Obstacles and levers to social mobilization: the history of co-determination in France and Germany

This article offers a comparative and historical study of the mobilizing factors (Davis and Thompson, 1994) influencing co-determination in France and Germany. In Germany, political opportunity, shared stakeholder interests, the presence of a social infrastructure, the dynamics of mobilization, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revue finance, contrôle, stratégie : FCS contrôle, stratégie : FCS, 2024-03, Vol.27-1 (27 (1))
Hauptverfasser: Aubert, Nicolas, Hollandts, Xavier, Wirtz, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 27 (1)
container_start_page
container_title Revue finance, contrôle, stratégie : FCS
container_volume 27-1
creator Aubert, Nicolas
Hollandts, Xavier
Wirtz, Peter
description This article offers a comparative and historical study of the mobilizing factors (Davis and Thompson, 1994) influencing co-determination in France and Germany. In Germany, political opportunity, shared stakeholder interests, the presence of a social infrastructure, the dynamics of mobilization, and the presence of a supporting institution enabled co-determination to take hold (Gomez and Wirtz, 2018). These ingredients were not present in France, despite reflection on the nature of the enterprise justifying co-determination. We thus contribute to understanding the institutionalization of a political ideology and show how two countries that are relatively close politically can take different trajectories. Cet article propose une étude comparative et historique des facteurs de mobilisation (Davis et Thompson, 1994) autour de la codétermination en France et en Allemagne. L’opportunité politique, les intérêts partagés des acteurs, la présence d’une infrastructure sociale, la dynamique de la mobilisation et la présence d’une institution socle ont permis à la codétermination de s’imposer en Allemagne (Gomez et Wirtz, 2018). Ces ingrédients n’étaient pas présents en France malgré une réflexion originale sur la nature de l’entreprise justifiant la codétermination. Nous contribuons ainsi à la compréhension de l’institutionnalisation d’une idéologie politique et montrons comment deux pays relativement proches politiquement peuvent emprunter des trajectoires différentes.
doi_str_mv 10.4000/fcs.11952
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04547731v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_04547731v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1032-7f3c1f31f12c4100a451c40dedd194cd057b7c5afc4c2a8c4a6e55ab77c78c003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsL3yBbF1PvzSST1l0ptgqFbnQ93LmT0Mh0IslQqE9vW0VXB87f4hPiHmGiAeDRc54gzoy6ECOlKiyMQXUpRqimtkDUeC1ucv4AUNVsVo1Es2nyQNy5LKlvZef2LmU5RJkjB-rkLjahC180hNg_yWHr5DbkIaaDjF5yLFo3uLQL_bkgQy-XiXp257PVMaH-cCuuPHXZ3f3qWLwvn98WL8V6s3pdzNcFI5SqsL5k9CV6VKwRgLRB1tC6tsWZ5haMbSwb8qxZ0ZQ1Vc4YaqxlO2WAciwefn631NWfKewoHepIoX6Zr-uTB9poa0vc43-XU8w5Of83QKhPIOsjyPoMsvwG2TFmaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Obstacles and levers to social mobilization: the history of co-determination in France and Germany</title><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><source>OpenEdition Freemium for Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Aubert, Nicolas ; Hollandts, Xavier ; Wirtz, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Aubert, Nicolas ; Hollandts, Xavier ; Wirtz, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>This article offers a comparative and historical study of the mobilizing factors (Davis and Thompson, 1994) influencing co-determination in France and Germany. In Germany, political opportunity, shared stakeholder interests, the presence of a social infrastructure, the dynamics of mobilization, and the presence of a supporting institution enabled co-determination to take hold (Gomez and Wirtz, 2018). These ingredients were not present in France, despite reflection on the nature of the enterprise justifying co-determination. We thus contribute to understanding the institutionalization of a political ideology and show how two countries that are relatively close politically can take different trajectories. Cet article propose une étude comparative et historique des facteurs de mobilisation (Davis et Thompson, 1994) autour de la codétermination en France et en Allemagne. L’opportunité politique, les intérêts partagés des acteurs, la présence d’une infrastructure sociale, la dynamique de la mobilisation et la présence d’une institution socle ont permis à la codétermination de s’imposer en Allemagne (Gomez et Wirtz, 2018). Ces ingrédients n’étaient pas présents en France malgré une réflexion originale sur la nature de l’entreprise justifiant la codétermination. Nous contribuons ainsi à la compréhension de l’institutionnalisation d’une idéologie politique et montrons comment deux pays relativement proches politiquement peuvent emprunter des trajectoires différentes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1287-1141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2261-5512</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/fcs.11952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Association FCS</publisher><subject>Business administration ; Economics and Finance ; Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Revue finance, contrôle, stratégie : FCS, 2024-03, Vol.27-1 (27 (1))</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1032-7f3c1f31f12c4100a451c40dedd194cd057b7c5afc4c2a8c4a6e55ab77c78c003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4958-1630</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04547731$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aubert, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollandts, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Obstacles and levers to social mobilization: the history of co-determination in France and Germany</title><title>Revue finance, contrôle, stratégie : FCS</title><description>This article offers a comparative and historical study of the mobilizing factors (Davis and Thompson, 1994) influencing co-determination in France and Germany. In Germany, political opportunity, shared stakeholder interests, the presence of a social infrastructure, the dynamics of mobilization, and the presence of a supporting institution enabled co-determination to take hold (Gomez and Wirtz, 2018). These ingredients were not present in France, despite reflection on the nature of the enterprise justifying co-determination. We thus contribute to understanding the institutionalization of a political ideology and show how two countries that are relatively close politically can take different trajectories. Cet article propose une étude comparative et historique des facteurs de mobilisation (Davis et Thompson, 1994) autour de la codétermination en France et en Allemagne. L’opportunité politique, les intérêts partagés des acteurs, la présence d’une infrastructure sociale, la dynamique de la mobilisation et la présence d’une institution socle ont permis à la codétermination de s’imposer en Allemagne (Gomez et Wirtz, 2018). Ces ingrédients n’étaient pas présents en France malgré une réflexion originale sur la nature de l’entreprise justifiant la codétermination. Nous contribuons ainsi à la compréhension de l’institutionnalisation d’une idéologie politique et montrons comment deux pays relativement proches politiquement peuvent emprunter des trajectoires différentes.</description><subject>Business administration</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><issn>1287-1141</issn><issn>2261-5512</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKsL3yBbF1PvzSST1l0ptgqFbnQ93LmT0Mh0IslQqE9vW0VXB87f4hPiHmGiAeDRc54gzoy6ECOlKiyMQXUpRqimtkDUeC1ucv4AUNVsVo1Es2nyQNy5LKlvZef2LmU5RJkjB-rkLjahC180hNg_yWHr5DbkIaaDjF5yLFo3uLQL_bkgQy-XiXp257PVMaH-cCuuPHXZ3f3qWLwvn98WL8V6s3pdzNcFI5SqsL5k9CV6VKwRgLRB1tC6tsWZ5haMbSwb8qxZ0ZQ1Vc4YaqxlO2WAciwefn631NWfKewoHepIoX6Zr-uTB9poa0vc43-XU8w5Of83QKhPIOsjyPoMsvwG2TFmaQ</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Aubert, Nicolas</creator><creator>Hollandts, Xavier</creator><creator>Wirtz, Peter</creator><general>Association FCS</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-1630</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Obstacles and levers to social mobilization: the history of co-determination in France and Germany</title><author>Aubert, Nicolas ; Hollandts, Xavier ; Wirtz, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1032-7f3c1f31f12c4100a451c40dedd194cd057b7c5afc4c2a8c4a6e55ab77c78c003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Business administration</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aubert, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollandts, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Revue finance, contrôle, stratégie : FCS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aubert, Nicolas</au><au>Hollandts, Xavier</au><au>Wirtz, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Obstacles and levers to social mobilization: the history of co-determination in France and Germany</atitle><jtitle>Revue finance, contrôle, stratégie : FCS</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27-1</volume><issue>27 (1)</issue><issn>1287-1141</issn><eissn>2261-5512</eissn><abstract>This article offers a comparative and historical study of the mobilizing factors (Davis and Thompson, 1994) influencing co-determination in France and Germany. In Germany, political opportunity, shared stakeholder interests, the presence of a social infrastructure, the dynamics of mobilization, and the presence of a supporting institution enabled co-determination to take hold (Gomez and Wirtz, 2018). These ingredients were not present in France, despite reflection on the nature of the enterprise justifying co-determination. We thus contribute to understanding the institutionalization of a political ideology and show how two countries that are relatively close politically can take different trajectories. Cet article propose une étude comparative et historique des facteurs de mobilisation (Davis et Thompson, 1994) autour de la codétermination en France et en Allemagne. L’opportunité politique, les intérêts partagés des acteurs, la présence d’une infrastructure sociale, la dynamique de la mobilisation et la présence d’une institution socle ont permis à la codétermination de s’imposer en Allemagne (Gomez et Wirtz, 2018). Ces ingrédients n’étaient pas présents en France malgré une réflexion originale sur la nature de l’entreprise justifiant la codétermination. Nous contribuons ainsi à la compréhension de l’institutionnalisation d’une idéologie politique et montrons comment deux pays relativement proches politiquement peuvent emprunter des trajectoires différentes.</abstract><pub>Association FCS</pub><doi>10.4000/fcs.11952</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-1630</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1287-1141
ispartof Revue finance, contrôle, stratégie : FCS, 2024-03, Vol.27-1 (27 (1))
issn 1287-1141
2261-5512
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04547731v1
source OpenEdition Journals; OpenEdition Freemium for Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Business administration
Economics and Finance
Humanities and Social Sciences
title Obstacles and levers to social mobilization: the history of co-determination in France and Germany
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A00%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Obstacles%20and%20levers%20to%20social%20mobilization:%20the%20history%20of%20co-determination%20in%20France%20and%20Germany&rft.jtitle=Revue%20finance,%20contr%C3%B4le,%20strat%C3%A9gie%20:%20FCS&rft.au=Aubert,%20Nicolas&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=27-1&rft.issue=27%20(1)&rft.issn=1287-1141&rft.eissn=2261-5512&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/fcs.11952&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_04547731v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true