Shapes of direct cortical responses vs. short-range axono-cortical evoked potentials: The effects of direct electrical stimulation applied to the human brain

•Electrical stimulation in white matter induces delays in the evoked response due to slow conduction velocity.•The waveforms from white matter and cortical stimulation remain generally identical.•Responses to white matter and cortical stimulation differ on response times.•The relaxation of the N1 co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurophysiology 2024-11
Hauptverfasser: Turpin, Clotilde, Rossel, Olivier, Schlosser-Perrin, Félix, Ng, Sam, Matsumoto, Riki, Mandonnet, Emmanuel, Duffau, Hugues, Bonnetblanc, François
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Clinical neurophysiology
container_volume
creator Turpin, Clotilde
Rossel, Olivier
Schlosser-Perrin, Félix
Ng, Sam
Matsumoto, Riki
Mandonnet, Emmanuel
Duffau, Hugues
Bonnetblanc, François
description •Electrical stimulation in white matter induces delays in the evoked response due to slow conduction velocity.•The waveforms from white matter and cortical stimulation remain generally identical.•Responses to white matter and cortical stimulation differ on response times.•The relaxation of the N1 component is longer during cortical stimulations.•There is probable activation of intra-cortical axons during cortical stimulation. Direct cortical responses (DCR) and axono-cortical evoked potentials (ACEP) are generated by electrically stimulating the cortex either directly or indirectly through white matter pathways, potentially leading to different electrogenic processes. For ACEP, the slow conduction velocity of axons (median ≈ 4 m.s−1) is anticipated to induce a delay. For DCR, direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the cortex is expected to elicit additional cortical activity involving smaller and slower non-myelinated axons. We tried to validate these hypotheses. DES was administered either directly on the cortex or to white matter fascicles within the resection cavity, while recording DCR or ACEP at the cortical level in nine patients. Short but significant delays (≈ 2 ms) were measurable for ACEP immediately following the initial component (≈ 7 ms). Subsequent activities (≈ 40 ms) exhibited notable differences between DCR and ACEP, suggesting the presence of additional cortical activities for DCR. Distinctions between ACEPs and DCRs can be made based on a delay at the onset of early components and the dissimilarity in the shape of the later components (>40 ms after the DES artifact). The comparison of different types of evoked potentials allows to better understand the effects of DES.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.10.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04795276v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1388245724003213</els_id><sourcerecordid>3132141567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-cdea8a6939a9a4781f8eb05f4ac3d2dad6986a1830b1bd6941ef9967a09ed903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUjBCIlsI_QMhHOCTY-XBiDkhVBS3SShzYu_XivBAviR3sZNX-GP4rb0lZceLij_HMPHkmSV4Lngku5PtDZkbr5iHLeV4SlBH4JLkUTZ2njaryp3QumibNy6q-SF7EeOCc17zMnycXharqRih-mfz6NsCMkfmedTagWZjxYbEGRhYwzt5FejzGjMWB8DSA-44M7r3z6ZmIR_8DOzb7Bd1iYYwf2H5Ahn1Pfv9a40hr-KOJi53WERbrHYN5Hi0ZLJ4tpBvWCRxrA1j3MnnWkx--etyvkv3nT_ubu3T39fbLzfUuNXkhZWo6hAakKhQoKOlnfYMtr_oSTNHlHXRSNRJEU_BWtHQpBfZKyRq4wk7x4ip5t9kOMOo52AnCg_Zg9d31Tp8wXtaUaC2PgrhvN-4c_M8V46InGw2OIzj0a9SFKHJRikrWRC03qgk-xoD92VtwfepQH_TWoT51eEIJJNmbxwlrO2F3Fv0tjQgfNwJSJEeLQUdj0RncYtadt_-f8BukxbIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132141567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shapes of direct cortical responses vs. short-range axono-cortical evoked potentials: The effects of direct electrical stimulation applied to the human brain</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Turpin, Clotilde ; Rossel, Olivier ; Schlosser-Perrin, Félix ; Ng, Sam ; Matsumoto, Riki ; Mandonnet, Emmanuel ; Duffau, Hugues ; Bonnetblanc, François</creator><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Clotilde ; Rossel, Olivier ; Schlosser-Perrin, Félix ; Ng, Sam ; Matsumoto, Riki ; Mandonnet, Emmanuel ; Duffau, Hugues ; Bonnetblanc, François</creatorcontrib><description>•Electrical stimulation in white matter induces delays in the evoked response due to slow conduction velocity.•The waveforms from white matter and cortical stimulation remain generally identical.•Responses to white matter and cortical stimulation differ on response times.•The relaxation of the N1 component is longer during cortical stimulations.•There is probable activation of intra-cortical axons during cortical stimulation. Direct cortical responses (DCR) and axono-cortical evoked potentials (ACEP) are generated by electrically stimulating the cortex either directly or indirectly through white matter pathways, potentially leading to different electrogenic processes. For ACEP, the slow conduction velocity of axons (median ≈ 4 m.s−1) is anticipated to induce a delay. For DCR, direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the cortex is expected to elicit additional cortical activity involving smaller and slower non-myelinated axons. We tried to validate these hypotheses. DES was administered either directly on the cortex or to white matter fascicles within the resection cavity, while recording DCR or ACEP at the cortical level in nine patients. Short but significant delays (≈ 2 ms) were measurable for ACEP immediately following the initial component (≈ 7 ms). Subsequent activities (≈ 40 ms) exhibited notable differences between DCR and ACEP, suggesting the presence of additional cortical activities for DCR. Distinctions between ACEPs and DCRs can be made based on a delay at the onset of early components and the dissimilarity in the shape of the later components (&gt;40 ms after the DES artifact). The comparison of different types of evoked potentials allows to better understand the effects of DES.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-2457</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-8952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.10.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39578190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Awake brain surgery ; Axono-cortical evoked potential ; Direct cortical response ; Direct Electrical Stimulation ; Electrocorticography ; Electrogenesis ; Engineering Sciences ; Evoked Potentials ; Intra-operative neural monitoring ; Signal and Image processing ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurophysiology, 2024-11</ispartof><rights>2024 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-cdea8a6939a9a4781f8eb05f4ac3d2dad6986a1830b1bd6941ef9967a09ed903</cites><orcidid>0009-0002-3291-4846</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.10.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39578190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://inria.hal.science/hal-04795276$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Clotilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossel, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlosser-Perrin, Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Riki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandonnet, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffau, Hugues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnetblanc, François</creatorcontrib><title>Shapes of direct cortical responses vs. short-range axono-cortical evoked potentials: The effects of direct electrical stimulation applied to the human brain</title><title>Clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>•Electrical stimulation in white matter induces delays in the evoked response due to slow conduction velocity.•The waveforms from white matter and cortical stimulation remain generally identical.•Responses to white matter and cortical stimulation differ on response times.•The relaxation of the N1 component is longer during cortical stimulations.•There is probable activation of intra-cortical axons during cortical stimulation. Direct cortical responses (DCR) and axono-cortical evoked potentials (ACEP) are generated by electrically stimulating the cortex either directly or indirectly through white matter pathways, potentially leading to different electrogenic processes. For ACEP, the slow conduction velocity of axons (median ≈ 4 m.s−1) is anticipated to induce a delay. For DCR, direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the cortex is expected to elicit additional cortical activity involving smaller and slower non-myelinated axons. We tried to validate these hypotheses. DES was administered either directly on the cortex or to white matter fascicles within the resection cavity, while recording DCR or ACEP at the cortical level in nine patients. Short but significant delays (≈ 2 ms) were measurable for ACEP immediately following the initial component (≈ 7 ms). Subsequent activities (≈ 40 ms) exhibited notable differences between DCR and ACEP, suggesting the presence of additional cortical activities for DCR. Distinctions between ACEPs and DCRs can be made based on a delay at the onset of early components and the dissimilarity in the shape of the later components (&gt;40 ms after the DES artifact). The comparison of different types of evoked potentials allows to better understand the effects of DES.</description><subject>Awake brain surgery</subject><subject>Axono-cortical evoked potential</subject><subject>Direct cortical response</subject><subject>Direct Electrical Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrocorticography</subject><subject>Electrogenesis</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Intra-operative neural monitoring</subject><subject>Signal and Image processing</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1388-2457</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUjBCIlsI_QMhHOCTY-XBiDkhVBS3SShzYu_XivBAviR3sZNX-GP4rb0lZceLij_HMPHkmSV4Lngku5PtDZkbr5iHLeV4SlBH4JLkUTZ2njaryp3QumibNy6q-SF7EeOCc17zMnycXharqRih-mfz6NsCMkfmedTagWZjxYbEGRhYwzt5FejzGjMWB8DSA-44M7r3z6ZmIR_8DOzb7Bd1iYYwf2H5Ahn1Pfv9a40hr-KOJi53WERbrHYN5Hi0ZLJ4tpBvWCRxrA1j3MnnWkx--etyvkv3nT_ubu3T39fbLzfUuNXkhZWo6hAakKhQoKOlnfYMtr_oSTNHlHXRSNRJEU_BWtHQpBfZKyRq4wk7x4ip5t9kOMOo52AnCg_Zg9d31Tp8wXtaUaC2PgrhvN-4c_M8V46InGw2OIzj0a9SFKHJRikrWRC03qgk-xoD92VtwfepQH_TWoT51eEIJJNmbxwlrO2F3Fv0tjQgfNwJSJEeLQUdj0RncYtadt_-f8BukxbIA</recordid><startdate>20241108</startdate><enddate>20241108</enddate><creator>Turpin, Clotilde</creator><creator>Rossel, Olivier</creator><creator>Schlosser-Perrin, Félix</creator><creator>Ng, Sam</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Riki</creator><creator>Mandonnet, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Duffau, Hugues</creator><creator>Bonnetblanc, François</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3291-4846</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241108</creationdate><title>Shapes of direct cortical responses vs. short-range axono-cortical evoked potentials: The effects of direct electrical stimulation applied to the human brain</title><author>Turpin, Clotilde ; Rossel, Olivier ; Schlosser-Perrin, Félix ; Ng, Sam ; Matsumoto, Riki ; Mandonnet, Emmanuel ; Duffau, Hugues ; Bonnetblanc, François</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2366-cdea8a6939a9a4781f8eb05f4ac3d2dad6986a1830b1bd6941ef9967a09ed903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Awake brain surgery</topic><topic>Axono-cortical evoked potential</topic><topic>Direct cortical response</topic><topic>Direct Electrical Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrocorticography</topic><topic>Electrogenesis</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Intra-operative neural monitoring</topic><topic>Signal and Image processing</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turpin, Clotilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossel, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlosser-Perrin, Félix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Riki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandonnet, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffau, Hugues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnetblanc, François</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turpin, Clotilde</au><au>Rossel, Olivier</au><au>Schlosser-Perrin, Félix</au><au>Ng, Sam</au><au>Matsumoto, Riki</au><au>Mandonnet, Emmanuel</au><au>Duffau, Hugues</au><au>Bonnetblanc, François</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shapes of direct cortical responses vs. short-range axono-cortical evoked potentials: The effects of direct electrical stimulation applied to the human brain</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2024-11-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1388-2457</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><eissn>1872-8952</eissn><abstract>•Electrical stimulation in white matter induces delays in the evoked response due to slow conduction velocity.•The waveforms from white matter and cortical stimulation remain generally identical.•Responses to white matter and cortical stimulation differ on response times.•The relaxation of the N1 component is longer during cortical stimulations.•There is probable activation of intra-cortical axons during cortical stimulation. Direct cortical responses (DCR) and axono-cortical evoked potentials (ACEP) are generated by electrically stimulating the cortex either directly or indirectly through white matter pathways, potentially leading to different electrogenic processes. For ACEP, the slow conduction velocity of axons (median ≈ 4 m.s−1) is anticipated to induce a delay. For DCR, direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the cortex is expected to elicit additional cortical activity involving smaller and slower non-myelinated axons. We tried to validate these hypotheses. DES was administered either directly on the cortex or to white matter fascicles within the resection cavity, while recording DCR or ACEP at the cortical level in nine patients. Short but significant delays (≈ 2 ms) were measurable for ACEP immediately following the initial component (≈ 7 ms). Subsequent activities (≈ 40 ms) exhibited notable differences between DCR and ACEP, suggesting the presence of additional cortical activities for DCR. Distinctions between ACEPs and DCRs can be made based on a delay at the onset of early components and the dissimilarity in the shape of the later components (&gt;40 ms after the DES artifact). The comparison of different types of evoked potentials allows to better understand the effects of DES.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39578190</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinph.2024.10.016</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3291-4846</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1388-2457
ispartof Clinical neurophysiology, 2024-11
issn 1388-2457
1872-8952
1872-8952
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04795276v1
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Awake brain surgery
Axono-cortical evoked potential
Direct cortical response
Direct Electrical Stimulation
Electrocorticography
Electrogenesis
Engineering Sciences
Evoked Potentials
Intra-operative neural monitoring
Signal and Image processing
Tumors
title Shapes of direct cortical responses vs. short-range axono-cortical evoked potentials: The effects of direct electrical stimulation applied to the human brain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T16%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shapes%20of%20direct%20cortical%20responses%20vs.%20short-range%20axono-cortical%20evoked%20potentials:%20The%20effects%20of%20direct%20electrical%20stimulation%20applied%20to%20the%20human%20brain&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Turpin,%20Clotilde&rft.date=2024-11-08&rft.issn=1388-2457&rft.eissn=1872-8952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.10.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3132141567%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132141567&rft_id=info:pmid/39578190&rft_els_id=S1388245724003213&rfr_iscdi=true