Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?

At the crossroads of spatial planning and agriculture, this article explores how planning practices impact on-farm diversification strategies in peri-urban Mediterranean France. It focuses on farm building permit applications, statistically analyzing a database of 860 buildings applied for and inter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2024-12, Vol.147, p.107361, Article 107361
Hauptverfasser: Nougarèdes, Brigitte, Melot, Romain, Vanel, Laurie, Campardon, Myriam, Brahimi, Dyhia, Hammond, Roy, Mesini, Béatrice, Perrin, Coline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107361
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 147
creator Nougarèdes, Brigitte
Melot, Romain
Vanel, Laurie
Campardon, Myriam
Brahimi, Dyhia
Hammond, Roy
Mesini, Béatrice
Perrin, Coline
description At the crossroads of spatial planning and agriculture, this article explores how planning practices impact on-farm diversification strategies in peri-urban Mediterranean France. It focuses on farm building permit applications, statistically analyzing a database of 860 buildings applied for and interviewing local authorities and farmers’ representatives. Results show the large proportion of applications related to reterritorialization of food systems, development of recreational activities, and production of green energy. These on-farm diversification trends highlight the transformation of peri-urban areas from a natural or agricultural landscape into a multifunctional landscape, posing several planning challenges. Planners don’t know how to assess whether a new building is really essential for farming, or to find the right trade-offs to support farming dynamics while limiting soil sealing. Their assessment criteria generally favor large, full-time, and economically viable farms. Comparing two provinces’ planning practices, we observe significant differences in interpretation of national law, with incoherent or unharmonized criteria applied especially when assessing professional farming activities, new dwellings, and solar energy projects. We also highlight two potential obstacles to farmers’ generational renewal and agroecological or food transitions: i) lack of transparency regarding the rules and the decision-making processes behind building permit assessment, and ii) the frequent rejection of applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures. Such results point to the role of planners in transforming peri-urban landscapes and the need for more consistent regulation of new farm buildings, supporting and not hindering farm adaptation strategies and the multifunctionality of peri-urban areas. •Decentralized planning induces unclear decision-making procedures and differing treatment of farm building applications.•Applications concern a wide range of farm buildings, confirming on-farm diversification trends.•Evaluations differ according to local planning authorities, types of production, buildings applied for, and applicants.•Applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures are often rejected.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107361
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04705700v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837724003144</els_id><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_04705700v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-152ff922b51119eee90696ffe8389888aa50c0b7294530ba8e38d8ee3613ea463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUzEHBWv0PuXrYmmQ_kj1JrdYKFS8K3kI2-2JfabNLsi34701Z0aOn4Q0zw5shhHI244xXt9vZzvj2EKHvdjPBRJFomVf8jEyYqIpM5VJekMsYt4yxquZiQj4eOtonl0f_Sftg7IAWIt2gbyHQzmfOhD1t8QghokNrBuw8RU97CJgdQmM8fYEWBwjBeEjXMqGFuyty7swuwvUPTsn78vFtscrWr0_Pi_k6s0LKIeOlcK4Woik55zUA1OmxyjlQuaqVUsaUzLJGirooc9YYBblqFUBqlYMpqnxKbsbcjdnpPuDehC_dGdSr-VqfOFZIVkrGjjxp1ai1oYsxgPs1cKZPC-qt_ltQnxbU44LJej9aIXU5IgQdLUIq2mIAO-i2w_9DvgEApYEm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Nougarèdes, Brigitte ; Melot, Romain ; Vanel, Laurie ; Campardon, Myriam ; Brahimi, Dyhia ; Hammond, Roy ; Mesini, Béatrice ; Perrin, Coline</creator><creatorcontrib>Nougarèdes, Brigitte ; Melot, Romain ; Vanel, Laurie ; Campardon, Myriam ; Brahimi, Dyhia ; Hammond, Roy ; Mesini, Béatrice ; Perrin, Coline</creatorcontrib><description>At the crossroads of spatial planning and agriculture, this article explores how planning practices impact on-farm diversification strategies in peri-urban Mediterranean France. It focuses on farm building permit applications, statistically analyzing a database of 860 buildings applied for and interviewing local authorities and farmers’ representatives. Results show the large proportion of applications related to reterritorialization of food systems, development of recreational activities, and production of green energy. These on-farm diversification trends highlight the transformation of peri-urban areas from a natural or agricultural landscape into a multifunctional landscape, posing several planning challenges. Planners don’t know how to assess whether a new building is really essential for farming, or to find the right trade-offs to support farming dynamics while limiting soil sealing. Their assessment criteria generally favor large, full-time, and economically viable farms. Comparing two provinces’ planning practices, we observe significant differences in interpretation of national law, with incoherent or unharmonized criteria applied especially when assessing professional farming activities, new dwellings, and solar energy projects. We also highlight two potential obstacles to farmers’ generational renewal and agroecological or food transitions: i) lack of transparency regarding the rules and the decision-making processes behind building permit assessment, and ii) the frequent rejection of applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures. Such results point to the role of planners in transforming peri-urban landscapes and the need for more consistent regulation of new farm buildings, supporting and not hindering farm adaptation strategies and the multifunctionality of peri-urban areas. •Decentralized planning induces unclear decision-making procedures and differing treatment of farm building applications.•Applications concern a wide range of farm buildings, confirming on-farm diversification trends.•Evaluations differ according to local planning authorities, types of production, buildings applied for, and applicants.•Applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures are often rejected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Building permit ; Farm buildings ; Farmland conversion ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Multifunctionality ; Rural planning</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2024-12, Vol.147, p.107361, Article 107361</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-152ff922b51119eee90696ffe8389888aa50c0b7294530ba8e38d8ee3613ea463</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3834-1372 ; 0000-0001-9914-0748 ; 0000-0002-5117-9907 ; 0000-0002-7889-2833</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107361$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04705700$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nougarèdes, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melot, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanel, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campardon, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brahimi, Dyhia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesini, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Coline</creatorcontrib><title>Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>At the crossroads of spatial planning and agriculture, this article explores how planning practices impact on-farm diversification strategies in peri-urban Mediterranean France. It focuses on farm building permit applications, statistically analyzing a database of 860 buildings applied for and interviewing local authorities and farmers’ representatives. Results show the large proportion of applications related to reterritorialization of food systems, development of recreational activities, and production of green energy. These on-farm diversification trends highlight the transformation of peri-urban areas from a natural or agricultural landscape into a multifunctional landscape, posing several planning challenges. Planners don’t know how to assess whether a new building is really essential for farming, or to find the right trade-offs to support farming dynamics while limiting soil sealing. Their assessment criteria generally favor large, full-time, and economically viable farms. Comparing two provinces’ planning practices, we observe significant differences in interpretation of national law, with incoherent or unharmonized criteria applied especially when assessing professional farming activities, new dwellings, and solar energy projects. We also highlight two potential obstacles to farmers’ generational renewal and agroecological or food transitions: i) lack of transparency regarding the rules and the decision-making processes behind building permit assessment, and ii) the frequent rejection of applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures. Such results point to the role of planners in transforming peri-urban landscapes and the need for more consistent regulation of new farm buildings, supporting and not hindering farm adaptation strategies and the multifunctionality of peri-urban areas. •Decentralized planning induces unclear decision-making procedures and differing treatment of farm building applications.•Applications concern a wide range of farm buildings, confirming on-farm diversification trends.•Evaluations differ according to local planning authorities, types of production, buildings applied for, and applicants.•Applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures are often rejected.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Building permit</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Farmland conversion</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Multifunctionality</subject><subject>Rural planning</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUzEHBWv0PuXrYmmQ_kj1JrdYKFS8K3kI2-2JfabNLsi34701Z0aOn4Q0zw5shhHI244xXt9vZzvj2EKHvdjPBRJFomVf8jEyYqIpM5VJekMsYt4yxquZiQj4eOtonl0f_Sftg7IAWIt2gbyHQzmfOhD1t8QghokNrBuw8RU97CJgdQmM8fYEWBwjBeEjXMqGFuyty7swuwvUPTsn78vFtscrWr0_Pi_k6s0LKIeOlcK4Woik55zUA1OmxyjlQuaqVUsaUzLJGirooc9YYBblqFUBqlYMpqnxKbsbcjdnpPuDehC_dGdSr-VqfOFZIVkrGjjxp1ai1oYsxgPs1cKZPC-qt_ltQnxbU44LJej9aIXU5IgQdLUIq2mIAO-i2w_9DvgEApYEm</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Nougarèdes, Brigitte</creator><creator>Melot, Romain</creator><creator>Vanel, Laurie</creator><creator>Campardon, Myriam</creator><creator>Brahimi, Dyhia</creator><creator>Hammond, Roy</creator><creator>Mesini, Béatrice</creator><creator>Perrin, Coline</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3834-1372</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-0748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-9907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-2833</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?</title><author>Nougarèdes, Brigitte ; Melot, Romain ; Vanel, Laurie ; Campardon, Myriam ; Brahimi, Dyhia ; Hammond, Roy ; Mesini, Béatrice ; Perrin, Coline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-152ff922b51119eee90696ffe8389888aa50c0b7294530ba8e38d8ee3613ea463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Building permit</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Farmland conversion</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Multifunctionality</topic><topic>Rural planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nougarèdes, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melot, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanel, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campardon, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brahimi, Dyhia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesini, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Coline</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nougarèdes, Brigitte</au><au>Melot, Romain</au><au>Vanel, Laurie</au><au>Campardon, Myriam</au><au>Brahimi, Dyhia</au><au>Hammond, Roy</au><au>Mesini, Béatrice</au><au>Perrin, Coline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>147</volume><spage>107361</spage><pages>107361-</pages><artnum>107361</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><abstract>At the crossroads of spatial planning and agriculture, this article explores how planning practices impact on-farm diversification strategies in peri-urban Mediterranean France. It focuses on farm building permit applications, statistically analyzing a database of 860 buildings applied for and interviewing local authorities and farmers’ representatives. Results show the large proportion of applications related to reterritorialization of food systems, development of recreational activities, and production of green energy. These on-farm diversification trends highlight the transformation of peri-urban areas from a natural or agricultural landscape into a multifunctional landscape, posing several planning challenges. Planners don’t know how to assess whether a new building is really essential for farming, or to find the right trade-offs to support farming dynamics while limiting soil sealing. Their assessment criteria generally favor large, full-time, and economically viable farms. Comparing two provinces’ planning practices, we observe significant differences in interpretation of national law, with incoherent or unharmonized criteria applied especially when assessing professional farming activities, new dwellings, and solar energy projects. We also highlight two potential obstacles to farmers’ generational renewal and agroecological or food transitions: i) lack of transparency regarding the rules and the decision-making processes behind building permit assessment, and ii) the frequent rejection of applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures. Such results point to the role of planners in transforming peri-urban landscapes and the need for more consistent regulation of new farm buildings, supporting and not hindering farm adaptation strategies and the multifunctionality of peri-urban areas. •Decentralized planning induces unclear decision-making procedures and differing treatment of farm building applications.•Applications concern a wide range of farm buildings, confirming on-farm diversification trends.•Evaluations differ according to local planning authorities, types of production, buildings applied for, and applicants.•Applications for multi-purpose premises and lightweight, mobile, or dismantlable structures are often rejected.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107361</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3834-1372</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-0748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-9907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-2833</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2024-12, Vol.147, p.107361, Article 107361
issn 0264-8377
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04705700v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agriculture
Building permit
Farm buildings
Farmland conversion
Humanities and Social Sciences
Multifunctionality
Rural planning
title Do planning practices hinder on-farm diversification in peri-urban Mediterranean France?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A20%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20planning%20practices%20hinder%20on-farm%20diversification%20in%20peri-urban%20Mediterranean%20France?&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Nougar%C3%A8des,%20Brigitte&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=147&rft.spage=107361&rft.pages=107361-&rft.artnum=107361&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107361&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_04705700v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837724003144&rfr_iscdi=true