Drying and fragmentation drive the dynamics of resources, consumers and ecosystem functions across aquatic‐terrestrial habitats in a river network
Rivers form meta‐ecosystems, in which disturbance and connectivity control biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and their interactions across the river network, but also across connected instream and riparian ecosystems. This aquatic–terrestrial linkage is modified by drying, a disturbance that also...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oikos 2024-06, Vol.2024 (6), p.861-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 861 |
container_title | Oikos |
container_volume | 2024 |
creator | Sarremejane, Romain Silverthorn, Teresa Arbaretaz, Angélique Truchy, Amélie Barthélémy, Nans López‐Rojo, Naiara Foulquier, Arnaud Simon, Laurent Pella, Hervé Singer, Gabriel Datry, Thibault |
description | Rivers form meta‐ecosystems, in which disturbance and connectivity control biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and their interactions across the river network, but also across connected instream and riparian ecosystems. This aquatic–terrestrial linkage is modified by drying, a disturbance that also naturally fragments river networks and thereby modifies organism dispersal and organic matter (OM) transfers across the river network. However, little evidence of the effects of drying on river network‐scale OM cycling exists. Here, we assessed the effects of fragmentation by drying at the river meta‐ecosystem scale by monitoring leaf resource stocks, invertebrate communities and decomposition rates, across three seasons and 20 sites, in the instream and riparian habitats of a river network naturally fragmented by drying. Although instream leaf resource quantity and quality increased, leaf‐shredder invertebrate richness and abundance decreased with flow intermittence. Decomposition was, however, mainly driven by network‐scale fragmentation and connectivity. Shredder richness and invertebrate‐driven decomposition both peaked at sites with intermediate amounts of intermittent reaches upstream, suggesting that upstream drying can promote the biodiversity and functioning of downstream ecosystems. Shredder richness, however, had a negative effect on decomposition in perennial sites, likely due to interspecific competition. Leaf quantity, invertebrate communities and invertebrate‐driven decomposition became more similar between instream and riparian habitats as drying frequency increased, likely due to homogenization of environmental conditions between both habitats as the river dried. Our study demonstrates the paramount effects of drying on the dynamics of resources, communities and ecosystem functioning in rivers and presents evidence of one of the first network‐scale examples of the co‐drivers of ecosystem functions across terrestrial–aquatic boundaries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/oik.10135 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04748861v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3063322484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-ea3c8939b935ebaa8f8bf80db687eb62b421994d68297163ce53f59dafd12163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhwBtY4oRE2nGcOPaxKqWtWKmX3i3HGXfdbuzWTlrlxiNw4An7JHh3EZzwZeTRN7_58xHykcExK-8k-vtjBoy3r8iKCYAKOhCvyQqAQ8Vqpd6SdznfAUDXdc2K_PqaFh9uqQkDdcncjhgmM_kY6JD8E9Jpg3RYghm9zTQ6mjDHOVnMX6iNIc8jprwvRhvzkiccqZuD3RFK3qaYS3icC9K-_Pg5YSqAKXmzpRvT-9IqUx-oobtmiQacnmO6f0_eOLPN-OFPPCI3385vzi6r9fXF1dnpurK8Fm2FhlupuOoVb7E3RjrZOwlDL2SHvaj7pmZKNYOQteqY4BZb7lo1GDewuvyPyOcDdmO2-iH50aRFR-P15ela73LQdI2Ugj2xov100D6k-DiXHfRduUMo02kOgvO6bmTzj7hfPKH7i2Wgd_7o4o_e-1O0Jwfts9_i8n-hvr76zngHLf8N4XuVdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3063322484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drying and fragmentation drive the dynamics of resources, consumers and ecosystem functions across aquatic‐terrestrial habitats in a river network</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Sarremejane, Romain ; Silverthorn, Teresa ; Arbaretaz, Angélique ; Truchy, Amélie ; Barthélémy, Nans ; López‐Rojo, Naiara ; Foulquier, Arnaud ; Simon, Laurent ; Pella, Hervé ; Singer, Gabriel ; Datry, Thibault</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarremejane, Romain ; Silverthorn, Teresa ; Arbaretaz, Angélique ; Truchy, Amélie ; Barthélémy, Nans ; López‐Rojo, Naiara ; Foulquier, Arnaud ; Simon, Laurent ; Pella, Hervé ; Singer, Gabriel ; Datry, Thibault</creatorcontrib><description>Rivers form meta‐ecosystems, in which disturbance and connectivity control biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and their interactions across the river network, but also across connected instream and riparian ecosystems. This aquatic–terrestrial linkage is modified by drying, a disturbance that also naturally fragments river networks and thereby modifies organism dispersal and organic matter (OM) transfers across the river network. However, little evidence of the effects of drying on river network‐scale OM cycling exists. Here, we assessed the effects of fragmentation by drying at the river meta‐ecosystem scale by monitoring leaf resource stocks, invertebrate communities and decomposition rates, across three seasons and 20 sites, in the instream and riparian habitats of a river network naturally fragmented by drying. Although instream leaf resource quantity and quality increased, leaf‐shredder invertebrate richness and abundance decreased with flow intermittence. Decomposition was, however, mainly driven by network‐scale fragmentation and connectivity. Shredder richness and invertebrate‐driven decomposition both peaked at sites with intermediate amounts of intermittent reaches upstream, suggesting that upstream drying can promote the biodiversity and functioning of downstream ecosystems. Shredder richness, however, had a negative effect on decomposition in perennial sites, likely due to interspecific competition. Leaf quantity, invertebrate communities and invertebrate‐driven decomposition became more similar between instream and riparian habitats as drying frequency increased, likely due to homogenization of environmental conditions between both habitats as the river dried. Our study demonstrates the paramount effects of drying on the dynamics of resources, communities and ecosystem functioning in rivers and presents evidence of one of the first network‐scale examples of the co‐drivers of ecosystem functions across terrestrial–aquatic boundaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/oik.10135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Biodiversity ; biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships (BEF) ; Decomposition ; Dispersal ; Drying ; Ecological function ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental Sciences ; Fragmentation ; Habitats ; Invertebrates ; Leaves ; meta-ecosystems ; metacommunities ; Organic matter ; River ecology ; River networks ; Rivers ; subsidies ; Upstream</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2024-06, Vol.2024 (6), p.861-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Oikos published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jun 2024</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-ea3c8939b935ebaa8f8bf80db687eb62b421994d68297163ce53f59dafd12163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4943-1173 ; 0000-0002-5952-6950 ; 0000-0001-6152-6573</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Foik.10135$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Foik.10135$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04748861$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarremejane, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverthorn, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbaretaz, Angélique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truchy, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barthélémy, Nans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Rojo, Naiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foulquier, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pella, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datry, Thibault</creatorcontrib><title>Drying and fragmentation drive the dynamics of resources, consumers and ecosystem functions across aquatic‐terrestrial habitats in a river network</title><title>Oikos</title><description>Rivers form meta‐ecosystems, in which disturbance and connectivity control biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and their interactions across the river network, but also across connected instream and riparian ecosystems. This aquatic–terrestrial linkage is modified by drying, a disturbance that also naturally fragments river networks and thereby modifies organism dispersal and organic matter (OM) transfers across the river network. However, little evidence of the effects of drying on river network‐scale OM cycling exists. Here, we assessed the effects of fragmentation by drying at the river meta‐ecosystem scale by monitoring leaf resource stocks, invertebrate communities and decomposition rates, across three seasons and 20 sites, in the instream and riparian habitats of a river network naturally fragmented by drying. Although instream leaf resource quantity and quality increased, leaf‐shredder invertebrate richness and abundance decreased with flow intermittence. Decomposition was, however, mainly driven by network‐scale fragmentation and connectivity. Shredder richness and invertebrate‐driven decomposition both peaked at sites with intermediate amounts of intermittent reaches upstream, suggesting that upstream drying can promote the biodiversity and functioning of downstream ecosystems. Shredder richness, however, had a negative effect on decomposition in perennial sites, likely due to interspecific competition. Leaf quantity, invertebrate communities and invertebrate‐driven decomposition became more similar between instream and riparian habitats as drying frequency increased, likely due to homogenization of environmental conditions between both habitats as the river dried. Our study demonstrates the paramount effects of drying on the dynamics of resources, communities and ecosystem functioning in rivers and presents evidence of one of the first network‐scale examples of the co‐drivers of ecosystem functions across terrestrial–aquatic boundaries.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships (BEF)</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>meta-ecosystems</subject><subject>metacommunities</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>subsidies</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EEkvhwBtY4oRE2nGcOPaxKqWtWKmX3i3HGXfdbuzWTlrlxiNw4An7JHh3EZzwZeTRN7_58xHykcExK-8k-vtjBoy3r8iKCYAKOhCvyQqAQ8Vqpd6SdznfAUDXdc2K_PqaFh9uqQkDdcncjhgmM_kY6JD8E9Jpg3RYghm9zTQ6mjDHOVnMX6iNIc8jprwvRhvzkiccqZuD3RFK3qaYS3icC9K-_Pg5YSqAKXmzpRvT-9IqUx-oobtmiQacnmO6f0_eOLPN-OFPPCI3385vzi6r9fXF1dnpurK8Fm2FhlupuOoVb7E3RjrZOwlDL2SHvaj7pmZKNYOQteqY4BZb7lo1GDewuvyPyOcDdmO2-iH50aRFR-P15ela73LQdI2Ugj2xov100D6k-DiXHfRduUMo02kOgvO6bmTzj7hfPKH7i2Wgd_7o4o_e-1O0Jwfts9_i8n-hvr76zngHLf8N4XuVdg</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Sarremejane, Romain</creator><creator>Silverthorn, Teresa</creator><creator>Arbaretaz, Angélique</creator><creator>Truchy, Amélie</creator><creator>Barthélémy, Nans</creator><creator>López‐Rojo, Naiara</creator><creator>Foulquier, Arnaud</creator><creator>Simon, Laurent</creator><creator>Pella, Hervé</creator><creator>Singer, Gabriel</creator><creator>Datry, Thibault</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Nordic Ecological Society</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4943-1173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5952-6950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-6573</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Drying and fragmentation drive the dynamics of resources, consumers and ecosystem functions across aquatic‐terrestrial habitats in a river network</title><author>Sarremejane, Romain ; Silverthorn, Teresa ; Arbaretaz, Angélique ; Truchy, Amélie ; Barthélémy, Nans ; López‐Rojo, Naiara ; Foulquier, Arnaud ; Simon, Laurent ; Pella, Hervé ; Singer, Gabriel ; Datry, Thibault</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3265-ea3c8939b935ebaa8f8bf80db687eb62b421994d68297163ce53f59dafd12163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships (BEF)</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>meta-ecosystems</topic><topic>metacommunities</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>subsidies</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarremejane, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverthorn, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbaretaz, Angélique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truchy, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barthélémy, Nans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Rojo, Naiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foulquier, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pella, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datry, Thibault</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarremejane, Romain</au><au>Silverthorn, Teresa</au><au>Arbaretaz, Angélique</au><au>Truchy, Amélie</au><au>Barthélémy, Nans</au><au>López‐Rojo, Naiara</au><au>Foulquier, Arnaud</au><au>Simon, Laurent</au><au>Pella, Hervé</au><au>Singer, Gabriel</au><au>Datry, Thibault</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drying and fragmentation drive the dynamics of resources, consumers and ecosystem functions across aquatic‐terrestrial habitats in a river network</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2024</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>861</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>861-n/a</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><abstract>Rivers form meta‐ecosystems, in which disturbance and connectivity control biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and their interactions across the river network, but also across connected instream and riparian ecosystems. This aquatic–terrestrial linkage is modified by drying, a disturbance that also naturally fragments river networks and thereby modifies organism dispersal and organic matter (OM) transfers across the river network. However, little evidence of the effects of drying on river network‐scale OM cycling exists. Here, we assessed the effects of fragmentation by drying at the river meta‐ecosystem scale by monitoring leaf resource stocks, invertebrate communities and decomposition rates, across three seasons and 20 sites, in the instream and riparian habitats of a river network naturally fragmented by drying. Although instream leaf resource quantity and quality increased, leaf‐shredder invertebrate richness and abundance decreased with flow intermittence. Decomposition was, however, mainly driven by network‐scale fragmentation and connectivity. Shredder richness and invertebrate‐driven decomposition both peaked at sites with intermediate amounts of intermittent reaches upstream, suggesting that upstream drying can promote the biodiversity and functioning of downstream ecosystems. Shredder richness, however, had a negative effect on decomposition in perennial sites, likely due to interspecific competition. Leaf quantity, invertebrate communities and invertebrate‐driven decomposition became more similar between instream and riparian habitats as drying frequency increased, likely due to homogenization of environmental conditions between both habitats as the river dried. Our study demonstrates the paramount effects of drying on the dynamics of resources, communities and ecosystem functioning in rivers and presents evidence of one of the first network‐scale examples of the co‐drivers of ecosystem functions across terrestrial–aquatic boundaries.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/oik.10135</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4943-1173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5952-6950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-6573</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-1299 |
ispartof | Oikos, 2024-06, Vol.2024 (6), p.861-n/a |
issn | 0030-1299 1600-0706 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04748861v1 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Aquatic ecosystems Biodiversity biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships (BEF) Decomposition Dispersal Drying Ecological function Ecosystems Environmental conditions Environmental Sciences Fragmentation Habitats Invertebrates Leaves meta-ecosystems metacommunities Organic matter River ecology River networks Rivers subsidies Upstream |
title | Drying and fragmentation drive the dynamics of resources, consumers and ecosystem functions across aquatic‐terrestrial habitats in a river network |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T05%3A57%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drying%20and%20fragmentation%20drive%20the%20dynamics%20of%20resources,%20consumers%20and%20ecosystem%20functions%20across%20aquatic%E2%80%90terrestrial%20habitats%20in%20a%20river%20network&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Sarremejane,%20Romain&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=2024&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=861&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=861-n/a&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/oik.10135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3063322484%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3063322484&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |