Ecosystem engineers shape ecological network structure and stability: A framework and literature review
Ecosystem engineering is a ubiquitous process where species influence the physical environment and thereby structure ecological communities. However, there has been little effort to synthesize or predict how ecosystem engineering may impact the structure and stability of interaction networks. To ass...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Functional ecology 2024-08, Vol.38 (8), p.1683-1696 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1696 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1683 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Sanders, Dirk Frago, Enric |
description | Ecosystem engineering is a ubiquitous process where species influence the physical environment and thereby structure ecological communities. However, there has been little effort to synthesize or predict how ecosystem engineering may impact the structure and stability of interaction networks.
To assess current scientific understanding of ecosystem engineering impacts via habitat forming, habitat modification and bioturbation on interaction networks/food webs, we reviewed the literature covering marine, freshwater and terrestrial food webs, plant‐pollinator networks and theory.
We provide a conceptual framework and identify three major pathways of engineering impact on networks through changes in resource availability and energy flow, habitat heterogeneity and environmental filtering. These three processes often work in concert and most studies report that engineering increases species richness. This is particularly marked for engineers that increase habitat heterogeneity and thereby the number of available niches.
The response of network structure to ecosystem engineering varies, however some patterns emerge from this review. Engineered habitat heterogeneity leads to a higher number of links between species in the networks and increases link density. Connectance can be negatively or positively affected by ecosystem engineer impact, depending on the engineering pathway and the engineer impact of species richness.
We discuss how ecosystem engineers can stabilize or destabilize communities through the changes in niche space, diversity, network structure and the dependency on the engineering impact. Theory and empirical evidence need to inform each other to better integrate ecosystem engineering and ecological networks. A mechanistic understanding how ecosystem engineering traits shape interactions networks and their stability will be important to predict species extinctions and can provide crucial information for conservation and ecosystem restoration.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2435.14608 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04631061v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153731891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-dd79e88cbae9a9224ac89e683f6bac1769f245a69854a0590de5b8fe7dfc29dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1P4zAQxa0VK21hOe81Ehc4BPwROza3qirLSpW4wNmaOpNiNo2LnVD1v9-kWXHggpiLNc-_Nxr7EfKL0Ws21A0TSua8EPKaFYrqb2T2rpyQGeXK5LpQ4gc5TemFUmok5zOyWbqQDqnDbYbtxreIMWXpGXaYoQtN2HgHTdZitw_xb5a62Luuj5hBWw0drH3ju8NtNs_qCFs8QuPVoGKEIxnxzeP-J_leQ5Pw_P95Rp7ulo-L-3z18PvPYr7KXcGYzquqNKi1WwMaMJwX4LRBpUWt1uBYqUzNCwnKaFkAlYZWKNe6xrKqHTeVE2fkapr7DI3dRb-FeLABvL2fr-yo0eEPGFXsjX-BZQN7ObG7GF57TJ3d-uSwaaDF0CcrmBSlYNqM6MUH9CX0sR1ebQXVpmSSl3SgbibKxZBSxPp9A0btGKgd47NjfPYY6OCQk2PvGzx8htu75WLy_QNPT6Gt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3089715270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem engineers shape ecological network structure and stability: A framework and literature review</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sanders, Dirk ; Frago, Enric</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Dirk ; Frago, Enric</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem engineering is a ubiquitous process where species influence the physical environment and thereby structure ecological communities. However, there has been little effort to synthesize or predict how ecosystem engineering may impact the structure and stability of interaction networks.
To assess current scientific understanding of ecosystem engineering impacts via habitat forming, habitat modification and bioturbation on interaction networks/food webs, we reviewed the literature covering marine, freshwater and terrestrial food webs, plant‐pollinator networks and theory.
We provide a conceptual framework and identify three major pathways of engineering impact on networks through changes in resource availability and energy flow, habitat heterogeneity and environmental filtering. These three processes often work in concert and most studies report that engineering increases species richness. This is particularly marked for engineers that increase habitat heterogeneity and thereby the number of available niches.
The response of network structure to ecosystem engineering varies, however some patterns emerge from this review. Engineered habitat heterogeneity leads to a higher number of links between species in the networks and increases link density. Connectance can be negatively or positively affected by ecosystem engineer impact, depending on the engineering pathway and the engineer impact of species richness.
We discuss how ecosystem engineers can stabilize or destabilize communities through the changes in niche space, diversity, network structure and the dependency on the engineering impact. Theory and empirical evidence need to inform each other to better integrate ecosystem engineering and ecological networks. A mechanistic understanding how ecosystem engineering traits shape interactions networks and their stability will be important to predict species extinctions and can provide crucial information for conservation and ecosystem restoration.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14608</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Availability ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Bioturbation ; ecological communities ; ecological restoration ; Ecology, environment ; ecosystem engineers ; ecosystem functions ; Ecosystem restoration ; Ecosystems ; Energy flow ; Engineering ; Engineers ; Environmental restoration ; Environmental Sciences ; Food availability ; Food chains ; Food plants ; Food webs ; freshwater ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Genetics ; habitat modification ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Information processing ; Life Sciences ; Literature reviews ; Marine ecosystems ; Networks ; Niches ; physical environment ; Pollinators ; Populations and Evolution ; Resource availability ; restoration ; species ; species interactions ; Species richness ; Stability ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2024-08, Vol.38 (8), p.1683-1696</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-dd79e88cbae9a9224ac89e683f6bac1769f245a69854a0590de5b8fe7dfc29dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2383-8693 ; 0000-0001-8817-1303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2435.14608$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2435.14608$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04631061$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frago, Enric</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem engineers shape ecological network structure and stability: A framework and literature review</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Ecosystem engineering is a ubiquitous process where species influence the physical environment and thereby structure ecological communities. However, there has been little effort to synthesize or predict how ecosystem engineering may impact the structure and stability of interaction networks.
To assess current scientific understanding of ecosystem engineering impacts via habitat forming, habitat modification and bioturbation on interaction networks/food webs, we reviewed the literature covering marine, freshwater and terrestrial food webs, plant‐pollinator networks and theory.
We provide a conceptual framework and identify three major pathways of engineering impact on networks through changes in resource availability and energy flow, habitat heterogeneity and environmental filtering. These three processes often work in concert and most studies report that engineering increases species richness. This is particularly marked for engineers that increase habitat heterogeneity and thereby the number of available niches.
The response of network structure to ecosystem engineering varies, however some patterns emerge from this review. Engineered habitat heterogeneity leads to a higher number of links between species in the networks and increases link density. Connectance can be negatively or positively affected by ecosystem engineer impact, depending on the engineering pathway and the engineer impact of species richness.
We discuss how ecosystem engineers can stabilize or destabilize communities through the changes in niche space, diversity, network structure and the dependency on the engineering impact. Theory and empirical evidence need to inform each other to better integrate ecosystem engineering and ecological networks. A mechanistic understanding how ecosystem engineering traits shape interactions networks and their stability will be important to predict species extinctions and can provide crucial information for conservation and ecosystem restoration.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Bioturbation</subject><subject>ecological communities</subject><subject>ecological restoration</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>ecosystem engineers</subject><subject>ecosystem functions</subject><subject>Ecosystem restoration</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Energy flow</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>habitat modification</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>physical environment</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Populations and Evolution</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>species interactions</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1P4zAQxa0VK21hOe81Ehc4BPwROza3qirLSpW4wNmaOpNiNo2LnVD1v9-kWXHggpiLNc-_Nxr7EfKL0Ws21A0TSua8EPKaFYrqb2T2rpyQGeXK5LpQ4gc5TemFUmok5zOyWbqQDqnDbYbtxreIMWXpGXaYoQtN2HgHTdZitw_xb5a62Luuj5hBWw0drH3ju8NtNs_qCFs8QuPVoGKEIxnxzeP-J_leQ5Pw_P95Rp7ulo-L-3z18PvPYr7KXcGYzquqNKi1WwMaMJwX4LRBpUWt1uBYqUzNCwnKaFkAlYZWKNe6xrKqHTeVE2fkapr7DI3dRb-FeLABvL2fr-yo0eEPGFXsjX-BZQN7ObG7GF57TJ3d-uSwaaDF0CcrmBSlYNqM6MUH9CX0sR1ebQXVpmSSl3SgbibKxZBSxPp9A0btGKgd47NjfPYY6OCQk2PvGzx8htu75WLy_QNPT6Gt</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Sanders, Dirk</creator><creator>Frago, Enric</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-8693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8817-1303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Ecosystem engineers shape ecological network structure and stability: A framework and literature review</title><author>Sanders, Dirk ; Frago, Enric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-dd79e88cbae9a9224ac89e683f6bac1769f245a69854a0590de5b8fe7dfc29dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Bioturbation</topic><topic>ecological communities</topic><topic>ecological restoration</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>ecosystem engineers</topic><topic>ecosystem functions</topic><topic>Ecosystem restoration</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Energy flow</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>habitat modification</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>physical environment</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Populations and Evolution</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>species interactions</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frago, Enric</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanders, Dirk</au><au>Frago, Enric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem engineers shape ecological network structure and stability: A framework and literature review</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1683</spage><epage>1696</epage><pages>1683-1696</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Ecosystem engineering is a ubiquitous process where species influence the physical environment and thereby structure ecological communities. However, there has been little effort to synthesize or predict how ecosystem engineering may impact the structure and stability of interaction networks.
To assess current scientific understanding of ecosystem engineering impacts via habitat forming, habitat modification and bioturbation on interaction networks/food webs, we reviewed the literature covering marine, freshwater and terrestrial food webs, plant‐pollinator networks and theory.
We provide a conceptual framework and identify three major pathways of engineering impact on networks through changes in resource availability and energy flow, habitat heterogeneity and environmental filtering. These three processes often work in concert and most studies report that engineering increases species richness. This is particularly marked for engineers that increase habitat heterogeneity and thereby the number of available niches.
The response of network structure to ecosystem engineering varies, however some patterns emerge from this review. Engineered habitat heterogeneity leads to a higher number of links between species in the networks and increases link density. Connectance can be negatively or positively affected by ecosystem engineer impact, depending on the engineering pathway and the engineer impact of species richness.
We discuss how ecosystem engineers can stabilize or destabilize communities through the changes in niche space, diversity, network structure and the dependency on the engineering impact. Theory and empirical evidence need to inform each other to better integrate ecosystem engineering and ecological networks. A mechanistic understanding how ecosystem engineering traits shape interactions networks and their stability will be important to predict species extinctions and can provide crucial information for conservation and ecosystem restoration.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.14608</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2383-8693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8817-1303</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2024-08, Vol.38 (8), p.1683-1696 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04631061v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aquatic habitats Availability Biodiversity and Ecology Bioturbation ecological communities ecological restoration Ecology, environment ecosystem engineers ecosystem functions Ecosystem restoration Ecosystems Energy flow Engineering Engineers Environmental restoration Environmental Sciences Food availability Food chains Food plants Food webs freshwater Freshwater ecosystems Genetics habitat modification Habitats Heterogeneity Information processing Life Sciences Literature reviews Marine ecosystems Networks Niches physical environment Pollinators Populations and Evolution Resource availability restoration species species interactions Species richness Stability Wildlife conservation |
title | Ecosystem engineers shape ecological network structure and stability: A framework and literature review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A38%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem%20engineers%20shape%20ecological%20network%20structure%20and%20stability:%20A%20framework%20and%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Sanders,%20Dirk&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1683&rft.epage=1696&rft.pages=1683-1696&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.14608&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E3153731891%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3089715270&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |