What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support
The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2024-12, Vol.110 (8), p.103981, Article 103981 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 103981 |
container_title | Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research |
container_volume | 110 |
creator | Erivan, Roger Urbain, Antoine Santorum, Tony Giordano, Gérard Reina, Nicolas Bonnomet, François Jenny, Jean Yves Peuchot, Henri Bonin, Nicolas Hormi-Menard, Mehdi Miletic, Bruno Wegrzyn, Julien Razanabola, Fredson Jardin, Christophe Nieto, Hervé Loubignac, François Matsoukis, Jean Hardy, Jérémy Duhamel, Alain Migaud, Henri SoFCOT |
description | The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and sensitivity of the clinical measurement of the LLD in different ideal and "degraded" clinical situations, (2) determine the threshold from which the human eye is capable of detecting a length inequality in clinic, (3) to determine whether the use of a graduated support (centimeter paper) improves the clinical measurement threshold.
Our hypothesis was that clinical measurement on a centimeter support would improve clinical measurement accuracy.
This was an in silico study, the experiment was conducted on a mannequin. Different inequalities were created on a mannequin and photographed with a total of 30 inequalities from −22 to +22 mm on sheet or centimeter paper (CP). This was a multicenter study, with 40 different readers. We asked the readers to make a second measurement one month later. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. The error rate at the threshold of 3 mm and 5 mm were calculated versus the gold standard. Finally, we determined at which thresholds respectively 75% and 95% of the measurements were correct.
A total of 4140 measurements were performed and compared to the gold standard. With a threshold of 75% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 2.8 mm on centimeter paper and 4.5 mm on sheet. With a threshold of 95% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 3.4 mm on centimeter paper and 5.2 mm on sheet. Interobserver agreement (assessed overall on the 40 observers by Krippendorff's generalized Kappa) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 0.79 to 0.92) on CP and 0.71 (CI95% = 0.63 to 0.79) on sheet. Intra-observer agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among observers who made 2 measurements had a median value (IQR) of 0.96 (0.94 to 0.99) on CP and 0.90 (0.83 to 0.94) on sheet.
The clinical detection threshold on sheet at the patient's bed appears close to 5 mm. A more precise measurement is possible with graduated centimeter paper. A study in daily practice on patients in real situations would confirm our results.
III; prospective diagnostic comparative in Silico study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04760451v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877056824002627</els_id><sourcerecordid>3099801519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-725d8c6fa6be92fe4ac470525b272ecee9b2092adc6513a332872cbae8e7a7fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFDEYhwdRbK1-AQ-Sox52TTJ_MgOClKK2sOBF8RgyyTs775JJtkmmZf06flEzTi2evCThx5NfePMUxWtGt4yy5v1h61MMW055lYOya9mT4py1Qmxo3bRP_zmfFS9iPFDaNKzkz4uzsuO043VzXvz6MapEMJI0AtEWHWpliYEEOqF3OQ4QR28NGXwg1t9DXnHqiQW3TyNBB7ezsphOH8mNIxEtak9ims2J-IEEOAZvZo09LgxRzhB_TDjhT_Wnf47o9kQRDS6n-dlA9kGZWSUwJM7How_pZfFsUDbCq4f9ovj--dO3q-vN7uuXm6vL3UZzwdJG8Nq0uhlU00PHB6iUrgSted1zwUEDdP0ytTK6qVmpypK3guteQQtCiQHKi-Ld2jsqK48BJxVO0iuU15c7uWS0Eg2tanbHMvt2ZfN8tzPEJCeMGqxVDvwcZUm7rqWsZl1G-Yrq4GMMMDx2MyoXkfIgF5FyESlXkfnSm4f-uZ_APF75ay4DH1YA8o_cIQQZNYLTYDBkd9J4_F__bzrPs2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099801519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Erivan, Roger ; Urbain, Antoine ; Santorum, Tony ; Giordano, Gérard ; Reina, Nicolas ; Bonnomet, François ; Jenny, Jean Yves ; Peuchot, Henri ; Bonin, Nicolas ; Hormi-Menard, Mehdi ; Miletic, Bruno ; Wegrzyn, Julien ; Razanabola, Fredson ; Jardin, Christophe ; Nieto, Hervé ; Loubignac, François ; Matsoukis, Jean ; Hardy, Jérémy ; Duhamel, Alain ; Migaud, Henri ; SoFCOT</creator><creatorcontrib>Erivan, Roger ; Urbain, Antoine ; Santorum, Tony ; Giordano, Gérard ; Reina, Nicolas ; Bonnomet, François ; Jenny, Jean Yves ; Peuchot, Henri ; Bonin, Nicolas ; Hormi-Menard, Mehdi ; Miletic, Bruno ; Wegrzyn, Julien ; Razanabola, Fredson ; Jardin, Christophe ; Nieto, Hervé ; Loubignac, François ; Matsoukis, Jean ; Hardy, Jérémy ; Duhamel, Alain ; Migaud, Henri ; SoFCOT</creatorcontrib><description>The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and sensitivity of the clinical measurement of the LLD in different ideal and "degraded" clinical situations, (2) determine the threshold from which the human eye is capable of detecting a length inequality in clinic, (3) to determine whether the use of a graduated support (centimeter paper) improves the clinical measurement threshold.
Our hypothesis was that clinical measurement on a centimeter support would improve clinical measurement accuracy.
This was an in silico study, the experiment was conducted on a mannequin. Different inequalities were created on a mannequin and photographed with a total of 30 inequalities from −22 to +22 mm on sheet or centimeter paper (CP). This was a multicenter study, with 40 different readers. We asked the readers to make a second measurement one month later. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. The error rate at the threshold of 3 mm and 5 mm were calculated versus the gold standard. Finally, we determined at which thresholds respectively 75% and 95% of the measurements were correct.
A total of 4140 measurements were performed and compared to the gold standard. With a threshold of 75% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 2.8 mm on centimeter paper and 4.5 mm on sheet. With a threshold of 95% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 3.4 mm on centimeter paper and 5.2 mm on sheet. Interobserver agreement (assessed overall on the 40 observers by Krippendorff's generalized Kappa) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 0.79 to 0.92) on CP and 0.71 (CI95% = 0.63 to 0.79) on sheet. Intra-observer agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among observers who made 2 measurements had a median value (IQR) of 0.96 (0.94 to 0.99) on CP and 0.90 (0.83 to 0.94) on sheet.
The clinical detection threshold on sheet at the patient's bed appears close to 5 mm. A more precise measurement is possible with graduated centimeter paper. A study in daily practice on patients in real situations would confirm our results.
III; prospective diagnostic comparative in Silico study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39209256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Clinical measurement ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; In silico study ; Leg Length Inequality ; Life Sciences ; Lower limb length inequality ; Manikins ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2024-12, Vol.110 (8), p.103981, Article 103981</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-725d8c6fa6be92fe4ac470525b272ecee9b2092adc6513a332872cbae8e7a7fe3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-1503-0311 ; 0000-0002-2752-4918 ; 0000-0003-4059-9014 ; 0000-0002-9180-8448 ; 0000-0003-0923-7672 ; 0000-0003-0194-8664 ; 0000-0001-9826-9072 ; 0000-0001-8935-9666 ; 0000-0001-9146-9792 ; 0000-0001-7418-3610 ; 0009-0001-2891-6569</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39209256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-04760451$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erivan, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbain, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santorum, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reina, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnomet, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenny, Jean Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peuchot, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hormi-Menard, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miletic, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegrzyn, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razanabola, Fredson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardin, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loubignac, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsoukis, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duhamel, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migaud, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SoFCOT</creatorcontrib><title>What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support</title><title>Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research</title><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><description>The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and sensitivity of the clinical measurement of the LLD in different ideal and "degraded" clinical situations, (2) determine the threshold from which the human eye is capable of detecting a length inequality in clinic, (3) to determine whether the use of a graduated support (centimeter paper) improves the clinical measurement threshold.
Our hypothesis was that clinical measurement on a centimeter support would improve clinical measurement accuracy.
This was an in silico study, the experiment was conducted on a mannequin. Different inequalities were created on a mannequin and photographed with a total of 30 inequalities from −22 to +22 mm on sheet or centimeter paper (CP). This was a multicenter study, with 40 different readers. We asked the readers to make a second measurement one month later. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. The error rate at the threshold of 3 mm and 5 mm were calculated versus the gold standard. Finally, we determined at which thresholds respectively 75% and 95% of the measurements were correct.
A total of 4140 measurements were performed and compared to the gold standard. With a threshold of 75% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 2.8 mm on centimeter paper and 4.5 mm on sheet. With a threshold of 95% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 3.4 mm on centimeter paper and 5.2 mm on sheet. Interobserver agreement (assessed overall on the 40 observers by Krippendorff's generalized Kappa) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 0.79 to 0.92) on CP and 0.71 (CI95% = 0.63 to 0.79) on sheet. Intra-observer agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among observers who made 2 measurements had a median value (IQR) of 0.96 (0.94 to 0.99) on CP and 0.90 (0.83 to 0.94) on sheet.
The clinical detection threshold on sheet at the patient's bed appears close to 5 mm. A more precise measurement is possible with graduated centimeter paper. A study in daily practice on patients in real situations would confirm our results.
III; prospective diagnostic comparative in Silico study.</description><subject>Clinical measurement</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In silico study</subject><subject>Leg Length Inequality</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lower limb length inequality</subject><subject>Manikins</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1877-0568</issn><issn>1877-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFDEYhwdRbK1-AQ-Sox52TTJ_MgOClKK2sOBF8RgyyTs775JJtkmmZf06flEzTi2evCThx5NfePMUxWtGt4yy5v1h61MMW055lYOya9mT4py1Qmxo3bRP_zmfFS9iPFDaNKzkz4uzsuO043VzXvz6MapEMJI0AtEWHWpliYEEOqF3OQ4QR28NGXwg1t9DXnHqiQW3TyNBB7ezsphOH8mNIxEtak9ims2J-IEEOAZvZo09LgxRzhB_TDjhT_Wnf47o9kQRDS6n-dlA9kGZWSUwJM7How_pZfFsUDbCq4f9ovj--dO3q-vN7uuXm6vL3UZzwdJG8Nq0uhlU00PHB6iUrgSted1zwUEDdP0ytTK6qVmpypK3guteQQtCiQHKi-Ld2jsqK48BJxVO0iuU15c7uWS0Eg2tanbHMvt2ZfN8tzPEJCeMGqxVDvwcZUm7rqWsZl1G-Yrq4GMMMDx2MyoXkfIgF5FyESlXkfnSm4f-uZ_APF75ay4DH1YA8o_cIQQZNYLTYDBkd9J4_F__bzrPs2w</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Erivan, Roger</creator><creator>Urbain, Antoine</creator><creator>Santorum, Tony</creator><creator>Giordano, Gérard</creator><creator>Reina, Nicolas</creator><creator>Bonnomet, François</creator><creator>Jenny, Jean Yves</creator><creator>Peuchot, Henri</creator><creator>Bonin, Nicolas</creator><creator>Hormi-Menard, Mehdi</creator><creator>Miletic, Bruno</creator><creator>Wegrzyn, Julien</creator><creator>Razanabola, Fredson</creator><creator>Jardin, Christophe</creator><creator>Nieto, Hervé</creator><creator>Loubignac, François</creator><creator>Matsoukis, Jean</creator><creator>Hardy, Jérémy</creator><creator>Duhamel, Alain</creator><creator>Migaud, Henri</creator><creator>SoFCOT</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1503-0311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-4918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-9014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9180-8448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0923-7672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-8664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-9072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-9666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9146-9792</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-3610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2891-6569</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support</title><author>Erivan, Roger ; Urbain, Antoine ; Santorum, Tony ; Giordano, Gérard ; Reina, Nicolas ; Bonnomet, François ; Jenny, Jean Yves ; Peuchot, Henri ; Bonin, Nicolas ; Hormi-Menard, Mehdi ; Miletic, Bruno ; Wegrzyn, Julien ; Razanabola, Fredson ; Jardin, Christophe ; Nieto, Hervé ; Loubignac, François ; Matsoukis, Jean ; Hardy, Jérémy ; Duhamel, Alain ; Migaud, Henri ; SoFCOT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-725d8c6fa6be92fe4ac470525b272ecee9b2092adc6513a332872cbae8e7a7fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical measurement</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In silico study</topic><topic>Leg Length Inequality</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lower limb length inequality</topic><topic>Manikins</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erivan, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbain, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santorum, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Gérard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reina, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnomet, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenny, Jean Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peuchot, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hormi-Menard, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miletic, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegrzyn, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razanabola, Fredson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardin, Christophe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loubignac, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsoukis, Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duhamel, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migaud, Henri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SoFCOT</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erivan, Roger</au><au>Urbain, Antoine</au><au>Santorum, Tony</au><au>Giordano, Gérard</au><au>Reina, Nicolas</au><au>Bonnomet, François</au><au>Jenny, Jean Yves</au><au>Peuchot, Henri</au><au>Bonin, Nicolas</au><au>Hormi-Menard, Mehdi</au><au>Miletic, Bruno</au><au>Wegrzyn, Julien</au><au>Razanabola, Fredson</au><au>Jardin, Christophe</au><au>Nieto, Hervé</au><au>Loubignac, François</au><au>Matsoukis, Jean</au><au>Hardy, Jérémy</au><au>Duhamel, Alain</au><au>Migaud, Henri</au><au>SoFCOT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>103981</spage><pages>103981-</pages><artnum>103981</artnum><issn>1877-0568</issn><eissn>1877-0568</eissn><abstract>The threshold of a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) by clinical examination on a sheet or centimeter paper (CP) is not known precisely whether or not it concerns limbs equipped with a hip prosthesis. We therefore conducted a prospective in silico study in order to: (1) determine the reproducibility and sensitivity of the clinical measurement of the LLD in different ideal and "degraded" clinical situations, (2) determine the threshold from which the human eye is capable of detecting a length inequality in clinic, (3) to determine whether the use of a graduated support (centimeter paper) improves the clinical measurement threshold.
Our hypothesis was that clinical measurement on a centimeter support would improve clinical measurement accuracy.
This was an in silico study, the experiment was conducted on a mannequin. Different inequalities were created on a mannequin and photographed with a total of 30 inequalities from −22 to +22 mm on sheet or centimeter paper (CP). This was a multicenter study, with 40 different readers. We asked the readers to make a second measurement one month later. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. The error rate at the threshold of 3 mm and 5 mm were calculated versus the gold standard. Finally, we determined at which thresholds respectively 75% and 95% of the measurements were correct.
A total of 4140 measurements were performed and compared to the gold standard. With a threshold of 75% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 2.8 mm on centimeter paper and 4.5 mm on sheet. With a threshold of 95% accurate measurement, the LLD detection threshold was 3.4 mm on centimeter paper and 5.2 mm on sheet. Interobserver agreement (assessed overall on the 40 observers by Krippendorff's generalized Kappa) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI95%) = 0.79 to 0.92) on CP and 0.71 (CI95% = 0.63 to 0.79) on sheet. Intra-observer agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient among observers who made 2 measurements had a median value (IQR) of 0.96 (0.94 to 0.99) on CP and 0.90 (0.83 to 0.94) on sheet.
The clinical detection threshold on sheet at the patient's bed appears close to 5 mm. A more precise measurement is possible with graduated centimeter paper. A study in daily practice on patients in real situations would confirm our results.
III; prospective diagnostic comparative in Silico study.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>39209256</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1503-0311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-4918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-9014</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9180-8448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0923-7672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-8664</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-9072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-9666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9146-9792</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-3610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2891-6569</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1877-0568 |
ispartof | Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2024-12, Vol.110 (8), p.103981, Article 103981 |
issn | 1877-0568 1877-0568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04760451v1 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Clinical measurement Computer Simulation Humans In silico study Leg Length Inequality Life Sciences Lower limb length inequality Manikins Observer Variation Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results |
title | What is the clinical detection threshold for lower limb length inequality? In silico study of reproducibility and optimization using a centimeter graduated support |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20clinical%20detection%20threshold%20for%20lower%20limb%20length%20inequality?%20In%20silico%20study%20of%20reproducibility%20and%20optimization%20using%20a%20centimeter%20graduated%20support&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics%20&%20traumatology,%20surgery%20&%20research&rft.au=Erivan,%20Roger&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=103981&rft.pages=103981-&rft.artnum=103981&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103981&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3099801519%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099801519&rft_id=info:pmid/39209256&rft_els_id=S1877056824002627&rfr_iscdi=true |