A Method to Improve Land Use Representation for Weather Simulations Based on High‐Resolution Data Sets—Application to Corine Land Cover Data in the WRF Model

Land cover (LC) data incorporation, for weather modeling purposes, highlights many problems. The straightforward Single Level Mode (SLM) aggregation is not adapted for high‐resolution LC maps, with a high number of classes, because it could generate false classifications. We propose a Multi‐Level Mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Bode, M., Hedde, T., Roubin, P., Durand, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.)
container_volume 10
creator Bode, M.
Hedde, T.
Roubin, P.
Durand, P.
description Land cover (LC) data incorporation, for weather modeling purposes, highlights many problems. The straightforward Single Level Mode (SLM) aggregation is not adapted for high‐resolution LC maps, with a high number of classes, because it could generate false classifications. We propose a Multi‐Level Mode (MLM) aggregation method that includes a hierarchical structure. This study focuses on the Corine Land Cover (CLC) data set. Differences between MLM and SLM methods are small at the finest horizontal resolution and increase to a value of around 16% at 9‐km horizontal resolution. To further integrate CLC data into WRF (Weather Research Forecasting model), we included a dedicated table of physical parameters next to using the classical conversion toward the USGS one. To evaluate the LC impact on the modeled boundary layer, we used WRF at 1 km to simulate a 4‐day period with diurnal cycles of valley winds in the heterogeneous western pre‐Alps area. We tested three LCs (USGS, MODIS, and CLC), where CLC has two physical parameter tables and two aggregation methods. CLC performs better than other tested LCs. The CLC aggregation methods revealed limited differences between the simulated variables, although the MLM method gives better results. Since these comparisons are restricted to a single location with the same LC type, the differences between various simulations regarding atmospheric parameters probably result from horizontal advection from upwind areas where surface conditions differ. Extended time series with multiple locations and diverse meteorological conditions need to be considered to reinforce the results presented here. Key Points A new grid aggregation method (MLM) for land use (LU) categories is described, which addresses ambiguities in assigning the LU to cells Simulations with a physical parameter table specific for the Corine Land Cover (CLC) classes show limited improvements over the conversion to the USGS table Using CLC as an LU map improves the Weather Research Forecasting compared to USGS maps
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021EA002123
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04781674v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2779450144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-1594e9abf4e8f85e89957d3885edfb1dc75334ef44a7f27db19015cdea4f38ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhSMEEhV0xwEssUKi4L80yTKUliIVIbUglpYbj4lRGgc7BbHjCCy4AFfjJBhSIVZs7NHz5_dGM1F0QPAJwTQ7pZiScY7DSdlW1KOMsUGMU779p96N-t4_YIwJjYeY8l70kaMraEurUGvR5apx9gnQTNYK3XpAc2gceKhb2RpbI20dugPZluDQwqzW1Y_s0Zn0oFAApua-_Hx9m4O31frny7lsJVpA6z9f3_OmqUzRWYW0kXWm3oSNQqzrYBMeS0B38wm6sgqq_WhHy8pDf3PvRbeT8c1oOphdX1yO8tmgYElKBiTOOGRyqTmkOo0hzbI4USwNpdJLoookZoyD5lwmmiZqSTJM4kKB5JqlWrO96KjzLWUlGmdW0r0IK42Y5jPxrWEecoYJfyKBPezYMK_HNfhWPNi1q0N7giZJxmNMOA_UcUcVznrvQP_aEiy-dyb-7izgtMOfTQUv_7JivFhQwhhhX886mOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779450144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Method to Improve Land Use Representation for Weather Simulations Based on High‐Resolution Data Sets—Application to Corine Land Cover Data in the WRF Model</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bode, M. ; Hedde, T. ; Roubin, P. ; Durand, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bode, M. ; Hedde, T. ; Roubin, P. ; Durand, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Land cover (LC) data incorporation, for weather modeling purposes, highlights many problems. The straightforward Single Level Mode (SLM) aggregation is not adapted for high‐resolution LC maps, with a high number of classes, because it could generate false classifications. We propose a Multi‐Level Mode (MLM) aggregation method that includes a hierarchical structure. This study focuses on the Corine Land Cover (CLC) data set. Differences between MLM and SLM methods are small at the finest horizontal resolution and increase to a value of around 16% at 9‐km horizontal resolution. To further integrate CLC data into WRF (Weather Research Forecasting model), we included a dedicated table of physical parameters next to using the classical conversion toward the USGS one. To evaluate the LC impact on the modeled boundary layer, we used WRF at 1 km to simulate a 4‐day period with diurnal cycles of valley winds in the heterogeneous western pre‐Alps area. We tested three LCs (USGS, MODIS, and CLC), where CLC has two physical parameter tables and two aggregation methods. CLC performs better than other tested LCs. The CLC aggregation methods revealed limited differences between the simulated variables, although the MLM method gives better results. Since these comparisons are restricted to a single location with the same LC type, the differences between various simulations regarding atmospheric parameters probably result from horizontal advection from upwind areas where surface conditions differ. Extended time series with multiple locations and diverse meteorological conditions need to be considered to reinforce the results presented here. Key Points A new grid aggregation method (MLM) for land use (LU) categories is described, which addresses ambiguities in assigning the LU to cells Simulations with a physical parameter table specific for the Corine Land Cover (CLC) classes show limited improvements over the conversion to the USGS table Using CLC as an LU map improves the Weather Research Forecasting compared to USGS maps</description><identifier>ISSN: 2333-5084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2333-5084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021EA002123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics ; Boundary layers ; CLC ; Datasets ; land cover ; Land use ; nocturnal stable flows ; Physics ; Simulation ; valley wind ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Earth and Space Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-1594e9abf4e8f85e89957d3885edfb1dc75334ef44a7f27db19015cdea4f38ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-1594e9abf4e8f85e89957d3885edfb1dc75334ef44a7f27db19015cdea4f38ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6125-5080 ; 0000-0002-3365-0283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021EA002123$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021EA002123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,1416,11560,27922,27923,45572,45573,46050,46474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04781674$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bode, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedde, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roubin, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, P.</creatorcontrib><title>A Method to Improve Land Use Representation for Weather Simulations Based on High‐Resolution Data Sets—Application to Corine Land Cover Data in the WRF Model</title><title>Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.)</title><description>Land cover (LC) data incorporation, for weather modeling purposes, highlights many problems. The straightforward Single Level Mode (SLM) aggregation is not adapted for high‐resolution LC maps, with a high number of classes, because it could generate false classifications. We propose a Multi‐Level Mode (MLM) aggregation method that includes a hierarchical structure. This study focuses on the Corine Land Cover (CLC) data set. Differences between MLM and SLM methods are small at the finest horizontal resolution and increase to a value of around 16% at 9‐km horizontal resolution. To further integrate CLC data into WRF (Weather Research Forecasting model), we included a dedicated table of physical parameters next to using the classical conversion toward the USGS one. To evaluate the LC impact on the modeled boundary layer, we used WRF at 1 km to simulate a 4‐day period with diurnal cycles of valley winds in the heterogeneous western pre‐Alps area. We tested three LCs (USGS, MODIS, and CLC), where CLC has two physical parameter tables and two aggregation methods. CLC performs better than other tested LCs. The CLC aggregation methods revealed limited differences between the simulated variables, although the MLM method gives better results. Since these comparisons are restricted to a single location with the same LC type, the differences between various simulations regarding atmospheric parameters probably result from horizontal advection from upwind areas where surface conditions differ. Extended time series with multiple locations and diverse meteorological conditions need to be considered to reinforce the results presented here. Key Points A new grid aggregation method (MLM) for land use (LU) categories is described, which addresses ambiguities in assigning the LU to cells Simulations with a physical parameter table specific for the Corine Land Cover (CLC) classes show limited improvements over the conversion to the USGS table Using CLC as an LU map improves the Weather Research Forecasting compared to USGS maps</description><subject>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>CLC</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>nocturnal stable flows</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>valley wind</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>2333-5084</issn><issn>2333-5084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhSMEEhV0xwEssUKi4L80yTKUliIVIbUglpYbj4lRGgc7BbHjCCy4AFfjJBhSIVZs7NHz5_dGM1F0QPAJwTQ7pZiScY7DSdlW1KOMsUGMU779p96N-t4_YIwJjYeY8l70kaMraEurUGvR5apx9gnQTNYK3XpAc2gceKhb2RpbI20dugPZluDQwqzW1Y_s0Zn0oFAApua-_Hx9m4O31frny7lsJVpA6z9f3_OmqUzRWYW0kXWm3oSNQqzrYBMeS0B38wm6sgqq_WhHy8pDf3PvRbeT8c1oOphdX1yO8tmgYElKBiTOOGRyqTmkOo0hzbI4USwNpdJLoookZoyD5lwmmiZqSTJM4kKB5JqlWrO96KjzLWUlGmdW0r0IK42Y5jPxrWEecoYJfyKBPezYMK_HNfhWPNi1q0N7giZJxmNMOA_UcUcVznrvQP_aEiy-dyb-7izgtMOfTQUv_7JivFhQwhhhX886mOw</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Bode, M.</creator><creator>Hedde, T.</creator><creator>Roubin, P.</creator><creator>Durand, P.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union/Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-5080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3365-0283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>A Method to Improve Land Use Representation for Weather Simulations Based on High‐Resolution Data Sets—Application to Corine Land Cover Data in the WRF Model</title><author>Bode, M. ; Hedde, T. ; Roubin, P. ; Durand, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-1594e9abf4e8f85e89957d3885edfb1dc75334ef44a7f27db19015cdea4f38ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>CLC</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>nocturnal stable flows</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>valley wind</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bode, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedde, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roubin, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bode, M.</au><au>Hedde, T.</au><au>Roubin, P.</au><au>Durand, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Method to Improve Land Use Representation for Weather Simulations Based on High‐Resolution Data Sets—Application to Corine Land Cover Data in the WRF Model</atitle><jtitle>Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2333-5084</issn><eissn>2333-5084</eissn><abstract>Land cover (LC) data incorporation, for weather modeling purposes, highlights many problems. The straightforward Single Level Mode (SLM) aggregation is not adapted for high‐resolution LC maps, with a high number of classes, because it could generate false classifications. We propose a Multi‐Level Mode (MLM) aggregation method that includes a hierarchical structure. This study focuses on the Corine Land Cover (CLC) data set. Differences between MLM and SLM methods are small at the finest horizontal resolution and increase to a value of around 16% at 9‐km horizontal resolution. To further integrate CLC data into WRF (Weather Research Forecasting model), we included a dedicated table of physical parameters next to using the classical conversion toward the USGS one. To evaluate the LC impact on the modeled boundary layer, we used WRF at 1 km to simulate a 4‐day period with diurnal cycles of valley winds in the heterogeneous western pre‐Alps area. We tested three LCs (USGS, MODIS, and CLC), where CLC has two physical parameter tables and two aggregation methods. CLC performs better than other tested LCs. The CLC aggregation methods revealed limited differences between the simulated variables, although the MLM method gives better results. Since these comparisons are restricted to a single location with the same LC type, the differences between various simulations regarding atmospheric parameters probably result from horizontal advection from upwind areas where surface conditions differ. Extended time series with multiple locations and diverse meteorological conditions need to be considered to reinforce the results presented here. Key Points A new grid aggregation method (MLM) for land use (LU) categories is described, which addresses ambiguities in assigning the LU to cells Simulations with a physical parameter table specific for the Corine Land Cover (CLC) classes show limited improvements over the conversion to the USGS table Using CLC as an LU map improves the Weather Research Forecasting compared to USGS maps</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2021EA002123</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-5080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3365-0283</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2333-5084
ispartof Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023-02, Vol.10 (2), p.n/a
issn 2333-5084
2333-5084
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04781674v1
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Boundary layers
CLC
Datasets
land cover
Land use
nocturnal stable flows
Physics
Simulation
valley wind
Weather forecasting
title A Method to Improve Land Use Representation for Weather Simulations Based on High‐Resolution Data Sets—Application to Corine Land Cover Data in the WRF Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A09%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Method%20to%20Improve%20Land%20Use%20Representation%20for%20Weather%20Simulations%20Based%20on%20High%E2%80%90Resolution%20Data%20Sets%E2%80%94Application%20to%20Corine%20Land%20Cover%20Data%20in%20the%20WRF%20Model&rft.jtitle=Earth%20and%20space%20science%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Bode,%20M.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2333-5084&rft.eissn=2333-5084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021EA002123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2779450144%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779450144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true