What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support

The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2024-12, Vol.110 (8), p.103981, Article 103981
Hauptverfasser: Erivan, Roger, Urbain, Antoine, Santorum, Tony, Giordano, Gérard, Reina, Nicolas, Bonnomet, François, Jenny, Jean Yves, Peuchot, Henri, Bonin, Nicolas, Hormi-Menard, Mehdi, Miletic, Bruno, Wegrzyn, Julien, Razanabola, Fredson, Jardin, Christophe, Nieto, Hervé, Loubignac, François, Matsoukis, Jean, Hardy, Jérémy, Duhamel, Alain, Migaud, Henri, SoFCOT
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 103981
container_title Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research
container_volume 110
creator Erivan, Roger
Urbain, Antoine
Santorum, Tony
Giordano, Gérard
Reina, Nicolas
Bonnomet, François
Jenny, Jean Yves
Peuchot, Henri
Bonin, Nicolas
Hormi-Menard, Mehdi
Miletic, Bruno
Wegrzyn, Julien
Razanabola, Fredson
Jardin, Christophe
Nieto, Hervé
Loubignac, François
Matsoukis, Jean
Hardy, Jérémy
Duhamel, Alain
Migaud, Henri
SoFCOT
description The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and sensitivity of the clinical measurement of the LLD in different ideal and "degraded" clinical situations, (2) determine the threshold from which the human eye is capable of detecting a length inequality in clinic, (3) to determine whether the use of a graduated support (centimeter paper) improves the clinical measurement threshold. Our hypothesis was that clinical measurement on a centimeter support would improve clinical measurement accuracy. This was an in silico study, the experiment was conducted on a mannequin. Different inequalities were created on a mannequin and photographed with a total of 30 inequalities from −22 to +22 mm on sheet or centimeter paper (CP). This was a multicenter study, with 40 different readers. We asked the readers to make a second measurement one month later. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. The error rate at the threshold of 3 mm and 5 mm were calculated versus the gold standard. Finally, we determined at which thresholds respectively 75% and 95% of the measurements were correct. A total of 4140 measurements were performed and compared to the gold standard. With a threshold of 75% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 2.8 mm on centimeter paper and 4.5 mm on sheet. With a threshold of 95% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 3.4 mm on centimeter paper and 5.2 mm on sheet. Interobserver agreement (assessed overall on the 40 observers by Krippendorff's generalized Kappa) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 0.79 to 0.92) on CP and 0.71 (CI95% = 0.63 to 0.79) on sheet. Intra-observer agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among observers who made 2 measurements had a median value (IQR) of 0.96 (0.94 to 0.99) on CP and 0.90 (0.83 to 0.94) on sheet. The clinical detection threshold on sheet at the patient's bed appears close to 5 mm. A more precise measurement is possible with graduated centimeter paper. A study in daily practice on patients in real situations would confirm our results. III; prospective diagnostic comparative in Silico study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04760451v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877056824002627</els_id><sourcerecordid>3099801519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-725d8c6fa6be92fe4ac470525b272ecee9b2092adc6513a332872cbae8e7a7fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFDEYhwdRbK1-AQ-Sox52TTJ_MgOClKK2sOBF8RgyyTs775JJtkmmZf06flEzTi2evCThx5NfePMUxWtGt4yy5v1h61MMW055lYOya9mT4py1Qmxo3bRP_zmfFS9iPFDaNKzkz4uzsuO043VzXvz6MapEMJI0AtEWHWpliYEEOqF3OQ4QR28NGXwg1t9DXnHqiQW3TyNBB7ezsphOH8mNIxEtak9ims2J-IEEOAZvZo09LgxRzhB_TDjhT_Wnf47o9kQRDS6n-dlA9kGZWSUwJM7How_pZfFsUDbCq4f9ovj--dO3q-vN7uuXm6vL3UZzwdJG8Nq0uhlU00PHB6iUrgSted1zwUEDdP0ytTK6qVmpypK3guteQQtCiQHKi-Ld2jsqK48BJxVO0iuU15c7uWS0Eg2tanbHMvt2ZfN8tzPEJCeMGqxVDvwcZUm7rqWsZl1G-Yrq4GMMMDx2MyoXkfIgF5FyESlXkfnSm4f-uZ_APF75ay4DH1YA8o_cIQQZNYLTYDBkd9J4_F__bzrPs2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099801519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Erivan, Roger ; Urbain, Antoine ; Santorum, Tony ; Giordano, Gérard ; Reina, Nicolas ; Bonnomet, François ; Jenny, Jean Yves ; Peuchot, Henri ; Bonin, Nicolas ; Hormi-Menard, Mehdi ; Miletic, Bruno ; Wegrzyn, Julien ; Razanabola, Fredson ; Jardin, Christophe ; Nieto, Hervé ; Loubignac, François ; Matsoukis, Jean ; Hardy, Jérémy ; Duhamel, Alain ; Migaud, Henri ; SoFCOT</creator><creatorcontrib>Erivan, Roger ; Urbain, Antoine ; Santorum, Tony ; Giordano, Gérard ; Reina, Nicolas ; Bonnomet, François ; Jenny, Jean Yves ; Peuchot, Henri ; Bonin, Nicolas ; Hormi-Menard, Mehdi ; Miletic, Bruno ; Wegrzyn, Julien ; Razanabola, Fredson ; Jardin, Christophe ; Nieto, Hervé ; Loubignac, François ; Matsoukis, Jean ; Hardy, Jérémy ; Duhamel, Alain ; Migaud, Henri ; SoFCOT</creatorcontrib><description>The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and sensitivity of the clinical measurement of the LLD in different ideal and "degraded" clinical situations, (2) determine the threshold from which the human eye is capable of detecting a length inequality in clinic, (3) to determine whether the use of a graduated support (centimeter paper) improves the clinical measurement threshold. Our hypothesis was that clinical measurement on a centimeter support would improve clinical measurement accuracy. This was an in silico study, the experiment was conducted on a mannequin. Different inequalities were created on a mannequin and photographed with a total of 30 inequalities from −22 to +22 mm on sheet or centimeter paper (CP). This was a multicenter study, with 40 different readers. We asked the readers to make a second measurement one month later. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. The error rate at the threshold of 3 mm and 5 mm were calculated versus the gold standard. Finally, we determined at which thresholds respectively 75% and 95% of the measurements were correct. A total of 4140 measurements were performed and compared to the gold standard. With a threshold of 75% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 2.8 mm on centimeter paper and 4.5 mm on sheet. With a threshold of 95% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 3.4 mm on centimeter paper and 5.2 mm on sheet. Interobserver agreement (assessed overall on the 40 observers by Krippendorff's generalized Kappa) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 0.79 to 0.92) on CP and 0.71 (CI95% = 0.63 to 0.79) on sheet. Intra-observer agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among observers who made 2 measurements had a median value (IQR) of 0.96 (0.94 to 0.99) on CP and 0.90 (0.83 to 0.94) on sheet. The clinical detection threshold on sheet at the patient's bed appears close to 5 mm. A more precise measurement is possible with graduated centimeter paper. A study in daily practice on patients in real situations would confirm our results. III; prospective diagnostic comparative in Silico study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39209256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Clinical measurement ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; In silico study ; Leg Length Inequality ; Life Sciences ; Lower limb length inequality ; Manikins ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research, 2024-12, Vol.110 (8), p.103981, Article 103981</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-725d8c6fa6be92fe4ac470525b272ecee9b2092adc6513a332872cbae8e7a7fe3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-1503-0311 ; 0000-0002-2752-4918 ; 0000-0003-4059-9014 ; 0000-0002-9180-8448 ; 0000-0003-0923-7672 ; 0000-0003-0194-8664 ; 0000-0001-9826-9072 ; 0000-0001-8935-9666 ; 0000-0001-9146-9792 ; 0000-0001-7418-3610 ; 0009-0001-2891-6569</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39209256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-04760451$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erivan, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbain, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santorum, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reina, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnomet, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenny, Jean Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peuchot, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hormi-Menard, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miletic, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegrzyn, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razanabola, Fredson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardin, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loubignac, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsoukis, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duhamel, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migaud, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SoFCOT</creatorcontrib><title>What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support</title><title>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</title><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><description>The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and sensitivity of the clinical measurement of the LLD in different ideal and "degraded" clinical situations, (2) determine the threshold from which the human eye is capable of detecting a length inequality in clinic, (3) to determine whether the use of a graduated support (centimeter paper) improves the clinical measurement threshold. Our hypothesis was that clinical measurement on a centimeter support would improve clinical measurement accuracy. This was an in silico study, the experiment was conducted on a mannequin. Different inequalities were created on a mannequin and photographed with a total of 30 inequalities from −22 to +22 mm on sheet or centimeter paper (CP). This was a multicenter study, with 40 different readers. We asked the readers to make a second measurement one month later. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. The error rate at the threshold of 3 mm and 5 mm were calculated versus the gold standard. Finally, we determined at which thresholds respectively 75% and 95% of the measurements were correct. A total of 4140 measurements were performed and compared to the gold standard. With a threshold of 75% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 2.8 mm on centimeter paper and 4.5 mm on sheet. With a threshold of 95% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 3.4 mm on centimeter paper and 5.2 mm on sheet. Interobserver agreement (assessed overall on the 40 observers by Krippendorff's generalized Kappa) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 0.79 to 0.92) on CP and 0.71 (CI95% = 0.63 to 0.79) on sheet. Intra-observer agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among observers who made 2 measurements had a median value (IQR) of 0.96 (0.94 to 0.99) on CP and 0.90 (0.83 to 0.94) on sheet. The clinical detection threshold on sheet at the patient's bed appears close to 5 mm. A more precise measurement is possible with graduated centimeter paper. A study in daily practice on patients in real situations would confirm our results. III; prospective diagnostic comparative in Silico study.</description><subject>Clinical measurement</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In silico study</subject><subject>Leg Length Inequality</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lower limb length inequality</subject><subject>Manikins</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1877-0568</issn><issn>1877-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFDEYhwdRbK1-AQ-Sox52TTJ_MgOClKK2sOBF8RgyyTs775JJtkmmZf06flEzTi2evCThx5NfePMUxWtGt4yy5v1h61MMW055lYOya9mT4py1Qmxo3bRP_zmfFS9iPFDaNKzkz4uzsuO043VzXvz6MapEMJI0AtEWHWpliYEEOqF3OQ4QR28NGXwg1t9DXnHqiQW3TyNBB7ezsphOH8mNIxEtak9ims2J-IEEOAZvZo09LgxRzhB_TDjhT_Wnf47o9kQRDS6n-dlA9kGZWSUwJM7How_pZfFsUDbCq4f9ovj--dO3q-vN7uuXm6vL3UZzwdJG8Nq0uhlU00PHB6iUrgSted1zwUEDdP0ytTK6qVmpypK3guteQQtCiQHKi-Ld2jsqK48BJxVO0iuU15c7uWS0Eg2tanbHMvt2ZfN8tzPEJCeMGqxVDvwcZUm7rqWsZl1G-Yrq4GMMMDx2MyoXkfIgF5FyESlXkfnSm4f-uZ_APF75ay4DH1YA8o_cIQQZNYLTYDBkd9J4_F__bzrPs2w</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Erivan, Roger</creator><creator>Urbain, Antoine</creator><creator>Santorum, Tony</creator><creator>Giordano, Gérard</creator><creator>Reina, Nicolas</creator><creator>Bonnomet, François</creator><creator>Jenny, Jean Yves</creator><creator>Peuchot, Henri</creator><creator>Bonin, Nicolas</creator><creator>Hormi-Menard, Mehdi</creator><creator>Miletic, Bruno</creator><creator>Wegrzyn, Julien</creator><creator>Razanabola, Fredson</creator><creator>Jardin, Christophe</creator><creator>Nieto, Hervé</creator><creator>Loubignac, François</creator><creator>Matsoukis, Jean</creator><creator>Hardy, Jérémy</creator><creator>Duhamel, Alain</creator><creator>Migaud, Henri</creator><creator>SoFCOT</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1503-0311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-4918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-9014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9180-8448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0923-7672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-8664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-9072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-9666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9146-9792</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-3610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2891-6569</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support</title><author>Erivan, Roger ; Urbain, Antoine ; Santorum, Tony ; Giordano, Gérard ; Reina, Nicolas ; Bonnomet, François ; Jenny, Jean Yves ; Peuchot, Henri ; Bonin, Nicolas ; Hormi-Menard, Mehdi ; Miletic, Bruno ; Wegrzyn, Julien ; Razanabola, Fredson ; Jardin, Christophe ; Nieto, Hervé ; Loubignac, François ; Matsoukis, Jean ; Hardy, Jérémy ; Duhamel, Alain ; Migaud, Henri ; SoFCOT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-725d8c6fa6be92fe4ac470525b272ecee9b2092adc6513a332872cbae8e7a7fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical measurement</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In silico study</topic><topic>Leg Length Inequality</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lower limb length inequality</topic><topic>Manikins</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erivan, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbain, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santorum, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reina, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnomet, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenny, Jean Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peuchot, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hormi-Menard, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miletic, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegrzyn, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razanabola, Fredson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardin, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loubignac, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsoukis, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duhamel, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migaud, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SoFCOT</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erivan, Roger</au><au>Urbain, Antoine</au><au>Santorum, Tony</au><au>Giordano, Gérard</au><au>Reina, Nicolas</au><au>Bonnomet, François</au><au>Jenny, Jean Yves</au><au>Peuchot, Henri</au><au>Bonin, Nicolas</au><au>Hormi-Menard, Mehdi</au><au>Miletic, Bruno</au><au>Wegrzyn, Julien</au><au>Razanabola, Fredson</au><au>Jardin, Christophe</au><au>Nieto, Hervé</au><au>Loubignac, François</au><au>Matsoukis, Jean</au><au>Hardy, Jérémy</au><au>Duhamel, Alain</au><au>Migaud, Henri</au><au>SoFCOT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>103981</spage><pages>103981-</pages><artnum>103981</artnum><issn>1877-0568</issn><eissn>1877-0568</eissn><abstract>The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and sensitivity of the clinical measurement of the LLD in different ideal and "degraded" clinical situations, (2) determine the threshold from which the human eye is capable of detecting a length inequality in clinic, (3) to determine whether the use of a graduated support (centimeter paper) improves the clinical measurement threshold. Our hypothesis was that clinical measurement on a centimeter support would improve clinical measurement accuracy. This was an in silico study, the experiment was conducted on a mannequin. Different inequalities were created on a mannequin and photographed with a total of 30 inequalities from −22 to +22 mm on sheet or centimeter paper (CP). This was a multicenter study, with 40 different readers. We asked the readers to make a second measurement one month later. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. The error rate at the threshold of 3 mm and 5 mm were calculated versus the gold standard. Finally, we determined at which thresholds respectively 75% and 95% of the measurements were correct. A total of 4140 measurements were performed and compared to the gold standard. With a threshold of 75% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 2.8 mm on centimeter paper and 4.5 mm on sheet. With a threshold of 95% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 3.4 mm on centimeter paper and 5.2 mm on sheet. Interobserver agreement (assessed overall on the 40 observers by Krippendorff's generalized Kappa) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 0.79 to 0.92) on CP and 0.71 (CI95% = 0.63 to 0.79) on sheet. Intra-observer agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among observers who made 2 measurements had a median value (IQR) of 0.96 (0.94 to 0.99) on CP and 0.90 (0.83 to 0.94) on sheet. The clinical detection threshold on sheet at the patient's bed appears close to 5 mm. A more precise measurement is possible with graduated centimeter paper. A study in daily practice on patients in real situations would confirm our results. III; prospective diagnostic comparative in Silico study.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>39209256</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1503-0311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-4918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-9014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9180-8448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0923-7672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-8664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-9072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-9666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9146-9792</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-3610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2891-6569</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-0568
ispartof Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2024-12, Vol.110 (8), p.103981, Article 103981
issn 1877-0568
1877-0568
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04760451v1
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Clinical measurement
Computer Simulation
Humans
In silico study
Leg Length Inequality
Life Sciences
Lower limb length inequality
Manikins
Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
title What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20clinical%20detection%20threshold%20for%20lower%20limb%20length%20inequality?%20In%20silico%20study%20of%20reproducibility%20and%20optimization%20using%20a%20centimeter%20graduated%20support&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics%20&%20traumatology,%20surgery%20&%20research&rft.au=Erivan,%20Roger&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=103981&rft.pages=103981-&rft.artnum=103981&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3099801519%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099801519&rft_id=info:pmid/39209256&rft_els_id=S1877056824002627&rfr_iscdi=true