vfnuffDxO3sfTaP7yNBuP5lHOWZJGSTYMLS0yJgoQkJtCiNSwTJQYyqQKMc4UAi8k52XGVZlnAjPO4zROuJJxn9wd9y5MpVtnV8btdWOsno7m-jCDkAMXSm5ZsDdHG55db9B3etlsXB3O0zHjsQKVSBXU7VGFz7x3WP6tZaAP4er1Uh_CDfL-KHe2wv1_TL8-_-hvtAJ5WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3123909579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving supercooled liquid water representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dupont, Rémi ; Taymans, Claire ; Vié, Benoît</creator><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Rémi ; Taymans, Claire ; Vié, Benoît</creatorcontrib><description>Most numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have a significant bias in predicting supercooled liquid water (SLW). For this reason, icing risk diagnostic tools do not use supercooled liquid water forecast by the models as an input parameter, but rather temperature and humidity, which are forecast better than SLW. The main objective of this study is to improve the SLW representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3 (Three Ice categories) used in the operational Applications de la Recherche à l'Opérationnel à Méso‐Echelle (AROME) model. For this purpose, several parametrizations of the microphysical processes were evaluated to find a better representation of SLW in the Mesoscale Non‐Hydrostatic model (MESO‐NH), which also uses ICE3. Elements of the microphysical scheme of the HARMONIE‐AROME model and work carried out by the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (CNRM) have been tested and compared with the current scheme. After a preliminary study, three parametrizations of the microphysical scheme were selected, in which the processes of ice initiation, snow and graupel collection of cloud droplets, condensation, Bergeron–Findeisen, and saturation adjustment were modified. Then, MESO‐NH simulations were performed and compared with observations from the In‐Cloud ICing and Large‐drop Experiment (ICICLE) airborne campaign. Three case studies were used with different icing weather conditions such as freezing rain, freezing drizzle, lake effect, etc. The results show a better representation of SLW with a greater presence of cloud droplets for colder temperatures up to −$$ - $$30  ∘$$ ^{\circ } $$C. However, the liquid water content remains underestimated and the ice mass is overestimated. The ice initiation and cloud droplet collection by snow and graupel play a major role in the SLW representation. Parametrizations with restrictive ice initiation criteria reduce cloud droplet consumption and provide better agreement with observations. The results are promising and need to be investigated further with more cases and in the operational model AROME. This article presents the evaluation of updated microphysical parametrizations to improve the representation of supercooled liquid water in numerical weather prediction models. These updated parametrizations lead to an improvement in the liquid water content representation, with a greater presence of cloud droplets at negative temperature and a sharp decrease in ice‐crystal content. The results are promising for operational icing forecasts, which currently use proxy parameters to determine icing risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-9009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-870X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qj.4806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Cloud droplets ; cloud microphysics ; Clouds ; Drizzle ; Droplets ; Freezing ; Freezing drizzle ; Freezing rain ; Graupel ; Ice ; Icing ; Lake effects ; Liquid water content ; Moisture content ; Ocean, Atmosphere ; Sciences of the Universe ; Snow ; supercooled liquid water ; Water content ; Weather ; Weather conditions ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2024-10, Vol.150 (764), p.4086-4112</ispartof><rights>2024 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2156-5b81566db14d040cad446a1b4feb4fa69ee3b9e02d722fb29fcb4eb2236352973</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6021-0603 ; 0009-0009-3050-3278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fqj.4806$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fqj.4806$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04802497$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Rémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taymans, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vié, Benoît</creatorcontrib><title>Improving supercooled liquid water representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3</title><title>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</title><description>Most numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have a significant bias in predicting supercooled liquid water (SLW). For this reason, icing risk diagnostic tools do not use supercooled liquid water forecast by the models as an input parameter, but rather temperature and humidity, which are forecast better than SLW. The main objective of this study is to improve the SLW representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3 (Three Ice categories) used in the operational Applications de la Recherche à l'Opérationnel à Méso‐Echelle (AROME) model. For this purpose, several parametrizations of the microphysical processes were evaluated to find a better representation of SLW in the Mesoscale Non‐Hydrostatic model (MESO‐NH), which also uses ICE3. Elements of the microphysical scheme of the HARMONIE‐AROME model and work carried out by the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (CNRM) have been tested and compared with the current scheme. After a preliminary study, three parametrizations of the microphysical scheme were selected, in which the processes of ice initiation, snow and graupel collection of cloud droplets, condensation, Bergeron–Findeisen, and saturation adjustment were modified. Then, MESO‐NH simulations were performed and compared with observations from the In‐Cloud ICing and Large‐drop Experiment (ICICLE) airborne campaign. Three case studies were used with different icing weather conditions such as freezing rain, freezing drizzle, lake effect, etc. The results show a better representation of SLW with a greater presence of cloud droplets for colder temperatures up to −$$ - $$30  ∘$$ ^{\circ } $$C. However, the liquid water content remains underestimated and the ice mass is overestimated. The ice initiation and cloud droplet collection by snow and graupel play a major role in the SLW representation. Parametrizations with restrictive ice initiation criteria reduce cloud droplet consumption and provide better agreement with observations. The results are promising and need to be investigated further with more cases and in the operational model AROME. This article presents the evaluation of updated microphysical parametrizations to improve the representation of supercooled liquid water in numerical weather prediction models. These updated parametrizations lead to an improvement in the liquid water content representation, with a greater presence of cloud droplets at negative temperature and a sharp decrease in ice‐crystal content. The results are promising for operational icing forecasts, which currently use proxy parameters to determine icing risk.</description><subject>Cloud droplets</subject><subject>cloud microphysics</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Drizzle</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Freezing drizzle</subject><subject>Freezing rain</subject><subject>Graupel</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Icing</subject><subject>Lake effects</subject><subject>Liquid water content</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Ocean, Atmosphere</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>supercooled liquid water</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather conditions</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0035-9009</issn><issn>1477-870X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10FFLwzAQB_AgCs4pfoWADyLSeUnTZnkcY7rJQBQF30LaXl1G13ZJt7Fvb-bENx-Og-PHcfcn5JrBgAHwh_VyIIaQnpAeE1JGQwmfp6QHECeRAlDn5ML7JQAkksseeZutWtdsbf1F_aZFlzdNhQWt7HpjC7ozHTrqsHXose5MZ5ua2pp2C6Qrm7umXey9zU1Ffb7AFdLZeBJfkrPSVB6vfnuffDxO3sfTaP7yNBuP5lHOWZJGSTYMLS0yJgoQkJtCiNSwTJQYyqQKMc4UAi8k52XGVZlnAjPO4zROuJJxn9wd9y5MpVtnV8btdWOsno7m-jCDkAMXSm5ZsDdHG55db9B3etlsXB3O0zHjsQKVSBXU7VGFz7x3WP6tZaAP4er1Uh_CDfL-KHe2wv1_TL8-_-hvtAJ5WA</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Dupont, Rémi</creator><creator>Taymans, Claire</creator><creator>Vié, Benoît</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6021-0603</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3050-3278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Improving supercooled liquid water representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3</title><author>Dupont, Rémi ; Taymans, Claire ; Vié, Benoît</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2156-5b81566db14d040cad446a1b4feb4fa69ee3b9e02d722fb29fcb4eb2236352973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cloud droplets</topic><topic>cloud microphysics</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Drizzle</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Freezing drizzle</topic><topic>Freezing rain</topic><topic>Graupel</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Icing</topic><topic>Lake effects</topic><topic>Liquid water content</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Ocean, Atmosphere</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>supercooled liquid water</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather conditions</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Rémi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taymans, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vié, Benoît</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dupont, Rémi</au><au>Taymans, Claire</au><au>Vié, Benoît</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving supercooled liquid water representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>764</issue><spage>4086</spage><epage>4112</epage><pages>4086-4112</pages><issn>0035-9009</issn><eissn>1477-870X</eissn><abstract>Most numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have a significant bias in predicting supercooled liquid water (SLW). For this reason, icing risk diagnostic tools do not use supercooled liquid water forecast by the models as an input parameter, but rather temperature and humidity, which are forecast better than SLW. The main objective of this study is to improve the SLW representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3 (Three Ice categories) used in the operational Applications de la Recherche à l'Opérationnel à Méso‐Echelle (AROME) model. For this purpose, several parametrizations of the microphysical processes were evaluated to find a better representation of SLW in the Mesoscale Non‐Hydrostatic model (MESO‐NH), which also uses ICE3. Elements of the microphysical scheme of the HARMONIE‐AROME model and work carried out by the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (CNRM) have been tested and compared with the current scheme. After a preliminary study, three parametrizations of the microphysical scheme were selected, in which the processes of ice initiation, snow and graupel collection of cloud droplets, condensation, Bergeron–Findeisen, and saturation adjustment were modified. Then, MESO‐NH simulations were performed and compared with observations from the In‐Cloud ICing and Large‐drop Experiment (ICICLE) airborne campaign. Three case studies were used with different icing weather conditions such as freezing rain, freezing drizzle, lake effect, etc. The results show a better representation of SLW with a greater presence of cloud droplets for colder temperatures up to −$$ - $$30  ∘$$ ^{\circ } $$C. However, the liquid water content remains underestimated and the ice mass is overestimated. The ice initiation and cloud droplet collection by snow and graupel play a major role in the SLW representation. Parametrizations with restrictive ice initiation criteria reduce cloud droplet consumption and provide better agreement with observations. The results are promising and need to be investigated further with more cases and in the operational model AROME. This article presents the evaluation of updated microphysical parametrizations to improve the representation of supercooled liquid water in numerical weather prediction models. These updated parametrizations lead to an improvement in the liquid water content representation, with a greater presence of cloud droplets at negative temperature and a sharp decrease in ice‐crystal content. The results are promising for operational icing forecasts, which currently use proxy parameters to determine icing risk.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/qj.4806</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6021-0603</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3050-3278</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-9009
ispartof Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2024-10, Vol.150 (764), p.4086-4112
issn 0035-9009
1477-870X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04802497v1
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cloud droplets
cloud microphysics
Clouds
Drizzle
Droplets
Freezing
Freezing drizzle
Freezing rain
Graupel
Ice
Icing
Lake effects
Liquid water content
Moisture content
Ocean, Atmosphere
Sciences of the Universe
Snow
supercooled liquid water
Water content
Weather
Weather conditions
Weather forecasting
title Improving supercooled liquid water representation in the microphysical scheme ICE3
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20supercooled%20liquid%20water%20representation%20in%20the%20microphysical%20scheme%20ICE3&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Meteorological%20Society&rft.au=Dupont,%20R%C3%A9mi&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=764&rft.spage=4086&rft.epage=4112&rft.pages=4086-4112&rft.issn=0035-9009&rft.eissn=1477-870X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qj.4806&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3123909579%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3123909579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true