Between impartiality and politicization: Confidence in the judiciary among political winners and losers
With courts considered political actors, partisan gaps in perceptions of the judiciary have been widely examined by US political analysts. Contributing to recently expanding research on determinants of public support for courts beyond the US, this article explores how views of the judiciary are poli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electoral studies 2024-02, Vol.87, p.102714, Article 102714 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102714 |
container_title | Electoral studies |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Böhringer, Eileen Boucher, Charlotte |
description | With courts considered political actors, partisan gaps in perceptions of the judiciary have been widely examined by US political analysts. Contributing to recently expanding research on determinants of public support for courts beyond the US, this article explores how views of the judiciary are politicized in European democracies. Relying on the European Values Study (EVS), we find a gap in confidence in the judicial system between political winners and losers. Yet, this gap is smaller for judicial confidence than for confidence in government and parliament, underlining that courts are not perceived as just another site of partisan politics. Paying attention to variation within the groups of winners and losers, we demonstrate that for all three institutions we study, the gap in confidence is larger for supporters of populist parties than for those supporting mainstream parties. We conclude by showing that the confidence gap narrows as courts become more independent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102714 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04712361v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261379423001361</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0261379423001361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c6beca9f9470aeebc7de7c494512f2502b0b92876607eb51bc703b169ff6bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPwyAYhonRxDn9DXL10Am0g-FtLupMlnjQO6H0Y6PpYCndFv31Uqu7euLLx_O-gQehW0omlFB-X0-gAdPFbl9NGGF52jJBizM0ojORZ3wmyTkaEcZplgtZXKKrGGtCKJOSjtD6EbojgMduu9Nt53Tjuk-sfYV3IY3OuC_dueAf8CJ46yrwBrDzuNsArvdVutdt4rfBr_8SusFH5z208aenCTGN1-jC6ibCze85Ru_PTx-LZbZ6e3ldzFeZyYuiywwvwWhpZSGIBiiNqECYQhZTyiybElaSUrKZ4JwIKKc0ASQvKZfW8tLmY3Q3tG50o3at26bHqaCdWs5Xqt-RQlCWc3qgiRUDa9oQYwv2FKBE9WZVrU5mVW9WDWZTcj4kIX3k4KBV0bheTOXaxKsquH87vgFKv4h5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Between impartiality and politicization: Confidence in the judiciary among political winners and losers</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Böhringer, Eileen ; Boucher, Charlotte</creator><creatorcontrib>Böhringer, Eileen ; Boucher, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><description>With courts considered political actors, partisan gaps in perceptions of the judiciary have been widely examined by US political analysts. Contributing to recently expanding research on determinants of public support for courts beyond the US, this article explores how views of the judiciary are politicized in European democracies. Relying on the European Values Study (EVS), we find a gap in confidence in the judicial system between political winners and losers. Yet, this gap is smaller for judicial confidence than for confidence in government and parliament, underlining that courts are not perceived as just another site of partisan politics. Paying attention to variation within the groups of winners and losers, we demonstrate that for all three institutions we study, the gap in confidence is larger for supporters of populist parties than for those supporting mainstream parties. We conclude by showing that the confidence gap narrows as courts become more independent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences ; Judicial independence ; Political science ; Populism ; Public support ; Trust in institutions ; Winner-loser gap</subject><ispartof>Electoral studies, 2024-02, Vol.87, p.102714, Article 102714</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c6beca9f9470aeebc7de7c494512f2502b0b92876607eb51bc703b169ff6bf3</cites><orcidid>0009-0009-6563-290X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379423001361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-04712361$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Böhringer, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><title>Between impartiality and politicization: Confidence in the judiciary among political winners and losers</title><title>Electoral studies</title><description>With courts considered political actors, partisan gaps in perceptions of the judiciary have been widely examined by US political analysts. Contributing to recently expanding research on determinants of public support for courts beyond the US, this article explores how views of the judiciary are politicized in European democracies. Relying on the European Values Study (EVS), we find a gap in confidence in the judicial system between political winners and losers. Yet, this gap is smaller for judicial confidence than for confidence in government and parliament, underlining that courts are not perceived as just another site of partisan politics. Paying attention to variation within the groups of winners and losers, we demonstrate that for all three institutions we study, the gap in confidence is larger for supporters of populist parties than for those supporting mainstream parties. We conclude by showing that the confidence gap narrows as courts become more independent.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Judicial independence</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Public support</subject><subject>Trust in institutions</subject><subject>Winner-loser gap</subject><issn>0261-3794</issn><issn>1873-6890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFPwyAYhonRxDn9DXL10Am0g-FtLupMlnjQO6H0Y6PpYCndFv31Uqu7euLLx_O-gQehW0omlFB-X0-gAdPFbl9NGGF52jJBizM0ojORZ3wmyTkaEcZplgtZXKKrGGtCKJOSjtD6EbojgMduu9Nt53Tjuk-sfYV3IY3OuC_dueAf8CJ46yrwBrDzuNsArvdVutdt4rfBr_8SusFH5z208aenCTGN1-jC6ibCze85Ru_PTx-LZbZ6e3ldzFeZyYuiywwvwWhpZSGIBiiNqECYQhZTyiybElaSUrKZ4JwIKKc0ASQvKZfW8tLmY3Q3tG50o3at26bHqaCdWs5Xqt-RQlCWc3qgiRUDa9oQYwv2FKBE9WZVrU5mVW9WDWZTcj4kIX3k4KBV0bheTOXaxKsquH87vgFKv4h5</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Böhringer, Eileen</creator><creator>Boucher, Charlotte</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6563-290X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Between impartiality and politicization: Confidence in the judiciary among political winners and losers</title><author>Böhringer, Eileen ; Boucher, Charlotte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-c6beca9f9470aeebc7de7c494512f2502b0b92876607eb51bc703b169ff6bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Judicial independence</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Public support</topic><topic>Trust in institutions</topic><topic>Winner-loser gap</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Böhringer, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Böhringer, Eileen</au><au>Boucher, Charlotte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Between impartiality and politicization: Confidence in the judiciary among political winners and losers</atitle><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>102714</spage><pages>102714-</pages><artnum>102714</artnum><issn>0261-3794</issn><eissn>1873-6890</eissn><abstract>With courts considered political actors, partisan gaps in perceptions of the judiciary have been widely examined by US political analysts. Contributing to recently expanding research on determinants of public support for courts beyond the US, this article explores how views of the judiciary are politicized in European democracies. Relying on the European Values Study (EVS), we find a gap in confidence in the judicial system between political winners and losers. Yet, this gap is smaller for judicial confidence than for confidence in government and parliament, underlining that courts are not perceived as just another site of partisan politics. Paying attention to variation within the groups of winners and losers, we demonstrate that for all three institutions we study, the gap in confidence is larger for supporters of populist parties than for those supporting mainstream parties. We conclude by showing that the confidence gap narrows as courts become more independent.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102714</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6563-290X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-3794 |
ispartof | Electoral studies, 2024-02, Vol.87, p.102714, Article 102714 |
issn | 0261-3794 1873-6890 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04712361v1 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Humanities and Social Sciences Judicial independence Political science Populism Public support Trust in institutions Winner-loser gap |
title | Between impartiality and politicization: Confidence in the judiciary among political winners and losers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A51%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Between%20impartiality%20and%20politicization:%20Confidence%20in%20the%20judiciary%20among%20political%20winners%20and%20losers&rft.jtitle=Electoral%20studies&rft.au=B%C3%B6hringer,%20Eileen&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=102714&rft.pages=102714-&rft.artnum=102714&rft.issn=0261-3794&rft.eissn=1873-6890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102714&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES0261379423001361%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261379423001361&rfr_iscdi=true |