Mobilizing William Godwin, the “Father of British Anarchism”: History, Strategy, and the Intellectual Cultures of Post-war British Anarchism
This article examines the reconfigurations of British anarchist politics and culture, focusing on the reception of William Godwin by three influential anarchist writers and activists: George Woodcock, Colin Ward, and Albert Meltzer. It argues that mobilizing Godwin was an important part of their eff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern intellectual history 2024-06, Vol.21 (2), p.384-409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 409 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 384 |
container_title | Modern intellectual history |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Adams, Matthew S. Hansson, John-Erik |
description | This article examines the reconfigurations of British anarchist politics and culture, focusing on the reception of William Godwin by three influential anarchist writers and activists: George Woodcock, Colin Ward, and Albert Meltzer. It argues that mobilizing Godwin was an important part of their efforts to define, and then defend, a particular version of anarchist intellectual culture in Britain, each with its own unique history and strategic perspectives regarding social and political change. These competing conceptualizations of Godwin's legacy and significance therefore reflected both their independent political and intellectual concerns and developing rifts in the broader anarchist movement, especially between proponents of gradualism and those of more militant forms of anarchism. Ultimately, for all three, Godwin became a cipher for internal ideological struggles in anarchist politics, as his pliable ideas were mobilized in the battle for the meaning of British anarchism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1479244323000239 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04586619v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_04586619v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-4546ad167006954271fdb05279deaec24ffda3282c658440bb36e8e50eb467b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM1Kw0AAhBdRsFYfwNtehUb3P4m3WuwPVBSqeAybZNOsbBPZ3VrqqY_gA-jL9UlMrPTS0wzDN3MYAC4xusYIhzczzMKYMEYJRQgRGh-BThsFhHF8vPeMnoIz594aJCZIdMDXQ51qoz91NYev2hgtF3BU5ytd9aAvFdxuvoeyMRbWBbyz2mtXwn4lbVZqt9hufm7hWDtf23UPzryVXs0bJ6v8rz2pvDJGZX4pDRwsjV9a5dqlp9r5YCXt4eQ5OCmkceriX7vgZXj_PBgH08fRZNCfBhkJmQ8YZ0LmWIQIiZgzEuIiTxEnYZwrqTLCiiKXlEQkEzxiDKUpFSpSHKmUiTDltAuudrulNMm71Qtp10ktdTLuT5M2Q4xHQuD4Azcs3rGZrZ2zqtgXMEra-5OD--kvRa16Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mobilizing William Godwin, the “Father of British Anarchism”: History, Strategy, and the Intellectual Cultures of Post-war British Anarchism</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adams, Matthew S. ; Hansson, John-Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Matthew S. ; Hansson, John-Erik</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the reconfigurations of British anarchist politics and culture, focusing on the reception of William Godwin by three influential anarchist writers and activists: George Woodcock, Colin Ward, and Albert Meltzer. It argues that mobilizing Godwin was an important part of their efforts to define, and then defend, a particular version of anarchist intellectual culture in Britain, each with its own unique history and strategic perspectives regarding social and political change. These competing conceptualizations of Godwin's legacy and significance therefore reflected both their independent political and intellectual concerns and developing rifts in the broader anarchist movement, especially between proponents of gradualism and those of more militant forms of anarchism. Ultimately, for all three, Godwin became a cipher for internal ideological struggles in anarchist politics, as his pliable ideas were mobilized in the battle for the meaning of British anarchism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-2443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-2451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1479244323000239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Modern intellectual history, 2024-06, Vol.21 (2), p.384-409</ispartof><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-5440-4866 ; 0000-0001-8311-9901</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://u-paris.hal.science/hal-04586619$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansson, John-Erik</creatorcontrib><title>Mobilizing William Godwin, the “Father of British Anarchism”: History, Strategy, and the Intellectual Cultures of Post-war British Anarchism</title><title>Modern intellectual history</title><description>This article examines the reconfigurations of British anarchist politics and culture, focusing on the reception of William Godwin by three influential anarchist writers and activists: George Woodcock, Colin Ward, and Albert Meltzer. It argues that mobilizing Godwin was an important part of their efforts to define, and then defend, a particular version of anarchist intellectual culture in Britain, each with its own unique history and strategic perspectives regarding social and political change. These competing conceptualizations of Godwin's legacy and significance therefore reflected both their independent political and intellectual concerns and developing rifts in the broader anarchist movement, especially between proponents of gradualism and those of more militant forms of anarchism. Ultimately, for all three, Godwin became a cipher for internal ideological struggles in anarchist politics, as his pliable ideas were mobilized in the battle for the meaning of British anarchism.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><issn>1479-2443</issn><issn>1479-2451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkM1Kw0AAhBdRsFYfwNtehUb3P4m3WuwPVBSqeAybZNOsbBPZ3VrqqY_gA-jL9UlMrPTS0wzDN3MYAC4xusYIhzczzMKYMEYJRQgRGh-BThsFhHF8vPeMnoIz594aJCZIdMDXQ51qoz91NYev2hgtF3BU5ytd9aAvFdxuvoeyMRbWBbyz2mtXwn4lbVZqt9hufm7hWDtf23UPzryVXs0bJ6v8rz2pvDJGZX4pDRwsjV9a5dqlp9r5YCXt4eQ5OCmkceriX7vgZXj_PBgH08fRZNCfBhkJmQ8YZ0LmWIQIiZgzEuIiTxEnYZwrqTLCiiKXlEQkEzxiDKUpFSpSHKmUiTDltAuudrulNMm71Qtp10ktdTLuT5M2Q4xHQuD4Azcs3rGZrZ2zqtgXMEra-5OD--kvRa16Ig</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Adams, Matthew S.</creator><creator>Hansson, John-Erik</creator><general>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5440-4866</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8311-9901</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Mobilizing William Godwin, the “Father of British Anarchism”: History, Strategy, and the Intellectual Cultures of Post-war British Anarchism</title><author>Adams, Matthew S. ; Hansson, John-Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-4546ad167006954271fdb05279deaec24ffda3282c658440bb36e8e50eb467b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansson, John-Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Modern intellectual history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Matthew S.</au><au>Hansson, John-Erik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mobilizing William Godwin, the “Father of British Anarchism”: History, Strategy, and the Intellectual Cultures of Post-war British Anarchism</atitle><jtitle>Modern intellectual history</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>384</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>384-409</pages><issn>1479-2443</issn><eissn>1479-2451</eissn><abstract>This article examines the reconfigurations of British anarchist politics and culture, focusing on the reception of William Godwin by three influential anarchist writers and activists: George Woodcock, Colin Ward, and Albert Meltzer. It argues that mobilizing Godwin was an important part of their efforts to define, and then defend, a particular version of anarchist intellectual culture in Britain, each with its own unique history and strategic perspectives regarding social and political change. These competing conceptualizations of Godwin's legacy and significance therefore reflected both their independent political and intellectual concerns and developing rifts in the broader anarchist movement, especially between proponents of gradualism and those of more militant forms of anarchism. Ultimately, for all three, Godwin became a cipher for internal ideological struggles in anarchist politics, as his pliable ideas were mobilized in the battle for the meaning of British anarchism.</abstract><pub>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</pub><doi>10.1017/S1479244323000239</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5440-4866</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8311-9901</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1479-2443 |
ispartof | Modern intellectual history, 2024-06, Vol.21 (2), p.384-409 |
issn | 1479-2443 1479-2451 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04586619v1 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Humanities and Social Sciences |
title | Mobilizing William Godwin, the “Father of British Anarchism”: History, Strategy, and the Intellectual Cultures of Post-war British Anarchism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A59%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mobilizing%20William%20Godwin,%20the%20%E2%80%9CFather%20of%20British%20Anarchism%E2%80%9D:%20History,%20Strategy,%20and%20the%20Intellectual%20Cultures%20of%20Post-war%20British%20Anarchism&rft.jtitle=Modern%20intellectual%20history&rft.au=Adams,%20Matthew%20S.&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=384&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=384-409&rft.issn=1479-2443&rft.eissn=1479-2451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1479244323000239&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_04586619v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |