A flow cytometry method for safe detection of bacterial viability
Flow cytometry is a relevant tool to meet the requirements of academic and industrial research projects aimed at estimating the features of a bacterial population (e.g., quantity, viability, activity). One of the remaining challenges is now the safe assessment of bacterial viability while minimizing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cytometry. Part A 2024-02, Vol.105 (2), p.146-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 146 |
container_title | Cytometry. Part A |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Servain-Viel, S Aknin, M-L Domenichini, S Perlemuter, G Cassard, A-M Schlecht-Louf, G Moal, V Lievin-Le |
description | Flow cytometry is a relevant tool to meet the requirements of academic and industrial research projects aimed at estimating the features of a bacterial population (e.g., quantity, viability, activity). One of the remaining challenges is now the safe assessment of bacterial viability while minimizing the risks inherent to existing protocols. In our core facility at the Paris-Saclay University, we have addressed this issue with two objectives: measuring bacterial viability in biological samples and preventing bacterial contamination and chemical exposure of the staff and cytometers used on the platform. Here, we report the development of a protocol achieving these two objectives, including a viability labeling step before bacteria fixation, which removes the risk of biological exposure, and the decrease of the use of reagents such as propidium iodide (PI), which are dangerous for health (CMR: carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic). For this purpose, we looked for a non-CMR viability dye that can irreversibly label dead bacteria before fixation procedures and maintain intense fluorescence after further staining. We decided to test on the bacteria, eFluor Fixable Viability dyes, which are usually used on eukaryotic cells. Since the bacteria had size and granularity characteristics very similar to those associated with flow cytometry background signals, a step of bacterial DNA labeling with SYTO or DRAQ5 was necessarily added to differentiate them from the background. Three marker combinations (viability-DNA) were tested on LSR Fortessa and validated on pure bacterial populations (Gram
, Gram
) and polybacterial cultures. Any of the three methods can be used and adapted to the needs of each project and allow users to adapt the combination according to the configuration of their cytometer. Having been tested on six bacterial populations, validated on two cytometers, and repeated at least two times in each evaluated condition, we consider this method reliable in the context of these conditions. The reliability of the results obtained in flow cytometry was successfully validated by applying this protocol to confocal microscopy, permeabilization, and also to follow cultures over time. This flow cytometry protocol for measuring bacterial viability under safer conditions also opens the prospect of its use for further bacterial characterization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cyto.a.24794 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04739169v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2927725972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-e45aa0037e6f3372d5b71ba2c2f887920f03c2338d79b7aa4aab5afef5a70e523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMotlZvniXgRcHW7GTT2RxL8QsKXvQcZncTumXb1GRb6b9319YevMwMw8P7zgdj14kYJULAY7Fr_IhGkKJOT1g_UQqGqZbi9FgD9NhFjAshpBISzllPImZjmeo-m0y4q_0371SWtgk73sa5L7nzgUdylpe2sUVT-RX3judUNDZUVPNtRXlVV83ukp05qqO9OuQB-3x--pi-DmfvL2_TyWxYSJ00Q5sqonYCtGMnJUKpckxyggJclqEG4YQsQMqsRJ0jUUqUq9bfKUJhFcgBu9_rzqk261AtKeyMp8q8Tmam64kUW6ex3iYte7dn18F_bWxszLKKha1rWlm_iQYyhAQzgapFb_-hC78Jq3YTAxoQQWnszB_2VBF8jMG64wSJMN0bTHdAQ-b3DS1-cxDd5EtbHuG_u8sfWWyB-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2927725972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A flow cytometry method for safe detection of bacterial viability</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Servain-Viel, S ; Aknin, M-L ; Domenichini, S ; Perlemuter, G ; Cassard, A-M ; Schlecht-Louf, G ; Moal, V Lievin-Le</creator><creatorcontrib>Servain-Viel, S ; Aknin, M-L ; Domenichini, S ; Perlemuter, G ; Cassard, A-M ; Schlecht-Louf, G ; Moal, V Lievin-Le</creatorcontrib><description>Flow cytometry is a relevant tool to meet the requirements of academic and industrial research projects aimed at estimating the features of a bacterial population (e.g., quantity, viability, activity). One of the remaining challenges is now the safe assessment of bacterial viability while minimizing the risks inherent to existing protocols. In our core facility at the Paris-Saclay University, we have addressed this issue with two objectives: measuring bacterial viability in biological samples and preventing bacterial contamination and chemical exposure of the staff and cytometers used on the platform. Here, we report the development of a protocol achieving these two objectives, including a viability labeling step before bacteria fixation, which removes the risk of biological exposure, and the decrease of the use of reagents such as propidium iodide (PI), which are dangerous for health (CMR: carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic). For this purpose, we looked for a non-CMR viability dye that can irreversibly label dead bacteria before fixation procedures and maintain intense fluorescence after further staining. We decided to test on the bacteria, eFluor Fixable Viability dyes, which are usually used on eukaryotic cells. Since the bacteria had size and granularity characteristics very similar to those associated with flow cytometry background signals, a step of bacterial DNA labeling with SYTO or DRAQ5 was necessarily added to differentiate them from the background. Three marker combinations (viability-DNA) were tested on LSR Fortessa and validated on pure bacterial populations (Gram
, Gram
) and polybacterial cultures. Any of the three methods can be used and adapted to the needs of each project and allow users to adapt the combination according to the configuration of their cytometer. Having been tested on six bacterial populations, validated on two cytometers, and repeated at least two times in each evaluated condition, we consider this method reliable in the context of these conditions. The reliability of the results obtained in flow cytometry was successfully validated by applying this protocol to confocal microscopy, permeabilization, and also to follow cultures over time. This flow cytometry protocol for measuring bacterial viability under safer conditions also opens the prospect of its use for further bacterial characterization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4930</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24794</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37786349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biological properties ; Biological samples ; Carcinogens ; Confocal microscopy ; Contamination ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Dyes ; Flow cytometry ; Industrial research ; Iodides ; Labelling ; Labels ; Life Sciences ; Populations ; Propidium iodide ; Protocol ; Reagents ; Reliability aspects ; Research projects ; Risk reduction ; Viability</subject><ispartof>Cytometry. Part A, 2024-02, Vol.105 (2), p.146-156</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-e45aa0037e6f3372d5b71ba2c2f887920f03c2338d79b7aa4aab5afef5a70e523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-e45aa0037e6f3372d5b71ba2c2f887920f03c2338d79b7aa4aab5afef5a70e523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1813-5128</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37786349$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04739169$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Servain-Viel, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aknin, M-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domenichini, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perlemuter, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassard, A-M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlecht-Louf, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moal, V Lievin-Le</creatorcontrib><title>A flow cytometry method for safe detection of bacterial viability</title><title>Cytometry. Part A</title><addtitle>Cytometry A</addtitle><description>Flow cytometry is a relevant tool to meet the requirements of academic and industrial research projects aimed at estimating the features of a bacterial population (e.g., quantity, viability, activity). One of the remaining challenges is now the safe assessment of bacterial viability while minimizing the risks inherent to existing protocols. In our core facility at the Paris-Saclay University, we have addressed this issue with two objectives: measuring bacterial viability in biological samples and preventing bacterial contamination and chemical exposure of the staff and cytometers used on the platform. Here, we report the development of a protocol achieving these two objectives, including a viability labeling step before bacteria fixation, which removes the risk of biological exposure, and the decrease of the use of reagents such as propidium iodide (PI), which are dangerous for health (CMR: carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic). For this purpose, we looked for a non-CMR viability dye that can irreversibly label dead bacteria before fixation procedures and maintain intense fluorescence after further staining. We decided to test on the bacteria, eFluor Fixable Viability dyes, which are usually used on eukaryotic cells. Since the bacteria had size and granularity characteristics very similar to those associated with flow cytometry background signals, a step of bacterial DNA labeling with SYTO or DRAQ5 was necessarily added to differentiate them from the background. Three marker combinations (viability-DNA) were tested on LSR Fortessa and validated on pure bacterial populations (Gram
, Gram
) and polybacterial cultures. Any of the three methods can be used and adapted to the needs of each project and allow users to adapt the combination according to the configuration of their cytometer. Having been tested on six bacterial populations, validated on two cytometers, and repeated at least two times in each evaluated condition, we consider this method reliable in the context of these conditions. The reliability of the results obtained in flow cytometry was successfully validated by applying this protocol to confocal microscopy, permeabilization, and also to follow cultures over time. This flow cytometry protocol for measuring bacterial viability under safer conditions also opens the prospect of its use for further bacterial characterization.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological properties</subject><subject>Biological samples</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Confocal microscopy</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Industrial research</subject><subject>Iodides</subject><subject>Labelling</subject><subject>Labels</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Propidium iodide</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Reliability aspects</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>1552-4922</issn><issn>1552-4930</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMotlZvniXgRcHW7GTT2RxL8QsKXvQcZncTumXb1GRb6b9319YevMwMw8P7zgdj14kYJULAY7Fr_IhGkKJOT1g_UQqGqZbi9FgD9NhFjAshpBISzllPImZjmeo-m0y4q_0371SWtgk73sa5L7nzgUdylpe2sUVT-RX3judUNDZUVPNtRXlVV83ukp05qqO9OuQB-3x--pi-DmfvL2_TyWxYSJ00Q5sqonYCtGMnJUKpckxyggJclqEG4YQsQMqsRJ0jUUqUq9bfKUJhFcgBu9_rzqk261AtKeyMp8q8Tmam64kUW6ex3iYte7dn18F_bWxszLKKha1rWlm_iQYyhAQzgapFb_-hC78Jq3YTAxoQQWnszB_2VBF8jMG64wSJMN0bTHdAQ-b3DS1-cxDd5EtbHuG_u8sfWWyB-g</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Servain-Viel, S</creator><creator>Aknin, M-L</creator><creator>Domenichini, S</creator><creator>Perlemuter, G</creator><creator>Cassard, A-M</creator><creator>Schlecht-Louf, G</creator><creator>Moal, V Lievin-Le</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-5128</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>A flow cytometry method for safe detection of bacterial viability</title><author>Servain-Viel, S ; Aknin, M-L ; Domenichini, S ; Perlemuter, G ; Cassard, A-M ; Schlecht-Louf, G ; Moal, V Lievin-Le</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-e45aa0037e6f3372d5b71ba2c2f887920f03c2338d79b7aa4aab5afef5a70e523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological properties</topic><topic>Biological samples</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Confocal microscopy</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Industrial research</topic><topic>Iodides</topic><topic>Labelling</topic><topic>Labels</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Propidium iodide</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Reliability aspects</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Servain-Viel, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aknin, M-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domenichini, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perlemuter, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassard, A-M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlecht-Louf, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moal, V Lievin-Le</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Cytometry. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Servain-Viel, S</au><au>Aknin, M-L</au><au>Domenichini, S</au><au>Perlemuter, G</au><au>Cassard, A-M</au><au>Schlecht-Louf, G</au><au>Moal, V Lievin-Le</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A flow cytometry method for safe detection of bacterial viability</atitle><jtitle>Cytometry. Part A</jtitle><addtitle>Cytometry A</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>146-156</pages><issn>1552-4922</issn><eissn>1552-4930</eissn><abstract>Flow cytometry is a relevant tool to meet the requirements of academic and industrial research projects aimed at estimating the features of a bacterial population (e.g., quantity, viability, activity). One of the remaining challenges is now the safe assessment of bacterial viability while minimizing the risks inherent to existing protocols. In our core facility at the Paris-Saclay University, we have addressed this issue with two objectives: measuring bacterial viability in biological samples and preventing bacterial contamination and chemical exposure of the staff and cytometers used on the platform. Here, we report the development of a protocol achieving these two objectives, including a viability labeling step before bacteria fixation, which removes the risk of biological exposure, and the decrease of the use of reagents such as propidium iodide (PI), which are dangerous for health (CMR: carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic). For this purpose, we looked for a non-CMR viability dye that can irreversibly label dead bacteria before fixation procedures and maintain intense fluorescence after further staining. We decided to test on the bacteria, eFluor Fixable Viability dyes, which are usually used on eukaryotic cells. Since the bacteria had size and granularity characteristics very similar to those associated with flow cytometry background signals, a step of bacterial DNA labeling with SYTO or DRAQ5 was necessarily added to differentiate them from the background. Three marker combinations (viability-DNA) were tested on LSR Fortessa and validated on pure bacterial populations (Gram
, Gram
) and polybacterial cultures. Any of the three methods can be used and adapted to the needs of each project and allow users to adapt the combination according to the configuration of their cytometer. Having been tested on six bacterial populations, validated on two cytometers, and repeated at least two times in each evaluated condition, we consider this method reliable in the context of these conditions. The reliability of the results obtained in flow cytometry was successfully validated by applying this protocol to confocal microscopy, permeabilization, and also to follow cultures over time. This flow cytometry protocol for measuring bacterial viability under safer conditions also opens the prospect of its use for further bacterial characterization.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37786349</pmid><doi>10.1002/cyto.a.24794</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-5128</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-4922 |
ispartof | Cytometry. Part A, 2024-02, Vol.105 (2), p.146-156 |
issn | 1552-4922 1552-4930 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04739169v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Bacteria Biological properties Biological samples Carcinogens Confocal microscopy Contamination Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Dyes Flow cytometry Industrial research Iodides Labelling Labels Life Sciences Populations Propidium iodide Protocol Reagents Reliability aspects Research projects Risk reduction Viability |
title | A flow cytometry method for safe detection of bacterial viability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20flow%20cytometry%20method%20for%20safe%20detection%20of%20bacterial%20viability&rft.jtitle=Cytometry.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Servain-Viel,%20S&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=146-156&rft.issn=1552-4922&rft.eissn=1552-4930&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24794&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2927725972%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2927725972&rft_id=info:pmid/37786349&rfr_iscdi=true |