Short-term Efficiency and Tolerance of Ketoprofen and Methylprednisolone in Acute Sciatica: A Randomized Trial

Although anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used in acute discogenic sciatica, data regarding their efficacy are scarce and controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketoprofen and methylprednisolone with placebo in sciatica. Multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2019-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1294-1299
Hauptverfasser: Gastaldi, Romain, Durand, Marjorie, Roustit, Matthieu, Zulian, Myriam, Monteiro, Irène, Juvin, Robert, Gaudin, Philippe, Baillet, Athan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1299
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1294
container_title Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
container_volume 20
creator Gastaldi, Romain
Durand, Marjorie
Roustit, Matthieu
Zulian, Myriam
Monteiro, Irène
Juvin, Robert
Gaudin, Philippe
Baillet, Athan
description Although anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used in acute discogenic sciatica, data regarding their efficacy are scarce and controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketoprofen and methylprednisolone with placebo in sciatica. Multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with confirmed discogenic acute sciatica, without neurologic deficit, were randomized into three arms. Besides standard-of-care analgesic therapy, they received intravenous injections of methylprednisolone (60 mg/d) or ketoprofen (200 mg/d) or placebo for five days. The primary outcome was leg pain over five days. Secondary outcomes were clinical responses at days 3 and 5, lumbar pain, Straight Leg Raise Test and lumbar flexion index, analgesic consumption, realization of lumbar spine injections, and surgery during the study period. Fifty-four patients were randomized, and 50 completed the study. In patients admitted to the hospital for pain control with acute lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation and receiving an oral analgesic protocol including paracetamol, nefopam, tramadol, and morphine, there was no additional analgesic effect seen between groups. There was no significant difference in leg pain between the three groups over the study period. In the methylprednisolone group, however, we observed a higher rate of clinically relevant responses at day 3. No difference was observed on other secondary efficacy outcomes and safety. No significant difference in leg pain was observed between groups. However, there was a higher proportion of patients relieved with intravenous methylprednisolone at day 3, compared with ketoprofen or placebo.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/pm/pny252
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04760686v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A607392932</galeid><sourcerecordid>A607392932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-3eca1a230b388f4a6f5530bec4f97127f9026a5d0e62aee5ad8c2631cac685d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiNERT_gwB9AlrjQQ1p_xE7CLapailiERMvZmjpj1pVjBydB2v56vOxSRIV8sD1-_M689hTFa0bPGG3F-Ticj2HDJX9WHDHJVVkpUT_fr7mo5WFxPE33lDJVNeJFcSiorJWU8qgIN-uY5nLGNJBLa51xGMyGQOjJbfSYIBgk0ZJPOMcxRYvh99lnnNcbPybsg5uijwGJC6Qzy4zkxjiYnYH3pCNfMxwH94BZLjnwL4sDC37CV_v5pPh2dXl7cV2uvnz4eNGtSlOxai4FGmDABb0TTWMrUFbKvEFT2bZmvLYt5QpkT1FxQJTQN4YrwQwY1cheiJPidKe7Bq_H5AZIGx3B6etupbcxWtWKqkb9ZJl9t2Ozvx8LTrMe3GTQewgYl0lzJtu2yWmbjL59gt7HJYXsRHOhqkwq1f6lvoNH7YKNcwKzFdWdorVoeSt4ps7-Q-XR4-BMflHrcvyfC3tPJsVpSmgfjTGqt32gx0Hv-iCzb_aFLncD9o_kn48XvwBH_qwa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2364215669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-term Efficiency and Tolerance of Ketoprofen and Methylprednisolone in Acute Sciatica: A Randomized Trial</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gastaldi, Romain ; Durand, Marjorie ; Roustit, Matthieu ; Zulian, Myriam ; Monteiro, Irène ; Juvin, Robert ; Gaudin, Philippe ; Baillet, Athan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gastaldi, Romain ; Durand, Marjorie ; Roustit, Matthieu ; Zulian, Myriam ; Monteiro, Irène ; Juvin, Robert ; Gaudin, Philippe ; Baillet, Athan</creatorcontrib><description>Although anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used in acute discogenic sciatica, data regarding their efficacy are scarce and controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketoprofen and methylprednisolone with placebo in sciatica. Multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with confirmed discogenic acute sciatica, without neurologic deficit, were randomized into three arms. Besides standard-of-care analgesic therapy, they received intravenous injections of methylprednisolone (60 mg/d) or ketoprofen (200 mg/d) or placebo for five days. The primary outcome was leg pain over five days. Secondary outcomes were clinical responses at days 3 and 5, lumbar pain, Straight Leg Raise Test and lumbar flexion index, analgesic consumption, realization of lumbar spine injections, and surgery during the study period. Fifty-four patients were randomized, and 50 completed the study. In patients admitted to the hospital for pain control with acute lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation and receiving an oral analgesic protocol including paracetamol, nefopam, tramadol, and morphine, there was no additional analgesic effect seen between groups. There was no significant difference in leg pain between the three groups over the study period. In the methylprednisolone group, however, we observed a higher rate of clinically relevant responses at day 3. No difference was observed on other secondary efficacy outcomes and safety. No significant difference in leg pain was observed between groups. However, there was a higher proportion of patients relieved with intravenous methylprednisolone at day 3, compared with ketoprofen or placebo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-2375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny252</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30576555</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analgesics ; Anti-inflammatory agents ; Bone surgery ; Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; Corticosteroids ; Inflammation ; Intervertebral discs ; Intravenous administration ; Ketoprofen ; Leg ; Life Sciences ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Methylprednisolone ; Morphine ; Pain ; Paracetamol ; Patients ; Sciatica ; Spine (lumbar) ; Tramadol</subject><ispartof>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1294-1299</ispartof><rights>2018 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>2018 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-3eca1a230b388f4a6f5530bec4f97127f9026a5d0e62aee5ad8c2631cac685d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-3eca1a230b388f4a6f5530bec4f97127f9026a5d0e62aee5ad8c2631cac685d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3813-1826</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30576555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04760686$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gastaldi, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roustit, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zulian, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Irène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juvin, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudin, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baillet, Athan</creatorcontrib><title>Short-term Efficiency and Tolerance of Ketoprofen and Methylprednisolone in Acute Sciatica: A Randomized Trial</title><title>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><description>Although anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used in acute discogenic sciatica, data regarding their efficacy are scarce and controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketoprofen and methylprednisolone with placebo in sciatica. Multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with confirmed discogenic acute sciatica, without neurologic deficit, were randomized into three arms. Besides standard-of-care analgesic therapy, they received intravenous injections of methylprednisolone (60 mg/d) or ketoprofen (200 mg/d) or placebo for five days. The primary outcome was leg pain over five days. Secondary outcomes were clinical responses at days 3 and 5, lumbar pain, Straight Leg Raise Test and lumbar flexion index, analgesic consumption, realization of lumbar spine injections, and surgery during the study period. Fifty-four patients were randomized, and 50 completed the study. In patients admitted to the hospital for pain control with acute lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation and receiving an oral analgesic protocol including paracetamol, nefopam, tramadol, and morphine, there was no additional analgesic effect seen between groups. There was no significant difference in leg pain between the three groups over the study period. In the methylprednisolone group, however, we observed a higher rate of clinically relevant responses at day 3. No difference was observed on other secondary efficacy outcomes and safety. No significant difference in leg pain was observed between groups. However, there was a higher proportion of patients relieved with intravenous methylprednisolone at day 3, compared with ketoprofen or placebo.</description><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anti-inflammatory agents</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Corticosteroids</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intervertebral discs</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Ketoprofen</subject><subject>Leg</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Paracetamol</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sciatica</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><subject>Tramadol</subject><issn>1526-2375</issn><issn>1526-4637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiNERT_gwB9AlrjQQ1p_xE7CLapailiERMvZmjpj1pVjBydB2v56vOxSRIV8sD1-_M689hTFa0bPGG3F-Ticj2HDJX9WHDHJVVkpUT_fr7mo5WFxPE33lDJVNeJFcSiorJWU8qgIN-uY5nLGNJBLa51xGMyGQOjJbfSYIBgk0ZJPOMcxRYvh99lnnNcbPybsg5uijwGJC6Qzy4zkxjiYnYH3pCNfMxwH94BZLjnwL4sDC37CV_v5pPh2dXl7cV2uvnz4eNGtSlOxai4FGmDABb0TTWMrUFbKvEFT2bZmvLYt5QpkT1FxQJTQN4YrwQwY1cheiJPidKe7Bq_H5AZIGx3B6etupbcxWtWKqkb9ZJl9t2Ozvx8LTrMe3GTQewgYl0lzJtu2yWmbjL59gt7HJYXsRHOhqkwq1f6lvoNH7YKNcwKzFdWdorVoeSt4ps7-Q-XR4-BMflHrcvyfC3tPJsVpSmgfjTGqt32gx0Hv-iCzb_aFLncD9o_kn48XvwBH_qwa</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Gastaldi, Romain</creator><creator>Durand, Marjorie</creator><creator>Roustit, Matthieu</creator><creator>Zulian, Myriam</creator><creator>Monteiro, Irène</creator><creator>Juvin, Robert</creator><creator>Gaudin, Philippe</creator><creator>Baillet, Athan</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-1826</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Short-term Efficiency and Tolerance of Ketoprofen and Methylprednisolone in Acute Sciatica: A Randomized Trial</title><author>Gastaldi, Romain ; Durand, Marjorie ; Roustit, Matthieu ; Zulian, Myriam ; Monteiro, Irène ; Juvin, Robert ; Gaudin, Philippe ; Baillet, Athan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-3eca1a230b388f4a6f5530bec4f97127f9026a5d0e62aee5ad8c2631cac685d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anti-inflammatory agents</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Corticosteroids</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intervertebral discs</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Ketoprofen</topic><topic>Leg</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Paracetamol</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sciatica</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><topic>Tramadol</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gastaldi, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durand, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roustit, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zulian, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro, Irène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juvin, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudin, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baillet, Athan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gastaldi, Romain</au><au>Durand, Marjorie</au><au>Roustit, Matthieu</au><au>Zulian, Myriam</au><au>Monteiro, Irène</au><au>Juvin, Robert</au><au>Gaudin, Philippe</au><au>Baillet, Athan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-term Efficiency and Tolerance of Ketoprofen and Methylprednisolone in Acute Sciatica: A Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Med</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1294</spage><epage>1299</epage><pages>1294-1299</pages><issn>1526-2375</issn><eissn>1526-4637</eissn><abstract>Although anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used in acute discogenic sciatica, data regarding their efficacy are scarce and controversial. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketoprofen and methylprednisolone with placebo in sciatica. Multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients with confirmed discogenic acute sciatica, without neurologic deficit, were randomized into three arms. Besides standard-of-care analgesic therapy, they received intravenous injections of methylprednisolone (60 mg/d) or ketoprofen (200 mg/d) or placebo for five days. The primary outcome was leg pain over five days. Secondary outcomes were clinical responses at days 3 and 5, lumbar pain, Straight Leg Raise Test and lumbar flexion index, analgesic consumption, realization of lumbar spine injections, and surgery during the study period. Fifty-four patients were randomized, and 50 completed the study. In patients admitted to the hospital for pain control with acute lumbar radicular pain due to intervertebral disc herniation and receiving an oral analgesic protocol including paracetamol, nefopam, tramadol, and morphine, there was no additional analgesic effect seen between groups. There was no significant difference in leg pain between the three groups over the study period. In the methylprednisolone group, however, we observed a higher rate of clinically relevant responses at day 3. No difference was observed on other secondary efficacy outcomes and safety. No significant difference in leg pain was observed between groups. However, there was a higher proportion of patients relieved with intravenous methylprednisolone at day 3, compared with ketoprofen or placebo.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30576555</pmid><doi>10.1093/pm/pny252</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-1826</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-2375
ispartof Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1294-1299
issn 1526-2375
1526-4637
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04760686v1
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analgesics
Anti-inflammatory agents
Bone surgery
Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Corticosteroids
Inflammation
Intervertebral discs
Intravenous administration
Ketoprofen
Leg
Life Sciences
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Methylprednisolone
Morphine
Pain
Paracetamol
Patients
Sciatica
Spine (lumbar)
Tramadol
title Short-term Efficiency and Tolerance of Ketoprofen and Methylprednisolone in Acute Sciatica: A Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-term%20Efficiency%20and%20Tolerance%20of%20Ketoprofen%20and%20Methylprednisolone%20in%20Acute%20Sciatica:%20A%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Pain%20medicine%20(Malden,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Gastaldi,%20Romain&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1294&rft.epage=1299&rft.pages=1294-1299&rft.issn=1526-2375&rft.eissn=1526-4637&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pm/pny252&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA607392932%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2364215669&rft_id=info:pmid/30576555&rft_galeid=A607392932&rfr_iscdi=true